Familiarity in source memory

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2546-2565

  Mollison, Matthew V ^a   Curran, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

EEG; ERP; Familiarity; Recognition memory; Recollection; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FAMILIARITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION; RECOLLECTION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865560587     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.027     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Addante R.J., Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. Neuroimage 2012, 62:439-450.
2. Allan K., Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychologica 1998, 98:231-252.
3. Aly M., Knight R.T., Yonelinas A.P. Faces are special but not too special: Spared face recognition in amnesia is based on familiarity. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3941-3948.
4. Brady T.F., Konkle T., Alvarez G.A., Oliva A. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:14325-14329.
5. Caldwell J.I., Masson M.E. Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location. Memory and Cognition 2001, 29:285-295.
6. Cansino S., Maquet P., Dolan R.J., Rugg M.D. Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cerebral Cortex 2002, 12:1048-1056.
7. Clark S., Gronlund S. Global matching models of recognition memory how the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1996, 3:37-60.
8. Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition 2000, 28:923-938.
9. Curran T. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1088-1106.
10. Curran T., Cleary A.M. Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 15:191-205.
11. Curran T., DeBuse C., Leynes P.A. Conflict and criterion setting in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:2-17.
12. Curran T., DeBuse C., Woroch B., Hirshman E. Combined pharmcological and electrophysiological dissociation of familiarity and recollection. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:1979-1985.
13. Curran T., Dien J. Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:979-988.
14. Curran T., Friedman W.J. ERP old/new effects at different retention intervals in recency discrimination tasks. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 18:107-120.
15. Curran T., Hancock J. The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces. NeuroImage 2007, 36:464-471.
16. Curran T., Tepe K.L., Piatt C. Event-related potential explorations of dual processes in recognition memory. Binding in human memory: A neurocognitive approach 2006, 467-492. Oxford University Press, New York. H.D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, U. Lindenberger (Eds.).
17. Diana R.A., Van den Boom W., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. ERP correlates of source memory: Unitized source information increases familiarity-based retrieval. Brain Research 2011, 1367:278-286.
18. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:379-386.
19. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:730-740.
20. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:1808-1818.
21. Dien J. Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 1998, 30:34-43.
22. Dien J. The ERP PCA toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2010, 187:138-145.
23. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Trujillo C., Knight R.T. Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:33-47.
24. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Winward L., Hayward D., Knight R.T. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 18:255-272.
25. Düzel E., Vargha-Khadem F., Heinze H.J., Mishkin M. Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98:8101-8106.
26. Düzel E., Yonelinas A.P., Mangun G.R., Heinze H.J., Tulving E. Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94:5973-5978.
27. Ecker U.K.H., Zimmer H.D. ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:1907-1919.
28. Ecker U.K.H., Zimmer H.D., Groh-Bordin C. Color and context: An ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35:1483-1501.
29. Ecker U.K.H., Zimmer H.D., Groh-Bordin C. The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory. Brain Research 2007, 1185:221-230.
30. Eichenbaum H. Remembering: Functional organization of the declarative memory system. Current Biology 2006, 16:R643-R645.
31. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:123-152.
32. Eldridge L.L., Sarfatti S., Knowlton B.J. The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:139-145.
33. Elfman K.W., Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:752-768.
34. Friedman D., Johnson R. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique 2000, 51:6-28.
35. Greenhouse S., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24:95-112.
36. Groh-Bordin C., Zimmer H.D., Ecker U.K.H. Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection. NeuroImage 2006, 32:1879-1890.
37. Gruber T., Tsivilis D., Giabbiconi C.-M., Müller M.M. Induced electroencephalogram oscillations during source memory: Familiarity is reflected in the gamma band, recollection in the theta band. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:1043-1053.
38. Hicks J.L., Marsh R.L., Ritschel L. The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:503-508.
39. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
40. Jäger T., Mecklinger A., Kipp K.H. Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron 2006, 52:535-545.
41. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28.
42. Junghöfer M., Elbert T., Tucker D.M., Braun C. The polar average reference effect: A bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110:1149-1155.
43. Klimesch W., Doppelmayr M., Yonelinas A.P., Kroll N.E., Lazzara M., Röhm D., et al. Theta synchronization during episodic retrieval: Neural correlates of conscious awareness. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 12:33-38.
44. Lucas H.D., Voss J.L., Paller K.A. Familiarity or Conceptual Priming? Good Question!: Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:615-617.
45. Mayes A.R., Holdstock J.S., Isaac C.L., Montaldi D., Grigor J., Gummer A., et al. Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition. Hippocampus 2004, 14:763-784.
46. Mayes A.R., Montaldi D., Migo E. Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:126-135.
