Using activity domain theory for managing complex systems

Using Activity Domain Theory for Managing Complex Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-317

  Taxén, Lars ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898188969     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-192-6     Document Type: Book

References (442)

1. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
2. IS theories (2008). Theories Used in IS Research. Wiki, Retrieved Sept 21, 2008, from http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
3. Jones, M., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127-157.
4. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with Technology - Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Kraut, R., Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in Software Development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69-81.
6. Latour, B. (1992). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 103-130). London: Routledge.
7. Malone, T., Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Services, 26(1), 87-119.
8. MatrixOne. (2008). Retrieved Feb 2, 2005, from http://www.matrixone.com/index.html
9. Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
10. Parnas, D. L. (1995). On ICSE's 'most influential' papers. ACM SIGSOFT, 20(3), 29-33.
11. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds., 2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
12. Standish Group, Inc. (2001). Extreme Chaos. February 2001, The Standish Group. Retrieved from http://www.standishgroup.com/
13. Taxén, L., Svensson, D. (2005). Towards an Alternative Foundation for Managing Product Life-Cycles in Turbulent Environments. International Journal of Product Development (IJPD), 2(1-2), 24-46.
14. Wartofsky, M. (1987). Epistemology Historicized. In A. Shimony & D. Nails (Eds.), Naturalistic Epistemology (pp. 357-374). Dordrecht: Reidel.
15. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 276-292.
16. Lilliesköld, J., Taxén, L., Karlsson, M., & Klasson, M. (2005). Managing complex development projects - using the system anatomy. In Proceedings Portland International Conference on Management of Technology and Engineering, PICMET '05, July 31st - Aug 4th, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA.
17. Lindmark, S., Andersson, E., Johansson, M., & Bohlin, E. (2004). Telecom Dynamics, History and State of the Swedish Telecom Sector and its Innovation System 1970-2003. VINNOVA Analysis VA 2004:04. Stockholm: VINNOVA.
18. Lindmark, S., Andersson, E.J., Bohlin, E., & Johansson, M. (2006). Innovation system dynamics in the Swedish telecom sector. Info: The journal of policy, regulation and strategy for telecommunications, 8(4), 49-66.
19. MatrixOne (2008). Retrieved Feb 2, 2005, from http://www.matrixone.com/index.html
20. Vedin, B. (1992). Teknisk revolt - Det svenska AXE-systemets brokiga framgångshistoria. [Technical revolt - The diversified success story of the Swedish AXE system (in Swedish)]. Värnamo, Sweden: Atlantis.
21. Axelsson, K. (1998). Metodisk systemstrukturering - att skapa samstämmighet mellan informations-systemarkitektur och verksamhet [Methodological Structuration of Systems - to create concordance between information system architecture and business (in Swedish)]. Dissertation No. 1, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
22. Davenport, T., Eccles, R., & Prusak, L. (1992). Information Politics. Sloan Management Review, 34(1), 53-65.
23. Gandhi, M., & Robertson, E. L. (1992). A Specification-based Data Model. Indiana University Computer Science Department Technical Report TR344. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Retrieved Sept 30, 2008, from http://www.cs.indiana.edu/ftp/techreports/index.html
24. Gandhi, M., & Robertson, E. L. (1995). SDBM as a Model for Codesign Data. In J. Rozenblit & K. Buchenrieder (Eds.), Computer Aided Software/Hardware Engineering (pp. 338-355). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
25. Karlsson, E. A. (2002). Incremental Development- Terminology and Guidelines. In Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, (Vol. 1, pp. 381-401). Singapore: World Scientific.
26. MatrixOne (2008). Retrieved Feb 2, 2005, from http://www.matrixone.com/index.html
27. Rational™ (2008). Retrieved Oct 1, 2008, from http://www-01.ibm.com/software/se/rational/
28. th, 2001.
29. Taxén, L. (1995). The Dialectical Approach to System Design. In Proceedings of Integrated Design and Process Technology (pp. 147-152), December 6-9, Austin, Texas.
30. Taxén, L. (2005). A Socio-technical Approach Towards Alignment. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(4), 427-439. doi:10.1002/spip.245
31. Taxén, L. (2006). An Integration Centric Approach for the Coordination of Distributed Software Development Projects. Information and Software Technology, 48(9), 767-780. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2006.01.007
32. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Business.
33. th International Software Process Workshop on Representing and Enacting the Software Process, 14(4), 82-83.
34. Humphrey, W., & Kellner, M. (1989). Software Process Modelling: Principles of Entity Process Models. CMU/SEI-89-TR-2. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
35. Latour, B. (1992). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 103-130). London: Routledge.
36. Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
37. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds., 2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
38. Taxén, L. (2005). A Socio-technical Approach Towards Alignment. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(4), 427-439. doi:10.1002/spip.245
39. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-network theory: Current status and future prospects. In A. Lee, J. Liebenau, J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 466-480). London: Chapman & Hall.
40. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy: From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.
43. Bernstein, R. (1999). Praxis and Action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, (Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Boston: Beacon Press.
45. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
46. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1960). The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx's "Capital". S. Syrovatkin (Trans.). Moscow: Progress, 1982. Retrieved Oct 7, 2008, from http://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/abstract/index.htm
47. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1967). Problema abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v svete "Kapitale" Marksa [The Problem of the Abstract and Concrete in the light of Marx's Capital]. "Kapital" K. Marksa. Filosofiya i sovremennost' [Marx's "Capital": Philosophy and the Present]. Moscow.
48. Israel, J. (1979). The language of dialectics and the dialectics of language. New York: Humanities Press.
49. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with Technology - Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
50. Kolakowski, L. (1969). Toward a Marxist humanism: essays on the left today. New York: Grove Press.
51. Kosík, K. (1976). Dialectics of the concrete. Dordrecht: Reidel.
52. Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Liedman, S.-E. (1998). I skuggan av framtiden. [In the shadow of the future]. Finland: Albert Bonniers Förlag (in Swedish).
54. Mackie, J. (1976). Problems from Locke. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. Marx, K. (1852b). Theses on Feuerbach. In Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 1 (pp. 13-15). Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1966.
56. Marx, K. (1867). Capital, I, chapter 7. New York: International Publishers. Retrieved Sept 22, 2008, from http://www.ecn.bris.ac.uk/het/marx/cap1/index.htm
57. Popper, K. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London.
58. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
59. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
60. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: University Press.
61. Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy: From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Bødker, S., & Bøgh Andersen, P. (2005). Complex Mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353-402. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci2004_1
63. Boland, R. J. (1996). Why shared meanings have no place in structuration theory: A reply to Scapens and Macintosh. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(7/8), 691-697. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(96)00014-1
64. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Bühler, K. (1933). Die Axiomatik der Sprachwissenschaften. Einleitung und Kommentar von Elisabeth Ströker. Frankfurt am Main (1969).
