The pedagogical potential of interactive whiteboards 2.0

Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 491-505

  Schmid, Euline Cutrim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898565592     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch026     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Betcher, C. (2008). Smarboard lessons podcast. Lesson 100: Roundtable [Internet]. California: Chris Betcher. 2007. Retrieved May 2008 from http://pdtogo.com/smart/?p=115
2. Burden, K. (2002). Learning from the bottom up the contribution of school based practice and research in the effective use of interactive whiteboards for the FE/HE sector. Learning and Skills Research. Making an Impact Regionally Conference, The Earth Centre, Doncaster, United Kingdom.
3. Costinhas, V. (2007). The e-board project: An overview. Paper presented at the A 11a LABCI Conference. Sao Paulo, Brazil.
4. Cuthell, J. P. (2005). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teaching, learning and attainment. Proceedings of SITE 2005, pp. 1353-1355. AACE Phoenix, Arizona.
5. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2006). Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 47-62.
6. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2007). Enhancing Performance Knowledge and Self-Esteem in Classroom Language Learning: the Potential of the ACTIVote System Component of Interactive Whiteboard Technology. System, 35, 119-133.
7. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008a). Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom. Computers and Education, 50, 338-356.
8. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008b) Interactive whiteboards and the normalisation of CALL. To appear in R. de Cassia, V. Morriott, P. L. Torres (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-Learning methodologies for language acquisition. Idea Group Inc.
9. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008c). Facilitating wholeclass collaborative learning in the English language classroom: the potential of interactive whiteboard technology. In A. Müller-Hartmann & M. Ditfurth v-Schocker (Eds.), Aufgabenori-entiertes Lernen und Lehren mit Medien: Ansätze, Erfahrungen, Perspektiven in der Fremdsprachendidaktik (forthcoming).
10. Gillen, J., Kleine Staarman, J., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A "learning revolution"? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology 32(3), 243-256.
11. Goodison, T. (2002a). Learning with ICT at primary level: Students' perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning 18, 282-295.
12. Goodison, T. (2002b). Enhancing learning with ICT at primary level. British Journal of Educational Technology 33(2), 215-228.
13. Goodison, T. (2003). Integrating ICT in the classroom: A case study of two contrasting lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology 34(5), 549-566.
14. Gray, G., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R., & Tomkins, S. (2005). The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key stage 3 strategies and framework. Language Learning Journal, 32, 38-44.
15. Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboard. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2, 102-117.
16. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007) Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3).
17. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology 32(3), 213-225.
18. Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). Teacher education in CALL. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
19. King, K. P. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers and Education, 39, 283-297.
20. Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker, S., Tseng, C., & You, J. (2007). Expert-novice teacher mentoring in language learning technology. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.). Research in CALL teacher education (pp. 283-298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Moss, G., Carrey, J., Levaaic, Ros, Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The Interactive whiteboards pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the schools whiteboard expansion (SWE) project: London Challenge. Institute of Education.
22. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
23. Rüschoff, B. (2007) WEB 2.0: New perspectives for digital media in language learning? Paper presented at the EuroCALL 2007 conference, Granada, Spain.
24. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Slaya, H. S., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williamsb, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? Computers and Education, 51(3), 1321-1341.
26. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of the higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
27. Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupils' views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.
28. Walker, R. (2003). Interactive Whiteboards in the MFL classroom. TELL & CALL, 3, 14-16.
29. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, U.K.: Longman AddisonWesley.
31. Wegner, G. (2007). IWB 2.0: the interactive whiteboard meets the read/write web. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from: http://www.slideshare.net/grahamwegner/iwb2
32. Yap, J. (2006). The pulse: Education's place for debate blog. Classroom Vice Discussion. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://careercenter.districtadministration.com/pulse/commentpost.aspx?news=no&postid=17626