Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 170-181

  Austen, Erin L ^a   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^b   Enns, James T ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; GLOVE; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SENSORY STIMULATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 4444341307     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.4.2.170     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. BOTVINICK, M., & COHEN, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
2. CHOLEWIAK, R. W., & COLLINS, A. A. (1991). Sensory and physiological bases of touch. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 23-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. DI PELLEGRINO, G. & FRASSINETTI, F. (2000). Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand. Current Biology, 10, 1475-1477.
4. DRIVER, J., & GROSSENBACHER, P. G. (1996). Multimodal spatial constraints on tactile selective attention. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 209-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
5. DRIVER, J. S., & SPENCE, C. J. (1994). Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconcious information processing (pp. 311-331). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
6. HOLMES, N., CALVERT, G., & SPENCE, C. (2004, June). Task- and practice-dependent modulation of visuotactile integration by tool-use. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the International Multisensory Research Forum, Barcelona. Available at http://www.science. mcmaster.ca/~IMRF/ 2004_submit/viewabstract.php?id=48/.
7. IRIKI, A., TANAKA, M., & IWAMURA, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. NeuroReport, 7, 2325-2330.
8. KENNETT, S., TAYLOR-CLARKE, M., & HAGGARD, P. (2001). Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology, 11, 1188-1191.
9. LÀDAVAS, E., FARNÈ, A., ZELONI, G., & DI PELLEGRINO, G. (2000). Seeing or not seeing where your hands are. Experimental Brain Research, 131, 458-467.
10. MACALUSO, E., FRITH, C. D., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science, 289, 1206-1208.
11. MARAVITA, A., & IRIKI, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 79-86.
12. MARAVITA, A., SPENCE, C., KENNETT, S., & DRIVER, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, B25-B34.
13. NIELSEN, T. I. (1963). Volition: A new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225-230.
14. NEWPORT, R., HINDLE, J. V., & JACKSON, S. R. (2001). Links between vision and somatosensation: Vision can improve the felt position of the unseen hand. Current Biology, 11, 975-980.
15. OVER, R. (1966). An experimentally induced conflict between vision and proprioception. British Journal of Psychology, 57, 335-341.
16. PAVANI, F., SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
17. PIERSON, J. M., BRADSHAW, J. L., MEYER, T. F., HOWARD, M. J., & BRADSHAW, J. A. (1991). Direction of gaze during vibrotactile choice reaction time tasks. Neuropsychologia, 29, 925-928.
18. ROCK, I., & HARRIS, C. S. (1967). Vision and touch. Scientific American, 216, 96-104
19. SOTO-FARACO, S., RONALD, A., & SPENCE, C. (in press). Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception. Perception & Psychophysics.
20. SPENCE, C., RANSON, J., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Cross-modal selective attention: On the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 410-424.
21. TIPPER, S. P., LLOYD, D., SHORLAND, B., DANCE, C., HOWARD, L. A., & MCGLONE, F. (1998). Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. NeuroReport, 9, 1741-1744.
22. TIPPER, S. P., PHILLIPS, N., DANCER, C., LLOYD, D., HOWARD, L. A., & MCGLONE, F. (2001). Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 160-167.
23. VAUGHT, G. M., SIMPSON, W. E., & RYDER, R. (1968). "Feeling" with a stick. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 26, 848.
24. WELCH, R. B., & WARREN, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (chap. 25, pp. 1-36). New York: Wiley.
25. YAMAMOTO, S., & KITAZAWA, S. (2001). Sensations at the tips of invisible tools. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 979-980.