Biocompatibility of antimicrobial melimine lenses: Rabbit and human studies

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 570-581

  Dutta, Debarun ^a,b   Ozkan, Jerome ^a,b   Willcox, Mark D P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b BRIEN HOLDEN VISION INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

antimicrobial activity; biocompatibility; contact lens; melimine; peptide

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; EXPERIMENTS; PEPTIDES;

ANTI-BACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE; CARBODIIMIDE HYDROCHLORIDES; COVALENT IMMOBILIZATION; MELIMINE; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

CONTACT LENSES;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; ANTIMICROBIAL CATIONIC PEPTIDE; BIOMATERIAL; ETAFILCON; MELIMINE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DISEASE MODEL; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RABBIT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; WETTABILITY;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; ANTIMICROBIAL CATIONIC PEPTIDES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RABBITS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 84899866692     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: 15389235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000232     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Sankaridurg PR, Vuppala N, Sreedharan A, Vadlamudi J, Rao GN. Gram-negative bacteria and contact lensYinduced acute red eye. Indian J Ophthalmol 1996;44:29-32.
2. Holden BA, La Hood D, Grant T, Newton-Howes J, Baleriola-Lucas C, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF. Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lensYrelated acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J 1996; 22:47-52.
3. Wu P, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. The causes of and cures for contact lensYinduced peripheral ulcer. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S63-6.
4. WillcoxM, Sharma S,NaduvilathTJ, Sankaridurg PR, Gopinathan U, Holden BA. External ocular surface and lens microbiota in contact lens wearers with corneal infiltrates during extended wear of hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37:90-5.
5. Willcox MD, Holden BA. Contact lensYrelated corneal infections. Biosci Rep 2001;21:445-61.
6. Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet 1991;338:650-3.
7. Ormerod LD, Smith RE. Contact lensYassociated microbial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:79-83.
8. Ganz T. The role of antimicrobial peptides in innate immunity. Integr Comp Biol 2003;43:300-4.
9. Kolar SS, McDermott AM. Role of host defence peptides in eye diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011;68:2201-13.
10. McDermott AM. The role of antimicrobial peptides at the ocular surface. Ophthalmic Res 2009;41:60-75.
11. McDermott AM. Defensins and other antimicrobial peptides at the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2004;2:229-47.
12. Hancock RE. Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1:156-64.
13. Hancock RE, Lehrer R. Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol 1998;16:82-8.
14. Yount NY, Bayer AS, Xiong YQ, Yeaman MR. Advances in antimicrobial peptide immunobiology. Biopolymers 2006;84:435-58.
15. Brogden KA. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:238-50.
16. Brandenburg LO, Merres J, Albrecht LJ, Varoga D, Pufe T. Antimicrobial peptides: multifunctional drugs for different applications. Polymers 2012;4:539-60.
17. Lipsky BA, Holroyd KJ, Zasloff M. Topical versus systemic antimicrobial therapy for treating mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded,multicenter trial of pexiganan cream. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:1537-45.
18. Yeung AT, Gellatly SL, Hancock RE. Multifunctional cationic host defence peptides and their clinical applications. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011;68:2161-76.
19. Willcox MD, Hume EB, Aliwarga Y, Kumar N, Cole N. A novel cationic-peptide coating for the prevention of microbial colonization on contact lenses. J Appl Microbiol 2008;105:1817-25.
20. Rasul R,ColeN, Balasubramanian D,Chen R, KumarN,Willcox MD. Interaction of the antimicrobial peptide melimine with bacterial membranes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010;35:566-72.
21. Dutta D, Cole N, Kumar N, Willcox MD. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of melimine covalently bound to contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:175-82.
22. Cole N, Hume EB, Vijay AK, Sankaridurg P, Kumar N, Willcox MD. In vivo performance of melimine as an antimicrobial coating for contact lenses in models of CLARE and CLPU. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:390-5.
23. ISO 10993-5. Biological Evaluation of Medical DevicesYPart 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2009.
24. ISO 9394. Ophthalmic OpticsYContact Lenses and Contact Lens Care ProductsYDetermination of Biocompatibility by Ocular Study Using Rabbit Eyes. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2012.
25. Ehrmann K, Fedtke C, Radic A. Assessment of computer generated vision charts. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32: 133-40.
26. Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit. CCLRU grading scales. In: Phillips AJ, Speedwell L, eds. Contact Lenses. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997: 863-7.
27. Zhu H, Kumar A, Ozkan J, Bandara R, Ding A, Perera I, Steinberg P, Kumar N, Lao W, Griesser SS, Britcher L, Griesser HJ, Willcox MD. Fimbrolide-coated antimicrobial lenses: their in vitro and in vivo effects. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:292-300.
28. Lakkis C, Anastasopoulos F, Slater J, May L. The effect of silverinfused silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the ocular biota during daily wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2011; 34:S10.
29. Ozkan J, Zhu H, Willcox MD. Efficacy and clinical performance of selenium antibacterial silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:ARVO E-Abstract 5632.
30. Carnt N, Willcox MD, Evans V, Naduvilath T, Tilia D, Papas E, Sweeney D, Holden BA. Corneal Staining: The IER Matrix Study. Contact Lens Spectrum2007. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleid=100843. Accessed December 18, 2013.