66. De Saussure, F. (1966). Cours de Linguistique Générale. de Mauro, T., (Ed.). Paris: Payot.
67. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
68. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with Technology - Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
69. Kosík, K. (1976). Dialectics of the concrete. Dordrecht: Reidel.
70. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality (M.J. Hall, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Original work published 1975.
71. Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems in the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publ.
72. Tolman, C. W. (1988). The basic vocabulary of Activity Theory. Activity Theory, 1, 14-20. Retrieved Feb 10, 2008, from http://www.comnet.ca/~pballan/AT2.htm
73. Vološinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Language of Philosophy. London: Harvard University Press.
74. Von Humboldt, W. (1999). On language: on the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species. M. Losonsky (Ed.), P. Heath (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society - The development of higher Psychological Processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
76. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. W. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
77. Walsham, G. (2005). Knowledge Management Systems: Representation and Communication in Context. Systems, Signs & Actions, 1(1), 6-18. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from http://www.sysiac.org/
78. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Augier, M., Shariq, S. Z., & Vendelø, M. T. (2001). Understanding context: its emergence, transformation and role in tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 125-136. doi:10.1108/13673270110393176
80. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81. Brentsen, K. (2000). Intuitive User Interfaces. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 23-60.
82. Bannon, L., & Bødker, S. (1997). Constructing common information spaces. In J. A. Hughes, W. Prinz, T. Rodden, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Lancaster, UK, September 07 - 11, 1997) ECSCW (pp. 81-96). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
83. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
84. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.
85. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organization: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021-1046. doi:10.1177/017084069501600605
86. Bødker, S., & Bøgh Andersen, P. (2005). Complex Mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353-402. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci2004_1
87. Boland, R. J. (2001). The Tyranny of Space in Organizational Analysis. Information and Organization, 11, 3-23. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00007-2
88. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
89. Bryan-Kinns, N., Healey, P. G. T., Papworth, D., & Vaduuva, A. (2007). Cues to Common Knowledge. In L. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, R. Harper, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW'07: Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 43-447), September 24-28, Limerick, Ireland.
90. Bryant, W. C., & Gay, S. H. (1883). A Popular History of the United States (Vol. I). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
91. Burstein, F., & Linger, H. (2003). Supporting post-Fordist work practices. A knowledge management framework for supporting knowledge work. Information Technology & People, 16(3), 289-305. doi:10.1108/09593840310489395
92. Chalmers, A. F. (1976). What is this thing called science? St Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
93. Chen, X. (2003), December. Object and Event Concepts: A Cognitive Mechanism of Incommensurability. Philosophy of Science, 70, 962-974. doi:10.1086/377381
94. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://hdl.handle.net/1956/2434
95. Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268-1287. doi:10.1145/50087.50089
96. Dewey, J. (1991). 'Logic'. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The Theory of Enquiry. The Later works of John Dewey, (Vol. 12). Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
97. Engels, F. (1954). On the part played by labour in the transition from ape to man. Dialectics of Nature. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1876/part-played-labour/index.htm
98. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. doi:10.1080/13639080123238
99. Fabrikant, S. I. (2000). Spatialized Browsing in Large Data Archives. Transactions in GIS, 4(1), 65-78. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00038
100. Gershenson, C. (2002). Contextuality: A Philosophical Paradigm, with Applications to Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Philosophy of Cognitive Science Essay. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex, COGS.
101. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach lo Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
102. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström, D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 61-95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
103. Grandori, A., & Kogut, B. (2002). Dialogue on Organization and Knowledge. Organization Science, 13(3), 224-231. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.224.2774
104. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, 109-122.
105. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
106. Halliday, M. (1974). A Sociosemiotic Perspective on Language Development. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. University of London. School of Oriental and African Studies, 37(1), 98-118.
107. Hemingway, C. (1998). Towards a Socio-Cognitive Theory of Information Systems: An Analysis of Key Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. In The Workshop Proceedings of Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes. Boston: Kluwer. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/261417.html
108. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
109. Jensen, P. E. (2005). A Contextual Theory of Learning and the Learning Organization. Knowledge and Process Management, 12(1), 53-64. doi:10.1002/kpm.217
110. Jones, K. S. (2003). What Is an Affordance? Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 107-114. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_1
111. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-Mediated Activity: Functional Organs in Social and Development Contexts, In B. A. Nardi (Ed.) Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
112. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1-2), 31-68. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
113. Kofod-Petersen, A., & Cassens, J. (2006). Using Activity Theory to Model Context Awareness. In T.R. Roth-Berghofer, S. Schulz, & D.B. Leake (Eds.), MRC 2005 (Modeling and Retrieval of Context), LNAI 3946 (pp. 1-17). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
114. Kosík, K. (1976). Dialectics of the concrete. Dordrecht: Reidel.
115. Kraut, R., & Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in Software Development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69-81. doi:10.1145/203330.203345
116. Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
117. Larsson, R. (1990). Coordination of Action in Mergers and Acquisitions - Interpretative and Systems Approaches towards Synergy. Dissertation No. 10, Lund Studies in Economics and Management, The Institute of Economic Research. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
118. Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47. doi:10.2307/2391211
119. Liedman, S.-E. (2001). Ett oändligt äventyr - Om människans kunskaper. [An eternal adventure - About the knowledge of mankind]. Stockholm, Sweden: Albert Bonniers Förlag (in Swedish).
120. Love, N. (1997). Integrating Austin. Language Sciences, 19(1), 57-65. doi:10.1016/0388-0001(95)00027-5
121. Lutters, W., & Ackerman, M. (2007). Beyond Boundary Objects: Collaborative Reuse in Aircraft Technical Support. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16(3), 341-372. doi:10.1007/s10606-006-9036-x
122. Malone, T., & Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119. doi:10.1145/174666.174668
123. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
124. Meacham, J. (1999). Riegel, Dialectics, and Multiculturalism. Human Development, 42(3), 134-144. doi:10.1159/000022619
125. Merriam-Webster On Line. (2008). Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/
126. Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change. Organization, 12(3), 437-456. doi:10.1177/1350508405051279
127. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
128. Nilson, G. (1976). Oordning/ordning: studier i kärlekens villkor. [Order/disorder: studies in the conditions of love]. Göteborg: Bokförlaget Korpen (in Swedish).
129. Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
130. Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (2002). It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684-700. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.6.684.501
131. Parsons, J. (1996). An Information Model Bases on Classification Theory. Management Science, 42(10), 1437-1453. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.10.1437
132. Porter, M. (1996). What Is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, (November-December): 61-78.
133. Reber, A. S. (1995). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin Books.
134. Sawhney, M., & Prandelli, E. (2001). Communities of Creation: Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets. IEEE Engineering Management Review, First Quarter, 6-24.
