Mixture processing and odor-object segregation in insects

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 208, Issue , 2014, Pages 63-85

  Szyszka, Paul ^a   Stierle, Jacob S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blend; Insect; Neural coding; Odor mixtures; Odor object segregation

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA; ARTICLE; BEETLE; HONEYBEE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSECT; MOTH; NONHUMAN; ODOR; ODOR OBJECT SEGREGATION; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS; ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; SMELLING;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; INSECTS; MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; ODORS; OLFACTORY PATHWAYS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; SMELL;

EID: 84899057856     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: 18757855     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63350-7.00003-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (135)

1. Aihara Y., Shibuya T. Responses of single olfactory receptor cells to sex pheromones in the tobacco cutworm moth, Spodoptera litura. J. Insect Physiol. 1977, 23:5.
2. Andersson M.N., Binyameen M., Sadek M.M., Schlyter F. Attraction modulated by spacing of pheromone components and anti-attractants in a bark beetle and a moth. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37:899-911.
3. Anton S., Hansson B.S. Central processing of sex pheromone, host odour, and oviposition deterrent information by interneurons in the antennal lobe of female Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Comp. Neurol. 1994, 350:199-214.
4. Baker T.C., Cosse A.A., Todd J.L. Behavioral antagonism in the moth Helicoverpa zea in response to pheromone blends of three sympatric heliothine moth species is explained by one type of antennal neuron. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 855:511-513.
5. Baker T.C., Fadamiro H.Y., Cosse A.A. Moth uses fine tuning for odour resolution. Nature 1998, 393:530.
6. Benton R., Sachse S., Michnick S.W., Vosshall L.B. Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e20.
7. Beyaert I., Hilker M. Plant odour plumes as mediators of plant-insect interactions. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2013, 89:68-81.
8. Bitterman M.E., Menzel R., Fietz A., Schafer S. Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J. Comp. Psychol. 1983, 97:107-119.
9. Bregman A.S., Pinker S. Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Can. J. Psychol. 1978, 32:19-31.
10. Broome B.M., Jayaraman V., Laurent G. Encoding and decoding of overlapping odor sequences. Neuron 2006, 51:467-482.
11. Carde R.T., Willis M.A. Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:854-866.
12. Carlsson M.A., Hansson B.S. Responses in highly selective sensory neurons to blends of pheromone components in the moth Agrotis segetum. J. Insect Physiol. 2002, 48:443-451.
13. Chalier P., Crouzet J. Production of volatile components by Penicillium roqueforti cultivated in the presence of soya bean oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8:7.
14. Chandra S., Smith B.H. An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J. Exp. Biol. 1998, 201:3113-3121.
15. Christensen T.A., Mustaparta H., Hildebrand J.G. Chemical communication in heliothine moths. 2. Central processing of intraspecific and interspecific olfactory messages in the male corn-earworm moth Helicoverpa-Zea. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sen. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1991, 169:259-274.
16. Christensen T.A., Waldrop B.R., Harrow I.D., Hildebrand J.G. Local interneurons and information-processing in the olfactory glomeruli of the moth Manduca-sexta. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1993, 173:385-399.
17. Christensen T.A., Mustaparta H., Hildebrand J.G. Chemical communication in heliothine moths. 6. Parallel pathways for information-processing in the macroglomerular complex of the male tobacco budworm moth Heliothis-Virescens. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1995, 177:545-557.
18. Christensen T.A., Waldrop B.R., Hildebrand J.G. GABAergic mechanisms that shape the temporal response to odors in moth olfactory projection neurons. Olfaction Taste XII 1998, 855:475-481.
19. Christensen T.A., Pawlowski V.M., Lei H., Hildebrand J.G. Multi-unit recordings reveal context-dependent modulation of synchrony in odor-specific neural ensembles. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:927-931.
20. Clyne P.J., Certel S.J., De Bruyne M., Zaslavsky L., Johnson W.A., Carlson J.R. The odor specificities of a subset of olfactory receptor neurons are governed by Acj6, a POU-domain transcription factor. Neuron 1999, 22:339-347.
21. Daly K.C., Christensen T.A., Lei H., Smith B.H., Hildebrand J.G. Learning modulates the ensemble representations for odors in primary olfactory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:10476-10481.
22. Das S., Sadanandappa M.K., Dervan A., Larkin A., Lee J.A., Sudhakaran I.P., Priya R., Heidari R., Holohan E.E., Pimentel A., Gandhi A., Ito K., Sanyal S., Wang J.W., Rodrigues V., Ramaswami M. Plasticity of local GABAergic interneurons drives olfactory habituation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:E646-E654.
