The dynamics of the inventor network in german biotechnology: Geographic proximity versus triadic closure

Journal of Economic Geography

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 589-620

  Ter Wal, Anne L J ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geographic proximity; Inventor networks; Network evolution; Triadic closure

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; LOCATION THEORY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84899836793     PISSN: 14682702     EISSN: 14682710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbs063     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abramovsky, L., Simpson, H. (2011) Geographic proximity and firm-university innovation linkages: evidence from great britain. Journal of Economic Geography, 11: 949-977.
2. Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., Varga, A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31: 1069-1085.
3. Ahuja, G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.
4. Almeida, P., Kogut, B. (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45: 905-917.
5. Arthur, W. B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. Audretsch, D. B. (2001) The role of small firms in US biotechnology clusters. Small Business Economics, 17: 3-15.
7. Audretsch, D. B., Feldman, M. P. (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11: 253-273.
8. Audretsch, D. B., Feldman, M. P. (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86: 630-640.
9. Audretsch, D. B., Stephan, P. E. (1996) Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86: 641-652.
10. Balland, P.-A. (2012) Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (gnss) industry. Regional Studies, 46: 741-756.
11. Baptista, R., Swann, P. (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more?. Research Policy, 27: 525-540.
12. Baum, J. A. C., Cowan, R., Jonard, N. (2010) Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Management Science, 56: 2094-2110.
13. Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., Phillips, D. J. (2004) Friends or strangers?. Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15: 259-275.
14. Bell, G. G., Zaheer, A. (2007) Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18: 955-972.
15. Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., Schmoch, U. (2006) Motives to patent: empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35: 655-672.
16. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. (2002) UCINET for Windows software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
17. Boschma, R., Frenken, K. (2010) The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In R. Boschma, R. Martin (eds) Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar.
18. Boschma, R. A. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39: 61-74.
19. Boschma, R. A., Frenken, K. (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science?. Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 273-302.
20. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 975-1005.
21. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2004) Knowledge networks from patent data: methodological issues and research targets. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
22. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9: 439-468.
23. Broekel, T., Boschma, R. (2012) Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12: 409-433.
24. Burt, R. S. (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-399.
25. Buskens, V. (2002) Social Networks and Trust. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Coleman, J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
27. Cowan, R., Jonard, N., Özman, M. (2004) Knowledge dynamics in a network industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71: 469-484.
28. Cowan, R., Jonard, N., Zimmermann, J. B. (2006) Evolving networks of inventors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16: 155-174.
29. Criscuolo, P., Salter, A., Sheehan, T. (2007) Making knowledge visible: using expert yellow pages to map capabilities in professional services firms. Research Policy, 36: 1603-1619.
30. Dahl, M. S., Pedersen, C. Ø. R. (2004) Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? Research Policy, 33: 1673-1686.
31. Davis, J. A. (1970) Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: testing two theoretical models on 742 sociograms. American Sociological Review, 35: 843-852.
32. Ejermo, O., Karlsson, C. (2006) Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships. Research Policy, 35: 412-430.
33. Faulconbridge, J. R. (2006) Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix?. Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms. Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 517-540.
34. Fleming, L., King, C., III, Juda, A. I. (2007) Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18: 938-954.
35. Gambardella, A. (1995) Science and Innovation in the US Pharmaceutical Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. García-Muiña, F. E., Pelechano-Barahona, E., Navas-López, J. E. (2009) Knowledge codification and technological innovation success: empirical evidence from spanish biotech companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76: 141-153.
37. Gargiulo, M., Benassi, M. (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11: 183-196.
38. Gertler, M. S. (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 75-99.
39. Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B. (2006) Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35: 1-23.
40. Gittelman, M. (2007) Does geography matter for science-based firms?. Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organization Science, 18: 724-741.
41. Giuliani, E. (2010) Network dynamics in regional clusters: the perspective of an emerging economy. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG).
42. Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., Geuna, A., Gonzales, R., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., Le Bas, C., Luzzi, A., Magazzini, L., Nesta, L., Nomaler, ö., Palomeras, N., Patel, P., Romanelli, M., Verspagen, B. (2007) Inventors and invention processes in Europe: results from the PATVAL-EU survey. Research Policy, 36: 1107-1127.
43. Gordon, I. R., McCann, P. (2005) Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 5: 523-543.
44. Grabher, G., Ibert, O. (2006) Bad company?. The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 251-271.
45. Gulati, R. (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-652.
46. Gulati, R., Gargiulo, M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439-1493.
47. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498.
48. Hoetker, G. (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 331-343.
49. Hopkins, M., Martin, P., Nightingale, P., Kraft, A., Mahdi, S. (2007) The myth of the biotech revolution: an assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change. Research Policy, 36: 566-589.
