Whose claim is legitimate anyway? Negotiating power in inter-agency collaboration

Legitimacy and Trust in Criminal Law, Policy and Justice: Norms, Procedures, Outcomes

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 111-128

  Laenen, Freya Vander ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898500915     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Apostel, L. 1985. Paradoxen van de welzijnszorg: een driefrontenoorlog. In Interventierecht. Bijdragen tot de studiedag georganiseerd n.a.v. het emeritaat van Prof. Dr. G. De Bock op 5 oktober 1984 ed. Seminarie en Laboratorium voor Jeugdwelzijn en Volwassenenvorming. Malle: De Sikkel, 29-48.
2. Bales, W.D. and Piquero, A.R. 2012. Assessing the impact of imprisonment on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 71-101.
3. Barton, A. 1999a. Breaking the crime/drugs cycle: The birth of a new approach? The Howard Journal, 38(2), 144-57.
4. Barton, A. 1999b. Sentenced to treatment? Criminal justice orders and the health service. Critical Social Policy, 19(4), 463-83.
5. Barton, A. and Quinn, C. 2006. Risk management of groups or respect for the individual? Issues of information sharing and confidentiality in drug treatment and testing orders. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 9(1), 35-43.
6. Belgian Criminal Code (Belgisch Strafwetboek) of 8 June 1867 [Online]. Available at: http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=nl&la=N&cn=1867060801&table_name=wet [accessed: 5 March 2013].
7. Bellamy, C., Raab, C., Warren, A. and Heeney, C. 2006. Institutional shaping of interagency working: Managing tensions between collaborative working and client confidentiality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 405-34.
8. Bianchi, E.C. and Brockner, J. 2012. In the eyes of the beholder? The role of dispositional trust in judgments of procedural and interactional fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 46-59.
9. Bond, B.J. and Gittell, J.H. 2010. Cross-agency coordination of offender reentry: Testing collaboration outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 118-29.
10. Bottoms, A. and Tankebe, J. 2012. Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119-70.
11. Boyer, R., Carry, C., Chailonick, P., Friess, J., Gerey, N., Lecamp, M., Oddou, A., Roguin, G. and Rome, I. 2002. Toxicomanies et Lois: Controverses. Paris: L'Harmattan.
12. Bull, M. 2005. A comparative review of best practice guidelines for the diversion of drug related offenders. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(4), 223-34.
13. Bullock, T. 2003. Changing levels of drug use before, during and after imprisonment, in Prisoners' Drug Use and Treatment: Seven Research Studies, edited by M. Ramsay. London: Home Office, 23-47.
14. Chuang, E. and Wells, R. 2010. The role of inter-agency collaboration in facilitating receipt of behavioral health services for youth involved with child welfare and juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1814-1822.
15. Colman, C., De Ruyver, B., Vander Laenen, F., Vanderplasschen, W., Broekaert, E., De Keulenaer, S. and Thomaes, S. 2011. De Drugbehandelingkamer: een Andere Manier van Afhandelen. Het Pilootproject Geëvalueerd. Antwerpen: Maklu.
16. Compton, M.T., Neubert, B.N.D., Broussard, B., McGriff, J.A., Morgan, R. and Oliva, J.R. 2011. Use of force preferences and perceived effectiveness of actions among crisis intervention team (CIT) police officers and non-CIT officers in escalating psychiatric crisis involving a subject with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(4), 737-45.
17. Davidov, D.M., Nadroff, M.R., Jack, S.M. and Coben, J.H. 2012. Nurse home visitors' perspectives of mandatory reporting of children's exposure to intimate partner violence to child protection agencies. Public Health Nursing, 29(5), 412-26.
18. De Ruyver, B., Lemaître, A., Schoenaers, F., Vander Laenen, F., Ponsaers, P. and Pauwels, L. 2009. Onderzoek naar essentiële en bijkomende randvoorwaarden voor interactie justitie en drughulpverlening. Gent: Academia Press.
19. De Wree, E., De Ruyver, B. and Pauwels, L. 2009. Criminal justice responses to drug offences: Recidivism following the application of alternative sanctions in Belgium. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 16, 550-60.
20. De Wree, E., Pauwels, L., Colman, C. and De Ruyver, B. 2009. Alternative sanctions for drug users: Fruitless efforts or miracle solution? Crime, Law and Social Change, 52, 513-25.
21. Dickinson, H. and Glasby, J. 2010. 'Why partnership working doesn't work'. Pitfalls, problems and possibilities in English health and social care. Public Management Review, 12(6), 811-28.
22. Dirks, K.T. and Ferrin, D.L. 2001. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organizational Science, 12(4), 450-67.
23. Fletcher, B.W., Lehman, W.E.K., Wexler, H.K., Melnick, G., Taxman, F.S. and Young, D.W. 2009. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103S, 554-64.