23. Davis R.L. Traces of Drosophila memory. Neuron 2011, 70:8-19.
24. de Bruyne M., Baker T.C. Odor detection in insects: volatile codes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:882-897.
25. De Jong R., Visser J.H. Specificity-related suppression of responses to binary mixtures in olfactory receptors of the Colorado potato beetle. Brain Res. 1988, 447:18-24.
26. Deisig N., Lachnit H., Giurfa M., Hellstern F. Configural olfactory learning in honeybees: negative and positive patterning discrimination. Learn. Mem. 2001, 8:70-78.
27. Deisig N., Lachnit H., Giurfa M. The effect of similarity between elemental stimuli and compounds in olfactory patterning discriminations. Learn. Mem. 2002, 9:112-121.
28. Deisig N., Lachnit H., Sandoz J.C., Lober K., Giurfa M. A modified version of the unique cue theory accounts for olfactory compound processing in honeybees. Learn. Mem. 2003, 10:199-208.
29. Deisig N., Giurfa M., Lachnit H., Sandoz J.C. Neural representation of olfactory mixtures in the honeybee antennal lobe. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24:1161-1174.
30. Deisig N., Giurfa M., Sandoz J.C. Antennal lobe processing increases separability of odor mixture representations in the honeybee. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:2185-2194.
31. Deisig N., Kropf J., Vitecek S., Pevergne D., Rouyar A., Sandoz J.C., Lucas P., Gadenne C., Anton S., Barrozo R. Differential interactions of sex pheromone and plant odour in the olfactory pathway of a male moth. PLoS One 2012, 7:e33159.
32. Denker M., Finke R., Schaupp F., Grun S., Menzel R. Neural correlates of odor learning in the honeybee antennal lobe. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31:119-133.
33. Ditzen M., Evers J.F., Galizia C.G. Odor similarity does not influence the time needed for odor processing. Chem. Senses 2003, 28:781-789.
34. Dorn S., Natale D., Mattiacci L., Hern A., Pasqualini E. Response of female Cydia molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to plant derived volatiles. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2003, 93:335-342.
35. Faber T., Menzel R. Visualizing mushroom body response to a conditioned odor in honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 2001, 88:472-476.
36. Faber T., Joerges J., Menzel R. Associative learning modifies neural representations of odors in the insect brain. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:74-78.
37. Fadamiro H.Y., Cosse A.A., Baker T.C. Fine-scale resolution of closely spaced pheromone and antagonist filaments by flying male Helicoverpa zea. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 1999, 185:11.
38. Fernandez P.C., Locatelli F.F., Person-Rennell N., Deleo G., Smith B.H. Associative conditioning tunes transient dynamics of early olfactory processing. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10191-10202.
39. Galizia C.G., Menzel R. Odour perception in honeybees: coding information in glomerular patterns. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000, 10:504-510.
40. Galizia C.G., Menzel R. The role of glomeruli in the neural representation of odours: results from optical recording studies. J. Insect Physiol. 2001, 47:115-130.
41. Gao Q., Yuan B., Chess A. Convergent projections of Drosophila olfactory neurons to specific glomeruli in the antennal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:780-785.
42. Gerber B., Ullrich J. No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202:1839-1854.
43. Getchell T.V., Margolis F.L., Getchell M.L. Perireceptor and receptor events in vertebrate olfaction. Prog. Neurobiol. 1984, 23:317-345.
44. Girardin C.C., Kreissl S., Galizia C.G. Inhibitory connections in the honeybee antennal lobe are spatially patchy. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 109:332-343.
45. Guerrieri F., Lachnit H., Gerber B., Giurfa M. Olfactory blocking and odorant similarity in the honeybee. Learn. Mem. 2005, 12:86-95.
46. Guerrieri F., Schubert M., Sandoz J.C., Giurfa M. Perceptual and neural olfactory similarity in honeybees. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e60.
47. Hallem E.A., Ho M.G., Carlson J.R. The molecular basis of odor coding in the drosophila antenna. Cell 2004, 117:965-979.
48. Hancock P.J., Walton L., Mitchell G., Plenderleith Y., Phillips W.A. Segregation by onset asynchrony. J. Vis. 2008, 8(21):1-21.
49. Hansson B.S., Carlsson M.A., Kalinova B. Olfactory activation patterns in the antennal lobe of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 2003, 189:301-308.
