Implementing information technology governance: Models, practices and cases

Implementing Information Technology Governance: Models, Practices and Cases

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-255

  van Grembergen, Wim ^a,b   De Haes, Steven ^a,b   Thorp, John ^c  

^a ANTWERP MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (Belgium)

^b The Thorp Network Inc ^*  (Belgium)

^c Thorp Network Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898551553     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-924-3     Document Type: Book

References (100)

1. Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2003). Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & Management, 41(8), 1003-1020.
2. Burn, J.M., & Szeto, C. (2000). A comparison of the views of business and IT management on success factors for strategic alignment. Information & Management, 37(4), 197-216.
3. Broadbent, M., & Weill, P. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
4. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12).
5. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L.M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8).
6. Callahan, J., & Keyes, D. (2003). The evolution of IT Governance at NB Power. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
7. Carr, N.G. (2003). IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 41-49.
8. Croteau, A.M., & Bergeron, F. (2001). An information technology trilogy: Business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10, 77-99.
9. Duffy, J. (2002a). IT/Business alignment: Is it an option or is it mandatory? IDC document # 26831, IT and Business Alignment Advisory service.
10. Duffy, J. (2002b). IT Governance and Business Value Part 1: IT Governance - An issue of critical importanc. IDC document # 27291.
11. Duffy, J. (2002c). IT governance and business value Part 2: Who's responsible for what? IDC document # 27807.
12. Dutta, S. (1996). Linking IT and business strategy: The role and responsibility of senior management. European Management Journal, 14(3), 255-268.
13. Earl, J.M. (1993). Experiences in strategic information systems planning. MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 1-24.
14. Epstein, M.J., & Roy, M.J. (2004). How does your board rate? Now you can use a balanced scorecard to measure and improve corporate board performance. Strategic Finance, February, 25-31.
15. Evans, B. (2003). Business technology: IT is a must, no matter how you view it. Information Week, May 19, 74.
16. Feurer, R., Chaharbaghi, K., Weber, M., & Wargin, J. (2000). Aligning strategies, processes and IT: A case study. Information Systems Management, 23-34.
17. GAO (2005). Chief information, responsibilities and information and technology governance at leading private-sector companies. Retrieved from www.gao.gov.
18. Guldentops, E. (2003). Governing information technology through COBIT. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
19. Guldentops, E., & De Haes, S. (2002). COBIT 3rd Edition usage survey: Growing acceptance of COBIT. Information Systems Control Journal, 6.
20. Guldentops, E., Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2002). Control and governance maturity survey: establishing a reference benchmark and a self-assessment tool. Information Systems Control Journal, 6.
21. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.
22. Hatzakis, T. (2004). A social capital approach to IT relationship management evaluation. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
23. Henderson, J.C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1).
24. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N., & Oldach, S. (1993). Continuous strategic alignment: Exploiting iformation technology capabilities for competitive success. European Management Journal, 11(2), 139-149.
25. Hirschheim, R., & Sabherwal, R. (2001). Detours in the path toward strategic information systems alignment. California Management Review, 44(1), 86-108.
26. ITGI (2003). Board briefing on IT governance (2nd ed.). www.itgi.org.
27. ITGI (2005). COBIT 4.0. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
28. ITGI (2006a). Enterprise value: Governanace of IT investments, The Val IT framework. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
29. ITGI (2006b). Enterprise value: Governance of IT investments. The Business case. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
30. ITGI (2006c). IT Governance Global Status Report. Report published by ITGI and PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
31. ITGI (2006d). IT control objectives for Sarbanes-Oxley (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
32. ITGI (2006e). COBIT mapping: Overview of international IT guidance (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
33. Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. (2001). IS/IT governance: Need for an integrated model. Corporate Governance, 1(9), 9-11.
34. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
35. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translation vision into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Lie, C. L. (2001). Modelling the business value of information technology. Information & Management, 39(2), 191-210.
37. Luftman, J. (2000). Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Communications of AIS, 4(14).
38. Luftman, J. (2002).AchievingAlignment Détente. CIO Insight, July. Retrieved from http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,3959,325354,00.asp.
39. Luftman, J., & Brier, T. (1999). Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. California Management Review, 42(1), 109-122.
40. Maes R. (1999). Reconsidering information management through a generic framework. PrimaVera Working Paper (pp. 99-15).
41. Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Nolan, R., & McFarlan, F.W. (2005). Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 96-106.
43. OGC (Office of Government Commerce). About ITIL. Retrieved May 2005, from www.ogc.gov.uk.
44. Parker, M. (1995). Strategic transformation and information technology. London: Prentice Hall.
45. Parker, M., Benson, R., & Trainor, H. (1988). Information economics: Linking business performance to information technology. London: Prentice Hall.
46. Patel, N.V. (2003). An emerging strategy for e-business IT Governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
47. Peterson, R. R. (2003). Information strategies and tactics for information technology governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
48. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
49. Porter, M. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62-78.
50. Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, March, 81-113.
51. Ribbers, P., Peterson, R., & Parker, M. (2002). Designing information technology governance processes: Diagnosing contemporary practises and competing theories. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International.
52. Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Rockart, J. (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 81-93.
53. Rockart, J. (1982). The changing role of the information systems executive: A critical success factors perspective. Sloan Management Review, 245(1).