31. Jones L, Powell CH. Uptake and release phenomena in contact lens care by silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39: 29-36.
32. Stiegemeier MJ, Friederichs GJ, Hughes JL, Larsen S, Movic W, Potter WB. Clinical evaluation of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:143-51.
33. Lebow KA, Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multipurpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:213-20.
34. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multipurpose contact lens solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:23-30.
35. Lipener C. A randomized clinical comparison of OPTI-FREE EXPRESS and ReNu MultiPLUS multipurpose lens care solutions. Adv Ther 2009;26:435-46.
36. Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Corneal staining: do we really understand what we are seeing?Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:48-54.
37. Ward KW. Superficial punctate fluorescein staining of the ocular surface. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:8-16.
38. Fonn D, Peterson R, Woods C. Corneal staining as a response to contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2010;36:318-21.
39. Ladage PM, Petroll WM, Jester JV, Fisher S, Bergmanson JP, Cavanagh HD. Spherical indentations of human and rabbit corneal epithelium following extended contact lens wear. CLAO J 2002; 28:177-80.
40. Bright FV, Merchea MM, Kraut ND, Maziarz EP, Liu XM, Awasthi AK. A preservative-and-fluorescein interaction model for benign multipurpose solutionYassociated transient corneal hyperfluorescence. Cornea 2012;31:1480-8.
41. Bandamwar KL. Mechanism and Clinical Significance of Superficial Micropunctate Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea [PhD thesis]. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales; 2011.
42. Feenstra RP, Tseng SC. Comparison of fluorescein and rose bengal staining. Ophthalmology 1992;99: 605-617.
43. Wei XE, Markoulli M, Millar TJ, Willcox MD, Zhao Z. Divalent cations in tears, and their influence on tear film stability in humans and rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:3280-5.
44. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Papas E. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:309-15.
45. Szczotka-Flynn L, Lass JH, Sethi A, Debanne S, Benetz BA, Albright M, Gillespie B, Kuo J, Jacobs MR, Rimm A. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:5421-30.
46. Szczotka-Flynn L, Debanne SM, Cheruvu VK, Long B, Dillehay S, Barr J, Bergenske P, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J. Predictive factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:488-92.
47. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanideYpreserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-61.
48. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:166-74.
49. Miller MJ, Wilson LA, Ahearn DG. Effects of protein, mucin, and human tears on adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:513-7.
50. Dutta D, Cole N, Willcox M. Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Mol Vis 2012;18:14-21.
51. Borazjani RN, Levy B, Ahearn DG. Relative primary adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus aureus to HEMA-type contact lenses and an extended wear silicone hydrogel contact lens of high oxygen permeability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2004;27:3-8.
52. Boles SF, Refojo MF, Leong FL. Attachment of Pseudomonas to human-worn, disposable etafilcon A contact lenses. Cornea 1992; 11:47-52.
53. Arciola CR, Maltarello MC, Cenni E, Pizzoferrato A. Disposable contact lenses and bacterial adhesion. In vitro comparison between ionic/high-water- content and non-ionic/low-water-content lenses. Biomaterials 1995;16:685-90.
54. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:25-36.
55. Bruinsma GM, Rustema-Abbing M, de Vries J, Stegenga B, van der Mei HC, van der Linden ML, Hooymans JM, Busscher HJ. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3646-53.
56. Vijay AK, Zhu H, Ozkan J, Wu D, Masoudi S, Bandara R, Borazjani RN, Willcox MD. Bacterial adhesion to unworn and worn silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1095-106.
57. Losche M, Mohwald H. Electrostatic interactions in phospholipid membranes: II. Influence of divalent ions on monolayer structure. J Colloid Interface Sci 1989;131:56-87.
58. Schmidt TA, Sullivan DA, Knop E, Richards SM, Knop N, Liu S, Sahin A, Darabad RR, Morrison S, Kam WR, Sullivan BD. Transcription, translation, and function of lubricin, a boundary lubricant, at the ocular surface. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131: 766-76.
59. Greiner JV, Glonek T, Korb DR, Leahy CD. Meibomian gland phospholipids. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:371-5.
60. Berta A, Torok M. Soluble glycoproteins in aqueous tears. In: Holly FJ, ed. The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbock, TX: Dry Eye Institute; 1986: 506-20.
61. McDermott AM. Cationic antimicrobial peptides. A future therapeutic option? Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2007;82:467-70.
62. Jenssen H, Hamill P, Hancock RE. Peptide antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:491-511.
63. Dutta D, Willcox MD. A laboratory assessment of factors that affect bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Biology 2013;2:1269-81.
64. Trotti A, Garden A, Warde P, Symonds P, Langer C, Redman R, Pajak TF, Fleming TR, Henke M, Bourhis J, Rosenthal DI, Junor E, Cmelak A, Sheehan F, Pulliam J, Devitt-Risse P, FuchsH,ChambersM, O'Sullivan B, Ang KK. A multinational, randomized phase III trial of iseganan HCl oral solution for reducing the severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving radiotherapy for head-and-neck malignancy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:674-81.
65. Svenson J, Stensen W, Brandsdal BO, Haug BE, Monrad J, Svendsen JS. Antimicrobial peptides with stability toward tryptic degradation. Biochemistry 2008;47:3777-88.
66. Rasul R. Novel Antimicrobial Biomaterials. [PhD Thesis] Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales; 2010. Available at: http://www.unsworks.unsw.edu.au/primo-library/libweb/action/dlDisplay. do?vid=UNSWORKS&docId=unsworks-10024&fromSitemap=1&afterPDS=true. Accesssed February 20, 2014.