More ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 179-190

  Bridger, Emma K ^a   Bader, Regine ^a,b   Mecklinger, Axel ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Absolute familiarity; Event related potentials; FN400; Mirror effect; N400; Recollection; Relative familiarity; Word frequency

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE FAMILIARITY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; RELATIVE FAMILIARITY; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION; TIME; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898479259     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Addante R.J., Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. NeuroImage 2012, 62(1):439-450.
2. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database [webcelex] 1995, University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
3. Bader R., Mecklinger A., Hoppstädter M., Meyer P. Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroImage 2010, 50(2):772-781.
4. Balota D.A., Burgess G.C., Cortese M.J., Adams D.R. The word-frequency mirror effect in young, old, and early-stage Alzheimer[U+05F3]s disease: Evidence for two processes in episodic recognition performance. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46(1):199-226.
5. Bowles B., Crupi C., Mirsattari S.M., Pigott S.E., Parrent A.G., Pruessner J.C., et al. Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:16382-16387.
6. Bridger E.K., Bader R., Kriukova O., Unger K., Mecklinger A. The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400. NeuroImage 2012, 63:1334-1342.
7. Brysbaert M., Buchmeier M., Conrad M., Jacobs A.M., Bölte J., Böhl A. The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology 2011, 58(5):412-424.
8. Coane J.H., Balota D.A., Dolan P.O., Jacoby L.L. Not all sources of familiarity are created equal: The case of word frequency and repetition in episodic recognition. Memory & Cognition 2011, 39(5):791-805.
9. Cook G.I., Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L. The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:240-250.
10. Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28(6):923-938.
11. DeCarlo L.T. The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33(1):18-33.
12. Dien J., Santuzzi A.M. Application of repeated measures ANOVA to high-density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. Event-related potentials: A methods handbook 2005, 1-73. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T.C. Handy (Ed.).
13. Ecker U.H., Zimmer H.D., Groh-Bordin C. The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory. Brain Research 2007, 1185:221-230.
14. Glanzer M., Adams J.K. The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16(1):5-16.
15. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1983, 55:468-484.
16. Gruber M.J., Otten L.J. Voluntary control over prestimulus activity related to encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(29):9793-9800.
17. Heister J., Würzner K.-M., Bubenzer J., Pohl E., Hanneforth T., Geyken A., et al. dlexDB - eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung [dlexDB - a lexical database for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau 2011, 62:10-20.
18. Hintzman D.L. On explaining the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20(1):201-205.
19. Hintzman D.L., Curran T. Retrieval dynamics of Recognition and Frequency Judgments: Evidence for Separate Processes of Familiarity and Recall. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:1-18.
20. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
21. Jäger T., Mecklinger A., Kipp K.H. Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron 2006, 52(3):535-545.
22. Jasper H.H. Report of the Committee on Methods of Clinical Examination in Electroencephalography. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1958, 10:371-375.
23. Joordens S., Hockley W.E. Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1534-1555.
24. Kriukova O., Bridger E.K, Mecklinger A. Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Cognition 2013, 83:93-103.
25. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:463-470.
26. Küper K., Groh-Bordin C., Zimmer H.D., Ecker U.K.H. Electrophysiological correlates of exemplar-specific processes in implicit and explicit memory. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2012, 12(1):52-64.
27. Leynes A.P., Zish K. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(14):3240-3249.
28. Mackenzie G., Donaldson D.I. Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect. NeuroImage 2007, 36:454-463.
29. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
30. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1985, 62:203-208.
31. Mecklinger A. Electrophysiological measures of familiarity memory. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 2006, 37(4):292-299.
32. Mecklinger A., Brunnemann N., Kipp K. Two processes for recognition memory in children of early school age: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(2):435-446.
33. Mecklinger A., Frings C., Rosburg T. Response to Paller et al.: The role of familiarity in making inferences about unknown quantities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16(6):315-316.
34. Mollison M.V, Curran T. Familiarity in source memory. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(11):2546-2565.
35. Murdock B.B. The mirror effect and attention-likelihood theory: A reflective analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24(2):524-534.
36. Nessler D., Mecklinger A., Penney T.B. Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: The effects of differential encoding. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 10:283-301.
37. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
38. Reder L.M., Nhouyvanisvong A., Schunn C.D., Ayers M.S., Angstadt P., Hiraki K. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(2):294-320.
39. Reder L.M., Paynter C., Diana R.A., Ngiam J., Dickison D. Experience is a double-edged sword: A computational model of the encoding/retrieval trade-off with familiarity. The psychology of learning and motivation 2007, Vol. 48:271-312. Academic, San Diego.
40. Rosburg T., Johansson M., Mecklinger A. Strategic retrieval and retrieval orientation in reality monitoring studied by event-related potentials (ERPs). Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(3):557-571.
41. Rugg M.D. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition 1990, 18(4):367-379.
42. Rugg M.D., Coles M.G.H. The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition (pp. 27-39) 1995, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Rugg M.D., Cox C.J.C., Doyle M.C., Wells T. Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:471-484.
44. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
45. Rugg M.D., Doyle M.C. Event-related potentials and recognition memory for low- and high-frequency words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1992, 4(1):69-79.
46. Rugg M.D., Mark R.E., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Birch C.S., Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 1998, 392:595-598.
47. Scarborough D.L., Cortese C., Scarborough H.S. Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3(1):1-17.
48. Snodgrass J.G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:34-50.
49. Stenberg G., Hellman J., Johansson M., Rosén I. Familiarity or conceptual priming: Event-related potentials in name recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(3):447-460.
50. Van Petten C., Kutas M. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition 1990, 18(4):380-393.
51. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Functional significance of retrieval-related activity in lateral parietal cortex: Evidence from fMRI and ERPs. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30(5):1490-1501.
52. Voss J.L., Paller K.A. An electrophysiological signature of unconscious recognition memory. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12(3):349-355.
53. Voss J.L., Lucas H.D., Paller K.A. More than a feeling?: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval. Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 3(3-4):193-226.
54. Wiegand I., Bader R., Mecklinger A. Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: An electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory. Brain Research 2010, 1360:106-118.
55. Wilding E.L. The practice of rescaling scalp-recorded event-related potentials. Biological Psychology 2006, 72:325-332.
56. Wilding E.L., Herron J.E. Electrophysiological measures of episodic memory control and memory retrieval. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 2006, 37(4):315-321.
57. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Neuropsychologia 1996, 37:441-454.
58. Woodruff C.C., Hayama H.R., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research 2006, 1100:125-135.
59. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
60. Yonelinas A.P., Aly M., Wang W.-C., Koen J.D. Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus 2010, 20(11):1178-1194.
61. Young M.P., Rugg M.D. Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of event-related potentials in a semantic classification task. Psychophysiology 1992, 29(6):664-676.
62. Yu S.S., Rugg M.D. Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Research 2010, 1320:74-84.