Modeling metabolic systems: The need for dynamics

Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 373-382

  Song, Hyun Seob ^a   DeVilbiss, Frank ^a   Ramkrishna, Doraiswami ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METABOLISM;

BIOPROCESS OPTIMIZATION; DYNAMIC REGULATION; LARGE-SCALE NETWORK; LIVING ORGANISMS; METABOLIC MODELS; METABOLIC PATHWAYS; METABOLIC SYSTEMS; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES;

METABOLIC ENGINEERING;

EID: 84899912216     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22113398     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2013.08.004     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Ramkrishna D, Song HS: Dynamic models of metabolism: review of the cybernetic approach. AIChE J 2012, 58:986-997.
2. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO: What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:245-248.
3. Xu C, Liu L, Zhang Z, Jin D, Qiu J, Chen M: Genome-scale metabolic model in guiding metabolic engineering of microbial improvement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:519-539.
4. Kim HU, Sohn SB, Lee SY: Metabolic network modeling and simulation for drug targeting and discovery. Biotechnol J 2012, 7:330-342.
5. Asprey S, Macchietto S: Designing robust optimal dynamic experiments. J Process Control 2002, 12:545-556. (Pubitemid 34302548)
6. Flassig RJ, Sundmacher K: Optimal design of stimulus experiments for robust discrimination of biochemical reaction networks. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:3089-3096.
7. Finn RK, Wilson RE: Population dynamics of a continuous propagator for microorganisms. J Agric Food Chem 1954, 2:66-69.
8. Tu BP, Kudlicki A, Rowicka M, McKnight SL: Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes. Science 2005, 310:1152-1158. (Pubitemid 41681736)
9. Johnson CH, Egli M, Stewart PL: Structural insights into a circadian oscillator. Science 2008, 322:697-701.
10. Foth BJ, Zhang N, Chaal BK, Sze SK, Preiser PR, Bozdech Z: Quantitative time-course profiling of parasite and host cell proteins in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Cell Proteomics: MCP 2011, 10 M110 006411.
11. Kim JI, Song HS, Sunkara SR, Lali A, Ramkrishna D: Exacting predictions by cybernetic model confirmed experimentally: steady state multiplicity in the chemostat. Biotechnol Progr 2012, 28:1160-1166.
12. Lei F, Rotboll M, Jorgensen SB: A biochemically structured model for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 2001, 88:205-221. (Pubitemid 32575300)
13. Song HS, Ramkrishna D: Issues with increasing bioethanol productivity: a model directed study. Korean J Chem Eng 2010, 27:576-586.
14. Gernaey KV, Lantz AE, Tufvesson P, Woodley JM, Sin G: Application of mechanistic models to fermentation and biocatalysis for next-generation processes. Trends Biotechnol 2010, 28:346-354.
15. Song HS, Kim SJ, Ramkrishna D: Synergistic optimal integration of continuous and fed-batch reactors for enhanced productivity of lignocellulosic bioethanol. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011, 51:1690-1696.
16. Moreno-Sanchez R, Saavedra E, Rodriguez-Enriquez S, Olin-Sandoval V: Metabolic control analysis: a tool for designing strategies to manipulate metabolic pathways. J Biomed Biotechnol 2008, 2008:597913.
17. Cascante M, Boros LG, Comin-Anduix B, de Atauri P, Centelles JJ, Lee PW: Metabolic control analysis in drug discovery and disease. Nat Biotechnol 2002, 20:243-249. (Pubitemid 34205416)
18. Song HS, Morgan JA, Ramkrishna D: Towards increasing the productivity of lignocellulosic bioethanol: rational strategies fueled by modeling. In Bioethanol. Edited by Lima MAP. InTech; 2011.
19. Ozturk SS, Hu W-S: Cell Culture Technology for Pharmaceutical and Cell-based Therapies. CRC Press; 2006.
20. Chu BC, Lee H: Genetic improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation. Biotechnol Adv 2007, 25:425-441. (Pubitemid 47043375)
21. Jeppsson M, Johansson B, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF: Reduced oxidative pentose phosphate pathway flux in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains improves the ethanol yield from xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:1604-1609. (Pubitemid 34279964)
22. Anesiadis N, Cluett WR, Mahadevan R: Dynamic metabolic engineering for increasing bioprocess productivity. Metab Eng 2008, 10:255-266.
