Bridging the gap between what is known and what we do in renal medicine: Improving implementability of the European Renal Best Practice guidelines

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 951-957

  Van Der Veer, Sabine N ^a,b   Tomson, Charles R V ^c   Jager, Kitty J ^a   Van Biesen, Wim ^b  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chronic renal insufficiency; guideline adherence; guidelines as topic

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEPHROLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW;

CHRONIC RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EUROPE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC;

EID: 84899890266     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft496     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Shaneyfelt TM. Building bridges to quality. JAMA 2001; 286: 2600-2601
2. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000326
3. Palmer SC, Sciancalepore M, Strippoli GF. Trial quality in nephrology: how are we measuring up? Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58: 335-337
4. Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW et al. The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8: 19
5. Hartling L, Fernandes RM, Seida J et al. From the trenches: a cross-sectional study applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. PLoS One 2012; 7: e34697
6. Nagler EV, Webster AC, Bolignano D et al. European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) guideline development methodology: towards the best possible guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014; 29: 731-738
7. Vanholder RC, Abramowicz D, Cannata-Andia JB et al. The future of European nephrology 'guidelines'-A declaration of intent by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP). NDT Plus 2009; 2: 213-221
8. Stevens PE, Tomson CR. Guidelines in the United Kingdom and how they are used. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4 (Suppl 1): S23-S29
9. Kagoma YK, Garg AX, Li L et al. Reporting of the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased creatinine clearance testing. Kidney Int 2012; 81: 1245-1247
10. Locatelli F, Covic A, Macdougall IC et al. ORAMA: a study to investigate EBPG impact on renal anaemia-design and baseline data. J Nephrol 2008; 21: 592-603
11. Arenas MD, Alvarez-Ude F, Gil MT et al. Application of NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease: changes of clinical practices and their effects on outcomes and quality standards in three haemodialysis units. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1663-1668
12. Moore LW, Byham-Gray LD, Scott PJ et al. The mean dietary protein intake at different stages of chronic kidney disease is higher than current guidelines. Kidney Int 2013; 83: 724-732
13. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-1465
14. Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S et al. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007; 27: 94-102
15. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. literature review and Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16: 107-123
16. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998; 7: 149-158
17. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. III. Impact on patient care. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 2646-2655
18. National Guideline Clearinghouse. http://guideline.gov (11 January 2012, date last accessed)
19. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 525-531
20. International Guideline library. http://www.g-i-n.net/library (11 January 2012, date last accessed)
21. Irving MJ, Craig JC, Gallagher M et al. Implementing iron management clinical practice guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease having dialysis. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 310-314
22. Toussaint ND, Pedagogos E, Beavis J et al. Improving CKD-MBD management in haemodialysis patients: barrier analysis for implementing better practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1319-1326
23. Bennett RE, DeHart RM, Lauderdale SA. Survey of care provided by ambulatory care pharmacists to patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63: 2123-2127
24. Irving MJ, Tong A, Rychetnik L et al. Nephrologists' perspectives on the effect of guidelines on clinical practice: a semistructured interview study. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 55: 241-249
25. Deo A, Schmid CH, Earley A et al. Loss to analysis in randomized controlled trials in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58: 349-355
26. Fishbane S, Hazzan AD, Shirazian S et al. Quality of reporting of randomization methodology in nephrology trials. Kidney Int 2012; 82: 1144-1146
27. Rocco MV, Frankenfield DL, Hopson SD et al. Relationship between clinical performance measures and outcomes among patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 512-519
28. Danese MD, Belozeroff V, Smirnakis K et al. Consistent control of mineral and bone disorder in incident hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 1423-1429
29. Phrommintikul A, Haas SJ, Elsik M et al. Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2007; 369: 381-388
30. van Zuilen AD, Bots ML, Dulger A et al. Multifactorial intervention with nurse practitioners does not change cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2012; 82: 710-717
31. Vachharajani TJ, Moossavi S, Jordan JR et al. Re-evaluating the Fistula First Initiative in Octogenarians on Hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 1663-1667
32. Blake PG, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ. The risks of vascular access. Kidney Int 2012; 82: 623-625
33. van der Veer SN, Jager KJ, Nache AM et al. Translating knowledge on best practice into improving quality of RRT care: a systematic review of implementation strategies. Kidney Int 2011; 80: 1021-1034
34. Tomson CRV, Van der Veer SN. Learning from practice variation to improve the quality of care. Clin Med 2013; 13: 19-23
35. Guthrie B, Payne K, Alderson P et al. Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity. BMJ 2012; 345: e6341
36. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005; 294: 716-724
37. Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST, Jr, Agostini JV. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2870-2874
38. Michie S, Johnston M. Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. BMJ 2004; 328: 343-345
39. Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J et al. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res 2000; 34: 1429-1448
40. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G et al. Screening and follow-up of living kidney donors: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Transplantation 2011; 92: 962-972
41. Vanbelleghem H, Vanholder R, Levin NW et al. The Kidney Disease: improving Global Outcomes website: comparison of guidelines as a tool for harmonization. Kidney Int 2007; 71: 1054-1061
42. Lopez-Vargas PA, Craig JC, Gallagher MP et al. Barriers to timely arterio-venous fistula creation: a study of providers and patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 57: 873-882
43. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group: taxonomy of interventions to improve the delivery, practice and organisation of health care services. www.epoc.cochrane.org (22 June 2013, date last accessed)
44. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: iii-i72
45. Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM et al. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2009
46. Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework-A framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual 2004; 19: 297-304
47. Straus SE, Holroyd-Leduc J. Knowledge-to-action cycle. Evid Based Med 2008; 13: 98-100
48. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clinical Practice Guideline We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2011
49. Woolf S, Schunemann HJ, Eccles MP et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 61
50. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA et al. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 26
51. Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J et al. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 717-722
52. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 1049-1051
53. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1308-1311
54. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C et al. The GuideLine Implementabil-ity Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005; 5: 23
55. G-I-N Public toolkit: patient and public involvement in guidelines. http://www.g-i-n.net/activities/gin-public/toolkit (11 January 2012, date last accessed)
56. Legare F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making 2011; 31: E45-E74
57. Diaz Del CP, Gracia J, Blasco JA et al. A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: methodological approaches. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: 779-784
58. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M et al. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD004563
59. Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD006732
60. Treweek S, Oxman AD, Alderson P et al. Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci 2013; 8: 6
61. Fervers B, Burgers JS, Voellinger R et al. Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: 228-236
62. The ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE Process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation, Version 2.0, 2009. http://www.g-i-n.net. (11 January 2013, date last accessed)