An orthonormal basis for entailment

Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS 2005 - Recent Advances in Artifical Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 554-559

  Olney, Andrew ^a   Cai, Zhiqiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTAILMENT; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; VECTOR SPACE MODEL;

SEMANTICS; VECTORS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 32844474422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. th edition. New York: John Wiley.
2. van Dijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
3. Dumais, S. 1993. LSI Meets TREC: A Status Report. In Proceedings of the First Text Retrieval Conference (TREC1), 137-152. NIST Special Publication 500-207.
4. Foltz, P.W.; Kintsch, W.; and Landauer, TK. 1998. The measurement of textual Cohesion with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25: 285-307.
5. th, 2003. http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logistic
6. Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Syntax and Semantics 3: 41-58. New York: Academic.
7. Halliday, M. A. and Hassan, R. A., 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
8. Hu, X.; Cai, Z.; Louwerse, M.; Olney, A.; Penumatsa, P.; and Graesser, A. 2003. An improved LSA algorithm to evaluate contributions in student dialogue. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), 1489-1491.
9. Landauer, T. and Dumais, S. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104:211-240.
10. Lennat, D. 1995. CYC: a large scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38(11): 33-38.
11. Lennat, D.; Miller, G.; and Yokoi, T. 1995. CYC, Wordnet, and EDR: critiques and responses. Communications of the ACM 38(11): 45-48.
12. Manning, C. and Schütze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Miller, G. 1995. Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11): 39-41.
14. PASCAL. 2004. Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. Accessed on October 4th, 2004. http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE/
15. Salomaa, A. 1985. Computation and Automata. In Rota, G. C. (ed) The Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Volume 25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Singh, P.; Lin, T.; Mueller E.; Lim, G.; Perkins, T.; and Zhu, W. 2002. Open Mind Common Sense: Knowledge acquisition from the general public. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Ontologies, Databases, and Applications of Semantics for Large Scale Information Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
17. Swets J.; Tanner W.; and Birdsall T. 1961. Decision processes in perception. Psychological Review, 68(5): 301340.
18. th, 2004 http://lsa.colorado.edu/spaces.html