Erratum : Correction: MiR-1915 and miR-1225-5p regulate the expression of CD133, PAX2 and TLR2 in adult renal progenitor cells (PLOS ONE (2015) 9(1): DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0087496);A bioartificial renal tubule device embedding human renal stem/progenitor cells

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Sciancalepore, Anna Giovanna ^a   Sallustio, Fabio ^b,c,d   Girardo, Salvatore ^e,f   Passione, Laura Gioia ^a,d,e   Camposeo, Andrea ^a,e   Mele, Elisa ^a   Lorenzo, Mirella Di ^e,g   Costantino, Vincenzo ^b   Schena, Francesco Paolo ^b,c   Pisignano, Dario ^a,d,e  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^c Centro Addestramento Ricerca Scientifica in Oncologia (CARSO) Consortium   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^e CNR   (Italy)

^f DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^g University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE (POTASSIUM SODIUM); AQUAPORIN 2; CREATININE; UREA;

ADULT RENAL STEM CELL; ADULT STEM CELL; APICAL MEMBRANE; ARTICLE; BASOLATERAL MEMBRANE; BIOARTIFICIAL RENAL TUBULE DEVICE; BIOCHIP; CELL GROWTH; CELL POLARITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBEDDING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; KIDNEY CELL; LAMINAR FLOW; MICROTECHNOLOGY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SHEAR STRESS; STEM CELL CULTURE;

BIOARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY TUBULES, PROXIMAL; REGENERATION; SODIUM-POTASSIUM-EXCHANGING ATPASE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84898452859     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128258     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Sonntag F, Schilling N, Mader K, Gruchow M, Klotzbach U, et al. (2010) Design and prototyping of a chip-based multi-micro-organoid culture system for substance testing, predictive to human (substance) exposure. J Biotechnol 148: 70-75.
2. van der Meer AD, van den Berg A (2012) Organs-on-chips: breaking the in vitro impasse. Integr Biol 4: 461-470.
3. Whitesides GM, Ostuni E, Takayama S, Jiang X, Ingber DE (2001) Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3: 335-373. (Pubitemid 32928043)
4. Squires TM, Quake SR (2005) Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev Mod Phys 77: 977-1026. (Pubitemid 43272528)
5. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442: 368-373.
6. Webster A, Greenman J, Haswell SJ (2011) Development of microfluidic devices for biomedical and clinical application. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86: 10-17.
7. van Noort D, Ong SM, Zhang C, Zhang S, Arooz T, et al. (2009) Stem cells in microfluidics. Biotechnol Prog, 25: 52-60.
8. Meyvantsson I, Beebe DJ (2008) Cell culture models in microfluidic systems. Annu Rev Anal Chem 1: 423-449.
9. Inamdar NJ, Borenstein JT (2011) Microfluidic cell culture models for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotech 22: 681-689.
10. Kim SM, Leeb SH, Suh KY (2008) Cell research with physically modified microfluidic channels: A review. Lab Chip 8: 1015-1023. (Pubitemid 351904814)
11. Jang KJ, Suh KY (2010) A multi-layer microfluidic device for efficient culture and analysis of renal tubular cells. Lab Chip 10: 36-42.
12. Baudoin R, Griscom L, Monge M, Legallais C, Leclerc E (2007) Development of a renal microchip for in vitro distal tubule models. Biotechnol Prog 23: 1245-1253. (Pubitemid 47587101)
13. Huh D, Torisawa Y, Hamilton GA, Kim HJ, Ingber DE (2012) Microengineered physiological biomimicry: organs-on-chips. Lab Chip, 12: 2156-2164.
14. Shin M, Matsuda K, Ishii O, Terai H, Kaazempur-Mofrad M, et al. (2004) Endothelialized networks with a vascular geometry in microfabricated poly(dimethyl siloxane). Biomed. Microdevices 6: 269-278. (Pubitemid 39545746)
15. Song JW, Gi W, Futai N, Warnwe KA, Nor JE, et al. (2005) Computer-controlled microcirculatory support system for endothelial cell culture and shearing. Anal Chem 77: 3993-3999. (Pubitemid 40934263)
16. Carraro A, Hsu WM, Kulig KM, Cheung WS, Miller ML, et al. (2008) In vitro analysis of a hepatic device with intrinsic microvascular-based channels. Biomed Microdevices 10: 795-805.