47. Mecklinger A. Electrophysiological measures of familiarity memory. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 2006, 37:292-299.
48. Mecklinger A., Johansson M., Parra M., Hanslmayr S. Source-retrieval requirements influence late ERP and EEG memory effects. Brain Research 2007, 1172:110-123.
49. Mitchell K.J., Johnson M.K. Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:638-677.
50. Montaldi D., Mayes A.R. The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1291-1314.
51. Montaldi D., Mayes A.R Familiarity, recollection and medial temporal lobe function: An unresolved issue. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15:339-340.
52. Murnane K., Bayen U.J. An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory and Cognition 1996, 24:417-428.
53. Norman K.A., O'Reilly R.C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychological Review 2003, 110:611-646.
54. Nyhus E., Curran T. Semantic and perceptual effects on recognition memory: Evidence from ERP. Brain Research 2009, 1283:102-114.
55. Nyhus E., Curran T. Midazolam-induced amnesia reduces memory for details and affects the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24:416-427.
56. Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 156869.
57. Paller K.A., Voss J.L., Boehm S.G. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:243-250.
58. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:188-201.
59. Peters J., Daum I. Frontal but not parietal positivity during source recollection is sensitive to episodic content. Neuroscience Letters 2009, 454:182-186.
60. Quamme J.R., Yonelinas A.P., Norman K.A. Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus 2007, 17:192-200.
61. Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P., Cohen M.X., Dy C.J., Tom S.M., D'Esposito M. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2003, 42:2-13.
62. Ratcliff R., Van Zandt T., McKoon G. Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1995, 124:352-374.
63. Rhodes S.M., Donaldson D.I. Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:412-424.
64. Ross R.S., Slotnick S.D. The hippocampus is preferentially associated with memory for spatial context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:432-446.
65. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
66. Rugg M.D., Schloerscheidt A.M., Mark R.E. An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 39:47-69.
67. Sadeh T., Maril A., Bitan T., Goshen-Gottstein Y. Putting Humpty together and pulling him apart: Accessing and unbinding the hippocampal item-context engram. NeuroImage 2012, 60:808-817.
68. Senkfor A.J., Van Petten C. Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1005-1025.
69. Skinner E.I., Fernandes M.A. Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2163-2179.
70. Slotnick S.D. Does the hippocampus mediate objective binding or subjective remembering?. NeuroImage 2010, 49:1769-1776.
71. Smith M. Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:1-13.
72. Speer N.K., Curran T. ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection processes in visual associative recognition. Brain Research 2007, 1174:97-109.
73. Staresina B.P., Davachi L. Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:9162-9172.
74. Stenberg G., Hellman J., Johansson M., Rosén I. Familiarity or conceptual priming: Event-related potentials in name recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:447-460.
75. Stenberg G., Johansson M., Hellman J., Rosén I. "Do you see yonder cloud?"-On priming concepts, a new test and a familiar outcome. Reply to Lucas et al.: "Familiarity or Conceptual Priming? Good Question! Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009)". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:618-620.
76. Suzuki W.A., Amaral D.G. Functional neuroanatomy of the medial temporal lobe memory system. Cortex 2004, 40:220-222.
77. Tsivilis D., Otten L.J., Rugg M.D. Context effects on the neural correlates of recognition memory: An electrophysiological study. Neuron 2001, 31:497-505.
78. Tucker D.M. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993, 87:154-163.
79. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology Psychologie Canadienne 1985, 26:1-12.
80. Uncapher M.R., Rugg M.D. Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:8270-8279.
81. Unsworth N., Brewer G.A. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1578-1585.
82. Van Petten C., Senkfor A.J., Newberg W.M. Memory for drawings in locations: Spatial source memory and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:551-564.
83. Vargha-Khadem F., Gadian D.G., Watkins K.E., Connelly A., Van Paesschen W., Mishkin M. Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science 1997, 277:376-380.
84. Vilberg K.L., Moosavi R.F., Rugg M.D. The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Research 2006, 1122:161-170.
85. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1787-1799.
86. Wais P.E., Mickes L., Wixted J.T. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:400-405.
87. Wilding E.L. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2000, 35:81-87.
88. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain 1996, 119:889-905.
89. Wixted J.T., Squire L.R. The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15:210-217.
90. Wolk D.A., Schacter D.L., Lygizos M., Sen N.M., Holcomb P.J., Daffner K.R., et al. ERP correlates of recognition memory: Effects of retention interval and false alarms. Brain Research 2006, 1096:148-162.
91. Woodruff C.C., Hayama H.R., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research 2006, 1100:125-135.
92. Woroch B., Gonsalves B.D. Event-related potential correlates of item and source memory strength. Brain Research 2010, 1317C:180-191.
93. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
94. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition 1996, 5:131-141.
95. Yonelinas A.P., Kroll N.E., Dobbins I.G., Soltani M. Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6:654-661.
96. Yovel G., Paller K.A. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: When a face seems familiar but is not remembered. NeuroImage 2004, 21:789-800.
97. Yu S.S., Rugg M.D. Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Research 2010, 1320C:74-84.
98. Zimmer H.D., Ecker U.K.H. Remembering perceptual features unequally bound in object and episodic tokens: Neural mechanisms and their electrophysiological correlates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34:1066-1079.