135. Schmidt, K. (1990). Analysis of Cooperative Work. A Conceptual Framework. Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark, [Risø-M-2890].
136. Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1-2), 7-40. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/schmidt92taking.html
137. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
138. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358. doi:10.2307/2392246
139. Star, S. L. (1989). The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence (pp. 37-54). London: Pitman Publishers, Ltd.
140. Stetsenko, A. (1999). Social Interaction, Cultural Tools and the Zone of Proximal Development: In Search of a Synthesis. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U.J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches (pp. 235-252). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
141. Taxén, L., &Lilliesköld, J. (2008). Images as action instruments in complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 527-536. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.009
142. Virkkunen, J., & Kuutti, K. (2000). Understanding organizational learning by focusing on "activity systems." Accounting. Management and Information Technologies, 10(4), 291-319. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00005-9
143. Vološinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Language of Philosophy. London: Harvard University Press.
144. Webster's 1913 Dictionary (2008). Retrieved Sept 4, 2008, from http://humanities.uchicago.edu/orgs/ARTFL/forms_unrest/webster.form.html
145. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
146. Wikipedia (2008). Retrieved Aug 6, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_faber
147. Wiley, N. (1988). The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 254-261. doi:10.2307/202119
148. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
149. Yakura, E. K. (2002). Charting Time: Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956-970. doi:10.2307/3069324
150. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event Structure in Perception and Conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3-21. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3
151. Zinchenko, V. (2001). External and Internal: Another Comment on the Issue. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Cultural-Historical Psychology (pp. 135-147). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
152. Chalmers, A. F. (1976). What is this thing called science? St Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
153. Chen, X. (2003), December. Object and Event Concepts: A Cognitive Mechanism of Incommensurability. Philosophy of Science, 70, 962-974. doi:10.1086/377381
154. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. doi:10.1080/13639080123238
155. Freeman, W. J. (2004). How and why Brains Create Meaning from Sensory Information. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering, 14(2), 515-530. doi:10.1142/S0218127404009405
156. Gärdenfors, P. (1992). Blotta tanken. [The mere thought (in Swedish)]. Nora, Sweden: Nya Doxa.
157. Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
158. Gärdenfors, P. (2000b). Hur Homo blev Sapiens. Om tänkandets evolution. [How Homo became Sapiens. About the evolution of thinking (in Swedish)]. Nora, Sweden: Nya Doxa.
159. Greenfield, S. (1998). How Might the Brain Generate Consciousness? In S. Rose (Ed.) From Brain to Consciousness - Essays on the new science of the mind (pp. 210-227). London: Penguin Books.
160. Hampe, B. (2005). Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning, CLR 29 (pp. 1-13). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
161. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
162. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
163. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
164. Langacker, R. W. (1988). The nature of grammatical valence. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 91-125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
165. Lemke, J. (2000). Material Sign Processes and Ecosocial Organization. In P.B. Andersen, C. Emmeche, & N.O. Finnemann-Nielsen (Eds.), Downward Causation: Self-organization in Biology, Psychology, and Society (pp. 181-213). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press. Retrieved Oct 5, 2008, from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/jll-new.htm
166. Mingers, J. (2001). Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology. Information and Organization, 11(2), 103-128. doi:10.1016/S1471-7727(00)00005-1
167. Parsons, J. (1996). An Information Model Bases on Classification Theory. Management Science, 42(10), 1437-1453. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.10.1437
168. Plaut, D. C. (2002). Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: A computational account of optic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(7), 603-639. doi:10.1080/02643290244000112
169. Rogers, Y., & Ellis, J. (1994). Distributed Cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working. Journal of Information Technology, 9(2), 119-128. doi:10.1057/jit.1994.12
170. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
171. Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(4), 505-509. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00241-5
172. Sperry, R. W. (1976). Mental phenomena as causal determinants in brain function. In G. Globus, G. Maxwell, & I. Savodnik (Eds.), Consciousness and the Brain (pp. 163-177). New York: Plenum Press.
173. Vološinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Language of Philosophy. London: Harvard University Press.
174. Von Uexküll, J. (1983). An introduction to Umwelt. Semiotica, 2001(134), 107-110. From J. von Uexküll (1936). Niegeschaute Welten, 11-17. Berlin: S. Fischer Verlag. Excerpt selected and translated by Gösta Brunow.
175. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
176. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
177. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., & Ollinger, J. M. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 651-655. doi:10.1038/88486
178. Chen, P. (1976). The Entity Relationship Model - Towards a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36. doi:10.1145/320434.320440
179. Gandhi, M., & Robertson, E. L. (1992). A Specification-based Data Model. Indiana University Computer Science Department Technical Report TR344. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Retrieved Sept 30, 2008, from http://www.cs.indiana.edu/ftp/techreports/index.html
180. Halliday, M. (1975). Learning How To Mean. London: Edward Arnold.
181. Humphrey, W., & Kellner, M. (1989). Software Process Modelling: Principles of Entity Process Models. CMU/SEI-89-TR-2. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
182. Jacobson, I., Christerson, M., Jonsson, P., & Övergaard, G. (1992). Object-oriented software engineering: a use case driven approach. Wokingham, UK: ACM Press, Addison-Wesley.
183. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
184. Malone, T., & Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119. doi:10.1145/174666.174668
185. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
186. Taxén, L. (2005). A Socio-technical Approach Towards Alignment. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(4), 427-439. doi:10.1002/spip.245
187. Truex, D. P., Baskerville, R., & Klein, H. (1999). Growing Systems in Emergent Organizations. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 117-123. doi:10.1145/310930.310984
188. Alter, S. (2002). The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research. [from http://www.stevenalter.com/newsletter.htm]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 90-104. Retrieved April 2, 2008.
189. Alter, S. (2006). The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results. Larkspur, CA: Work System Press.
190. Alter, S. (2006b). Work Systems and IT Artifacts: Does the Definition Matter? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17(14), 299-313. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/17-14/default.asp?View=Journal&x=45&y=11
191. th Annual ISOnEworld Conference, April 11-13, 2007, Las Vegas, NV.
192. Alter, S. (2009). The Work System Method. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http://www.worksystemmethod.com/works.htm
193. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
194. Bannon, L., & Bødker, S. (1997). Constructing common information spaces. In J. A. Hughes, W. Prinz, T. Rodden, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Lancaster, UK, September 07 - 11, 1997) ECSCW (pp. 81-96). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
195. Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
196. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
197. Bergman, M., Lyytinen, K., & Mark, G. (2007). Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts. [JAIS]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(11), 546-568.
