Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments

Patient

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 5-21

  Deal, Ken ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BULLYING; CYBERBULLYING; DISCRETE CHOICE CONJOINT EXPERIMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RANDOM FOREST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEGMENTATION;

BULLYING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENTS; PHYSICIANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84899102190     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0037-9     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Bensing J. Bridging the gap, the separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:17-15.
2. Lerer L. Pharmaceutical marketing segmentation in the age of the internet. Int J Med Mark 2. 2002;2(2):159-66.
3. Bassi F. Latent class factor models for market segmentation: an application to pharmaceuticals. Stat Methods Appl. 2007;16:270-87.
4. Vaughn S, Sarianne S. Examining physician segments. Pharm Represent. 2009;39(4):12-5.
5. American Marketing Association. The American Marketing Association releases new definition for marketing. http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/ Documents/American%20Mar keting%20Association%20Releases%20New%20Definition%20for%20Marketing.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2013.
6. Andreasen AR. Redesigning the marketing universe. Keynote address, World Marketing Summit, Dhaka, 2 Mar 2012.
7. Levitt T. The marketing imagination. New York: The Free Press; 1983.
8. Smith W. Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J Mark. 1956;21:3-8.
9. Greengrove K. Needs-based segmentation: principles and practice. Int J Mark Res. 2002;44(4):405-21.
10. Ferrandiz J. The impact of generic goods in the pharmaceutical industry. Health Econ. 1999;8(7):599-612. (Pubitemid 29520661)
11. Cunningham C, Deal K, Chen Y. Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: a new patient-centered approach to the assessment of health service preferences. Patient. 2010;3(4):257-73.
12. Cunningham C, Deal K, Neville A, Miller H, Lohfeld L. Modeling the problem-based learning preferences of McMaster University undergraduate medical students using a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;3(2):245-66. (Pubitemid 44036010)
13. Cunningham C, Vaillancourt T, Rimas H, Deal K, Cunningham L, Short K, Chen Y. Modeling the bullying prevention program preferences of educators: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009;37(7):929-43. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9324-2.
14. Yin Y, Zhang X, Williams R, et al. LOGISMOS - Layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2010;29(12):2023-37.
15. Schaap M, van Walsum T, Neefjes L, et al. Robust shape regression for supervised vessel segmentation and its application to coronary segmentation in CTA. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2010;30(11):1974-86.
16. Van Gerven MA, Jurgelenaite R, Taal BG, et al. Predicting carcinoid heart disease with noisy-threshold classifier. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40(1):45-55. (Pubitemid 46654765)
17. Giuly RJ, Martone M, Ellisman M. Method: automatic segmentation of mitochondria utilizing patch classification, contour pair classification, and automatically seeded level sets. BMC Bioinform. 2012;13:29.
18. Dolnicar S, Lazarevski K. Methodological reasons for the theory/practice divide in market segmentation. J Mark Manag. 2009;25(3-4):357-73.
19. Aldenderfer M, Blashfield R. Cluster analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1984.
20. Everitt BS. Unresolved problems in cluster analysis. Biometrics. 1979;35:169-82.
21. Aaker D. Developing business strategies. 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 47.
22. Vermunt J. Latent class modeling with covariates: two improved three-step approaches. Polit Anal. 2010;18:450-69.
23. Dolnicar S, Leisch F. Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap. Market Lett. 2010;21:83-101.
24. Retzer J, Shan M. Cluster ensemble analysis and graphical depiction of cluster partitions. Proceedings of the 2007 Sawtooth Software Conference, Sequim (WA); 2007.
25. Williams G. Data mining with Rattle and R: the art of excavating data for knowledge discovery. New York: Springer Science? Business Media; 2011.
26. Orme B. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison: Research Publishers LLC: p. 65.
27. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(5-3):2.
28. Arabie P, Hubert L. Cluster analysis in marketing research. In: Bagozzi R, editor. Advanced methods of marketing research, Cambridge: Blackwell; 1994. p. 160-189.
29. Rousseeuw P. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Comput Appl Math. 1986;20:53-65. doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7. (Pubitemid 18538469)
30. Calinski T, Habarasz J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat. 1974;3:1-17.
31. Schwartz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6:461-4.
32. Akaike, H. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, editors. Second international symposium on information theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1973. p. 267-8.
33. Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika. 1987;52:345-70.
34. Sugiura N. Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1978;A7:13-26.
35. Banfield JD, Raftery AE. Model-based gaussian and non-gaussian clustering. Biometrics. 1993;49:803-21. (Pubitemid 23298358)
36. Rand WM. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J Am Stat Assoc. 1971;66:846-50.
37. Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing partitions. J Class. 1985;2:193-218.
38. Morey LC, Agresti A. An adjustment to the rand statistic for chance agreement. Classif Soc Bull. 1981;5:9-10.
39. Fowlkes EB, Mallows CL. A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings. J Am Stat Assoc. 1983;78(383):553-69.
40. Hultsch L. Untersuchung zur Besiedlung einer Sprengfläche im Pockautal durch die Tiergruppen Heteroptera (Wanzen) und Auchenorrhyncha (Zikaden).
41. Krieger AM, Green PE. A generalized Rand-index method for consensus clustering of separate partitions of the same data base. J Classif. 1999;16:63-89.
42. Zweig M, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39(4):561-77. (Pubitemid 23118304)
43. Vuk M, Curk T. ROC curve, lift chart and calibration plot. Metodoloski zvezki. 2006;3(1):89-108.
44. Goodman LA. The analysis of systems of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable. Part I: a modified latent structure approach. Am J Sociol. 1974;79:1179-259.
45. Magidson J, Vermunt JK. Latent class factor and cluster models, bi-plots and related graphical displays. Sociol Methodol. 2001;31:223-64. (Pubitemid 33584800)
46. The CBC Latent Class Technical Paper. Version 3. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, 2004.
47. Latent Class v4.5, Sawtooth Software Inc., 26 Sep 2012.
48. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. Latent Gold Choice 4.0 user's guide. Statistical Innovations; 2005.
49. Allenby G, Arora N, Ginter J. On the heterogeneity of demand. J Market Res. 1998;35:384-9.
50. Rossi P, Allenby G, McCullough R. Bayesian statistics and marketing. New York: Wiley; 2005.
51. Revelt D, Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Stat. 1998;30(4):647-57. (Pubitemid 128344306)
52. Johnson FR, Mansfield C. Survey design and analytical strategies for better healthcare stated-choice studies. The Patient. 2008;1(4):299-307.
53. MacQueen JB. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. University of California Press; 1967: p. 281-297.
54. Witek E. Comparison of model-based clustering with heuristic clustering methods. Folia Oeconomica. 2011;255:191-7.
55. Wang X, Qiu W, Zamar RH. CLUES: a non-parametric clustering method based on shrinking. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2007;52(1):286-98. (Pubitemid 47331707)
56. Chang F, Qiu W, Zamar RH, Lazarus R, Wang X. Clues: An R package for nonparametric clustering based on local shrinking. J Stat Softw. 2010;33:4.
57. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Finding groups in data. New York: Wiley; 2005.
58. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. http://www.R-project.org/.
59. Magidson, J. SI-CHAID 4.0 user's guide. Statistical Innovations; 2005.
60. Retzer J, Shan M. Cluster ensemble analysis and graphical depiction of cluster partitions. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Sawtooth Software Conference, Sequim (WA); 2007.
61. Strehl A, Ghosh J. Cluster ensembles: a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. J Mach Learn Res. 2002;3:583-617.
62. Orme B, Johnson R. Improving K-means cluster analysis: ensemble analysis instead of highest reproducibility replicates. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series; 2008.
63. Arseneault L, Walsh E, Trzesniewski K, Newcombe R, Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: a nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):130-8. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2388. (Pubitemid 46071156)
64. Arseneault L, Bowes L, Shakoor S. Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: 'Much ado about nothing'? Psychol Med. 2010;40:717-29.
65. Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh YJ, Hubbard A, Boyce WT. School bullying and youth violence: causes or consequences of psychopathologic behavior? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(9):1035-41. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.9.1035. (Pubitemid 44330463)
66. Sawtooth Software. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/version/ ssiweb/ssiweb-history.html. Accessed 13 Nov 2013.
67. Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health - a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14:403-13.
68. Chen C, Liaw A, Breiman L. Using random forest to learn imbalanced data. UC Berkeley: Department of Statistics; 2004.
69. Svetnik V, Liaw A, Tong C, et al. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003;43:1947-58.
70. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by random-Forest. R News. 2002;2(3):18-22.
71. Haley R. Benefit segmentation: a decision-oriented research tool. J Mark. 1968;32(3):30-5.
72. Zapert K, Spears D. Reengineering a US-based diabetes patient segmentation for Japan: lost in translation. Presented at 2011 Annual National Conference of the Pharmaceutical Marketing Research group; 2011.
73. Bogle A, Simpson SL, Mills TM. Segmentations that work. First Annual Meeting of the Pharmaceutical Marketing Research Group; 2007.
74. Ross C, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction. Med Care. 1993;31(12):1138-49.
75. Magidson J, Eagle T, Vermunt JK. New developments in latent class choice models. In: Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings; 2003: p. 89-112.
76. The CBC Latent Class Technical Paper. Version 3. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series; 2004.
77. McCullough PR. Comparing hierarchical Bayes and latent class choice: practical issues for sparse data sets. In: 2009 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, Delray Beach (FL); Mar 2009.