23. Cassman M: Barriers to progress in systems biology. Nature 2005, 438:1079. (Pubitemid 41831663)
24. Alon U: An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits. London: Chapman & Hall; 2006.
25. Glick BR: Metabolic load and heterologous gene-expression. Biotechnol Adv 1995, 13:247-261.
26. Bailey JE: Mathematical modeling and analysis in biochemical engineering: past accomplishments and future opportunities. Biotechnol Progr 1998, 14:8-20. (Pubitemid 28118259)
27. Gauch HG: Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press; 2003.
28. Penny W: Comparing dynamic causal models using AIC, BIC and free energy. Neuroimage 2012, 59:319-330.
29. McDonald CP, Urban NR: Using a model selection criterion to identify appropriate complexity in aquatic biogeochemical models. Ecol Model 2010, 221:428-432.
30. Symonds MR, Moussalli A: A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2011, 65:13-21.
31. Roos T: Short course: introduction to information-theoretic modeling. Fifth Brazilian Conference on Statistical Modelling in Insurance and Finance; Maresias, Brazil: 2011.
32. Barron A, Rissanen J, Yu B: The minimum description length principle in coding and modeling. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 1998, 44:2743-2760. (Pubitemid 128741906)
33. Grünwald PD: The Minimum Description Length Principle. MIT Press; 2007.
34. Rissanen J: Information and Complexity in Statistical Modeling. Incorporated: Springer Publishing Company; 2007.
35. Kirk P, Thorne T, Stumpf MP: Model selection in systems and synthetic biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2013, 24:767-774.
36. Akaike H: Information Theory and An Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. International Symposium on Information Theory. 2nd edn.. Armenian SSR: Tsahkadsor; 1973,267-281.
37. Schwarz G: Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals Statistics 1978, 6:461-464.
38. McQuarrie AD, Tsai C-L: Regression and Time Series Model Selection. Singapore: World Scientific; 1998.
39. Kitano H: Towards a theory of biological robustness. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:137.
40. Kitano H: Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5:826-837. (Pubitemid 39457498)
41. Young JD, Henne KL, Morgan JA, Konopka AE, Ramkrishna D: Integrating cybernetic modeling with pathway analysis provides a dynamic, systems-level description of metabolic control. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 100:542-559. (Pubitemid 351792930)
42. Edwards JS, Palsson BO: Robustness analysis of the Escherichia coli metabolic network. Biotechnol Progr 2000, 16:927-939. (Pubitemid 32044843)
43. Behre J, Wilhelm T, von Kamp A, Ruppin E, Schuster S: Structural robustness of metabolic networks with respect to multiple knockouts. J Theor Biol 2008, 252:433-441. (Pubitemid 351681901)
44. Wilhelm T, Behre J, Schuster S: Analysis of structural robustness of metabolic networks. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 2004, 1:114-120.
45. Kompala DS, Ramkrishna D, Jansen NB, Tsao GT: Investigation of bacterial-growth on mixed substrates - experimental evaluation of cybernetic models. Biotechnol Bioeng 1986, 28:1044-1055. (Pubitemid 16588537)
46. Jones KD, Kompala DS: Cybernetic model of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. J Biotechnol 1999, 71:105-131. (Pubitemid 29354244)
47. Wang L, Ridgway D, Gu T, Moo-Young M: Kinetic modeling of cell growth and product formation in submerged culture of recombinant Aspergillus niger. Chem Eng Commun 2008, 196:481-490.
48. Charalampopoulos D, Vázquez JA, Pandiella SS: Modelling and validation of Lactobacillus plantarum fermentations in cereal-based media with different sugar concentrations and buffering capacities. Biochem Eng J 2009, 44:96-105.
49. Vázquez JA, Murado MA: Unstructured mathematical model for biomass, lactic acid and bacteriocin production by lactic acid bacteria in batch fermentation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2008, 83:91-96. (Pubitemid 351181540)
50. Steuer R, Gross T, Selbig J, Blasius B: Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:11868-11873. (Pubitemid 44215778)
51. Çelik E, Çalk P, Oliver SG: A structured kinetic model for recombinant protein production by Mut+ strain of Pichia pastoris. Chem Eng Sci 2009, 64:5028-5035.