198. Bertelsen, O. (1999). Mediation and Heterogeneity in Design. In Y. Dittrich, C. Floyd, N. Jayaratna, F. Kensing, R. Klischewski (Eds.), Social Thinking - Software Practice (pp. 16-20). Dagstuhl-Seminar-Report; 250, 05.09.1999 - 10.09.1999 (99361). Wadern, Germany: IBFI gem. GmbH.
199. th 2001.
200. Bertelsen, O., Korpela, M., & Mursu, A. (2004). Preface. In O. Bertelsen, M. Korpela, A. Mursu, (Eds.), ATIT 2004, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical Methods for IT-Design (p. 3). September 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark. Report PB-574, Daimi, Denmark: University of Aarhus. Retrieved Oct 6, 2008, from http://www.daimi.au.dk/research/papers-reports/reports
201. Bititci, U., & Muir, D. (1997). Business process definition: a bottom-up approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(4), 365-374. doi:10.1108/01443579710159950
202. Boland, R. J., & Ramkrishnan, V. T. (1995). Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350-372. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.4.350
203. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (199). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34. doi:10.2307/2393807
204. Carlile, P. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
205. Clement, A., & Wagner, I. (1995). Fragmented Exchange: Disarticulation and the Need for Regionalized Communication Spaces. In H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW '95 (pp. 33-50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Papers.
206. Cohen, M. D. (1996). Individual learning and organizational routine. In Cohen, M. D., Sproull L. S. (Eds.) Organizational Learning (pp. 188-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
207. COSI. (2009). Complexity in Social Science. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://www.irit.fr/COSI/index.php
208. Devadoss, P., & Pan, S. L. (2007). Enterprise Systems Use: Towards a Structurational Analysis of Enterprise Systems Induced Organizational Transformation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 352-385.
209. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
210. Durkheim, É. (1972). Selected writings. A. Giddens (Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
211. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
212. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R.L. Punamäki (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
213. Engeström, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creations in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R.L. Punamäki (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
214. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. doi:10.1080/13639080123238
215. Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of Interest: Learning through the Interaction of Multiple Knowledge Systems. In S. Bjornestad, R. Moe, A. Morch, A. Opdahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th IRIS Conference (pp. 1-14). Bergen, Norway: Department of Information Science.
216. Fjuk, A., Smordal, O., & Nurminen, M. (1997). Taking Articulation Work Seriously - an activity theoretical approach. TUCS TR 120 (Technical Report). Turku, Finland: Turku Centre for Computer Science.
217. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
218. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
219. rd European Conference on Knowledge Management (3ECKM), Dublin. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://www.ida.liu.se/~gorgo/engpub.html
220. Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525-557.
221. Jones, M. (1999). Structuration Theory. In W. Currie, R. Galliers (Eds.), Rethinking management information systems: an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 103-135). Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
222. Jones, M., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127-157.
223. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-Mediated Activity: Functional Organs in Social and Development Contexts, In B. A. Nardi (Ed.) Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
224. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with Technology - Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
225. Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
226. Kjellström, G. (1991). On the Efficiency of Gaussian Adaptation. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 71(3). doi:10.1007/BF00941405
227. Kjellström, G., & Taxén, L. (1981). Stochastic Optimization in System Design. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, CAS-28(7), 702-715. doi:10.1109/TCS.1981.1085030
228. Kjellström, G., & Taxén, L. (1992). Gaussian Adaptation, an evolution-based efficient global optimizer. In I. C. Brezinsk, & U. Kulish (Eds.), Computational and Applied Mathematics (pp. 267-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Elsevier Science Publishers.
229. Korpela, M. (2004). ActAD in Information Systems Analysis and Design. In O. Bertelsen, M. Korpela, A. Mursu, (Eds.), ATIT 2004, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical Methods for IT-Design (pp. 134-136), September, Copenhagen, Denmark. Report PB-574. Daimi, Denmark: University of Aarhus. Retrieved Oct 6, 2008, from http://www.daimi.au.dk/research/papers-reports/reports
230. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.) Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
231. Latour, B. (1992). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 103-130). London: Routledge.
232. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
233. Leiman, M. (1999). The concept of sign in the work of Vygotsky, Winnicott, and Bakhtin: Further integration of object relations theory and activity theory. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R.L. Punamäki (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 419-434). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
234. Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems in the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publ.
235. Lewin, A. Y. (1999). Application of Complexity Theory to Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), 215. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.215
236. Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
237. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
238. McKelvey, B. (1997). Quasi-Natural Organization Science. Organization Science, 8(4), 352-380. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.4.351
239. McKelvey, B. (1999). Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes. Organization Science, 10(3), 94-321. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.294
240. Morel, B., & Ramanujam, R. (1999). Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems. Organization Science, 10(3), 278-293. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.278
241. Orlikowski, W. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
242. Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
243. Reynolds, C. (2009). Boids. Background and Update. Retrieved February 20, 2009, from http://www.red3d.com/cwr/boids/
244. th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 910-924). Aix-en-Provence, France: Euro-Arab Management School.
245. Rose, J., & Lewis, P. J. (2001). Using structuration theory in action research: an intranet development project. In L. Russo, B. Fitzgerald, & J.I. DeGross (Eds.), Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: the Social and Organisational Perspective (pp. 273-296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
246. th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 217-231), Bled, Slovenia, June 27-29.
247. Rousseau, D. M., & House, R. J. (1994). Meso organizational behavior: avoiding three fundamental biases. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 1, 13-30.
248. Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1-2), 7-40. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/schmidt92taking.html
249. Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5(2/3), 155-200. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/schmidt96coordination.html
250. rd Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
251. Stamper, R. K. (2001). Organisational semiotics. Informatics without the computer. In K. Liu, R. J. Clare, P. B. Andersen, R. K. Stamper (Eds.), Information, organisation and technology. Studies in organisational semiotics (pp. 115-171). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
252. Strauss, A. (1985). Work and the Division of Labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), 1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00212.x
253. rd Nordic conference on Cultural and Activity Research, 3-5 September, Copenhagen, Denmark.
254. Virkkunen, J., & Kuutti, K. (2000). Understanding organizational learning by focusing on "activity systems." Accounting. Management and Information Technologies, 10(4), 291-319. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00005-9
255. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-network theory: Current status and future prospects. In A. Lee, J. Liebenau, J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 466-480). London: Chapman & Hall.
256. Weber, M. (1983). Ekonomi och samhälle. Förståendesociologins grunder. [Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology] (pp. 3-22). Lund, Sweden: Argos (in Swedish).
