Systematic development of hybrid cybernetic models: Application to recombinant yeast co-consuming glucose and xylose

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 984-1002

  Song, Hyun Seob ^a   Morgan, John A ^a   Ramkrishna, Doraiswami ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE MODE; BIOPROCESS; CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT; CYBERNETIC MODELING; CYBERNETIC MODELS; ELEMENTARY MODE; FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; INTRACELLULAR METABOLITES; METABOLIC MODELS; METABOLIC NETWORK; MODEL REDUCTION TECHNIQUES; MULTIPLE SUBSTRATES; OVERPARAMETERIZATION; PSEUDO STEADY STATE; RECOMBINANT YEAST; SACCHAROMYCES; SUBSTRATE UPTAKE; UPTAKE RATE;

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; METABOLISM; YEAST;

SUBSTRATES;

GLUCOSE; XYLOSE;

ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYBERNETICS; DYNAMIC FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; ELEMENTARY MODE; FUNGAL STRAIN; GLUCOSE UTILIZATION; HYBRID; HYBRID CYBERNETIC MODEL; MACROSCOPIC BIOREACTION MODEL; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES; STOICHIOMETRY; YEAST;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SACCHAROMYCES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; XYLOSE;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; SACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 67650838724     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22332     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bakker B, Bro C, Kotter P, Luttik M, van Dijken J, Pronk J. 2000. The mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase adh3p is involved in a redox shuttle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 182(17):4730-4737. (Pubitemid 30641792)
2. Baloo S, Ramkrishna D. 1991a. Metabolic-regulation in bacterial continuous cultures. 1. Biotechnol Bioeng 38(11):1337-1352.
3. Baloo S, Ramkrishna D. 1991b. Metabolic-regulation in bacterial continuous cultures. 2. Biotechnol Bioeng 38(11):1353-1363.
4. Cakir T, Arga K, Altintas M, Ulgen K. 2004a. Flux analysis of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae YPB-G utilizing starch for optimal ethanol production. Process Chem 39(12):2097-2108. (Pubitemid 39123604)
5. Cakir T, Kirdar B, Ulgen K. 2004b. Metabolic pathway analysis of yeast strengthens the bridge between transcriptornics and metabolic networks. Biotechnol Bioeng 86(3):251-260. (Pubitemid 38560353)
6. Cortassa S, Aon J, Aon M. 1995. Fluxes of carbon, phosphorylation, and redox intermediates during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on different carbon sources. Biotechnol Bioeng 47(2):193-208.
7. Covert MW, Palsson BO. 2002. Transcriptional regulation in constraints-based metabolic models of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 277(31):28058-28064. (Pubitemid 34966757)
8. Covert MW, Palsson BO. 2003. Constraints-based models: Regulation of gene expression reduces the steady-state solution space. J Theor Biol 221(3):309-325.
9. Covert MW, Schilling CH, Palsson B. 2001. Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of metabolism. J Theor Biol 213(1):73-88. (Pubitemid 33052300)
10. Edwards JS, Palsson BO. 2000. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: Its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(10):5528-5533.
11. Famili I, Forster J, Nielson J, Palsson BO. 2003. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(23):13134-13139. (Pubitemid 37444707)
12. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund M. 2007. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74(5):937-953. (Pubitemid 46434767)
13. Herrgard MJ, Lee BS, Portnoy V, Palsson BO. 2006. Integrated analysis of regulatory and metabolic networks reveals novel regulatory mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 16(5):627-635.
14. Hjersted JL, Henson MA, Mahadevan R. 2007. Genome-scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fedbatch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(5):1190-1204. (Pubitemid 47195316)
15. Jones K, Kompala D. 1999. Cybernetic model of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. J Bacteriol 71(1-3):105-131. (Pubitemid 29354244)
16. Kim JI. 2005. A hybrid model of anaerobic E. coli: Cybernetic approach and elementary mode analysis. M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
17. Kim JI, Varner JD, Ramkrishna D. 2008. A hybrid model of anaerobic E. coli GJ T001: Combination of elementary flux modes and cybernetic variables. Biotechnol Prog 24(5):993-1006.
18. Klamt S. 2006. Generalized concept of minimal cut sets in biochemical networks. BioSystems 83(2-3):233-247. (Pubitemid 43204329)
19. Klamt S, Gilles ED. 2004. Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks. Bioinformatics 20(2):226-234.
20. Klamt S, Stelling J. 2002. Combinatorial complexity of pathway analysis in metabolic networks. Mol Biol Rep 29(1-2):233-236. (Pubitemid 35021891)
