Clinical evaluation of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 143-151

  Stiegemeier, Mary Jo ^a   Friederichs, Greg J ^a   Hughes, Jane Lindell ^a   Larsen, Steven ^a   Movic, Wilson ^a   Potter, William B ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Efficacy; MPS; Multi purpose solution; Ocular symptoms; Safety; Subjective comfort; Symptomatic wearers

Indexed keywords

BORATE SODIUM; BORIC ACID; CITRATE SODIUM; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; EDETIC ACID; POLYAMINOPROPYL BIGUANIDE; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WETTING AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; EVALUATION; EYE BURNING; EYE DISCOMFORT; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; SCORING SYSTEM; SLIT LAMP; SOFT CONTACT LENS; VISUAL ACUITY; WETTABILITY;

ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CORNEAL DISEASES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745267707     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2006.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Silbert JA. Comfort, convenience and acuity. Understanding factors leading to contact lens success. Supp to CL Spectrum; September 1996.
2. Young G., Veys J., Pritchard N., and Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthal Physiol Opt 22 (2002) 516-527
3. Briggs S.T. Profile of contact lens failures in Saudi Arabia. Clin Exp Optom 79 (1996) 255-259
4. Pritchard N., Fonn D., and Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. ICLC 26 (1999) 157-162
5. Schlanger J.L. A study of contact lens failures. J Am Optom Assoc 64 (1993) 220-224
6. Weed K.H., Fonn D., and Potvin R. Discontinuation of contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 70 12s (1993) 140
7. Covey M., and Munro F. Differential diagnosis in contact lens aftercare. Part 3. Ocular discomfort. Optician 217 5700 (1999) 26-32
8. Nason R.J., Boshnik E.L., Cannon W.M., et al. Multi-site comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc 65 (1994) 774-780
9. Efron N., Brennan N.A., Currie J.M., et al. Determinants of the initial comfort of hydrogel contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63 (1986) 819-823
10. Lemp M.A., Caffery B., Lebow K., et al. Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry-eye population. CLAO J 25 1 (1999) 40-47
11. Efron N., and Brennan N. A survey of wearers of low water content hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 71 3 (1988) 86-90
12. Fonn D., and Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 76 10 (1999) 700-704
13. Armitage B., Boshnick E., Davis H., et al. Multicenter evaluation of Acuvue disposable contact lenses in plus powers. ICLC 17 (1990) 168-172
14. Hoekel J.R., Maydew T.O., Bassi C.J., et al. An evaluation of the 8.4 and 8.8 mm base curve radii in the Ciba NewVue vs. the Vistakon Acuvue. ICLC 21 (1994) 14-17
15. Pritchard N. How can I avoid CL drop-outs?. Optician 222 5825 (2001) 14-18
16. Riley C., Chalmers R.L., and Pence N. The impact of lens choice in the relief of contact lens-related symptoms and ocular surface findings. Contact Lens Ant Eye 28 (2005) 13-19
17. Malet F., Karsenti D., and Pouliquen P. Preservative-free ocular hydrating agents in symptomatic contact lens wearers: saline versus PVP solution. Eye Contact Lens 29 1 (2003) 38-43
18. Barabino S., Rolando M., Camicione P., et al. Effects of a 0.9% sodium chloride ophthalmic solution on the ocular surface of symptomatic contact lens wearers. Can J Ophthalmol 40 1 (2005) 45-50
19. Epstein AB. Contact lens drop-out: how lens care products and poor communication can sabotage your practice. Review of CLs; July 28-31, 2003.
20. Jones L., Jones D., and Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose solutions. Contact Lens Ant Eye 20 (1997) 23-30
21. Larsen S., Smith C., Mathis J., et al. Comfort differences between multi-purpose solutions. CL Spectrum 17 12 (2002) 40-43
22. Stiegemeier M., Cedrone R., Evans D., et al. Clinical performance of 'no rub' multi-purpose solutions. Cont Lens Ant Eye 27 (2004) 65-74
23. Ketelson H.A., Meadows D.L., and Stone R.P. Dynamic wettability properties of a soft contact lens hydrogel. Colloids Surf: Biointerf 40 (2005) 1-9
24. Ketelson H.A., Meadows D.L., McQueen N.D., et al. Enhancing wettability with multi-purpose solutions. Rev Cornea CLs 1 (2005) 44-48
25. Ketelson H.A., and Meadows D.L. Wettability of soft contact lenses: new thoughts about an old problem. Rev CLs 10 (2004) 34-38
26. Garofalo R.J., Dassanayake N., Carey C., et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multi-purpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 31 4 (2005) 166-174
27. Pritchard N., Young G., Coleman S., et al. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multi-purpose care systems. Contact Lens Ant Eye 26 (2003) 3-9
28. Lemp M.A. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J 21 4 (1995) 221-232
29. Lebow K.A., and Schachet J.L. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 29 4 (2003) 213-220
30. Minarik M.A., and Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 15 (1989) 185-188
31. Minno G.E., Eckel L., Groemminger S., et al. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses. I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 68 (1991) 865-872
32. Myers R., Larsen D.W., Tsao M., et al. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci 68 (1991) 776-782
33. Tomlinson A., and Caroline P. Comparative evaluation of surface deposits on high water content hydrogel contact lens polymers. CLAO J 16 (1990) 121-127
34. Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose solutions. Contact Lens Ant Eye 20 (1997) 23-30
35. Jones L., MacDougall N., and Sorbara G.L. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 79 (2002) 753-761