50. Heisenberg M. Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4:266-275.
51. Hillier N.K., Vickers N.J. Mixture interactions in moth olfactory physiology: examining the effects of odorant mixture, concentration, distal stimulation, and antennal nerve transection on sensillar responses. Chem. Senses 2011, 36:93-108.
52. Hopfield J.J. Olfactory computation and object perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88:6462-6466.
53. Hopfield J.F., Gelperin A. Differential conditioning to a compound stimulus and its components in the terrestrial mollusc Limax maximus. Behav. Neurosci. 1989, 103:5.
54. Hosler J.S., Smith B.H. Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends. J. Exp. Biol. 2000, 203:2797-2806.
55. Jinks A., Laing D.G. The analysis of odor mixtures by humans: evidence for a configurational process. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 72:51-63.
56. Joerges J., Kuttner A., Galizia C.G., Menzel R. Representations of odours and odour mixtures visualized in the honeybee brain. Nature 1997, 387:285-288.
57. Kaissling K.E. Kinetics of olfactory responses might largely depend on the odorant-receptor interaction and the odorant deactivation postulated for flux detectors. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 2013, 199:879-896.
58. Kamin L.J. Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. Punishment and Aversive Behavior 1969, 279-296. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. B. Campbell, R. Church (Eds.).
59. Knudsen J.T., Eriksson R., Gershenzon J., Stahl B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 2006, 72:120.
60. Krofczik S., Menzel R., Nawrot M.P. Rapid odor processing in the honeybee antennal lobe network. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2009, 2:9.
61. Kuebler L.S., Olsson S.B., Weniger R., Hansson B.S. Neuronal processing of complex mixtures establishes a unique odor representation in the moth antennal lobe. Front. Neural Circuits 2011, 5:7.
62. Kunze J., Gumbert A. The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems. Behav. Ecol. 2001, 12:10.
63. Laloi D., Bailez O., Roger B., Pham-Delegue M.H., Wadhams L.J. Recognition of complex odors by restrained and free-flying honeybees, Apis mellifera. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000, 26:2307-2319.
64. Leal W.S. Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58:373-391.
65. Lei H., Vickers N. Central processing of natural odor mixtures in insects. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:915-927.
66. Linster C., Sachse S., Galizia C.G. Computational modeling suggests that response properties rather than spatial position determine connectivity between olfactory glomeruli. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 93:3410-3417.
67. Lipp R., Kitterick P., Summerfield Q., Bailey P.J., Paul-Jordanov I. Concurrent sound segregation based on inharmonicity and onset asynchrony. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1417-1425.
68. Locatelli F.F., Fernandez P.C., Villareal F., Muezzinoglu K., Huerta R., Galizia C.G., Smith B.H. Nonassociative plasticity alters competitive interactions among mixture components in early olfactory processing. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 37:63-79.
69. Macrides F., Chorover S.L. Olfactory bulb units: activity correlated with inhalation cycles and odor quality. Science 1972, 175:84-87.
70. Martelli C., Carlson J.R., Emonet T. Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:6285-6297.
71. Matsumoto Y., Menzel R., Sandoz J.C., Giurfa M. Revisiting olfactory classical conditioning of the proboscis extension response in honey bees: a step toward standardized procedures. J. Neurosci. Methods 2012, 211:159-167.
72. Menzel R. Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee. Learn. Mem. 2001, 8:53-62.
73. Meyer A., Galizia C.G. Elemental and configural olfactory coding by antennal lobe neurons of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 2012, 198:159-171.
74. Mobbs P.G. The brain of the honeybee Apis-mellifera. 1. The connections and spatial-organization of the mushroom bodies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1982, 298:309-354.
75. Münch D., Schmeichel B., Silbering A.F., Galizia C.G. Weaker ligands can dominate an odor blend due to syntopic interactions. Chem. Senses 2013, 38:293-304.
76. Murlis J., Elkinton J.S., Carde R.T. Odor pand how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37:505-532.
77. Myrick A.J., Park K.C., Hetling J.R., Baker T.C. Detection and discrimination of mixed odor strands in overlapping plumes using an insect-antenna-based chemosensor system. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35:118-130.
78. Najar-Rodriguez A.J., Galizia C.G., Stierle J., Dorn S. Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of an insect to changing ratios of constituents in host plant-derived volatile mixtures. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213:3388-3397.
79. Nakagawa T., Vosshall L.B. Controversy and consensus: noncanonical signaling mechanisms in the insect olfactory system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009, 19:284-292.
80. Namiki S., Iwabuchi S., Kanzaki R. Representation of a mixture of pheromone and host plant odor by antennal lobe projection neurons of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 2008, 194:501-515.
81. Niewalda T., Voller T., Eschbach C., Ehmer J., Chou W.C., Timme M., Fiala A., Gerber B. A combined perceptual, physico-chemical, and imaging approach to 'odour-distances' suggests a categorizing function of the Drosophila antennal lobe. PLoS One 2011, 6.
82. Nikonov A.A., Leal W.S. Peripheral coding of sex pheromone and a behavioral antagonist in the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002, 28:1075-1089.
83. Nowotny T., Stierle J.S., Galizia C.G., Szyszka P. Data-driven honeybee antennal lobe model suggests how stimulus-onset asynchrony can aid odour segregation. Brain Res. 2013, 1536:119-134.
84. O'Connell R.J., Grant A.J., Mayer M.S., Mankin R.W. Morphological correlates of differences in pheromone sensitivity in insect sensilla. Science 1983, 220:1408-1410.
85. Ochieng S.A., Park K.C., Baker T.C. Host plant volatiles synergize responses of sex pheromone-specific olfactory receptor neurons in male Helicoverpa zea. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 2002, 188:325-333.
86. Olsen S.R., Wilson R.I. Lateral presynaptic inhibition mediates gain control in an olfactory circuit. Nature 2008, 452:956-960.
87. Olsen S.R., Bhandawat V., Wilson R.I. Excitatory interactions between olfactory processing channels in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Neuron 2007, 54:89-103.
88. Olsson S.B., Kuebler L.S., Veit D., Steck K., Schmidt A., Knaden M., Hansson B.S. A novel multicomponent stimulus device for use in olfactory experiments. J. Neurosci. Methods 2011, 195:1-9.
89. Pelosi P. Perireceptor events in olfaction. J. Neurobiol. 1996, 30:3-19.
90. Rath L., Giovanni Galizia C., Szyszka P. Multiple memory traces after associative learning in the honey bee antennal lobe. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 34:352-360.
91. Reinhard J., Sinclair M., Srinivasan M.V., Claudianos C. Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants. PLoS One 2010, 5:e9110.
92. Rescorla R., Wagner A. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory 1972, vol. 39. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. A.H. Black, W.F. Prokasy (Eds.).
93. Riffell J.A., Abrell L., Hildebrand J.G. Physical processes and real-time chemical measurement of the insect olfactory environment. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:837-853.
94. Riffell J.A., Lei H., Christensen T.A., Hildebrand J.G. Characterization and coding of behaviorally significant odor mixtures. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:335-340.
95. Root C.M., Masuyama K., Green D.S., Enell L.E., Nassel D.R., Lee C.H., Wang J.W. A presynaptic gain control mechanism fine-tunes olfactory behavior. Neuron 2008, 59:311-321.
96. Rospars J.P., Lansky P., Chaput M., Duchamp-Viret P. Competitive and noncompetitive odorant interactions in the early neural coding of odorant mixtures. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:2659-2666.
97. Sachse S., Galizia C.G. Role of inhibition for temporal and spatial odor representation in olfactory output neurons: a calcium imaging study. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:1106-1117.
98. Sachse S., Galizia C.G. The coding of odour-intensity in the honeybee antennal lobe: local computation optimizes odour representation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 18:2119-2132.
99. Saha D., Leong K., Li C., Peterson S., Siegel G., Raman B. A spatiotemporal coding mechanism for background-invariant odor recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:1830-1839.
100. Sandoz J.C., Galizia C.G., Menzel R. Side-specific olfactory conditioning leads to more specific odor representation between sides but not within sides in the honeybee antennal lobes. Neuroscience 2003, 120:1137-1148.
101. Sato K., Pellegrino M., Nakagawa T., Vosshall L.B., Touhara K. Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels. Nature 2008, 452:1002-1006.
102. Schuckel J., Meisner S., Torkkeli P.H., French A.S. Dynamic properties of Drosophila olfactory electroantennograms. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 2008, 194:483-489.
103. Shanbhag S.R., Muller B., Steinbrecht R.A. Atlas of olfactory organs of Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Internal organization and cellular architecture of olfactory sensilla. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2000, 29:211-229.
104. Shang Y., Claridge-Chang A., Sjulson L., Pypaert M., Miesenbock G. Excitatory local circuits and their implications for olfactory processing in the fly antennal lobe. Cell 2007, 128:601-612.
105. Silbering A.F., Benton R. Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11:173-179.
106. Silbering A.F., Galizia C.G. Processing of odor mixtures in the Drosophila antennal lobe reveals both global inhibition and glomerulus-specific interactions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11966-11977.
