Systemic classification of concern-based design methods in the context of enterprise architecture

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 115-131

  Balabko, Pavel ^a   Wegmann, Alain ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Classification; Concern; Design; Enterprise architecture; Organization level; Systemic inquiry

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CLASSIFICATION; CONCERN; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; SYSTEMIC INQUIRY;

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 33744729050     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-006-7976-9     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aksit M, Tripathi A. Data abstraction mechanisms in SINA/ST, OOPSLA'88, ACM press, San Diego, September 1988;267-275.
2. Aksit M, Wakita K, Bosch J, Bergmans L, Yonezawa A. Abstracting object interactions using composition filters. ECOOP'93 Workshop on Object-Based Distributed Programming, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 1993:152-184.
3. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, 1977.
4. Andrade L, Fiadeiro J. Interconnecting Objects Via Contracts. UML'99, Springer Verlag, 1999;566-583.
5. Atkinson C, Kühne T, Bunse C. Dimensions of component-based development. ECOOP'99 Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming 1999:185-186.
6. Audi R. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 1999.
7. Barbier F, et al. Formalization of the whole-part relationship in the unified modeling language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2003;29(5):459-470.
8. Bækdal LK, Kristensen BB. Aggregation from multiple perspectives by roles. IEEE TOOLS PACIFIC 99. Melbourne, Australia, 1999;139-150.
9. Chang SK, et al. The future of visual languages. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. Tokyo, Japan, 1999;58-63.
10. Clarke S, Harrison W, Ossher H, Tarr P. Subject-oriented design: Towards improved alignment of requirements, design, and code. OOPSLA'99 1999;325-339.
11. Dori D. Object-Process Methodology. A Holistic Systems Paradigm. Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag, 2000.
12. Fiadeiro JL, Lopes A. Semantics of Architectural Connectors, TAPSOFT'97, Springer-Verlag, 1997;505-519.
13. Gamma E, et al. Design patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-wesley professional computing series, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1994.
14. Gerstla P, Pribbenow S. A conceptual theory of pan-whole relations and its applications. Data & Knowledge Engineering 1996;20:305-322.
15. Harrison W, Ossher H, Subject-oriented programming (a critique of pure objects). OOPSLA'93, ACM, 1993;411-428.
16. Holt AW, Ramsey HR, Grimes JD. Coordination system technology as the basis for a programming environment. Electrical Communication 1983;77(4):307-313.
17. Halpin T. Object role modeling: An overview. Microsoft Corporation 2001, retrieved from http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ on February 16, 2004.
18. Recommendation X.902, Open Distributed Processing - Basic Reference Model - Part 2: Foundations ISO/IEC and ITU-T 1996.
19. Kandé MM, Strohmeier A. Towards a UML Profile for Software Architecture. UML'2000. York, UK, 2000;513-527.
20. Kendall EA. Goals and roles: The essentials of object oriented business process modeling. ECOOP'98 Workshop on Object Oriented Business Process Modeling, 1998.
21. Kendall EA. Role model designs and implementations with aspect Oriented programming. OOPSLA'99. ACM, 1999;353-369.
22. Kiczales G, et al. Aspect-Oriented Programming. ECOOP'97. Springer-Verlag, 1997;220-242.
23. Kilov H. Business Specifications: The Key to Successful Software Engineering. Prentice-Hall, 1999.
24. Kristensen BB, Object-Oriented Modeling with Roles. OOIS'95. Springer, 1995; 57-71.
25. Lieberherr KJ. Component enhancement: An adaptive reusability mechanism for groups of collaborating classes. IFIP 12th World ComputerCongress on Algorithms, Software, Architecture-Information Processing'92, 1992;179-185.
26. Marcaillou S, Kriouile A, Coulette B. VBOOL, une extension d'Eiffel intégrant le concept de point de vue. MCSEAI'94 1994; 115-125.
27. Miller JG. Living Systems. University of Colorado Press, 1995.
28. Motschnig-Pitrik R, Contexts and views in object-oriented languages. IEEE CONTEXT99. LNCS, 1999;1688:256-269.
29. Motschnig-Pitrik R, Kaasbøll J. Part-whole relationship categories and their application in object-oriented analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 1999a;11:779-797.
30. Motschnig-Pitrik. R. Contexts as means to decompose information bases and represent relativized information. CHI Workshop #11. Hague. Netherlands, 2000.
31. Motschnig-Pitrik R. A generic framework for the modeling of contexts and its applications. Data & Knowledge Engineering. Elsevier Science Publishers, 2000a;32:145-180.
32. Motschnig-Pitrik R. The viewpoint abstraction in object-oriented modeling and the uml. ER'2000. Salt Lake City, Utah, 2000b;543-557.
33. Mylopoulos J, Motschnig-Pitrik R, Partitioning information bases with contexts. CoopIS'95. Vienna, 1995; 44-54.
34. Nassar M, et al. Towards a view based unified modeling language. ICEIS'03, Angers, France, 2003;257-265.
35. Nentwich C, Emmerich W, Finkelstein A, Consistency management with repair actions. IEEE ICSE 03. Portland, Oregon, 2003;455-464.
36. Nuseibeh B, Kramer J, Finkelstein A. Expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements speccification. ICSE'93 1993;187-196.
37. Odeh M, Beeson I, Green S, Sa J. Modeling processes using RAD and UML activity diagrams: An exploratory study. Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT'2002), Doha Qatar, 2002.
38. Ould MA. Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for ReEngineering and Improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1995.
39. Ossher H, Tarr P. Multi-dimensional separation of concerns and the hyperspace approach. Symposium on Software Architectures and Component Technology: The State of the Art in Software Development. Kluwer, 2001.
40. Reenskaug T, Wold P, Lehne OA. Working With Objects: The OOram Software Engineering Method. Manning Publication Co, 1996.
41. Rein GL. Collaboration technology for organization design Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences'93. Hawaii, 1993; 137-148.
42. Rescher N, Oppenheim P. Logical analysis of Gestalt concepts. Brithish Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1955;6(22),89-106.
43. Riehle D, Gross T. Role model based framework design and integration. OOPSLA'98, ACM Press, 1998;117-133.
44. Riehle D. Composite design pattern. OOPSLA'97, 1997;218-228.
45. Riehle D. Describing and composing patterns using role diagrams. WOON'96, Russia, St. Petersburg, Electrotechnical University, 1996; 169-178.
46. Singh B, Rein GL. Role interaction nets (RINs): A process description formalism, technical report CT-083-92. Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corp, 1992.
47. Sowa JF. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, Pacific Grove, Brooks Cole Publishing Co., 1999.
48. Steimann F. On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modeling. Data and Knowledge Engineering 2000;35:83-106.
49. Steimann F, Gößner J, Mück T. On the key role of composition in object-oriented modelling. UML2003, San Francisco, USA, 2003; 106-120
50. Turner CR, et al. Feature engineering. IEEE 9th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Ise-Shima (Isobe), Japan, 1998; 162-164.
51. VanHilst M, Notkin D. Using role components to implement collaboration-based designs. OOPSLA'96, San Jose, USA, ACM Press, 1996; 359-369.
52. Wegmann A. On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (SEAM). ICEIS 2003, Angers, France, 2003; 483-490.
53. Wisse P. Metapattern: Context and Time in Information Models, Addison-Wesley Pub Co; 1st edition, December 15, 2000.
54. Zachman JA. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM System Journal 1987;26(3):276-292.