50. Huber, F. (2012) Do clusters really matter for innovation practices in information technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 12: 107-126.
51. Ibrahim, S. E., Fallah, M. H., Reilly, R. R. (2009) Localized sources of knowledge and the effect of knowledge spillovers: an empirical study of inventors in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 9: 405-431.
52. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. (1993) Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577-598.
53. Kilduff, M., Tsai, W. (2003) Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.
54. Krauss, G., Stahlecker, T. (2001) New biotechnology firms in germany: Heidelberg and the BioRegion Rhine-Neckar triangle. Small Business Economics, 17: 143-153.
55. Laforgia, F., Lissoni, F. (2006) What do you mean by 'mobile'?. Multiple applicant inventors in the European biotech industry, DRUID Working Paper 06-15.
56. Lehrer, M. (2005) Science-driven vs. market-pioneering high tech: comparative German technology sectors in the late nineteenth and late twentieth centuries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 251-278.
57. Li, P. F., Bathelt, H., Wang, J. (2012) Network dynamics and cluster evolution: changing trajectories of the aluminium extrusion industry in Dali, China. Journal of Economic Geography, 12: 127-155.
58. Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., Brewer, M. (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7: 428-443.
59. Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., Uberti, T. E. (2007) Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86: 471-493.
60. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L. (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6: 83-116.
61. Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., Guellec, D. (2008) The OECD REGPAT database: a presentation. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.
62. March, J. G. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
63. Martin, R. (2010) Roepke lecture in economic geography-rethinking regional path dependence: beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86: 1-27.
64. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., Zaheer, A. (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14: 91-103.
65. Nesta, L., Saviotti, P. P. (2005) Coherence of the knowledge base and the firm's innovative performance: evidence from the us pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53: 123-142.
66. Nesta, L., Saviotti, P. P. (2006) Firm knowledge and market value in biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15: 625-652.
67. Nicholas, T. (2009) Spatial diversity in invention: evidence from the early R&D labs. Journal of Economic Geography, 9: 1-31.
68. Obstfeld, D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens and orientation involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 100-130.
69. Orsenigo, L., Pammolli, F., Riccaboni, M. (2001) Technological change and network dynamics-lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30: 485-508.
70. Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W. W. (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15: 5-21.
71. Pavitt, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technological change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13: 343-373.
72. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.
73. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., Owen-Smith, J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 1132-1205.
74. Reagans, R. (2011) Close encounters: analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science, 22: 835-849.
75. Reagans, R., McEvily, B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 240-267.
76. Rothaermel, F. T., Thursby, M. (2007) The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Research Policy, 36: 832-849.
77. Saviotti, P. P. (1998) On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy, 26: 843-856.
78. Schmoch, U., Laville, F., Patel, P., Frietsch, R. (2003) Linking technology areas to industrial sectors: final report to the commission. Karlsruhe/Paris/Brighton: DG Research.
79. Shan, W., Walker, G., Kogut, B. (1994) Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 387-394.
80. Singh, J. (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51: 756-770.
81. Skvoretz, J. (1991) Theoretical and methodological models of networks and relations. Social Networks, 13: 275-300.
82. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In M. E. Sobel, M. P. Becker (eds) Sociological Methodology. Boston and London: Basil Blackwell.
83. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., Schweinberger, M., Huisman, M. (2007) Manual for SIENA version 3, University of Groningen/University of Oxford.
84. Song, J., Almeida, P., Wu, G. (2003) Learning-by-hiring: when is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49: 351-365.
85. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., Fleming, L. (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35: 994-1017.
86. Sorenson, O., Stuart, T. E. (2008) Bringing the context back in: settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 266-294.
87. Suire, R., Vicente, J. (2009) Why do some places succeed when others decline?. A social interaction model of cluster viability. Journal of Economic Geography, 9: 381-404.
88. Tamada, S., Naito, Y., Kodama, F., Gemba, K., Suzuki, J. (2006) Significant difference of dependence upon scientific knowledge among different technologies. Scientometrics, 68: 289-302.
89. Teece, D. J. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
90. Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2011) Cluster emergence and network evolution: a longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis. Regional Studies, in press.
91. Ter Wal, A. L. J., Boschma, R. A. (2011) Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45: 919-933.
92. Torre, A. (2008) On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42: 869-889.
93. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. (1997) University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5: 19-50.
94. Uzzi, B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35-67.
95. Walker, G., Kogut, B., Shan, W. J. (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8: 109-125.
96. Zaheer, A., Bell, G. G. (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 809-825.
97. Zander, U., Kogut, B. (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6: 76-92.
98. Zeller, C. (2001) Clustering biotech: a recipe for success? Spatial patterns of growth of biotechnology in Munich, Rhineland and Hamburg. Small Business Economics, 17: 123-141.
99. Zelner, B. A. (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1335-1348.
100. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Brewer, M. B. (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88: 290-306.