54. Rockart, J.F., Earl, M.J., & Ross, J.W. (1996). Eight imperatives for the new IT organization: Guidelines for IT managers who are trying to respond to business and technological changes, assume new roles, and build relationships with line managers. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 43-55.
55. Ross, J.W., & Weill, P. (2002). Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn't make. Harvard Business Review, 80(11), 84-92.
56. Sabherwal, R., & Chan, Y. (2001). Alignment between business and IS strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers and defenders. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 11-33.
57. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R.W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261-290.
58. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, W. (1997). A survey on corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2).
59. Smaczny, T. (2001). Is an alignment between business and information technology the appropriate paradigm to manage IT in today's organizations? Management Decisions, 39(10), 797-802.
60. Sohal, A.S., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2002). IT governance and management in large Australian organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 75, 97-112.
61. Strassman, P. (1990). The business value of computers. New Canaan, CT: The Information Economics Press.
62. Teo, S.H.T., & Ang, J.S.K. (1999). Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans. International Journal of Information Management, 19, 173-185.
63. Van Der Zee, J.T.M., & De Jong, B. (1999). Alignment is not enough: Integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 137-156.
64. Van Grembergen, W. (2000). The balanced scorecard and IT governance. Information Systems Control Journal, 2.
65. Van Grembergen, W. (2002). Introduction to the minitrack: IT governance and its mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
66. Van Grembergen, W., & Amelinckx, I. (2003). Measuring and managing ebusiness initiatives through the balanced scorecard. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
67. Van Grembergen, W., & Van Bruggen, R. (1997). Measuring and improving corporate information technology through the balanced scorecard technique. In Proceedings of the European Conference on the Evaluation of Information Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
68. Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2005). Measuring and improving IT governance through the balanced scorecard. Information Systems Control Journal, 2.
69. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Amelinckx, I. (2003). Using COBIT and the balanced scorecard as instruments for service level management. Information Systems Control Journal, 4.
70. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Guldentops, E. (2003). Structures, processes and relational mechanisms for IT governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology hovernance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
71. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Moons, J. (2005). IT Governance: linking business goals to IT goals and COBIT processes. Information Systems Control Journal, 4.
72. Van Grembergen, W., Kritis V., & Van Belle, J.-L. (1997). Bedrijfsveranderingen met informatietechnologie (Business transformations through information technology). The Netherlands: Kluwer, Deventer.
73. Van Grembergen, W., Saull, R., & De Haes, S. (2003). Linking the IT Balanced scorecard to the Business Objectives at a major Canadian Financial Group. Journal for Information Technology Cases and Applications (JITCA), 5(1).
74. Venkatraman, N. (1999). Valuing the IS contribution to the business. Computer Sciences Corporation.
75. Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
76. Weill, P., & Woodham, R. (2002). Don't just lead, govern: Implementing effective IT governance. (CISR WP No. 326). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
77. Weiss, J.W., & Anderson, D. (2004). Aligning technology and business strategy: Issues and frameworks, A field study of 15 companies. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
78. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (1992) Internal control: Integrated framework. Retrieved from www.coso.org.
79. ITGI (2005). COBIT 4.0. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
80. ITGI (2006). IT control objectives for Sarbanes-Oxley (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
81. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Moons, J. (2005). IT governance: Linking business goals to IT goals and COBIT processes. Information Systems Control Journal, 4.
82. Van Grembergen, W., Saull, R., & De Haes, S. (2003). Linking the IT Balanced scorecard to the Business Objectives at a major Canadian Financial Group. Journal for Information Technology Cases and Applications (JITCA), 5(1).
83. Venkatraman, N. (1999). Valuing the IS contribution to the business. Computer Sciences Corporation.
84. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 368-386. Carnegie Mellon Software engineering Institute. Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Retrieved from www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/.
85. Henderson, J.C., &Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1).
86. IBM. Rational Unified Process (RUP). Retrieved from www.ibm.com.
87. ITGI (2003). Board briefing on IT governance (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
88. ITGI (2005). COBIT 4.0. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
89. Luftman, J. (2002).AchievingAlignment Détente. CIO Insight, July. Retrieved from http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,3959,325354,00.asp.
90. Microsoft. Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF). Retrieved from www.microsoft.com/mof.
91. Parker, M. (1995). Strategic transformation and information technology. London: Prentice Hall.
92. Patel, N.V. (2003). An emerging strategy for e-business IT Governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
93. Peterson, R. R. (2003). Information strategies and tactics for information technology governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
94. Ribbers, P., Peterson, R., & Parker, M. (2002). Designing Information Technology Governance Processes: Diagnosing Contemporary Practises and Competing Theories. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
95. Romano, P. L. (Ed.). (1994). Activity-based management in action. Montvale, 160.
96. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Guldentops, E. (2003). Structures, processes and relational mechanisms for IT governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
97. Van Grembergen, W., Saull, R., & De Haes, S. (2003). Linking the IT Balanced scorecard to the Business Objectives at a major Canadian Financial Group. Journal for Information Technology Cases and Applications (JITCA), 5(1).
98. Weill, P., & Woodham, R. (2002). Don't just lead, govern: Implementing effective IT governance. (CISR WP No. 326). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
99. ITGI (2005). COBIT 4.0. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.
100. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Moons, J. (2005). IT governance: Linking business goals to IT goals and COBIT processes. Information Systems Control Journal, 4.