257. Wikipedia (2008b). Retrieved Aug 10, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_system
258. Wikipedia (2008b). Retrieved Aug 10, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_system
259. Work systems theory (2009). Retrieved from http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/Work_systems_theory
260. IS theories (2008). Theories Used in IS Research. [Wiki]. Retrieved Sept 21, 2008, from http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
261. Adler, N. (1999). Managing Complex Product Development - Three approaches. Stockholm: EFI, Stockholm School of Economics.
262. Agile Manifesto (2009). Retrieved Jan 29, 2009, from http://agilemanifesto.org/
263. Anderstedt, J., Anderstedt, U., Karlsson, M., & Klasson, M. (2002). Projekt och helhet - att leda projekt i praktiken. [Project and whole - to manage projects in practice (in Swedish)]. Stockholm: Författares Bokmaskin.
264. Babar, M. A., & Abrahamsson, P. (2008). Architecture-Centric Methods and Agile Approaches. In P. Abrahamsson, R. Baskerville, K. Conboy, B. Fitzgerald, L. Morgan, & X. Wang (Eds.), Proceeding of 9th International Conference, XP 2008 (pp. 242-243). Limerick, Ireland, June 10-14, 2008. Heidelberg: Springer.
265. Battin, R., Crocker, R., Kreidler, J., & Subramanian, K. (2001). Levering Resources in Global Software Development. IEEE Software, (March/April): 70-77. doi:10.1109/52.914750
266. Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2003). Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods. IEEE Computer, 36(6), 57-66.
267. Boehm, B. W., & Turner, R. (2003b). Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
268. Booch, G. (2006). On Architecture. IEEE Software, 23(2), 16-18. doi:10.1109/MS.2006.52
269. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
270. Brooks, F. P. (1995). The mythical man-month: essays on software engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
271. Crnkovic, I., Asklund, U., & Persson-Dahlqvist, A. (2003). Implementing and Integrating Product Data Management and Software Configuration Management. London: Artech House.
272. Damian, D. (2003). Global Software Development: Growing Opportunities, Ongoing Challenges. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8, 179-182. doi:10.1002/spip.182
273. Ebert, C., & De Neve, P. (2001). Surviving Global Software Development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 62-69. doi:10.1109/52.914748
274. Ekstedt, M., Johnson, P., Lilliesköld, J., & Jonsson, N. (2003). Making Project Complexity Understandable: the Elegance of Notations. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Management of Technology, Nancy, France, 2003.
275. Elshamy, A., & Elssamadisy, A. (2006). Divide After You Conquer: An Agile Software Development Practice for Large Projects. In P. Abrahamsson, M. Marchesi, & G. Succi (Eds.), XP 2006 LNCS 4044 (pp. 164-168). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
276. Fowler, M. (2003). Who needs an architect? IEEE Software, 20(5), 11-13. doi:10.1109/MS.2003.1231144
277. Fowler, M. (2004). Is design dead? Retrieved Jan 19, 2009, from http://martinfowler.com/articles/designDead.html#id58351
278. Fowler, M. (2006). Continuous Integration. Retrieved Jan 19, 2009, from http://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html
279. Fraser, S., Boehm, B., Järkvik, J., Lundh, E., & Vilkki, K. (2006). How Do Agile/XP Development Methods Affect Companies? In P. Abrahamsson, M. Marchesi, & G. Succi (Eds.), XP 2006 LNCS 4044 (pp. 225-228). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
280. Gandhi, M., & Robertson, E. L. (1992). A Specification-based Data Model. Indiana University Computer Science Department Technical Report TR344. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Retrieved Sept 30, 2008, from http://www.cs.indiana.edu/ftp/techreports/index.html
281. Gandhi, M., & Robertson, E. L. (1995). SDBM as a Model for Codesign Data. In J. Rozenblit & K. Buchenrieder (Eds.), Computer Aided Software/Hardware Engineering (pp. 338-355). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
282. Gorton, I., & Motwani, S. (1996). Issues in co-operative software engineering using globally distributed teams. Information and Software Technology, 38(10), 647-655. doi:10.1016/0950-5849(96)01099-3
283. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
284. Heeks, R., Krishna, S., Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2001). Synching or Sinking: Global Software Outsourcing Relationships. IEEE Software, 18(2), 54-60. doi:10.1109/52.914744
285. Henry, T. S. (2007). Architecture-Centric Project Estimation. Master of Science thesis in Computer Science & Applications. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Retrieved Jan 26, 2009, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05142007-214700/unrestricted/thesis.pdf
286. Herbsleb, J., & Moitra, D. (2001). Global Software Development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 16-20. doi:10.1109/52.914732
287. Järkvik, J., Berggren, C., & Söderlund, J. (2007). Innovation in project management: A neo-realistic approach to time-critical complex systems development. In T. Brady (Ed.), IRNOP VIII Conference, Projects as Innovation, Innovation as projects. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex. September 19-21, 2007.
288. Jensen, R. N., Møller, T., Sönder, P., & Tjørnehøj, G. (2006). Architecture and Design in eXtreme Programming; Introducing "Developer Stories". In P. Abrahamsson, M. Marchesi, & G. Succi (Eds.), XP 2006 LNCS 4044 (pp. 133-142). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
289. Jönsson, P. (2006). The Anatomy-An Instrument for Managing Software Evolution and Evolvability. In Second International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability (SE'06) (pp. 31-37), Philadelphia. September 24, 2006.
290. Karlsson, E. A. (2002). Incremental Development - Terminology and Guidelines. In Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, (Vol. 1, pp. 381-401). Singapore: World Scientific.
291. Karlsson, E. A., & Andersson, L. G. (2001). XP and Large Distributed Software Projects. In G. Succi, M., & M. Marchesi, (Eds.), Extreme Programming Examined (pp. 119-134). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
292. Karlsson, E. A., Andersson, L. G., & Leion, P. (2000). Daily build and feature development in large distributed projects. In [Los Alamos, CA: IEEE CS Press.]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE, 2000, 649-658.
293. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
294. Komi-Sirviö, S., & Tihinen, M. (2005). Lessons Learned by Participants of Distributed Software Development. Knowledge and Process Management, 12(2), 108-122. doi:10.1002/kpm.225
295. Kraut, R., & Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in Software Development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69-81. doi:10.1145/203330.203345
296. Kristofersson, A., & Lindeberg, C. (2006). Lean Product Development in Swedish Industry - An Exploratory Study. Master Thesis in Operations Management, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. Retrieved Jan 20, 2009, from http://arc.hhs.se/download.aspx?MediumId=161
297. Kruchten, P. (1995). Architectural Blueprints - The "4+1" View Model of Software Architecture. IEEE Software, 12(6), 42-50. doi:10.1109/52.469759
298. Larman, C., & Vodde, B. (2008). Scaling lean & agile development: thinking and organizational tools for large- scale Scrum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
299. th, 2005.
