Assessment of computer generated vision charts

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 133-140

  Ehrmann, Klaus ^a,b,c   Fedtke, Cathleen ^b,c,d   Radić, Alexa ^b,c,d  

^a BRIEN HOLDEN VISION INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c VISION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

^d AALEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bailey Lovie chart; Electronic vision chart; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISION TEST; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION TESTS;

EID: 67349277258     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Snellen H. Probebuchstaben zur bestimmung der sehschärfe. In: Graham C. (Ed). Vision and visual perception (1862), Wiley, New York
2. Bailey I., and Lovie J.E. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 53 November (11) (1976) 740-745
3. Standard B. Test charts for determining distance visual acuity. BS 4274 (1968), Brit Standard Institutions, London
4. O'Leary D. Subjective refraction. In: Edwards K and R L, editors. Optometry. London: Butterworths; 1988. p. 111-39.
5. Ferris F.L., Kassoff A., Bresnik G.H., and Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94 (1982) 91-96
6. Lovie-Kitchin J.E. Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8 4 (1988) 363-370
7. McMonnies C.W. Chart memory and visual acuity measurement. Clin Exp Optom 84 January (1) (2001) 26-33
8. Beck R.W., Moke P.S., Turpin A.H., Ferris III F.H., Sangiovanni J.P., Johnson C.A., et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol 135 February (2) (2003) 194-205
9. Rosser D.A., Murdoch I.E., Fitzke F.W., and Laidlaw D.A. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device. Eye 17 August (6) (2003) 701-706
10. Stewart C.E., Hussey A., Davies N., and Moseley M.J. Comparison of logmar etdrs chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 26 November (6) (2006) 597-601
11. Whatham A.R., Mermoud C., Deruaz A., Goldschmidt M., Zesiger P., and Safran A.B. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 26 March (2) (2006) 156-168
12. Reeves B., Wood J., and Hill A. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13 (1993) 17-25
13. ISO. ISO 8596 visual acuity testing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization, 1994.
14. Raasch T.W., Bailey I.L., and Bullimore M.A. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci 75 May (5) (1998) 342-348
15. Bailey I. Simplifying contrast sensitivity testing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59 (1982) 12
16. Brown B., and Lovie-Kitchin J.E. High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population. Optom Vis Sci 66 July (7) (1989) 467-473
17. McMonnies C.W. Chart construction and letter legibility/readability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19 November (6) (1999) 498-506
18. McMonnies C.W., and Ho A. Letter legibility and chart equivalence. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 20 March (2) (2000) 142-152
19. Pelli D.G., Robson J.G., and Wilkins A.J. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 2 3 (1988) 187-199
20. Raasch T.W., Bailey l., and Bullimore M.A. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci 75 5 (1998) 342-348
21. Lenne R.C., Vingrys A.J., and Smith G. Automated visual acuity testing. Clin Exp Optom 77 5 (1994) 190-195
22. Reeves B.C., Wood J.M., and Hill A.R. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13 January (1) (1993) 17-26
23. Elliott D.B., Sanderson K., and Conkey A. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthal Phys Opt 10 1 (1990) 21-24
24. Regan D., and Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology 90 (1983) 1192-2000