AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 63, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1308-1311

  Brouwers, Melissa C ^a,b   Kho, Michelle E ^a   Browman, George P ^c   Burgers, Jako S ^d   Cluzeau, Francoise ^e   Feder, Gene ^f   Fervers, Béatrice ^g   Graham, Ian D ^h   Grimshaw, Jeremy ⁱ   Hanna, Steven E ^a   Littlejohns, Peter ^j   Makarski, Julie ^a   Zitzelsberger, Louise ^k  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^h CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH   (Canada)

ⁱ OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^j NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^k Canadian Partnership Against Cancer   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; SHORT SURVEY; VALIDITY;

EID: 78049300104     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (12)

1. Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Institute of Medicine M.J. Field, K.N. Lohr, Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program 1990 National Academy Press Washington, DC
2. G.P. Browman, M. Brouwers, and B. Fervers Population-based cancer control and the role of guidelines - towards a "systems" approach J.M. Elwood, S.B. Sutcliffe, Cancer control 2010 Oxford University Press Oxford (UK)
3. T.M. Shaneyfelt, M.F. Mayo-Smith, and J. Rothwangl Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature JAMA 281 1999 1900 1905 [see comments]
4. F. Vigna-Taglianti, P. Vineis, and A. Liberati Quality of systematic reviews used in guidelines for oncology practice Ann Oncol 17 2006 691 701
5. D.L. Streiner, and G.R. Norman Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 3rd ed. 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford (UK)
6. M.C. Brouwers, M.E. Kho, and G.P. Browman AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement CMAJ 2010 May 31 [Epub ahead of print]
7. M.C. Brouwers, M.E. Kho, and G.P. Browman AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application CMAJ 2010 May 31 [Epub ahead of print]
8. AGREE Collaboration Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project Qual Saf Health Care 12 2003 18 23
9. T.K. Nuckols, Y.W. Lim, and B.O. Wynn Rigorous development does not ensure that guidelines are acceptable to a panel of knowledgeable providers J Gen Intern Med 23 2008 37 44
10. J. Watine, B. Friedberg, and E. Nagy Conflict between guideline methodologic quality and recommendation validity: a potential problem for practitioners Clin Chem 52 2006 65 72
11. D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, and D. Altman The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials JAMA 285 2001 1987 1991 (Pubitemid 32366951)
12. E. von Elm, D.G. Altman, and M. Egger Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies BMJ 335 2007 806 808 (Pubitemid 350057266)