메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 349-355

Loss to analysis in randomized controlled trials in CKD

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; CONSORT; intention to treat; loss to analysis; loss to follow up; randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; DATA ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; GRAFT FAILURE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MEDLINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SAMPLE SIZE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 80051947137     PISSN: 02726386     EISSN: 15236838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.023     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (35)

References (20)
  • 1
    • 0942287104 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Number, Quality, and Coverage of Randomized Controlled Trials in Nephrology
    • DOI 10.1097/01.ASN.0000100125.21491.46
    • G.F. Strippoli, J.C. Craig, and F.P. Schena The number, quality, and coverage of randomized controlled trials in nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 15 2 2004 411 419 (Pubitemid 38140782)
    • (2004) Journal of the American Society of Nephrology , vol.15 , Issue.2 , pp. 411-419
    • Strippoli, G.F.M.1    Craig, J.C.2    Schena, F.P.3
  • 2
    • 84969870387 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • chapter-8/8-12-2-2-high-risk-of-bias-due-to-incomplete-outcome-data.htm Accessed April 11
    • Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac. uk/cochrane/handbook500/chapter-8/8-12-2-2-high-risk-of-bias-due-to-incomplete- outcome-data.htm. Accessed April 11, 2011.
    • (2011) Cochrane Handbook
    • Jpt, H.1    Green, S.2
  • 3
    • 66249128302 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Missing outcomes in randomized trials: Addressing the dilemma
    • D.G. Altman Missing outcomes in randomized trials: addressing the dilemma Open Med 3 2 2009 e51 e53
    • (2009) Open Med , vol.3 , Issue.2
    • Altman, D.G.1
  • 4
    • 34249981469 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses
    • DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.013, PII S0895435607000777
    • N. Porta, C. Bonet, and E. Cobo Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses J Clin Epidemiol 60 7 2007 663 669 (Pubitemid 46891765)
    • (2007) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.60 , Issue.7 , pp. 663-669
    • Porta, N.1    Bonet, C.2    Cobo, E.3
  • 5
    • 39449117385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Comparison of Sevelamer and Calcium-Based Phosphate Binders on Mortality, Hospitalization, and Morbidity in Hemodialysis: A Secondary Analysis of the Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) Randomized Trial Using Claims Data
    • DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.002, PII S0272638607015909
    • W.L. St Peter, J. Liu, and E. Weinhandl A comparison of sevelamer and calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality, hospitalization, and morbidity in hemodialysis: a secondary analysis of the Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) randomized trial using claims data Am J Kidney Dis 51 3 2008 445 454 (Pubitemid 351273476)
    • (2008) American Journal of Kidney Diseases , vol.51 , Issue.3 , pp. 445-454
    • St. Peter, W.L.1    Liu, J.2    Weinhandl, E.3    Fan, Q.4
  • 11
    • 0033546995 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
    • S. Hollis, and F. Campbell What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials BMJ 319 7211 1999 670 674 (Pubitemid 29423954)
    • (1999) British Medical Journal , vol.319 , Issue.7211 , pp. 670-674
    • Hollis, S.1    Campbell, F.2
  • 12
    • 0037151796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Post-randomisation exclusions: The intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis
    • D. Fergusson, S.D. Aaron, and G. Guyatt Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis BMJ 325 7365 2002 652 654
    • (2002) BMJ , vol.325 , Issue.7365 , pp. 652-654
    • Fergusson, D.1    Aaron, S.D.2    Guyatt, G.3
  • 13
    • 35348821297 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: Are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
    • DOI 10.1177/1740774507081223
    • J. Gravel, L. Opatrny, and S. Shapiro The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say? Clin Trials 4 4 2007 350 356 (Pubitemid 47572267)
    • (2007) Clinical Trials , vol.4 , Issue.4 , pp. 350-356
    • Gravel, J.1    Opatrny, L.2    Shapiro, S.3
  • 14
    • 0035906308 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials
    • D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, and D. Altman The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials JAMA 285 15 2001 1987 1991 (Pubitemid 32366951)
    • (2001) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.285 , Issue.15 , pp. 1987-1991
    • Moher, D.1    Schulz, K.F.2    Altman, D.3
  • 15
    • 77956068940 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: Systematic review
    • I. Abraha, and A. Montedori Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review BMJ 340 2010 c2697
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340 , pp. 2697
    • Abraha, I.1    Montedori, A.2
  • 16
    • 70349231475 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Intention-to-treat analysis and accounting for missing data in orthopaedic randomized clinical trials
    • A. Herman, I.B. Botser, and S. Tenenbaum Intention-to-treat analysis and accounting for missing data in orthopaedic randomized clinical trials J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 9 2009 2137 2143
    • (2009) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.91 , Issue.9 , pp. 2137-2143
    • Herman, A.1    Botser, I.B.2    Tenenbaum, S.3
  • 17
    • 25144472336 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals
    • A.M. Wood, I.R. White, and S.G. Thompson Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals Clin Trials 1 4 2004 368 376
    • (2004) Clin Trials , vol.1 , Issue.4 , pp. 368-376
    • Wood, A.M.1    White, I.R.2    Thompson, S.G.3
  • 18
    • 77950189829 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    • K.F. Schulz, D.G. Altman, and D. Moher CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials BMJ 340 2010 c332
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340 , pp. 332
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Altman, D.G.2    Moher, D.3
  • 19
    • 67651046982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • LOST to Follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): A protocol on the potential impact
    • E.A. Akl, M. Briel, and J.J. You LOST to Follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): a protocol on the potential impact Trials 10 2009 40
    • (2009) Trials , vol.10 , pp. 40
    • Akl, E.A.1    Briel, M.2    You, J.J.3
  • 20
    • 0035977428 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impact of missing data due to drop-outs on estimators for rates of change in longitudinal studies: A simulation study
    • G. Touloumi, A.G. Babiker, and S.J. Pocock Impact of missing data due to drop-outs on estimators for rates of change in longitudinal studies: a simulation study Stat Med 20 24 2001 3715 3728
    • (2001) Stat Med , vol.20 , Issue.24 , pp. 3715-3728
    • Touloumi, G.1    Babiker, A.G.2    Pocock, S.J.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.