Clinical Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 499-518

  Conant, Emily F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast imaging; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BREAST; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DETECTION; DATA PROCESSING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LEARNING CURVE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84899895730     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: 15578275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2013.11.013     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151(10):716-726.
2. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening. NEngl J Med 2005, 353:1773-1783.
3. Tabar L., Vitak B., Chen T.H., et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011, 260(3):658-663.
4. Skaane P., Gullien R., Bjorndal H., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 2012, 53:524-529.
5. Rafferty E.A., Park J.M., Philpotts L.E., et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 2013, 266(1):104-113.
6. Skaane P., Bandos A.I., Gullien R., et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013, 267:47-56.
7. Michell M.J., Iqbal A., Wasan R.K., et al. Acomparison of the accuracy offilm-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol 2012, 67:976-981.
8. Baker J.A., Lo J.Y. Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2011, 18(10):1298-1310.
9. Helvie M.A. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. Radiol Clin North Am 2010, 48:917-929.
10. Baldwin P. Digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Technol 2009, 81:57-74.
11. Available at: Accessed March 30, 2013. http://breasttomo.com/sites/default/files/010-WP-00060-Rev2_June2012-TomoWhitePaper.pdf.
12. Available at: Accessed March 30, 2013. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf8/P080003b.pdf.
13. Svahn T., Anderson I., Chakraborty D., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single view breast tomosynthesis and dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010, 139:113-117.
14. Gur D., Adams G.S., Chough D.M., et al. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196:737-741.
15. Wallis M.G., Moa E., Zanca F., et al. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology 2012, 262:788-796.
16. Noroozian M., Hadjiiski L., Rahnama-Moghadam S., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology 2012, 262:61-68.
17. Bernardi D., Ciatto S., Pellegrini M., et al. Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 133:267-271.
18. Rose S.L., Tidwell A.L., Bujnoch L.J., et al. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. American journal of roentgenology 2013, 200(6):1401-1408.
19. Haas B.M., Kalra V., Geisel J., et al. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 2013, 269(3):694-700.
20. Conant EF, McCarthy AM, Kontos D, etal. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Digital Mammography Compared to Digital Mammography Alone: A "Natural Experiment" in General-Population Screening Outcomes in preparation (personal communications) 2014.
21. Poplack S.P., Tosteson T.D., Kogel C.A., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007, 189(3):616-623.
22. Tagliafico A., Astengo D., Cavagnetto F., et al. One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis. EurRadiol 2012, 22:539-544.
23. Gennaro G., Toledano A., di Maggio C., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:1545-1553.
24. Rafferty E, Niklason L, Halpern E, etal. Assessing radiologist performance using combined full-field digital mammography andbreast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography alone: results of a multi-center multi-reader trial. Presented at the Radiological Society of North America annual meeting. Chicago (IL), 2007.
25. Wald N.J., Murphy P., Major P., et al. UKCCCR multicentre randomized controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening. BMJ 1995, 311:1189-1193.
26. Rafferty E, Niklason L, Jameson-Meehan L. Breast tomosynthesis: one view or two? Presented at the Radiological Society of North America annual meeting. Chicago (IL), 2006.
27. Gur D., Abrams G.S., Chough D.M., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:586-591.
28. Zuley M.L., Bandoss A.I., Ganott M.A., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiology 2013, 266:89-95.
29. Brandt K.R., Craig D.A., Hoskins T.L., et al. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013, 200(2):291-298.
30. Waldherr C., Cerny P., Altermatt H.J., et al. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013, 200(1):226-231.
31. Hakim C.M., Chough D.M., Ganott M.A., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis inthe diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195(2):172-176.
32. Fornvik D., Zackrisson S., Ljungberg O., et al. Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy oftumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 2010, 3:240-247.
33. Meacock LM, Mombelloni S, Iqbal A, etal. The accuracy of breast cancer size measurement: digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT0 vs. 2D digital mammography (DM)). Presented at the European College of Radiology annual meeting. Vienna (Austria), 2010.
34. Kopans D., Gavenonis S., Halpern E., et al. Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J 2011, 17(6):638-644.
35. Spangler M.L., Zuley M., Sumkin J. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196:320-324.
36. Kopans D.B., Rusby J.E. Cutaneous caves and subcutaneous adipose columns in the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2008, 249(3):779-784.
37. Feng S.S., Sechopoulos I. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. Radiology 2012, 263:35-42.
38. Gur D., Zuley M.L., Anello M.I., et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. Acad Radiol 2012, 19:166-171.
39. Houssami N., Skaane P. Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 2013, 22(2):101-108. 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017.
40. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2013. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/RadiologicalDevicesPanel/UCM328613.pdf.
41. Chan H.P., Wei J., Zhang Y., et al. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Med Phys 2008, 35:4087-4095.
42. Chan H.P., Wei J., Sahiner B., et al. Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. Radiology 2005, 237:1075-1080.
43. Singh S., Tourassi G.D., Baker J.A., et al. Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. Med Phys 2008, 35:3626-3636.
44. Reiser I., Nishikawa R.M., Giger M.L., et al. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys 2006, 33:482-491.
45. Reiser I., Nishikawa R.M., Edwards A.V., et al. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. Med Phys 2008, 35:1486-1493.
46. Good W.F., Abrams G.S., Catullo V.J., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 190:865-869.
47. Bernardi D., Ciatto S., Pellegrini M., et al. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol 2012, 85:1174-1178.
48. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2013. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup%26sub=wom%26pag=dis%26ItemID=102872%26wf=5368.
49. Mammography Quality Standard Act requirements. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2013. http://www.fda.gov/radiation-emittingproducts/mammographyqualitystandardsactandprogram/facilitycertificationandinspection/ucm243765.htm.
50. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2013. http://gm.acr.org/Hidden/Economics/FeaturedCategories/Pubs/coding_source/archives/MayJun2011/QA.aspx.
51. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2013. http://www.okbreastcare.com/tomo.html.
52. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2013. http://www.breastimaginghouston.com/news.html.