European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Guideline development methodology: Towards the best possible guidelines

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 731-738

  Nagler, Evi V ^a   Webster, Angela C ^b,c,d   Bolignano, Davide ^a,e   Haller, Maria C ^a,f,g   Nistor, Ionut ^a,h   Van Der Veer, Sabine N ^a,i   Fouque, Denis ^a,j   Van Biesen, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^f ELISABETHINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^g MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^h GRIGORE T POPA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

ⁱ ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^j UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

more..

Author keywords

evidence based medicine; kidney diseases; practice guidelines as topic

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EUROPE; EUROPEAN RENAL BEST PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; KIDNEY DISEASES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EUROPE; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84897382444     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft407     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Fouque D, Laville M, Haugh M et al. Systematic reviews and their roles in promoting evidence-based medicine in renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 2398-2401
2. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM et al. (eds). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011
3. Van Biesen W, van der Veer SN, Jager KJ et al. What guidelines should or should not be: Implications for guideline production. Dial Transplant 2013; 28: 1980-1984
4. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A et al. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: The need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000; 355: 103-106
5. Amerling R, Winchester JF, Ronco C. Guidelines have done more harm than good. Blood Purif 2008; 26: 73-76
6. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G et al. Screening and follow-up of living kidney donors: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Transplantation 2011; 92: 962-972
7. Zoccali C, Abramowicz D, Cannata-Andia JB et al. European best practice quo vadis? From European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG) to European Renal Best Practice (ERBP). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 2162-2166
8. Vanholder R, Abramowicz D, Cannata-Andia JB et al. The future of European Nephrology 'Guidelines'-A declaration of intent by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP). NDT Plus 2009; 2: 213-221
9. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F et al. Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 525-531
10. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J 2010; 182: E839-E842
11. Fliser D, Laville M, Covic A et al. A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: Part 1: Definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 4263-4272
12. Bolignano D, Nagler EV, Van Biesen W et al. Providing guidance in the dark: Orphan renal diseases and the challenge to improve the quality of the evidence Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013. (in press
13. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: Target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 60
14. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplantation 2009; 9: S1-s157
15. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A et al. Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318: 527-530
16. Coyne DW. Influence of industry on renal guideline development. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 3-7
17. Woolf S, Schunemann H, Eccles M et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: Types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 61
18. Haugh M, Fouque D. Evidence-based nephrology. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14(Suppl. 3): 38-41
19. Eden J, Levit L, Berg A et al. (eds). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011
20. Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendations: The significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 719-725
21. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 401-406
22. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): Development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005; 5: 23-30
23. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
24. Glujovsky D, Bardach A, García Martí S et al. EROS: A new software for early stage of systematic reviews. Value Health 2011; 14: A564
25. Mlika-Cabanne N, Harbour R, de Beer H et al. Sharing hard labour: Developing a standard template for data summaries in guideline development. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: 141-145
26. Methods for development of KDIGO clinical practice guidelines. http ://www.kdigo.org/clinical-practice-guidelines/MethodsDevelopment. php#bibliography
27. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Guidelines Manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, (2012). www.nice.org.uk
28. Salesforce [online customer relationship management service]. http://www .salesforce.com/uk/
29. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-926
30. Shekelle P, Woolf S, Grimshaw J et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: Reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 62-68
31. Tattersall J, Dekker F, Heimbürger O et al. When to start dialysis: Updated guidance following publication of the Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 2082-2086
32. van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Health Care Anal 2009; 17: 198-216