GnuTutor: An open source intelligent tutoring system based on AutoTutor

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-09-02, Issue , 2009, Pages 70-75

  Olney, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATED AGENTS; CLASSIFICATION ,; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; MIXED-INITIATIVE; NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; OPEN SOURCES; SPEECH ACTS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; EDUCATION COMPUTING; LINGUISTICS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 77954223115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Arya, A.; DiPaola, S.; Jefferies, L.; and Enns, J. 2006. Socially communicative characters for interactive applications. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (WSCG06).
2. Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Balci, K. 2005. Xface: Open source toolkit for creating 3d faces of an embodied conversational agent. In Smart Graphics, 263-266. Munich, Germany: Springer. (Pubitemid 41480511)
4. Black, A., and Lenzo, K. 2001. Flite: a small fast runtime synthesis engine. In 4th ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Speech Synthesis, 20-24. ISCA.
5. Bloom, B. S. 1984. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13(6):4-16.
6. Bratko, I. 1986. Prolog programming for artificial intelligence. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
7. Brill, E. 1992. A simple rule-based part of speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. ACL.
8. Cai, Z.; Graesser, A. C.; Millis, K. K.; Halpern, D. F.; Wallace, P. S.; Moldovan, C.; and Forsyth, C. 2009. Interactive event: Aries.
9. Cohen, P. R., and Perrault, C. R. 1979. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 3(3): 177-212.
10. Cohen, P. R. 1984. The pragmatics of referring and the modality of communication. Computational Linguistics 10(2):97-146.
11. Deerwester, S. C.; Dumais, S. T.; Furnas, G. W.; Landauer, T. K.; and Harshman, R. A. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 41(6):391-407.
12. Dodds, P., and Fletcher, J. D. 2004. Opportunities for new "smart" learning environments enabled by next generation web capabilities. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13(4):391-404.
13. Dumais, S. 1991. Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 23(2):229-236.
14. Falmagne, J.; Cosyn, E.; Doignon, J.; and Thiery, N. 2006. The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In Missaoui, R., and Schmid, J., eds., Formal Concept Analysis, volume 3874, 61. Dresden, Germany: Fourth International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis.
15. Fikes, R., and Nilsson, N. J. 1971. Strips: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artif. Intell. 2(3/4): 189-208.
16. Foltz, P.; Gilliam, S.; and Kendall, S. 2000. Supporting Content-Based Feedback in On-Line Writing Evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments 8(2):111-127.
17. Giles, J.; Wo, L.; and Berry, M. 2003. GTP (General Text Parser) software for text mining. In Bozdogan, H., ed., Statistical data mining and knowledge discovery. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 455-471.
18. Graesser, A.; Wiemer-Hastings, P.; Wiemer-Hastings, K.; Harter, D.; Tutoring Research Group, T.; and Person, N. 2000. Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Evaluate the Contributions of Students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments 8(2): 129-147.
19. Graesser, A. C.; VanLehn, K.; Rose, C.; Jordan, P.; and Harter, D. 2001a. Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22:39-51. (Pubitemid 34069154)
20. Graesser, A.; Person, N.; Harter, D.; et al. 2001b. Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(3):257-279.
21. Graesser, A. C.; Chipman, P.; Haynes, B.; and Olney, A. 2005a. AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education 48(4):612-618. (Pubitemid 41723893)
22. Graesser, A. C.; Olney, A. M.; Haynes, B. C.; and Chipman, P. 2005b. AutoTutor: A cognitive system that simulates a tutor that facilitiates learning through mixed-initiaive dialogue. In Forsythe, C.; Bernard, M. L.; and Goldsmith, T. E., eds., Cognitive Systems: Human Cognitive Models in Systems Design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Graesser, A. C.; Gordon, S. E.; and Brainerd, L. E. 1992. Quest: A model of question answering. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23:733-745.
