Odour perception in honeybees: Coding information in glomerular patterns

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 504-510

  Galizia, C Giovanni ^a   Menzel, Randolf ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HONEYBEE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SMELLING; STEREOTYPY;

ANIMALS; BEES; BRAIN MAPPING; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; ODORS; OLFACTORY BULB; SMELL;

EID: 0033866727     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00109-4     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Mombaerts P. Molecular biology of odorant receptors in vertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 22:1999;487-509.
2. Clyne P.J., Warr C.G., Freeman M.R., Lessing D., Kim J., Carlson J.R. A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins: candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila. Neuron. 22:1999;327-338.
3. Vosshall L.B., Amrein H., Morozov P.S., Rzhetsky A., Axel R. A spatial map of olfactory receptor expression in the Drosophila antenna. Cell. 96:1999;725-736.
4. Rubin B.D., Katz L.C. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron. 23:1999;499-511. The authors measured glomerular response patterns to odours in rats, using intrinsic signals. As in honeybees, chemically similar odours elicit similar response patterns. The study opens a new window on the study of odour representation in mammals; certainly, a lot more can be expected soon.
5. Friedrich R.W., Korsching S.I. Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron. 18:1997;737-752.
6. Friedrich R.W., Korsching S.I. Chemotopic, combinatorial, and noncombinatorial odorant representations in the olfactory bulb revealed using a voltage-sensitive axon tracer. J Neurosci. 18:1998;9977-9988.
7. Bargmann C.I., Kaplan J.M. Signal transduction in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 21:1998;279-308.
8. Menzel R., Müller U. Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 19:1996;379-404.
9. Faber T., Joerges J., Menzel R. Associative learning modifies neural representations of odors in the insect brain. Nat Neurosci. 2:1999;74-78. The authors compare odour representation before and after appetitive olfactory learning. The results show that a learned odour leads to a significantly stronger response in the activated glomeruli and show that the correlation between the glomerular activity patterns induced by the positively reinforced odour and the non-rewarded odour decreases following the learning procedure.
10. Laska M., Galizia C.G., Giurfa M., Menzel R. Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees. Chem Senses. 24:1999;429-438.
11. Flanagan D., Mercer A.R. An atlas and 3-D reconstruction of the antennal lobes in the worker honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 18:1989;145-159.
12. Joerges J., Küttner A., Galizia C.G., Menzel R. Representations of odours and odour mixtures visualized in the honeybee brain. Nature. 387:1997;285-288.
13. Galizia C.G., Joerges J., Kuettner A., Faber T., Menzel R. A semi-in-vivo preparation for optical recording of the insect brain. J Neurosci Methods. 76:1997;61-69.
14. Galizia C.G., Nägler K., Hölldobler B., Menzel R. Odour coding is bilaterally symmetrical in the antennal lobes of honeybees (Apis mellifera). Eur J Neurosci. 10:1998;2964-2974.
15. Stopfer M., Bhagavan S., Smith B.H., Laurent G. Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature. 390:1997;70-74.
16. Chandra S., Smith B.H. An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J Exp Biol. 201:1998;3113-3121.
17. Smith B.H. Analysis of interaction in binary odorant mixtures. Physiol Behav. 65:1998;397-407.
18. Muller D., Gerber B., Hellstern F., Hammer M., Menzel R. Sensory preconditioning in honeybees. J Exp Biol. 203:2000;1351-1364.
19. Hellstern F., Wüstenberg D., Hammer M. Contextual learning in honeybees under laboratory conditions. Elsner N., Menzel R. Learning and Memory. Proceedings of the 23rd Göttingen Neurobiology Conference. 1995;30 Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.
20. Gerber B., Ullrich J. No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. J Exp Biol. 202:1999;1839-1854. In an extensive series of well-designed control experiments, the authors fail to show olfactory blocking in a honeybee classical conditioning paradigm. This indicates that in those cases where a blocking effect could be observed it may not be explicable with cognitive learning theories, but may rather be a consequence of the way in which sensory information is processed.
