Alternative sanctions for drug users: Fruitless efforts or miracle solution?

Crime, Law and Social Change

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 513-525

  de Wree, Eveline ^a   Pauwels, Lieven ^b   Colman, Charlotte ^a   de Ruyver, Brice ^a  

^a IRCP   (Belgium)

^b SVA   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350613239     PISSN: 09254994     EISSN: 15730751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-009-9206-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Inciardi, J., Martin, S., & Butzin, C. (2004). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 88-106.
2. Piquero, N. (2003). A recidivism analysis of Maryland's community probation program. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 295-307.
3. Stanford, J., & Arrigo, B. (2005). Lifting the Cover on Drug Courts: evaluation finding and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 3, 239-259.
4. Wilson, D., & Fowles, T. (2004). Drug treatment and testing orders: reconviction rates. The Howard Journal, 43, 93-98.
5. Goldkamp, J., White, M., & Robinson, J. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 27-72.
6. Peersen, M. (2004). Predicting re-offending: a 5-year prospective study on Icelandic prison inmates. Psychology, Crime and Law, 197-204.
7. Wartna B, Nijssen L. National studies on recidivism: an inventory of large-scale recidivism research in 33 European Countries. Memorandum 2006-2, WODC.
8. Kyvsgaard, B. (2003). The criminal career. Cambridge: University Press.
9. Ruefli, T., & Rogers, S. (2004). How do drug users define their progress in harm reduction programs? Qualitative research to develop user-generated outcomes. Harm Reduction Journal.
10. Bieleman, B. e.a. (2002). Opgevangen onder drang. Groningen, Intraval.
11. Krenz, S. (2004). French version of the addiction severity index (5th edn.): validity and reliability among Swiss opiate-dependent patients. European Addiction Research, 173-179.
12. Swanborn, P. (1999). Evalueren. Amsterdam: Boom.
13. Sherman, L. (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. London: Routledge.
14. Beyens, K. (2000). Straffen als sociale praktijk. Brussel: VUB.
15. Vander Laenen, F. (2004). De nieuwe Ministeriële Omzendbrief voor druggebruikers. Het vervolgingsbeleid laat er zich niet door leiden. Panopticon, 25(5), 9-30.
16. Kyvsgaard, B. (2000). Supervision of offenders: can an old-fashioned service system be of any service in the case of present-day offenders. Journal of Scandinavian studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1, 73-86.
17. Zanis, D. e.a. (2003). The effectiveness of early parole to substance abuse treatment facilities on 24-month criminal recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 223-235.
18. Inciardi, J. (2004). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 88-106.
19. MackKenzie, D. (2002). The impact of formal and informal social controls on the criminal activities of probationers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 243-276.
20. King, R., & Wincup, E. (2008). Doing research on crime and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Wild, T., Roberts, A., & Cooper, E. (2002). Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research, 84-93.
22. Spohn, C. e.a. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: the results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 149-176.
23. Hepburn, J., & Griffin, M. (2004). The effect of social bonds on successful adjustment to probation: an event history analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 46-75.
24. De Li, S., & Layton MacKenzie, D. (2003). The gendered effects of adult social bonds on the criminal activities of probationers. Criminal Justice Review, 28(2), 278-298.