The EIT ICT Labs - Towards a leading european innovation initiative;Die EIT ICT Labs - Entwicklung einer Europäischen IKT Innovationsinitiative

IT - Information Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 288-295

  Heger, Tobias ^a   Bub, Udo ^a  

^a NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

EIT ICT Labs; European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT); K.4.m Computing Milieux: computers and society: Miscellaneous ; K.7.2 Computing Milieux: The Computing Profession: Organizations ; Knowledge Triangle

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS AND SOCIETIES; EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY ICT LAB; INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION INITIATIVES; K.4.; K.7.2 [COMPUTING MILIEU: THE COMPUTING PROFESSION: ORGANIZATION]; KNOWLEDGE TRIANGLE; M [COMPUTING MILIEU: COMPUTER AND SOCIETY: MISCELLANEOUS];

LABORATORIES;

EID: 84899046029     PISSN: 16112776     EISSN: 21967032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1524/itit.2012.0691     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ahn, S. 1995. A new program in cooperative research between academia and industry in Korea, involving Centers of Excellence. In: Technovation 15:241-257.
2. Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. In: Administration Science Quarterly 45:425-455.
3. Balconi, M. 2004. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. In: Research Policy 33(1): 127-145.
4. Barnes, T., Pashby, I., and Gibbons, A. 2002. Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects. In: European Management Journal 20:272-285.
5. Basole, R. C. and Rouse, W. B. 2008. Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation. In: IBM Systems Journal 47(1):53-70.
6. Batterink, M.H., Wubben, E. F. M., Klerkx, L., and Omta, S.W. F. 2010. Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector. In: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 22(1):47-76.
7. Berman, E.M. 1990. The economic impact of industry-funded university R&D. In: Research Policy 19:349-355.
8. Bonaccorsi, A. and Piccaluga, A. 1994. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of University-Industry Relationships. In: R & D Management 24(3):229-247.
9. Brennan, L. L. 2003. The View from the Ivory Tower: What Do University Alliances Offer Technology Firms? In: Academy of Management Executive 17:125-126.
10. Brenner, M. and Sandström, U. 2000. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. In: Research Policy 29:291-301.
11. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and Organization. In: Organization Science 12(2):198-213.
12. Bub, U. 2010. Partnering for Research and Development within an Open Innovation Framework. In: Applied Technology and Innovation Management, Arnold, H., Erner, M., Möckel, P., and Schläffer, C. (Eds.) Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, 48-58.
13. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.
14. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. 2002. Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. In: Management Science, 48.
15. Cowan, R., Jonard, N., and Zimmermann, J.-B. 2007. Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks. In: Management Science 53(7):1051-1067.
16. Dhanaraj, C. and Parkhe, A. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. In: Academy of Management Review 31(3):659-669.
17. Dodgson, M., Gann, D., and Salter, A. 2006. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. In: R&D Management 36(3):333-346.
18. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., and Labini, M. 2006. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'. In: Research Policy 35(10):1450-1464.
19. Doz, Y. L., Olk, P.M., and Smith Ring, P. 2000. Formation Processes of R&D Consortia: Which Path to Take? Where Does It Lead? In: Strategic Management Journal 21(3):239-266.
20. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., and Paua, F., (Eds.) 2003. The Global Information Technology Report 2002-2003: Readiness for the Networked World. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions, and organizations. Pinter, London, Washington.
22. EIT ICT Labs. 2011. Catalyst and Co-Funding Model. http:// eit.ictlabs.eu/ict-labs/catalyst-and-co-funding-model/. Accessed 04 May 2012.
23. EIT ICT Labs. 2011. European Institute of Innovation and Technology: Vision & Mission. http://eit.ictlabs.eu/ict-labs/visionmission/. Accessed 19 November 2011.
24. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. In: Research Policy 29:109-123.
25. European Commission. 1995. Green Paper on Innovation. COM (95) 688.
26. European Commission. 2008. Establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology. European Commission, Brussels, No. 294/2008. http://eit.europa.eu/fileadmin/Content/Downloads/ PDF/Official_documents/l_09720080409en00010012.pdf.
27. European Institute of Innovation and Technology. 2011. @Timeglider: EIT Timeline. http://timeglider.com/app/viewer.php?uid= line_4c3954fabb6f3e59211cb77a7952a368. Accessed 30 November 2011.