24. Kawamoto, S.; Shimodaira, H.; Nitta, T.; Nishimoto, T.; Nakamura, S.; Itou, K.; Morishima, S.; Yotsukura, T.; Kai, A.; Lee, A.; et al. 2002. Opensource software for developing anthropomorphic spoken dialog agent. In Proc. of PRICAI-02, International Workshop on Lifelike Animated Agents, 64-69.
25. Koedinger, K.; Anderson, J.; Hadley, W.; and Mark, M. 1997. Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8(1):30-43.
26. Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. 1997. A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104:211-240. (Pubitemid 127055496)
27. Larsen, R. M. 1998. Lanczos bidiagonalization with partial reorthogonalization. Technical Report DAIMIPB-357, Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University.
28. Larsson, S., and Traum, D. 2000. Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit. Natural Language Engineering 6(3&4):323-340.
29. Larsson, S.; Ljunglöf, P.; Cooper, R.; Engdahl, E.; and Ericsson, S. 2000. GoDiS - an accomodating dialogue system. In Proceedings of the ANLP/NAACL 2000 Workshop on Conversational Systems, 7-10. Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics.
30. Lehoucq, R.; Sorensen, D.; and Yang, C. 1998. ARPACK users' guide: solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics.
31. Litman, D. J., and Allen, J. F. 1987. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversations. Cognitive Science 11(2):163-200.
32. Mancini, M.; Bresin, R.; and Pelachaud, C. 2007. A virtual head driven by music expressivity. IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing 15(6):1833.
33. Manning, C. D., and Schütze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. McTear, M. 1998. Modelling spoken dialogues with state transition diagrams: experiences with the CSLU toolkit. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Sydney, Australia: ISCA.
35. McTear, M. 2002. Spoken dialogue technology: enabling the conversational user interface. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 34(1):90-169.
36. Nuance. 1996. Nuance Speech Recognition System, Version 5, Developers Manual. Nuance Communications, Menlo Park, California.
37. Olde, B. A.; Franceschetti, D.; Karnavat, A.; and Graesser, A. C. 2002. The right stuff: Do you need to sanitize your corpus when using Latent Semantic Analysis? In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 708-713. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Olney, A.; Person, N.; Louwerse, M.; and Graesser, A. 2002. AutoTutor: A conversational tutoring environment. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Demonstration Session, 108-109. Philadelphia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
39. Olney, A.; Louwerse, M.; Mathews, E.; Marineau, J.; Hite-Mitchell, H.; and Graesser, A. 2003. Utterance classification in AutoTutor. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 03 Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using Natural Language Processing, 1-8. Philadelphia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
40. Rohde, D. 2007. SVDLIBC.
41. Schrder, M., and Hunecke, A. 2007. Mary tts participation in the blizzard challenge 2007. In Proc. Blizzard Challenge 2007.
42. Searle, J. R. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K., ed., Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 344-369.
43. Shoham, Y. 1994. Artificial intelligence techniques in Prolog. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
44. Sterling, L., and Shapiro, E. 1994. The art of Prolog: advanced programming techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
45. VanLehn, K.; Jordan, P.; Rose, C.; Bhembe, D.; Bottner, M.; Gaydos, A.; Makatchev, M.; Pappuswamy, U.; Ringenberg, M.; Roque, A.; et al. 2002. The architecture of Why2-Atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, volume 2363, 158-167. Springer.
46. VanLehn, K.; Graesser, A. C.; Jackson, G. T.; Jordan, P.; Olney, A.; and Rose, C. 2007. When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science 31:3-62.
47. VanLehn, K. 1988. Student modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 55-78.
48. Wisher, R. A., and Fletcher, J. D. 2004. The case for advanced distributed learning. Information & Security: An International Journal 14:17-25.
49. Zinn, C.; Moore, J.; and Core, M. 2002. A 3-tier planning architecture for managing tutorial dialogue. In ITS '02: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 574-584. London: Springer.