17. Khetani SR, Bhatia SN (2008) Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development. Nat Biotechnol 26: 120-126.
18. Park JW, Vahidi B, Taylor AM, Rhee SW, Jeon NL (2006) Microfluidic culture platform for neuroscience research. Nat Protoc 1: 2128-2136. (Pubitemid 46773335)
19. Mahler GJ, Esch MB, Glahn RP, Shuler ML (2009) Characterization of a gastrointestinal tract microscale cell culture analog used to predict drug toxicity. Biotechnol Bioeng 104: 193-205.
20. Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, Montoya-Zavala M, Hsin HY, et al. (2010) Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328: 1662-1668.
21. Sagrinati C, Ronconi E, Lazzeri E, Lasagni L, Romagnani P (2008) Stem-cell approaches for kidney repair: choosing the right cells. Trends Mol Med 14: 277-285.
22. Yokoo T, Kawamura T, Kobayashi E (2008) Stem cells for kidney repair: useful tool for acute renal failure? Kidney Int 74: 847-849.
23. Brodie JC, Humes HD (2005) Stem cell approaches for the treatment of renal failure. Pharmacol Rev 57: 299-313. (Pubitemid 41196952)
24. Bussolati B, Bruno S, Grange C, Buttiglieri S, Deregibus MC, et al. (2005) Isolation of Renal Progenitor Cells from Adult Human Kidney. Am J Pathol 166: 545-555. (Pubitemid 40189050)
25. Sagrinati C, Netti GS, Mazzinghi B, Lazzeri E, Liotta F, et al. (2006) Isolation of renal progenitor cells from adult human kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2443-2456.
26. Sallustio F, De Benedictis L, Castellano G, Zaza G, Loverre A, et al. (2010) TLR2 plays a role in the activation of human resident renal stem/progenitor cells. FASEB J 24: 514-525.
27. Angelotti ML, Ronconi E, Ballerini L, Peired A, Mazzinghi B, et al. (2012) Characterization of renal progenitors committed toward tubular lineage and their regenerative potential in renal tubular injury. Stem Cells 30: 1714-1725.
28. Sallustio F, Costantino V, Cox SN, Loverre A, Divella C, et al. (2013) Human renal stem/progenitor cells repair tubular epithelial cell injury through TLR2-driven inhibin-A and microvesicle-shuttled decorin. Kidney Int 83: 392-403.
29. Bussolati B, Tetta C, Camussi G (2008) Contribution of stem cells to kidney repair. Am J Nephrol 28: 813-822.
30. Lazzeri E, Crescoli C, Ronconi E, Mazzinghi B, Sagrinati C, et al. (2007) Regenerative potential of embryonic renal multipotent progenitors in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 3128-3138. (Pubitemid 350223972)
31. Humes HD, MacKay SM, Funke AJ, Buffington DA (1999) Tissue engineering of a bioartificial renal tubule assist device: in vitro transport and metabolic characteristics. Kidney Int 55: 2502-2514. (Pubitemid 29256506)
32. Tiranathanagul K, Brodie J, Humes HD (2006) Bioartificial kidney in the treatment of acute renal failure associated with sepsis. Nephrology 11: 285-291. (Pubitemid 44102136)
33. Ryan MJ, Johnson G, Kirk J, Fuerstenberg SM, Zager RA, et al. (1994) HK-2: an immortalized proximal tubule epithelial cell line from normal adult human kidney. Kidney Int 45: 48-57. (Pubitemid 24045991)
34. Chueh B, Huh D, Kyrtsos CR, Houssin T, Futai N, et al. (2007) Leakage-free bonding of porous membranes into layered microfluidic array systems. Anal Chem 79: 3504-3508. (Pubitemid 46717183)
35. Procino G, Mastrofrancesco L, Sallustio F, Costantino V, Barbieri C, et al. (2011) AQP5 is expressed in type-B intercalated cells in the collecting duct system of the rat, mouse and human kidney. Cell Physiol Biochem 28: 683-692.