24. Freeman, K. 2002. New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: Health, Well-Being and Participant Satisfaction. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
25. Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control, Crime and Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Geenens, K., Colpaert, K., Balthazar, T., Vander Laenen, F. and De Ruyver, B. 2005. Samenwerking en communicatie van cliëntinformatie binnen de hulpverlening en met de justitiële sector: wettelijke randvoorwaarden, in Tussen droom en daad: implementatie van case management voor druggebruikers binnen de hulpverlening en justitie, edited by K. Geenens et al. Gent: Academia Press, 191-241.
27. Glasby, J., Dickinson, H. and Smith, J. 2010. 'Creating NHS Local': The relationship between English local government and the National Health Service. Social Policy and Administration, 44(3), 244-64.
28. Hancock, T.U. and Waites, C. 2012. Facing structural inequality: Students' orientation to oppression and practice with oppressed groups. Journal of Social Work education, 48(1), 5-23.
29. Heale, P. and Lang, E. 2001. A process evaluation of the CREDIT (court referral and evaluation for drug intervention and treatment) pilot programme. Drug and Alcohol Review, 20(2), 223-30.
30. Henderson, C.E., Young, D.W., Jainchill, N., Hawke, J., Farkas, S. and Davis, R.M. 2007. Program use of effective drug abuse treatment practices for juvenile offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 279-90.
31. Holloway, K., Bennett, T. and Farrington, D. 2005. The Effectiveness of Criminal Justice and Treatment Programmes in Reducing Drug-Related Crime: A Systematic Review. London: Home Office, Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
32. Huq, A.Z., Tyler, T.R. and Schulhofer, S.J. 2011. Why does the public cooperate with law enforcement? The influence of the purposes and targets of policing. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17(3), 419-50.
33. Irvine, R., Kerridge, I., Mcphee, J. and Freeman, S. 2002. Interprofessionalism and ethics: Consensus or clash of cultures? Journal of Interprofessional care, 16(3), 199-210.
34. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quiton, P. and Tyler, T.R. 2012. Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051-1071.
35. Kamer. 2011. Verslag namens de Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, De behandeling van seksueel misbruik en feiten van pedofilie binnen een gezagsrelatie, inzonderheid binnen de Kerk. GeDr. St. Kamer, 31 maart 2011, DOC 53 0520/002.
36. Kanato, M. 2008. Drug use and health among prison inmates. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 21, 252-4.
37. Lasker, R.D., Weiss, E.S. and Miller, R. 2001. Partnership Synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179-205.
38. Liebling, A. 2011. Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 484-99.
39. Liebling, A. and Arnold, H. 2012. Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(5), 413-24.
40. Lough, G. 1997. Law enforcement and harm reduction: mutually exclusive or mutually compatible. International journal of Drug Policy, 9(3), 169-73.
41. Marlowe, D. 2003. Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. Science and Practice Perspectives, 2(1), 4-14.
42. McGrath, R.J., Cumming, G. and Holt, J. 2002. Collaboration among sex offender treatment providers and probation and parole officers: The beliefs and behaviours of treatment providers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(1), 49-65.
43. Mcleod, J. and Stewart, G. 1999. Evaluation of the Drug Diversion Pilot Programme: A Report Prepared for the Drugs and Health Protection Services Branch. Victoria: Public Health Division, Department of Human Services.
44. McSweeney, T., Stevens, A., Hunt, N. and Turnbull, P. 2007. Twisting arms or a helping hand? Assessing the impact of 'coerced' and comparable 'voluntary' drug treatment options. British Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 470-90.
45. McSweeney, T., Turnbull, P. and Hough, M. 2002. Review of Criminal Justice Interventions for Drug Users in Other Countries. London: Criminal policy research unit.
46. McSweeney, T., Turnbull, P. and Hough, M. 2008. The Treatment and Supervision of Drug Dependent Offenders: A Review of the Literature Prepared for the UK Drug Policy Commission. London: UK Drug Policy Commission.
47. Mears, D.P., Cochran, J.C. and Bales, W.D. 2012. Gender differences in the effects of prison on recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 370-78.
48. Mears, D.P, Winterfield, L., Hunsaker, J., Moore, G.E. and White, R.M. 2002. Drug Treatment in the Criminal Justice System: The Current State of Knowledge. Washington D.C.: Urban institute Justice policy center.
49. Morrissey, J.P., Fagan, J.A. and Cocozza, J.J. 2009. New models of collaboration between criminal justice and mental health systems: Commentary. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(11), 1211-1213.
50. Nash, B. 2005. Developing Drug Service Policies. Briefing No. 8: Working in Partnership. London: Drugscope.
51. Pavis, S., Constable, H. and Masters, H. 2003. Multi-agency, multi-professional work: Experiences from a drug prevention project. Health education Research. Theory & Practice, 18(6), 717-28.
52. Peters, R. and Wexler, H. 2005. Substance Abuse Treatment for Adults in the Criminal justice System. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services.
53. Purdy, J.M. 2012. A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72, 409-17.
54. Richardson, S. and Asthana, S. 2006. Inter-agency information sharing in health and social care services: The role of professional culture. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 657-69.
