Effects of a calcium phosphate-coated and anodized titanium surface on early bone response

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 790-797

  Koh, Jung Woo ^a   Kim, Young Sung ^b   Yang, Jae Ho ^a   Yeo, In Sung ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Calcium phosphate; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Oxidation; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; TITANIUM; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL ETCHING; DRUG EFFECT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPECTROMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; DRUG EFFECTS; PROCEDURES;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; RABBITS; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84898207768     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2783     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991; 62: 2-4.
2. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Osseointegration and the edentulous predicamen. The 10-year-old Toronto study. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 439-444.
3. Aalam AA, Nowzari H. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 793-798.
4. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wennerberg A, Heo SJ. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 349-356.
5. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Roser K, Albrektsson T. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodized implants. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1809-1817.
6. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 38-45.
7. Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87: 303-311.
8. Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1998; 17: 36-46.
9. de Lange G, Tadjoedin E. Fate of the HA coating of loaded implants in the augmented sinus floor: A human case study of retrieved implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 287-296.
10. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 442-447.
11. Orsini G, Piattelli M, Scarano A, et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 209-218.
12. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c. titanium screws blasted with 25-and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 30: 251-260.
13. Jung UW, Choi JY, Kim CS, et al. Evaluation of mandibular posterior single implants with two different surfaces: A 5-year comparative study. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1857-1863.
14. Roccuzzo M, Aglietta M, Bunino M, Bonino L. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched implants: A randomized-controlled double-blind split-mouth study. Five-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 148-152.
15. Vanden Bogaerde L, Pedretti G, Dellacasa P, Mozzati M, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Brånemark System TiUnite implants: An 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6: 121-129.
16. Geurs NC, Jeffcoat RL, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 811-815.
17. Hay DI, Moreno EC. Differential adsorption and chemical affinities of proteins for apatitic surfaces. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 930-942.
18. Lee JJ, Rouhfar L, Beirne OR. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A meta-analytic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 1372-1379.
19. Roynesdal AK, Ambjornsen E, Stovne S, Haanaes HR. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 500-505.
20. Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Kan JY, Kim JS, Campagni WV, Munoz CA. Peri-implant tissue response of immediately loaded, threaded, HA-coated implants: 1-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 173-181.
21. Stellino G, Landi L. A 6-year unloaded hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant placed into an extraction socket in conjunction with nonresorbable hydroxyapatite grafting material: Histologic evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 575-581.
22. Sun L, Berndt CC, Gross KA, Kucuk A. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: A review. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 570-592.
23. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 536-543.
24. Smith DC. Dental implants: Materials and design considerations. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 106-117.
25. Williams RL, Higgins SJ, Hamnett A, Williams DF. The characteristics of protein adsorption onto metallic biomaterials. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC (eds). Clinical Implant Materials, vol 9, Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1990: 327-332.
26. Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 32: 409-417.
27. Skripitz R, Aspenberg P. Tensile bond between bone and titanium: A reappraisal of osseointegration. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69: 315-319.
28. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 625-634.
29. Hanawa T. Titanium and its oxide film: A substrate for formation of apatite. In: Davies JE (ed). The Bone-Biomaterial Interface. Toronto University of Toronto Press,1991: 49-61.
30. LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: Calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002: 81-98.
31. Goene RJ, Testori T, Trisi P. Influence of a nanometer-scale surface enhancement on de novo bone formation on titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in human maxillae. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 211-219.
32. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 318-326.
33. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 24-30.
34. Turksen K, Bhargava U, Moe HK, Aubin JE. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies recognizing rat bone-associated molecules in vitro and in vivo. J Histochem Cytochem 1992; 40: 1339-1352.
35. Castellani R, de Ruijter A, Renggli H, Jansen J. Response of rat bone marrow cells to differently roughened titanium discs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 369-378.
36. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, Missirlis YF. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 87-96.
37. Zhuang LF, Jiang HH, Qiao SC, et al. The roles of extracellular signalregulated kinase 1/2 pathway in regulating osteogenic differentiation of murine preosteoblasts MC3T3-E1 cells on roughened titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012 Jan; 100(1): 125-133.
38. Pae A, Kim SS, Kim HS, Woo YH. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 475-481.
39. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 11-19.
40. Li Y, Lee IS, Cui FZ, Choi SH. The biocompatibility of nanostructured calcium phosphate coated on micro-arc oxidized titanium. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 2025-2032.
41. Blackwood DJ, Seah KH. Influence of anodization on the adhesion of calcium phosphate coatings on titanium substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 93: 1551-1556.
42. Fini M, Cigada A, Rondelli G, et al. In vitro and in vivo behaviour of Caand P-enriched anodized titanium. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1587-1594.