Latent semantic grammar induction: Context, projectivity, and prior distributions

HLT-NAACL 2007 - TextGraphs 2007: Graph-Based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 45-52

  Olney, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LATENT SEMANTICS; PART OF SPEECH; PRIOR DISTRIBUTION; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE;

GRAPHIC METHODS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84883271130     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Jerome R. Bellegarda. 2000. Large vocabulary speech recognition with multispan statistical language models. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(1):76-84.
2. Michael W. Berry, Susan T. Dumais, and Gavin W. O'Brien. 1995. Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, 37(4):573-595.
3. MichaelW. Berry. 1992. Large scale singular value computations. International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 6(1):13-49.
4. Eric Brill and Mitchell Marcus. 1992. Automatically acquiring phrase structure using distributional analysis. In Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Harriman, New York, pages 155-160, Philadelphia, February 23-26. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. John Carroll, Guido Minnen, and Ted Briscoe. 2003. Parser evaluation using a grammatical relation annotation scheme. In A. Abeill, editor, Treebanks: Building and Using Syntactically Annotated Corpora, chapter 17, pages 299-316. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6. Noam Chomsky. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague.
7. Noah Coccaro and Daniel Jurafsky. 1998. Towards better integration of semantic predictors in statistical language modeling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pages 2403-2406, Piscataway, NJ, 30th November-4th December. IEEE.
8. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
9. Michael A. Covington. 2001. A fundamental algorithm for dependency parsing. In John A. Miller and JefferyW. Smith, editors, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Association for Computing Machinery Southeast Conference, pages 95-102, Athens, Georgia.
10. Jane K. Cullum and Ralph A. Willoughby. 2002. Lanczos Algorithms for Large Symmetric Eigenvalue Computations, Volume 1: Theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
11. Scott C. Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, and Richard A. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391-407.
12. Yonggang Deng and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2003. Latent semantic information in maximum entropy language models for conversational speech recognition. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 56-63, Philadelphia, May 27-June 1. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Susan Dumais. 1991. Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 23(2):229-236.
14. Peter W. Foltz, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas K. Landauer. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2&3):285-308.
15. Zellig Harris. 1954. Distributional structure. Word, 10:140-162.
16. Richard A. Hudson. 1987. Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics, 23:109-132.
17. Dan Klein and ChristopherD.Manning. 2002. A generative constituent-context model for improved grammar induction. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 128-135, Philadelphia, July 7-12. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2004. Corpusbased induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency. In Proceedings of the 42nd AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 478-485, Philadelphia, July 21-26. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Dan Klein. 2005. The Unsupervised Learning of Natural Language Structure. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
20. Thomas K. Landauer and Susan T. Dumais. 1997. A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104:211-240.
21. Thomas. K. Landauer, Peter W. Foltz, and Darrell Laham. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2&3):259-284.
22. Rasmus M. Larsen. 1998. Lanczos bidiagonalization with partial reorthogonalization. Technical Report DAIMI PB-357, Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University.
23. Ryan McDonald, Fernando Pereira, Kiril Ribarov, and Jan Hajic. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 523-530, Philadelphia, October 6- 8. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Mark A. Paskin. 2001. Grammatical bigrams. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, pages 91-97.MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Vladimir Pericliev and Ilarion Ilarionov. 1986. Testing the projectivity hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 56-58, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Hinrich Schütze. 1995. Distributional part-of-speech tagging. In Proceedings of the 7th European Association for Computational Linguistics Conference (EACL-95), pages 141-149, Philadelphia, March 27- 31. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Zach Solan, David Horn, Eytan Ruppin, and Shimon Edelman. 2005. Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102:11629-11634.
28. Menno M. van Zaanen. 2000. ABL: Alignment-based learning. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 961- 967, Philadelphia, July 31-August 4. Association for Computational Linguistics.
29. Peter Wiemer-Hastings and Iraide Zipitria. 2001. Rules for syntax, vectors for semantics. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1112-1117, Mahwah, NJ, August 1-4. Erlbaum.