21. Linster C., Smith B.H. A computational model of the response of honey bee antennal lobe circuitry to odor mixtures: overshadowing, blocking and unblocking can arise from lateral inhibition. Behav Brain Res. 87:1997;1-14.
22. Galizia C.G., Mcilwrath S.L., Menzel R. A digital three-dimensional atlas of the honeybee antennal lobe based on optical sections acquired using confocal microscopy. Cell Tissue Res. 295:1999;383-394.
23. •], where this atlas is published for those glomeruli and odours mapped so far).
24. Morphological and physiological atlas of the honeybee antennal lobe, at URL: http://www.neurobiologie.fu-berlin.de/honeybeeALatlas. This site is constantly updated. Glomerular response patterns to a variety of odours are shown, together with examples of optical imaging recordings and three-dimensional reconstructions of the honeybee antennal lobe.
25. Berg B.G., Almaas T.J., Bjaalie J.G., Mustaparta H. The macroglomerular complex of the antennal lobe in the tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens: specified subdivision in four compartments according to information about biologically significant compounds. J Comp Physiol [A]. 183:1998;669-682.
26. Vickers N.J., Christensen T.A., Hildebrand J.G. Combinatorial odor discrimination in the brain: attractive and antagonist odor blends are represented in distinct combinations of uniquely identifiable glomeruli. J Comp Neurol. 400:1998;35-56.
27. Anton S., Hansson B. Physiological mismatching between neurons innervating olfactory glomeruli in a moth. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:1999;1813-1820.
28. Hammer M., Menzel R. Multiple sites of associative odor learning as revealed by local brain microinjections of octopamine in honeybees. Learn Memory. 5:1998;146-156.
29. Sachse S., Rappert A., Galizia C.G. The spatial representation of chemical structures in the antennal lobe of honeybees: steps towards the olfactory code. Eur J Neurosci. 11:1999;3970-3982. Responses to five series of homologous aliphatic hydrocarbons are measured in honeybees. The results show that responses are fuzzy with respect to carbon-chain length and functional group, implying that only a pattern of glomerular activation is capable of accurately coding any of the tested odours. Furthermore, the arrangement of glomerular responses is not random with respect to their functional response: often neighbouring glomeruli have similar response profiles.
30. Mori K. Relation of chemical structure to specificity of response in olfactory glomeruli. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 5:1995;467-474.
31. Mori K., Nagao H., Yoshihara Y. The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information. Science. 286:1999;711-715.
32. Yokoi M., Mori K., Nakanishi S. Refinement of odor molecule tuning by dendrodendritic synaptic inhibition in the olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:1995;3371-3375.
33. Flanagan D., Mercer A.R. Morphology and response characteristics of neurones in the deutocerebrum of the brain in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol. 164:1989;483-494.
34. Fonta C., Sun X.J., Masson C. Morphology and spatial distribution of bee antennal lobe interneurones responsive to odours. Chem Senses. 18:1993;101-119.
35. Laurent G. A systems perspective on early olfactory coding. Science. 286:1999;723-728.
36. Wang F., Nemes A., Mendelsohn M., Axel R. Odorant receptors govern the formation of a precise topographic map. Cell. 93:1998;47-60.
37. Tsuboi A., Yoshihara S., Yamazaki N., Kasai H., Asai-Tsuboi H., Komatsu M., Serizawa S., Ishii T., Matsuda Y., Nagawa F., Sakano H. Olfactory neurons expressing closely linked and homologous odorant receptor genes tend to project their axons to neighboring glomeruli on the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci. 19:1999;8409-8418.
38. Stopfer M., Laurent G. Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics. Nature. 402:1999;664-668. Carefully measuring the responses of projection neurons to a series of odours in locusts, the authors show that, upon repeated stimulation, responses decrease in intensity but the remaining spikes increase their temporal precision. These results show that the antennal lobe circuits change, on a short-term basis, even in non-associative paradigms. This is possibly linked to a more precise, and thus more reliable, odour representation in the antennal lobe.
39. King J.R., Christensen T.A., Hildebrand J.G. Response characteristics of an identified, sexually dimorphic olfactory glomerulus. J Neurosci. 20:2000;2391-2399. See Update.