Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 475-481

  Pae, Ahran ^a   Kim, Si Seok ^a   Kim, Hyeong Seob ^a   Woo, Yi Hyung ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Surface properties; Titanium; X ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TUMOR CELL LINE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84861634608     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 1523-1539.
2. Barrere F, Van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Nucleation of biomimetic Ca-P coatings on Ti6Al4V from a SBF × 5 solution: Influence of magnesium. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2211-2220.
3. Sena LA, Andrade MC, Rossi AM, Soares GA. Hydroxyapatite deposition by electrophoresis on Ti sheets with different surface finishing. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 60: 1-7.
4. MacDonald DE, Deo N, Markovic B, Stranick M, Somasundaran P. Adsorption and dissolution behavior of human plasma fibronectin on thermally and chemically modified titanium dioxide particles. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1269-1279.
5. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 252-259.
6. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: The oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 491-501.
7. Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim S, Kim K. Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on a titanium implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 60: 333-338.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of CP titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-µm-sized particles of Al2O3. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 30: 251-260.
9. Feighan JE, Goldberg VM, Davy D, Parr JA, Stevenson S. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77A:1380-1395.
10. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screwshaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 15-22.
11. Novaes A, Souza S, de Oliveira P, Souza A. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 377-383.
12. Piatelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piatelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002; 28: 2-8.
13. Son WW, Zhu X, Shin HI, Ong JL, Kim KH. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2003;66B:520-525.
14. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3893-3907.
15. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Röser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; 12: 1025-1031.
16. Ishizawa H, Fujino M, Ogino M. Mechanical and histological investigation of hydrothermally treated and untreated anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1459-1468.
17. Li LH, Kong YM, Kim HW, et al. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by microarc oxidation. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2867-2875.
18. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 137-146.
19. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, et al. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: Studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 605-616.
20. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 65-72.
21. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Characterization of thin hydroxyapatite layers formed on anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1071-1079.
22. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys 2001; 23: 329-346.
23. Lauer G, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Otten JE, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, Schilli W. The titanium surface texture effects adherence and growth of human gingival keratinocytes and human maxillary osteoblastlike cells in vitro. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 2799-2809.
24. Cui FZ, Luo ZS, Feng QL. Highly adhesive hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy formed by ion beam assisted deposition. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997; 8: 403-405.
25. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 667-681.
26. Castellani R, Ruijter A, Renggli H, Jansen J. Response of rat bone marrow cells to differently roughened titanium discs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 369-378.
27. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, et al. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 49: 155-166.
28. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, Missirlis YF. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 87-96.
29. Jayaraman M, Meyer U, Bűhner M, Joos U, Wiesmann HP. Influence of titanium surfaces on attachment of osteoblastlike cells in vitro. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 625-631.
30. Ong JL, Cardens HL, Cavin R, Carnes DL. Osteoblast responses to BMP-2-treated titanium in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 649-654.
31. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 302-310.
32. Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjorting-Hansen E, Jensen J S, Holmen A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2- blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 2: 77-84.
33. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Altebaeumer T, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kern D. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron- and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces. Cells Tissues Organs 2004; 178: 13-22.
34. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 331-344.
35. Bagno A, Di Bello C. Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004; 15: 935-949.
36. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piattelli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 779-784.