52. Tan YK, Liao JC: Metabolic ensemble modeling for strain engineers. Biotechnol J 2012, 7:343-353.
53. Tran LM, Rizk ML, Liao JC: Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks. Biophys J 2008, 95:5606-5617.
54. Smallbone K, Simeonidis E, Swainston N, Mendes P: Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism. Bmc Systems Biol 2010:4.
55. Lee SB, Bailey JE: Genetically structured models for Iac promoter-operator function in the Escherichia coli chromosome and in multicopy plasmids - Iac operator function. Biotechnol Bioeng 1984, 26:1372-1382. (Pubitemid 15224161)
56. Kotte O, Zaugg JB, Heinemann M: Bacterial adaptation through distributed sensing of metabolic fluxes. Mol Syst Biol 2010, 6:355.
57. Young JD, Ramkrishna D: On the matching and proportional laws of cybernetic models. Biotechnol Progr 2007, 23:83-99. (Pubitemid 46293491)
58. Sidoli FR, Mantalaris A, Asprey SP: Toward global parametric estimability of a large-scale kinetic single-cell model for mammalian cell cultures. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005, 44:868-878. (Pubitemid 40223749)
59. Song HS, Ramkrishna D: When is the quasi-steady-state approximation admissible in metabolic modeling? When admissible, what models are desirable?. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009, 48:7976-7985.
60. Provost A, Bastin G, Agathos SN, Schneider YJ: Metabolic design of macroscopic bioreaction models: application to Chinese hamster ovary cells. Bioprocess Biosystems Eng 2006, 29:349-366. (Pubitemid 44800771)
61. Kim JI, Varner JD, Ramkrishna D: A hybrid model of anaerobic E. coli GJT001: combination of elementary flux modes and cybernetic variables. Biotechnol Progr 2008, 24:993-1006.
62. Song HS, Morgan JA, Ramkrishna D: Systematic development of hybrid cybernetic models: application to recombinant yeast co-consuming glucose and xylose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 103:984-1002.
63. Song HS, Ramkrishna D: Prediction of metabolic function from limited data: lumped hybrid cybernetic modeling (L-HCM). Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 106:271-284.
64. Song HS, Ramkrishna D: Cybernetic models based on lumped elementary modes accurately predict strain-specific metabolic function. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:127-140.
65. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ: Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys J 2002, 83:1331-1340. (Pubitemid 34977706)
66. Hoffner K, Harwood SM, Barton PI: A reliable simulator for dynamic flux balance analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013, 110:792-802.
67. Schuster S, Hilgetag C: On elementary flux modes in biochemical reaction systems at steady state. J Biol Syst 1994, 2:165-182.
68. Song HS, Ramkrishna D: Reduction of a set of elementary modes using yield analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 102:554-568.
69. Song HS, Ramkrishna D, Pinchuk GE, Beliaev AS, Konopka AE, Fredrickson JK: Dynamic modeling of aerobic growth of Shewanella oneidensis. Predicting triauxic growth, flux distributions, and energy requirement for growth. Metab Eng 2013, 15:25-33.
70. Song HS, Ramkrishna D: Prediction of dynamic behavior of mutant strains from limited wild-type data. Metab Eng 2012, 14:69-80.
71. Rezola A, de Figueiredo LF, Brock M, Pey J, Podhorski A, Wittmann C et al.: Exploring metabolic pathways in genomescale networks via generating flux modes. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:534-540.
72. de Figueiredo LF, Podhorski A, Rubio A, Kaleta C, Beasley JE, Schuster S et al.: Computing the shortest elementary flux modes in genome-scale metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:3158-3165.
73. Tang YJ, Martin HG, Deutschbauer A, Feng XY, Huang R, Llora X et al.: Invariability of central metabolic flux distribution in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 under environmental or genetic perturbations. Biotechnol Progr 2009, 25:1254-1259.
74. Karr JR, Sanghvi JC, Macklin DN, Arora A, Covert MW: WholeCellKB: model organism databases for comprehensive whole-cell models. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D787-D792.
75. Karr JR, Sanghvi JC, Macklin DN, Gutschow MV, Jacobs JM, Bolival B Jr et al.: A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 2012, 150:389-401.