36. Simone S, Cosola C, Loverre A, Cariello M, Sallustio F, et al. (2012) BMP-2 induces a profibrotic phenotype in adult renal progenitor cells through Nox4 activation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 303: F23-F34.
37. Pereira BJG, Cheung AK (2000) Complications of dialysis. New York: Informa Healthcare 42 p.
38. Sung JH, Shuler ML (2009) Prevention of air bubble formation in a microfluidic perfusion cell culture system using a microscale bubble trap. Biomed Microdevices 11: 731-738.
39. Sheng Y, Bowser MT (2012) Size selective DNA transport through a nanoporous membrane in a PDMS microfluidic device. Analyst 137: 1144-1151.
40. Müller CB, Loman A, Pacheco V, Koberling F, Willbold D, et al. (2008) Precise measurement of diffusion by multi-color dual-focus fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. EPL 83: 46001.
41. Hsieh YC, Zahn JD (2005) Glucose recovery in a microfluidic microdialysis biochip. Sens Actuators B: Chem 107: 649-656.
42. Gugala Z, Gogolewski S (2004) Protein adsorption, attachment, growth and activity of primary rat osteoblasts on polylactide membranes with defined surface characteristics. Biomaterials 25: 2341-2351. (Pubitemid 38102388)
43. Tzoneva R, Faucheux N, Groth T (2007) Wettability of substrata controls cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesions. Biochim Biophys. Acta 1770: 1538-1547. (Pubitemid 47516626)
44. Frohlich EM, Zhang X, Charest JL (2012) The use of controlled surface topography and flow-induced shear stress to influence renal epithelial cell function. Integr Biol 4: 75-83.
45. Jang KJ, Cho HS, Kang DH, Bae WG, Kwon TH, et al. (2011) Fluid-shear-stress-induced translocation of aquaporin-2 and reorganization of actin cytoskeleton in renal tubular epithelial cells. Integr Biol 3: 134-141.
46. Duan Y, Gotoh N, Yan Q, Du Z, Weinstein AM, et al. (2008) Shear-induced reorganization of renal proximal tubule cell actin cytoskeleton and apical junctional complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 11418-11423.
47. Essig M, Terzi F, Burtin M, Friedlander G (2001) Mechanical strains induced by tubular flow affect the phenotype of proximal tubular cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F751-F762.
48. Wieser M, Stadler G, Jennings P, Streubel B, Pfaller W, et al. (2008) hTERT alone immortalizes epithelial cells of renal proximal tubules without changing their functional characteristics. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F1365-F1375.
49. Poulsom M, Alison MR, Forbes SJ, Wright NA (2002) Adult stem cell plasticity. J Pathol 197: 441-456.
50. Wagers AJ, Weissman IL (2004) Plasticity of adult stem cells. Cell 116: 639-648. (Pubitemid 38326723)
51. Ozgen N, Terashima M, Aung T, Sato Y, Isoe C, et al. (2004) Evaluation of long-term transport ability of a bioartificial renal tubule device using LLC-PK1 cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 2198-2207. (Pubitemid 39214111)
52. Sanechika N, Sawada K, Usui Y, Hanai K, Kakuta T, et al. (2011) Development of bioartificial renal tubule devices with lifespan-extended human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26: 2761-2769.
53. Jang KJ, Mehr AP, Hamilton GA, McPartlin LA, Chung S, et al. (2013) Human kidney proximal tubule-on-a-chip for drug transport and nephrotoxicity assessment. Integr Biol 19: 1119-29.
54. Lechleitner T, Klauser F, Seppi T, Lechner J, Jennings P, et al. (2008) The surface properties of nanocrystalline diamond and nanoparticulate diamond powder and their suitability as cell growth support surfaces. Biomaterials 29: 4275-4284.
55. Dankers PY, Boomker JM, Huizinga-van der Vlag A, Smedts FM, Harmsen MC, et al. (2010) The use of fibrous, supramolecular membranes and human tubular cells for renal epithelial tissue engineering: towards a suitable membrane for a bioartificial kidney. Macromol Biosci 10: 1345-1354.
56. Barac-Nieto M, Spitzer A (1988) The relationship between renal metabolism and proximal tubule transport during ontogeny. Pediatr Nephrol 2: 356-367.