Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 93-103

  Kriukova, Olga ^a   Bridger, Emma ^a   Mecklinger, Axel ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Associative recognition; Event related potentials; Familiarity; Recollection; Semantic relations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EPISODIC MEMORY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FAMILIARITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RECOLLECTION; SEMANTIC MEMORY; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

ASSOCIATIVE RECOGNITION; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; FAMILIARITY; RECOLLECTION; SEMANTIC RELATIONS;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882247290     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aggleton J.P., Brown M.W. Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:455-463.
2. American Electroencephalographic Society, Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology11, 1994, 111-113.
3. Bader R., Mecklinger A., Hoppstädter M., Meyer P. Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroImage 2010, 50:772-781.
4. Badham S.P., Estes Z., Maylor E.A. Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits. Psychology and Aging 2012, 1:141-152.
5. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:617-629.
6. Bentin S., Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:54-67.
7. Bridger E., Bader R., Kriukova O., Unger K., Rimpel J., Mecklinger A. The FN400 is electrophysiologically and functionally distinct from the N400. NeuroImage 2012, 63:1334-1342.
8. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:34-44.
9. Craik F.I.M. Levels of processing: Past, present and future?. Memory 2002, 10:305-318.
10. Craik F., Lockhart R. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972, 11:671-684.
11. Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition 2000, 28:923-938.
12. Deacon D., Grose-Fifer J., Yang C.-M., Stanick V., Hewitt S., Dynowska A. Evidence for a new conceptualization of semantic representation in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Cortex 2004, 40:467-478.
13. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:730-740.
14. Donaldson D.I., Rugg M.D. Recognition memory for new associations: Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:377-395.
15. Dosher B.A., Rosedale G. Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Commontime-course and failure of segregation. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:125-160.
16. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:123-152.
17. Estes Z., Golonka S., Jones L.L. Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2011, 54:249-294.
18. Estes Z., Jones L.L. Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138:112-130.
19. Ford J.H., Verfaellie M., Giovanello K.S. Neural correlates of familiarity-based associative retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3019-3025.
20. Giovanello K.S., Keane M.M., Verfaellie M. The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1859-1865.
21. Graf P., Schacter D.L. Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:930-940.
22. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1983, 55:468-484.
23. Greenfield D.B., Scott M.S. Young children's preference for complementary pairs: Evidence against a shift to a taxonomic preference. Developmental Psychology 1986, 22:19-21.
24. Greve A., van Rossum M.C.W., Donaldson D.I. Investigating the functional interaction between semantic and episodic memory: Convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the role of familiarity. NeuroImage 2007, 34:801-814.
25. Hampton J.A. Concepts and prototypes. Mind and Language 2000, 15:299-307.
26. Hare M., Jones M., Thomson C., Kelly S., McRae K. Activating event knowledge. Cognition 2009, 111:151-167.
27. Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11:523-532.
28. Hockley W.E., Consoli A. Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory and Cognition 1999, 27:657-664.
29. Hodges J., Graham K. Episodic memory: Insights from semantic dementia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 2001, 356:1423-1434.
30. Holm S. A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1979, 6:65-70.
31. Israel L., Schacter D.L. Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1997, 4:577-581.
32. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-535.
33. Jäger T., Mecklinger A., Kipp K.H. Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron 2006, 52:535-545.
34. Knott L., Dewhurst S., Howe M. What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of Backward Associative Strength and inter-item connectivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, 38:229-239.
35. Koivisto M., Revonsuo A. Cognitive representations underlying the N400 priming effect. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 12:487-490.
36. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:463-470.
37. Kutas M., Federmeier M. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62:621-647.
38. Lau E.F., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:920-933.
39. Lin E.L., Murphy G.L. Thematic relations in adults' concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:3-28.
40. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
41. Markman A., Wisniewski E. Similar and different: The differentiation of basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:54-70.
42. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1985, 62:203-208.
43. Mecklinger A. Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:565-582.
44. Mecklinger A. Electrophysiological measures of familiarity memory. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 2006, 37:292-299.
45. Mecklinger A., Jäger T. Episodic memory storage and retrieval: Insights from electrophysiological measures. Neuroimaging and psychological theories of human memory 2009, 357-382. Oxford University Press. F. Rösler, C. Ranganath, B. Röder, R.H. Kluwe (Eds.).
46. Moss H.E., Ostrin R.K., Tyler L.K., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1995, 21:863-883.
47. Murphy G.L. Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:834-839.
48. Naveh-Benjamin M., Hussain Z., Guez J., Bar-On M. Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:826-837.
49. Nessler D., Mecklinger A., Penney T.B. Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: The effects of differential encoding. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 10:283-301.
50. Opitz B., Cornell S. Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: Insights from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1595-1605.
51. Paller K.A., Voss J.L., Boehm S.G. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:243-250.
52. Park L., Shobe K.K., Kihlstrom J.F. Associative and categorical relations in the associative memory illusions. Psychological Science 2005, 16:792-797.
53. Patterson M.M., Light L.L., Van Ocker J.C., Olfman D. Discriminating semantic from episodic relatedness in young and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 2009, 16:535-562.
54. Perraudin S., Mounoud P. Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age. Developmental Science 2009, 12:956-977.
55. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:127-152.
56. Quamme J.R., Yonelinas A.P., Norman K.A. Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus 2007, 17:192-200.
57. Rhodes S.M., Donaldson D.I. Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:412-424.
58. Rhodes S.M., Donaldson D.I. Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. NeuroImage 2008, 39:873-884.
59. Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1975, 104:192-233.
60. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
61. Rugg M.D., Mark R.E., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Birch C.S., Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 1998, 392:595-598.
62. Rugg M.D., Yonelinas A.P. Human recognition memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:313-319.
63. Saalbach H., Imai M. Scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:485-501.
64. Sachs O., Weis S., Zellagui N., Sass K., Huber W., Zvyagintsev M. How different types of conceptual relations modulate brain activation during semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:1263-1273.
65. Sass K., Sachs O., Krach S., Kircher T. Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI. Brain Research 2009, 1270:78-87.
66. Schacter D.L., Israel L., Racine C. Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:1-24.
67. Snodgrass J.G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:34-50.
68. Squire L.R., Zola S.M. Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia. Hippocampus 1998, 8:205-211.
69. Stenberg G., Hellman J., Johansson M., Rosen I. Familiarity or conceptual priming: Event-related potentials in name recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:447-460.
70. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology 1985, 26:1-12.
71. Tulving E. Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53:1-25.
72. Ullsperger M., Mecklinger A., Müller U. An electrophysiological test of directed forgetting: Differential encoding or retrieval inhibition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:924-940.
73. Voss J.L., Federmeier K.D. FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:532-546.
74. Voss J.L., Paller K.A. Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval. NeuroImage 2009, 46:280-289.
75. Wiegand I., Bader R., Mecklinger A. Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: An electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory. Brain Research 2010, 1360:106-118.
76. Wisniewski E.J., Bassok M. What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 39:208-238.
77. Woodruff C.C., Hayama H.R., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research 2006, 1100:125-135.
78. Yonelinas P.A. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
79. Yonelinas A.P., Aly M., Wang W.-C., Koen J.D. Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1178-1194.
80. Yonelinas A.P., Kroll N.E., Dobbins I.G., Soltani M. Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6:654-661.