300. Maier, M. W., Emery, D., & Hilliard, R. (2001). Software architecture: introducing IEEE Standard 1471. Computer, 34(4), 107-109. doi:10.1109/2.917550
301. Malone, T., & Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119. doi:10.1145/174666.174668
302. Mathiassen, L. (1998). Reflective Systems Development. Dr. Techn. Thesis, Aalborg University.
303. MatrixOne. (2008). Retrieved Feb 2, 2005, from http://www.matrixone.com/index.html
304. McChesney, I. R., & Gallagher, S. (2004). Communication and co-ordination practices in software engineering projects. Information and Software Technology, 46(7), 473-489. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2003.10.001
305. Meso, P., & Jain, R. (2006). Agile Software Development: Adaptive Systems Principles and Best Practices. Information Systems Management, 23(3), 19-30. doi:10.1201/1078.10580530/46108.23.3.2006 0601/93704.3
306. Nord, R. L., & Tomayko, J. E. (2006). Software architecture-centric methods and agile development. IEEE Software, 23(2), 47-53. doi:10.1109/MS.2006.54
307. Ny Teknik. (2006). Ericsson utvecklar på löpande band [Ericsson develops on a conveyor Belt]. Ny Teknik, Jan 25, 2006 (In Swedish). Retrieved Jan 20, 2009, from http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/it_telekom/allmant/article38813.ece
308. Olsson, K. (1999). Daily build - the best of both worlds: rapid development and control. Stockholm: Sveriges verkstadsindustrier. Retrieved Jan 14, 2009, from http://www.spin-sweden.org/dailybuildreport.pdf
309. Ovaska, P., Rossi, M., & Marttiin, P. (2003). Architecture as a Coordination Tool in Multi-site Software Development. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8(4), 233-247. doi:10.1002/spip.186
310. Prikladnicki, R., Audy, J. L. N., & Evaristo, R. (2003). Global Software Development in Practice Lessons Learned. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8(4), 267-281. doi:10.1002/spip.188
311. Sakthivel, S. (2005). Virtual workgroups in offshore system development. Information and Software Technology, 47(5), 305-318. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2004.09.001
312. Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
313. Shaw, M., & Clements, P. (2006). The golden age of software architecture. IEEE Software, 23(2), 31-39. doi:10.1109/MS.2006.58
314. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358. doi:10.2307/2392246
315. Smolander, K., Rossi, M., & Purao, S. (2008). Software architectures: Blueprint, Literature, Language or Decision? European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 575-588. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.48
316. rd International Conference on Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems (pp. 28-47), 15-16 March 2005, Limerick, Ireland. Retrieved Feb 6, 2008, from http://www.alois2005.ul.ie/
317. Taxén, L. (2006). An Integration Centric Approach for the Coordination of Distributed Software Development Projects. Information and Software Technology, 48(9), 767-780. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2006.01.007
318. Taxén, L., &Lilliesköld, J. (2008). Images as action instruments in complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 527-536. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.009
319. Toffolon, C., & Dakhli, S. (2000). A framework for studying the coordination process in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM symposium on Applied computing - Volume 2 (pp. 851-857). Como, Italy.
320. Wikipedia (2009). Retrieved Jan 19, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development
321. Wikipedia (2009b). Retrieved Jan 30, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_refactoring
322. Appleton, D. (2004). Why Enterprise Architecture is an Oxymoron. Business Rules Journal, 5(4). Retrieved July 25, 2008, from http://www.BRCommunity.com/a2004/b191.html
323. Balabko, P., & Wegmann, A. (2006). Systemic classification of concern-based design methods in the context of enterprise architecture. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 115-131. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7976-9
324. Beznosov, K. (2000). Information Enterprise Architectures: Problems and Perspectives. Technical Report 2000-06. Miami, Florida: Florida International University.
325. Bititci, U., & Muir, D. (1997). Business process definition: a bottom-up approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(4), 365-374. doi:10.1108/01443579710159950
326. DoDAF (2004). The DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0. Department of Defense, February 9, 2004.
327. Fatolahi, A., & Shams, F. (2006). An investigation into applying UML to the Zachman framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 133-143. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7977-8
328. FEA. (2008). Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office website. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/a-1-fea.html
329. Goethals, F. G., Snoeck, M., Lemahieu, W., & Vandenbulcke, J. (2006). Management and enterprise architecture click: The FAD(E)E framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 67-79. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7971-1
330. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
331. Greefhorst, D., Koning, H., & Vliet, H. (2006). The many faces of architectural descriptions. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 103-113. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7975-x
332. Järkvik, J., Berggren, C., & Söderlund, J. (2007). Innovation in project management: A neo-realistic approach to time-critical complex systems development. In T. Brady (Ed.), IRNOP VIII Conference, Projects as Innovation, Innovation as projects. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex. September 19-21, 2007.
333. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., ter Doest, H., Arbab, F., Bosma, H., & Wieringa, R. (2006). Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 63-66. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7970-2
334. Keltikangas, E. (2006). Enterprise Architecture Documentation and Representation-A Pragmatic Documentation Framework. Thesis, Degree of Master of Science, Helsinki University of Technology.
335. Khoury, G. R., & Simhoff, S. J. (2004). Enterprise Architecture Modelling Using Elastic Metaphors. In S. Hartmann, & J. F. Roddick (Eds.), Conceptual Modelling 2004, First Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM2004) (pp. 65-69). Dunedin, New Zealand, January 18-22, 2004. CRPIT 31 Australian Computer Society.
336. Kirsilä, J., Hellström, M., & Wikström, K. (2007). Integration as a project management concept: A study of the commissioning process in industrial deliveries. International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 714-721. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.005
337. Lindström, Å., Johnson, P., Johansson, E., Ekstedt, M., & Simonsson, M. (2006). A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them? Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 81-90. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7972-0
338. Merriam-Webster On Line. (2008). Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/
339. Open Group. (2008). The Open Group Architectural Framework Version 8. Retrieved, July 21, 2008, from http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/
340. Rational™ (2008). Retrieved Oct 1, 2008, from http://www-01.ibm.com/software/se/rational/
341. Remington, K., & Pollack, J. (2007). Tools for Complex Projects. Burlington, MA: Gower Publishing Company.
342. Ross, J. W. (2005). Forget Strategy: Focus IT on your Operating Model. MIT Sloan CISR Research Briefing, V(3C). Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, MIT.
343. Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise Architecture As Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
344. Ross, R. (2003). Business Rules Manifesto - The Principals of Rule Independence. Business Rules Group, November 2003.