55. Roach, K. 1999. Four models of the criminal process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(2), 671-84.
56. Robinson, M. and Cottrell, D. 2005. Health professionals in multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams: Changing professional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(6), 547-60.
57. Salmon, G. and Rapport, F. 2005. Multi-agency voices: A thematic analysis of multi-agency working practices within the setting of a child and adolescent mental health service. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(5), 429-43.
58. Scull, A. 2006. Power, social control and psychiatry: Some critical reflections, in Perspectives on Punishment: The Contours of Control, edited by S. Armstrong and L. McAra. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197-216.
59. Seddon, T. 2007. Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(3), 269-86.
60. Sidman, M. 1989. Coercion and its Fallout. Boston: Authors Cooperative, Inc.
61. Schwalbe, C.S. and Maschi, T.M. 2012. Probation officers' perspectives on interagency collaboration for juvenile offender with mental health problems. Psychiatric Services, 63(8), 830-33.
62. Sparks, J.R. and Bottoms, A.E. 1995. Legitimacy and order in prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 45-62.
63. Stevens, A., Berto, D., Heckmann, W., Kerschl, V., Oeuvray, K., Van Ooyan, M., Steffan, E. and Uchtenhagen, A. 2005. Quasi-compulsory treatment of drug depend offenders: An international literature review. Substance Use & Misuse, 40(3), 269-83.
64. Stuart, H. 2012. United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A roadmap for change. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25(5), 365-9.
65. Svensson, K. 2003. Social work in the criminal justice system: An ambiguous exercise of caring power. Journal of Scandinavian studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 4, 84-100.
66. Taplin, S. 2002. The New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: A Process Evaluation. NSW Bureau of crime and statistics and research.
67. Todts, S. 2004. De drugwet en de hulpverlening: LAT-relatie of shotgun wedding?, Orde van de Dag, 26, 5-18.
68. Treloar, C., Abelson, J., Cao, W., Brener, L., Kippax, S. and Schultz, L. 2004. Barriers and Incentives to Treatment for Illicit Drug Users. Australia: Australian Government.
69. Turnbull, P., McSweeney, T., Webster, R., Edmunds, M. and Hough, M. 2000. An Evaluation of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders. Final Evaluation Report. London: Home Office.
70. Tyler, T.R. (ed.) 2007. Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: International Perspectives. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
71. Tyler, T.R. 2012. Justice and effective cooperation. Social Justice Research, 25(4), 355-75.
72. Van Damme, A. and Pauwels, L. 2012. Explaining support for vigilantism and punitiveness: Assessing the role of perceived procedural fairness, ethnocentrism, authoritarianism and anomia, in Social Conflicts, Citizens and Policing: Governance of Security Research Papers Series, edited by M. Cools et al. Antwerp-Apeldoorn: Maklu, 31-54.
73. Vander Laenen, F. 2011. The end of the affair? Het beroepsgeheim in de samenwerking tussen justitie en de hulpverlening. Panopticon, 32(4), 1-11.
74. Vander Laenen, F., Vandam, L. and Colman, C. 2010. Met velen aan de tafel: Goede voorbeelden van een integraal en geïntegreerd drugbeleid. Tijdschrift Verslaving, 6(4), 54-71.
75. Vander Laenen, F. Vander Beken, T. and De Bie, M. 2012. Strafrecht en welzijnswerk, in Handboek Forensisch Welzijnswerk, Ontwikkeling, Beleid, Organisatie en Praktijk, edited by R. Roose, F., Vander Laenen, I., Aertssen, I. and L. van Garsse. Gent: Academia Press, 3-25.
76. Vander Laenen, F., De Ruyver, B., Vanderplasschen, W., Ansseau, M., Smet, V., De Maeyer, J., Buckinx, M. and Van Audenhove, S. 2012. Analysis and Optimazation of Substitution Treatment in Belgium. Summary (draft report). Ghent: Ghent University.
77. van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T.R. and Jost, J.T. 2011. More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 127-38.
78. Verenging voor Alcohol en andere Drugproblemen (VAD) 2012. Juridische Handvaten voor de Hulpverlener bij het rapporteren aan politie en justitie bij doorverwijzing van meerderjarige druggebruikers. Brussels: VAD.
79. Weiss, I. 2005. Is there a global common core to social work? A cross-national comparative study of BSW graduate students. Social Work, 50(2), 101-10.
80. Wenzel, S.L., Longshore, D., Turner, S. and Ridgely, M.S. 2001. Drug courts - A bridge between criminal justice and health services. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(3), 241-53.
81. Wenzel, S.L., Turner, S.F. and Ridgely, M.S. 2004. Collaborations between drug court and service providers: Characteristics and challenges. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(3), 253-63.
82. Williams, I. 2009. Offender health and social care: A review of evidence on interagency collaboration. Health and Social Care in the Community, 17(6), 573- 80.
83. Wong, K.C. 2001. Federalization of local criminal procedures: A study of conflict in values and process. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 29, 203-35.