Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1287-1293

  Zopf, Regine ^a   Truong, Sandra ^a,b   Finkbeiner, Matthew ^a   Friedman, Jason ^a   Williams, Mark A ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Body location; Human body; Parietal cortex; Rubber hand illusion; Touch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79954425112     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 1995, 5(6):679-685.
2. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
3. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5(9):379-382.
4. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(2):229-240.
5. Critchley M. The parietal lobes 1953, Hafner, New York.
6. Culham J.C., Cavina-Pratesi C., Singhal A. The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging?. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(13):2668-2684.
7. Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(11):423-431.
8. Dijkerman H.C., de Haan E.H. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30(2):189-201. discussion 201-139.
9. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305(5685):875-877.
10. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25(7-8):920-950.
11. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bulthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 2000, 11(1):20-25.
12. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Goodale M.A., Gonzalez C.L., Kroliczak G. Action rules: Why the visual control of reaching and grasping is not always influenced by perceptual illusions. Perception 2008, 37(3):355-366.
14. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15(1):20-25.
15. Graziano M.S., Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 2000, 290(5497):1782-1786.
16. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68(4):685-701.
17. Holmes N.P., Spence C. Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: Spatial and temporal factors. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 166(3-4):489-497.
18. Johnson P.B., Ferraina S., Bianchi L., Caminiti R. Cortical networks for visual reaching: Physiological and anatomical organization of frontal and parietal lobe arm regions. Cerebral Cortex 1996, 6(2):102-119.
19. Jones E.G., Coulter J.D., Hendry S.H. Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1978, 181(2):291-347.
20. Kammers M.P.M., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(1):204-211.
21. Kammers M.P.M., Kootker J.A., Hogendoorn H., Dijkerman H.C. How many motoric body representations can we grasp?. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202(1):203-212.
22. Kammers M.P.M., Longo M.R., Tsakiris M., Dijkerman H.C., Haggard P. Specificity and coherence of body representations. Perception 2009, 38(12):1804-1820.
23. Kammers M.P.M., Mulder J., de Vignemont F., Dijkerman H.C. The weight of representing the body: Addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals. Experimental Brain Research 2009.
24. Karnath H.O., Perenin M.T. Cortical control of visually guided reaching: Evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(10):1561-1569.
25. Lloyd D.M., Shore D.I., Spence C., Calvert G.A. Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6(1):17-18.
26. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191(1):1-10.
27. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Zohary E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(4):731-740.
28. Newport R., Pearce R., Preston C. Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):385-395.
29. Pandya D.N., Kuypers H.G. Cortico-cortical connections in the rhesus monkey. Brain Research 1969, 13(1):13-36.
30. Pearson R.C.A., Powell T.P.S. The projections of the primary somatosensory cortex upon area 5 in the monkey. Brain Research Reviews 1985, 9:89-107.
31. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: A model from prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior 2002, 34(2):126-138.
32. Rossetti Y., Desmurget M., Prablanc C. Vectorial coding of movement: Vision, proprioception, or both?. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 74(1):457-463.
33. Shimada S., Fukuda K., Hiraki K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS One 2009, 4(7):e6185.
34. Smeets J.B., Brenner E. 10years of illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(6):1501-1504.
35. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(1):80-91.
36. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15(2):423-432.
37. Vallar G., Ronchi R. Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192(3):533-551.
38. van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., Gon J.J. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. Journal of Neurophysiology 1999, 81(3):1355-1364.
39. Zopf R., Savage G., Williams M.A. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):713-725.