345. Smith, D., O'Brien, L., Barbacci, M., & Coallier, F. (2002). A roadmap for enterprise integration. Software Technology and Engineering Practice, STEP 2002. Proceedings. 10th International Workshop on (pp. 94-102). 6-8 Oct. 2002.
346. Sowa, J., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalising the framework for IS architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590-616.
347. Veasey, P. W. (2001). Use of Enterprise Architectures in Managing Strategic Change. Business Process Management Journal, 7(5), 420-436. doi:10.1108/14637150110406803
348. Versteeg, G., & Bouwman, H. (2006). Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 91-102. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7973-z
349. Wikipedia (2008c). Retrieved Aug 10, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractor
350. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276-292.
351. Zachman, J. A. (1997). Enterprise Architecture: The Issue of the Century. Database Programming and Design, March, 1997. San Francisco: Miller Freeman.
352. Zachman, J. A. (2008). The Framework for Enterprise Architecture - Background, Description, and Utility. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://www.zifa.com/
353. Zachman, J. A. (2008b). The Framework for Enterprise Architecture - Cell Definitions. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://www.zifa.com/
354. 2. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://www.zachmaninternational.com/index.php/home-article/34-zachman-framework/13-the-zachmanframework
355. ARIS. (2008). Retrieved August 30, 2008, from http://www.ids-scheer.com/en/aris
356. Brown, D. H. (2001). Fundamentals of shared product structure. Port Chester, NY: D. H. Brown Associates, Inc.
357. Cao, G., Clarke, S., & Lehaney, B. (2001). A critique of BPR from a holistic perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 7(4), 332-339. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005732
358. CIMdata. (2008). Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Definition. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.cimdata.com/plm/definition.html
359. Eriksson, H. E., & Penker, M. (2000). Business Modeling with UML - Business Patterns at Work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
360. Estublier, J., Favre, J.-M., & Morat, P. (1998). Toward SCM/PDM Integration? System Configuration Management. SCM-8, (LNCS 1439), 75-94.
361. Hallin, K., Zimmerman, T., & Malmqvist, J. (2004). Towards a Framework for Integrated Information Management in Mechatronic Product Development. In NordDesign 2004 - Product Design in Changing Environment, 18-20 August 2004, Tampere, Finland.
362. Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264-280). London: Routledge.
363. Latour, B. (1992). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 103-130). London: Routledge.
364. Lindenthal, A. (2008). PDM and PLM. 2PLM John Stark Associates. Retrieved Aug 28, 2008, from http://www.johnstark.com/2plm269.html
365. Martinsons, M. G., & Davidson, R. (2003). Cultural Issues and IT Management: Looking Ahead. Guest Editorial. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(1), 3-7. doi:10.1109/TEM.2003.808299
366. Persson Dahlqvist, A., Asklund, U., Crnkovic, I., Svensson, D., Ranby, J., Hedin, A., & Larsson, M. (2001). Product Data Management and Software Configuration Management: Similarities and Difference. Technical Report. The Association of Swedish Engineering Industries.
367. PLCS. (2008). Product Life Cycle Support. Retrieved Sept 4, 2008, from http://www.plcs-resources.org/
368. Svensson, D., & Crnkovic, I. (2002). Information Management for Multi-Technology Products. In Design 2002, Dubrovnik, Croatia 14-17 May 2002.
369. Svensson, D., Malmström, J., Pikosz, P., & Malmqvist, J. (1999). A Framework for Modeling and Analysis of Engineering Information Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 12-15, Las Vegas, NV.
370. Taxén, L. (2004). IS Design as Domain Construction. In O. Bertelsen, M. Korpela, A. Mursu, (Eds.), ATIT 2004, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical Methods for IT-Design (pp. 111-122). September 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark. Report PB-574. Daimi, Denmark: University of Aarhus, Denmark. Retrieved Oct 6, 2008, from http://www.daimi.au.dk/research/papers-reports/reports
371. Taxén, L., & Svensson, D. (2005). Towards an Alternative Foundation for Managing Product Life-Cycles in Turbulent Environments. [IJPD]. International Journal of Product Development, 2(1-2), 24-46. doi:10.1504/IJPD.2005.006667
372. Trauth, E. M. (1989). The Evolution of Information Resource Management. Information & Management, 16(5), 257-268. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(89)90003-7
373. Abou-Zeid, E. (2008). Preface. In E. Abou-Zeid (Ed.), Knowledge Management and Business Strategies: Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Research (pp. xii-xvii). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
374. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
375. Bishoff, L., & Allen, N. (2004). Business Planning for Cultural Heritage Institutions. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
376. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organization: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021-1046. doi:10.1177/017084069501600605
377. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Towards a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
378. Chan, Y. (2002). Why haven't we mastered alignment? The importance of the Informal Organization Structure. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(21), 76-112.
379. Chandler, A. (1966). Strategy and Structure. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
380. th BPMDS Workshop on Creating and Maintaining the Fit between Business Processes and Support System (pp. 160-168). Riga, Latvia, 2004.
381. Earl, M. J. (1996). An Organizational Approach to IS Strategy Making. In M. J. Earl (Ed.), Information Management - The Organizational Dimension (pp. 136-170). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
382. Earl, M. J. (2001). Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215-233.
383. Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-276.
384. Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211-223. doi:10.1177/135050840072001
385. Goldkuhl, G. (2002). Anchoring scientific abstractions - ontological and linguistic determination following socio-instrumental pragmatism. In European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management (EcRM2002) (pp. 147-156). Reading, 29-30 April 2002. Draft retrieved Feb 4, 2006, from http://www.ida.liu.se/~gorgo/engpub.html
386. Gorelick, C., & Tantawy-Monsou, B. (2006). For performance through learning, knowledge management is the critical practice. The Learning Organization, 12(2), 125-139. doi:10.1108/09696470510583511
387. Hackney, R., Burn, J., Cowan, E., & Dhillon, G. (2000). Challenging Assumptions for Strategic Information Systems Planning: Theoretical Perspectives. [CAIS]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 3(9), 2-24.
388. Hildreth, P. M., & Kimble, C. (2002). The duality of knowledge. Information Research, 8(1). Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper142.html
389. Lemke, J. L. (1993). Discourse, Dynamics, and Social Change. Cultural Dynamics, 6(1), 243-275. In M. A. K. Halliday (Ed.) Language as Cultural Dynamic. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/cult-dyn.htm
390. Lewin, A. Y. (1999). Application of Complexity Theory to Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), 215. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.215
391. Luftman, J., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Key Issues for IT Executives. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(2), 89-104.