21. Kompala DS, Ramkrishna D, Tsao GT. 1984. Cybernetic modeling of microbial-growth on multiple substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 26(11):1272-1281. (Pubitemid 15224150)
22. Kompala DS, Ramkrishna D, Jansen NB, Tsao GT. 1986. Investigation of bacterial-growth on mixed substrates - Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models. Biotechnol Bioeng 28(7):1044-1055. (Pubitemid 16588537)
23. Krishnan MS. 1996. Process development of fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic sugars using genetically engineered yeasts. Ph.D. thesis. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
24. Krishnan MS, Xia Y, Ho NWY, Tsao GT. 1997. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic sugars - Studies using a genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast. Fuels Chem Biomass 666:74-92. (Pubitemid 127440697)
25. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ. 2002. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys J 83(3):1331-1340. (Pubitemid 34977706)
26. Maltsev N, Glass E, Ovchinnikova G, Gu Z. 2005. Molecular mechanisms involved in robustness of yeast central metabolism against null mutations. J Biochem 137(2):177-187. (Pubitemid 40502394)
27. Nissen T, Schulze U, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 1997. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 143:203-218.
28. Palsson B. 2000. The challenges of in silico biology. Nat Biotechnol 18(11):1147-1150.
29. Pitkänen JP, Aristidou A, Salusjarvi L, Ruohonen L, Penttila M. 2003. Metabolic flux analysis of xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae using continuous culture. Metab Eng 5(1):16-31. (Pubitemid 36599677)
30. Provost A, Bastin G. 2004. Dynamic metabolic modelling under the balanced growth condition. J Process Control 14(7):717-728.
31. Provost A, Bastin G, Agathos SN, Schneider YJ. 2006. Metabolic design of macroscopic bioreaction models: Application to Chinese hamster ovary cells. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 29(5-6):349-366. (Pubitemid 44800771)
32. Ramkrishna D, Kompala DS, Tsao GT. 1987. Are microbes optimal strategists. Biotechnol Prog 3(3):121-126.
33. Reed JL, Palsson BO. 2003. Thirteen years of building constraint-based in silico models of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 185(9):2692-2699.
34. Rockafellar R. 1970. Convex analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T. 2000. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat Biotechnol 18(3):326-332. (Pubitemid 30159487)
36. Schuster S, Hilgetag C, Woods JH, Fell DA. 2002. Reaction routes in biochemical reaction systems: Algebraic properties, validated calculation procedure and example from nucleotide metabolism. J Math Biol 45(2):153-181. (Pubitemid 44200164)
37. Song HS, Ramkrishna D. 2009a. Reduction of a set of elementary modes using yield analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 102(2):554-568.
38. Song HS, Ramkrishna D. 2009b. When is quasi-steady-state approximation admissible in metabolic modeling? When admissible, what models are desirable? Ind Eng Chem Res (in press).
39. Stephanopoulos GN, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J. 1998. Metabolic engineering: Principles and methodologies. San Diego: Academic Press.
40. Stryer L, editor. 1995. Biochemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
41. Turner B, Ramkrishna D, Jansen N. 1989. Cybernetic modeling of bacterial cultures at low growth-rates: Single-substrate systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 34(2):252-261. (Pubitemid 18621679)
42. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. 1999. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective. 1. Theoretical preliminaries. Biotechnol Prog 15(3):407-425.
43. von Kamp A, Schuster S. 2006. Metatool 5.0: Fast and flexible elementary modes analysis. Bioinformatics 22(15):1930-1931. (Pubitemid 44283044)
44. Wahlbom CF, Hahn-Hagerdal B. 2002. Furfural, 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, and acetoin act as external electron acceptors during anaerobic fermentation of xylose in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 78(2):172-178. (Pubitemid 34712341)
45. Wahlbom C, Eliasson A, B H-H. 2001. Intracellular fluxes in a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultivated anaerobically at different dilution rates and feed concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 72(3):289-296. (Pubitemid 32099581)
46. Young JD. 2005. A system-level mathematical description of metabolic regulation combining aspects of elementary mode analysis with cybernetic control laws. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
47. Young JD, Ramkrishna D. 2007. On the matching and proportional laws of cybernetic models. Biotechnol Prog 23(1):83-99. (Pubitemid 46293491)
48. Young JD, Henne KL, Morgan JA, Konopka AE, Ramkrishna D. 2008. Integrating cybernetic modeling with pathway analysis provides a dynamic, systems-level description of metabolic control. Biotechnol Bioeng 100(3):542-559. (Pubitemid 351792930)