How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1785, 2014, Pages

  Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dorsal stream; Ventral stream; Visual illusions; Visual perception; Visuomotor control

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PRIMATE; SIGNAL; VISION; VISUAL CUE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; DEER; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEASON;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; DEER; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETICS; GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; SEASONS;

EID: 84899702036     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0337     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Clark A. 2002 Is seeing all it seems? Action, reason and the grand illusion. J. Conscious. Stud. 9, 181-202.
2. Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A. 1981 Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept. Psychophys. 29, 336-342. (doi:10.3758/BF03207342)
3. Goodale MA, Pélisson D, Prablanc C. 1986 Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320, 748-750. (doi:10. 1038/320748a0)
4. Goodale MA, Milner AD. 1992 Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15, 20-25. (doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8)
5. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. 1982 Two cortical visual systems. In Analysis of visual behavior (eds DJ Ingle, MA Goodale, RJW Mansfield), pp. 549-586. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2006 The visual brain in action, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Goodale MA, Milner AD. 2013 Sight unseen: an exploration of conscious and unconscious vision, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Goodale MA. 1996 Visuomotor modules in the vertebrate brain. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 74, 390-400. (doi:10.1139/y96-032)
9. Kravitz DJ, Saleem KS, Baker CI, Mishkin M. 2011 A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 217-230. (doi:10.1038/ nrn3008)
10. Kravitz DJ, Saleem KS, Baker CI, Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. 2013 The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 26-49. (doi:10. 1016/j.tics.2012.10.011)
11. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP. 1991 A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349, 154-156. (doi:10.1038/349154a0)
12. Humphrey GK, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Servos P. 1994 The role of surface information in object recognition: studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 23, 1457-1481. (doi:10.1068/p231457)
13. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bülthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI. 1994 Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr. Biol. 4, 604-610. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00132-9)
14. Schenk T. 2012 No dissociation between perception and action in patient DF when haptic feedback is withdrawn. J. Neurosci. 32, 2013-2017. (doi:10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.3413-11.2012)
15. Whitwell RL, Milner AD, Cavina-Pratesi C, Byrne CM, Goodale MA. 2013 DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues. Neuropsychologia. 55, 41-50. (doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.019)
16. Milner AD et al. 1991 Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. Brain 114, 405-428. (doi:10. 1093/brain/114.1.405)
17. James TW, Culham JC, Humphrey GK, Milner A, Goodale MA. 2003 Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain 126, 2463-2475. (doi:10. 1093/brain/awg248)
18. Bridge H, Thomas OM, Minini L, Cavina-Pratesi C, Milner AD, Parker AJ. 2013 Structural and functional changes across the visual cortex of a patient with visual form agnosia. J. Neurosci. 33, 12 779-12 791. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4853-12.2013)
19. Grill-Spector K. 2003 The neural basis of object perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 159-166. (doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00040-0)
20. Bálint R. 1909 Seelenlähmung des 'Schauens', optische Ataxie, räumliche Störung der Aufmerksamkeit. Monatsschr. Psychiatr. Neurol. 25, 51-81. (doi:10.1159/000210464)
21. Perenin M-T, Vighetto A. 1988 Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 111, 643-674. (doi:10. 1093/brain/111.3.643)
22. Perenin MT, Vighetto A. 1983 Optic ataxia: a specific disorder in visuomotor coordination. In Spatially oriented behavior (eds A Hein, M Jeannerod), pp. 305-326. New York, NY: Springer.
23. Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2008 Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46, 774-785. (10. 1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8)
24. Goodale MA. 2011 Transforming vision into action. Vis. Res. 5, 1567-1587. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010. 07.027)
25. Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Mutara A, Sakata H. 1990 Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movements. Exp. Brain Res. 83, 29-36. (doi:10.1007/BF00232190)
26. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2003 Visually-guided grasping produces activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp. Brain Res. 153, 180-189. (doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1591-5)
27. Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodale MA, Culham JC. 2007 FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PLoS ONE 2, e424. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000424)
28. Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ. 1998 Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 50, 1253-1259. (doi:10.1212/WNL.50. 5.1253)
29. Castiello U. 2005 The neuroscience of grasping. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 726-736. (doi:10.1038/nrn1744)
30. Culham JC, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A. 2006 The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia 44, 2668-2684. (doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2005.11.003)
31. Grefkes C, Fink GR. 2005 The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J. Anat. 207, 3-17. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005. 00426.x)
32. Pierrot-Deseilligny CH, Milea D, Muri RM. 2004 Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 17, 17-25. (doi:10.1097/00019052-200402000-00005)
33. Karnath HO, Perenin M-T. 2005 Cortical control of visually guided reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1561-1569. (doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi034)
34. Cavina-Pratesi C, Monaco S, Fattori P, Galletti C, McAdam TD, Quinlan DJ, Goodale MA, Culham JC. 2010 Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. J. Neurosci. 30, 10 306-10 323. (doi:10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.2023-10.2010)
35. Prado J, Clavagnier S, Otzenberger H, Scheiber C, Perenin M-T. 2005 Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron 48, 849-858. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.010)
36. Weiskrantz L. 1997 Consciousness lost and found: a neuropsychological exploration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Weiskrantz L, Warrington EK, Sanders MD, Marshall J. 1974 Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 97, 709-728. (doi:10.1093/brain/97.1.709)
38. Sanders MD, Warrington EK, Marshall J, Weiskrantz L. 1974 'Blindsight': vision in a field defect. Lancet 20, 707-708. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(74)92907-9)
39. Thaler L, Goodale MA. 2010 Beyond distance and direction: the brain represents target locations non-metrically. J. Vis. 10, 1-27. (doi:10.1167/ 10.3.3)
40. Bridgeman B, Lewis S, Heit G, Nagle M. 1979 Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 5, 692-700. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.692)
41. Hansen RM, Skavenski AA. 1985 Accuracy of spatial localization near the time of a saccadic eye movement. Vis. Res. 25, 1077-1082. (doi:10.1016/ 0042-6989(85)90095-1)
42. Goodale MA. 1988 Modularity in visuomotor control: from input to output. In Computational processes in human vision: an interdisciplinary perspective (ed. ZW Pylyshyn), pp. 262-285. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Aglioti S, DeSouza J, Goodale MA. 1995 Sizecontrast illusions deceive the eyes but not the hand. Curr. Biol. 5, 679-685. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00133-3)
44. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bülthoff HH, Fahle M. 2000 Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol. Sci. 11, 20-25. (doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00209)
45. Franz VH. 2003 Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception? Exp. Brain Res. 151, 471-477. (doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1477-6)
46. Stöttinger E, Pfusterschmied J, Wagner H, Danckert J, Anderson B, Perner J. 2012 Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al. [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects. Exp. Brain Res. 216, 155-157. (doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2912-8)
47. Ganel T, Tanzer M, Goodale MA. 2008 A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychol. Sci. 19, 221-225. (doi:10. 1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02071.x)
48. Smeets JB, Brenner E. 2006 10 years of illusions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 1501-1504. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1501)
49. Koffka K. 1935 Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
50. Duncan J. 1984 Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113, 501-517. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501)
51. O'Craven KM, Downing PE, Kanwisher N. 1999 fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401, 584-587. (doi:10.1038/44134)
52. Ganel T, Goodale MA. 2003 Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 426, 664-667. (doi:10.1038/ nature02156)
53. Ganel T, Goodale MA. 2014 Variability-based Garner interference for perceptual estimations but not for grasping. Exp. Brain Res. (doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3867-3)
54. Pook PK, Ballard DH. 1996 Deictic human/robot interaction. Robot. Auton. Syst. 18, 259-269. (doi:10.1016/0921-8890(95)00080-1)