107. Silbering A.F., Okada R., Ito K., Galizia C.G. Olfactory information processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe: anything goes?. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:13075-13087.
108. Smith B.H. An analysis of blocking in odorant mixtures: an increase but not a decrease in intensity of reinforcement produces unblocking. Behav. Neurosci. 1997, 111:57-69.
109. Smith B.H. Analysis of interaction in binary odorant mixtures. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 65:397-407.
110. Smith B.H., Cobey S. The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. II. Blocking between odorants in binary mixtures. J. Exp. Biol. 1994, 195:91-108.
111. Smith B.H., Wright G.A., Daly K.C. Learning-based recognition and discrimination of floral odor. Biology of Floral Scent 2006, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. E. Pichersky, N. Dudareva (Eds.).
112. Stevenson R.J., Wilson D.A. Odour perception: an object-recognition approach. Perception 2007, 36:1821-1833.
113. Stierle J.S., Galizia C.G., Szyszka P. Millisecond stimulus onset-asynchrony enhances information about components in an odor mixture. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:6060-6069.
114. Strausfeld N.J. Organization of the honey bee mushroom body: representation of the calyx within the vertical and gamma lobes. J. Comp. Neurol. 2002, 450:4-33.
115. Strausfeld N.J., Sinakevitch I., Brown S.M., Farris S.M. Ground plan of the insect mushroom body: functional and evolutionary implications. J. Comp. Neurol. 2009, 513:265-291.
116. Strube-Bloss M.F., Nawrot M.P., Menzel R. Mushroom body output neurons encode odor-reward associations. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:3129-3140.
117. Su C.Y., Menuz K., Reisert J., Carlson J.R. Non-synaptic inhibition between grouped neurons in an olfactory circuit. Nature 2012, 492:66-71.
118. Szyszka P., Galkin A., Menzel R. Associative and non-associative plasticity in Kenyon cells of the honeybee mushroom body. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2008, 2:3.
119. Szyszka P., Stierle J.S., Biergans S., Galizia C.G. The speed of smell: odor-object segregation within milliseconds. PLoS One 2012, 7:e36096.
120. Usher M., Donnelly N. Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception. Nature 1998, 394:179-182.
121. Van Der Pers J., Den Otter C. Single cell responses from olfactory receptors of small ermine moths to sex-attractants. J. Insect Physiol. 1978, 24:12.
122. Vermeulen A., Rospars J.P. Why are insect olfactory receptor neurons grouped into sensilla? The teachings of a model investigating the effects of the electrical interaction between neurons on the transepithelial potential and the neuronal transmembrane potential. Eur. Biophys. J. 2004, 33:633-643.
123. Vetter R.S., Sage A.E., Justus K.A., Carde R.T., Galizia C.G. Temporal integrity of an airborne odor stimulus is greatly affected by physical aspects of the odor delivery system. Chem. Senses 2006, 31:359-369.
124. Vickers N.J. Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. Biol. Bull. 2000, 198:203-212.
125. Vickers N.J., Christensen T.A., Hildebrand J.G. Combinatorial odor discrimination in the brain: attractive and antagonist odor blends are represented in distinct combinations of uniquely identifiable glomeruli. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998, 400:35-56.
126. Visser J.H., Avé D.A. General green leaf volatiles in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1978, 24:12.
127. Vogt R.G., Riddiford L.M. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature 1981, 293:161-163.
128. Vosshall L.B., Hansson B.S. A unified nomenclature system for the insect olfactory coreceptor. Chem. Senses 2011, 36:497-498.
129. Vosshall L.B., Wong A.M., Axel R. An olfactory sensory map in the fly brain. Cell 2000, 102:147-159.
130. Wicher D., Schafer R., Bauernfeind R., Stensmyr M.C., Heller R., Heinemann S.H., Hansson B.S. Drosophila odorant receptors are both ligand-gated and cyclic-nucleotide-activated cation channels. Nature 2008, 452:1007-1011.
131. Wilson R.I., Laurent G. Role of GABAergic inhibition in shaping odor-evoked spatiotemporal patterns in the Drosophila antennal lobe. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:9069-9079.
132. Wilson R.I., Mainen Z.F. Early events in olfactory processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 29:163-201.
133. Wilson D.A., Stevenson R.J. Olfactory perceptual learning: the critical role of memory in odor discrimination. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2003, 27:307-328.
134. Wright G.A., Schiestl F.P. The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards. Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23:841-851.
135. Yamagata N., Schmuker M., Szyszka P., Mizunami M., Menzel R. Differential odor processing in two olfactory pathways in the honeybee. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2009, 3:16.