392. Martinsons, M. G., & Davidson, R. (2003). Cultural Issues and IT Management: Looking Ahead. Guest Editorial. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(1), 3-7. doi:10.1109/TEM.2003.808299
393. Merriam-Webster On Line. (2008). Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/
394. Opdahl, A. L. (1997). A model for comparing approaches to IS-architecture alignment. In B. Irgens, K. Ellingsen, E. Mathisen, N. M. Nielsen, & Z. Uddin Quazi (Eds.), Proceedings of "Norsk konferanse om organisasjoners bruk av IT" (pp. 67-79). Bodö, Norway, June.
395. Peltonen, T., & Lämsä, T. (2004). 'Communities of Practice' and the Social Process of Knowledge Creation: Towards a New Vocabulary for Making Sense of Organizational Learning. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 2004(4), 249-262.
396. Porter, M. (1996). What Is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, (November-December): 61-78.
397. Regev, G., & Wegmann, A. (2003). Why Do We Need Business Process Support? Balancing Specialization and Generalization with BPS Systems. Introductory note to the 4th BPMDS Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Business Process Support. Velden, Austria 2003.
398. th BPMDS Workshop on Creating and Maintaining the Fit between Business Processes and Support System (pp. 131-137). Riga, Latvia, 2004.
399. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
400. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds., 2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
401. Taxén, L. (2005). A Socio-technical Approach Towards Alignment. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(4), 427-439. doi:10.1002/spip.245
402. nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-12). Volume Track 1, 5-8 Jan. 1999.
403. Tuomi, I. (2002). The Future of Knowledge Management. [LLinE]. Lifelong Learning in Europe, VII(2), 69-79.
404. Virkkunen, J., & Kuutti, K. (2000). Understanding organizational learning by focusing on "activity systems." Accounting. Management and Information Technologies, 10(4), 291-319. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00005-9
405. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
406. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Excerpt retrieved Oct 8, 2008, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/2855.html
407. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
408. Zack, M. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.
409. Biazzo, S. (1998). A critical examination of the business process re-engineering phenomenon. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(9/10), 1000-1016. doi:10.1108/01443579810225586
410. Bititci, U., & Muir, D. (1997). Business process definition: a bottom-up approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(4), 365-374. doi:10.1108/01443579710159950
411. Chan, S. (2000). Information technology in business processes. Business Process Management Journal, 6(3), 224-237. doi:10.1108/14637150010325444
412. Cumbie, B., Jourdan, Z., Peachey, T., Dugo, T. M., & Craighead, C. W. (2005). Enterprise Resource Planning Research: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go from Here? [JITTA]. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 7(2), 21-36.
413. Davenport, T. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
414. Davenport, T. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-129.
415. Davenport, T., Short, J. (1998). The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. IEEE Engineering Management Review, Fall, 46-60.
416. Deakins, E., & Makgill, H. (1997). What killed BPR? Some evidence from the literature. Business Process Management Journal, 3(1), 81-107. doi:10.1108/14637159710161594
417. Gargeya, B., & Brady, C. (2005). Success and failure factors of adopting SAP in ERP system implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 501-516. doi:10.1108/14637150510619858
418. Goldkuhl, G., & Röstlinger, A. (2005). Praktikbegreppet - en praktikgenerisk modell som grund för teoriutveckling och verksamhetsutveckling. [The practice notion - a practice generic model as foundation for theory development and development of organizations]. Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University (in Swedish). Retrieved Feb 4, 2006, from http://www.ida.liu.se/~gorgo/engpub.html
419. Goldkuhl, G., Röstlinger, A., & Braf, E. (2001). Organisations As Practice Systems - Integrating Knowledge, Signs, Artefacts And Action. In IFIP 8.1 Working Conference Organisational Semiotics: evolving a science of information systems. July 23-25, 2001, Montreal, Canada. Draft retrieved Feb 6, 2006, from http://www.ida.liu.se/~gorgo/engpub.html
420. Gosain, S., Lee, Z., & Kim, Y. (2005). The management of cross-functional inter-dependencies in ERP implementations: emergent coordination patterns. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 371-387. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000549
421. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, (Volume 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
422. Halliday, M. (1975). Learning How To Mean. London: Edward Arnold.
423. Iivari, J., & Lyytinen, K. (1998). Research on Information Systems Development in Scandinavia - Unity in Plurality. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 10(1&2), 135-186.
424. Kumar, K., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2000). ERP experiences and evolution. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 23-26. doi:10.1145/332051.332063
425. Malone, T., & Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119. doi:10.1145/174666.174668
426. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
427. Marjanovic, O. (2005). Towards IS supported coordination in emergent business processes. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 476-487. doi:10.1108/14637150510619830
428. Melin, U. (2002). Koordination och informationssystem i företag och nätverk. [Coordination and Information System in Companies and Networks]. Linköping Studies in Information Science, Dissertation No. 6, Institutionen för datavetenskap, Linköpings universitet (in Swedish).
429. Morgan, T. (2002). Business Rules and Information Systems: Aligning IT with Business Goals. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
430. Parsons, J. (1996). An Information Model Bases on Classification Theory. Management Science, 42(10), 1437-1453. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.10.1437
431. Scheer, A.-W., & Habermann, F. (2000). Making ERP a Success. Using business process models to achieve positive results. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 57-61. doi:10.1145/332051.332073
432. Taxén, L., & Svensson, D. (2005). Towards an Alternative Foundation for Managing Product Life-Cycles in Turbulent Environments. [IJPD]. International Journal of Product Development, 2(1-2), 24-46. doi:10.1504/IJPD.2005.006667
433. Weigand, H., & Dignum, F. (1997). Formalization and rationalization of communication. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Communication Modelling, the Language/Action Perspective (LAP'97) (pp. 71-86). Veldhoven, June 9-10, The Netherlands.
434. Weigand, H., van der Poll, F., & de Moor, A. (2003). Coordination through Communication. In Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2003) (pp. 115-134). Tilburg, The Netherlands, July 1-2, 2003. Retrieved Feb 6, 2006, from http://infolab.uvt.nl/research/lap2003/
435. Wikipedia (2008d). Retrieved Aug 15, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swim_lane
436. Cane, S., & McCarthy, R. (2007). Measuring the impact of enterprise architecture. Issues in Information Systems, VIII(2), 437-442.
437. Hegel, G. F. W. (1830). Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Part One. Retrieved Sept 25, 2008, from http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/sl/sl_iv.htm#SL48n
438. Marx, K. (1852). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 1 (pp. 394-487). Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1966.
439. Örtenblad, A. (2005). Of course organizations can learn! The Learning Organization, 12(2), 213-218. doi:10.1108/09696470510583566
440. Weick, K. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell Business.
441. Wikipedia (2009d). Retrieved Jan 30, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_of_opposites
442. Wiley, N. (1988). The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 254-261. doi:10.2307/202119