28. European Institute of Innovation and Technology. 2011. European Institute of Innovation and Technology: Overview. http:// eit.europa.eu/about/overview.html. Accessed 30 November 2011.
29. Faems, D., van Looy, B., and Debackere, K. 2005. Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3):238-250.
30. Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF). 2007. ICT 2020 - Research for Innovations, Bonn.
31. Freeman, C. 1994. The Eonomics of Technical Change: A Critical Survey. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 18:463-514.
32. Gassmann, O. 2006. Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. In: R&D Management 36(3):223-228.
33. George, G., Zahra, S. A., and Wood, D. R. 2002. The Effects of Business-University Alliances on Innovative Output and Financial Performance: A Study of Publicly Traded Biotechnology Companies. In: Journal of Business Venturing 17(6):577-609.
34. Gulati, R. 1999. Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation. In: Strategic Management Journal 20(5):397-420.
35. Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. In: Strategic Management Journal 14(5):371-385.
36. Hagedoorn, J. 2000. Research partnerships. In: Research Policy 29(4-5):567-586.
37. Hakansson, H. 1987. Product development in networks. In Technological development: A network approach, H. Hakansson, Ed. Croom Helm, New York, 84-128.
38. Hannan, T. J. 2009. Physicians need to understand the importance of information technology in the 21st century. In: Internal Medicine Journal 39(10):633-635.
39. Hausschildt, J. and Salomo, S. 2007. Innovationsmanagement. Franz Vahlen, Munich.
40. Heger, T. and Bub, U. 2012. Towards a Cyclic Capability Profile for Open Innovation Networks. Presented at. R&D Management Conference 2012. May 23rd-25th, Grenoble
41. Jungwirth, C. andMueller, E. 2010. The Sustainability of Clusters - Consequences of Different Governance Regimes of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cluster Initiatives. In: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 30(14).
42. Kadushin, C. 2012. Understanding Social Networks - Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Oxford University Press, New York.
43. Knoke, D. 1993. Networks of Elite Structure and DecisionMaking. In: Sociological Methods Research 22(1):23-45.
44. Kontos, G. 2004. Bewertung des Erfolgs von Unternehmensnetzwerken in der F&E. Dissertation. RWTH Aachen, Aachen.
45. Koschatzky, K. and Stahlecker, T. 2010. The emergence of new modes of R&D services in Germany. In: The Service Industries Journal 30(5):685-700.
46. Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. 2007. University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. In: International Journal of Management Reviews 9(4):259-280.
47. Porter, M. E. 1998. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. In: Harvard Business Review 76(6):77-90.
48. Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. In: Economic Development Quarterly 14(1):15-34.
49. Provan, K.G., Fish, A., and Sydow, J. 2007. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. In: Journal of Management 33(3):479-516.
50. Rigby, D. and Zook, C. 2002. Open-market Innovation. In: Harvard Business Review 80(10):80-89.
51. Roberts, E. B. and Liu, W. K. 2001. Ally or Acquire? How Technology Leaders Decide. In: MIT Sloan Management Review 43(1):56-82.
52. Rohrbeck, R. and Arnold, H. 2006. Making University-Industry Collaboration Work - A Case Study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories Contrasted with Findings in Literature. In: Proceedings of the XVII ISPIM Conference.
53. Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., and Gemünden, H.G. 2009. Opening up for competitive advantage - How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. In: R&DManagement 39(4):420-430.
54. Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. In: The Academy of Management Review 22(4):887-910.
55. Saxenian, A. L. 1994. Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
56. Soh, P.-H. and Roberts, E. 2005. Technology Alliances and Networks: An External Link to Research Capability. In: IEEE Trans. Eng. Management 52(4):419-428.
57. Solow, R. 1959. Technical change and the aggregate production function. In: Review of Economics and Statistics 39:312-320.
58. Sydow, J. 1992. Strategische Netzwerke. Evoluation und Gestaltung, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.
59. Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from Technological Innovation - Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. In: Research Policy 15(6):285-305.
60. Tijssen, R. J. W. and van Wiijk, E. 1999. In search of the European Paradox: an international comparison of Europe's scientific performance and knowledge flows in information and communication technologies research. In: Research Policy 28(5):519-543.
61. UNDP. 2001. Human Development Report 2001: Making new technology work for human development. Oxford University Press, New York.
62. Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston.