Complex mediation

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 353-402

  Bødker, Susanne ^a   Andersen, Peter Bøgh ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; SEMIOTICS; SERVOMECHANISMS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

CO-OCCURRING MEDIATORS; COMPUTER MEDIATION; COUPLING ACTIVITY THEORY; METONYMIC MEDIATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 33644641042     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci2004_1     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andersen, P. B. (1990). A theory of computer semiotics: Semiotic approaches to construction and assessment of computer systems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Andersen, P. B. (2001a). Elastic systems. In M. Hirose (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. Interact '01: IFY TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 367-374). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
3. Andersen, P. B. (2001b). Maritime work and communication. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 8, 83-102.
4. Andersen, P. B. (2002). Dynamic semiotics. Semiotica, 139, 161-210.
5. Andersen, P. B. (2003). Saying and doing at sea. Proceedings of the ALOIS 2003 Conference on Action in Language, Organisation and Information Systems. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Retreived October 19, 2005, from http://www.vits.org/?pageld=161
6. Andersen, P. B. (2004a). Anticipated activities in maritime work, process control, and business processes. In K. Liu (Ed.), Virtual, distributed and flexible organizations: Studies in organizational semiotics (pp. 35-60). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
7. Andersen, P. B. (2004b). Diagramming complex activities. Proceedings of the ALOIS 2004 Conference on Action in Language, Organisation, and Information Systems. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Retrieved October 19, 2005, from http://www.vits.org/?pageld=37
8. Andersen, P. B. P., Carstensen, P., & Nielsen, M. (2002). Means of coordination. In K. Liu, R.J. Clarke, P. B. Andersen, & R. K. Stamper (Eds.), Coordination and communication using signs: Studies in organisational semiotics (pp. 32-58). Boston: Kluwer.
9. Bærentsen, K. (1989). Mennesker og maskiner [People and machines]. In M. Hedegaard, V. R. Hansen, & S. Thyssen (Eds.), Et virksomt liv (pp. 142-187). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitets Forlag.
10. Bannon, L., & Bødker, S. (1991). Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts in use. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 227-253). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2000). Instrumental interaction: An interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces glimpses of the future. Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.
12. Bergman, E. (2000). Information appliances and beyond. San Diego, CA: Academic.
13. Bertelsen, O. W. (1998). Elements to a theory of design artefacts: A contribution to critical systems development research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
14. Bertelsen, O. W. (2000). Design artefacts: Towards a design-oriented epistemology. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 15-28.
15. Bertelsen, O. W., & Bødker, S. (2001). Cooperation in massively distributed information spaces. Proceedings of ECSCW 2001 Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1- 18). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16. Bertelsen, O. W., & Bødker, S. (2002). Interaction through multi-artifacts. In S. Bagnara, S. Pozzi, A. Rizzo, & P. Wright (Eds.), Cognition, culture and design: Eleventh European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 103-111). Rome: Instituto di scienze e technologie della cognizione consiglio nazionale delle ricerche.
17. Bertelsen, O. W., & Nielsen, C. (1999). Dynamics in wastewater treatment: A framework for understanding formal constructs in complex technical settings. Proceedings of ECSCW '99. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
18. Brodersen, C., & Kristensen J. F. (2004). Interaction through negotiation. Proceedings of the third Nordic Conference on Human - Computer Interaction. Tampere, Finland: ACM.
19. Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface - A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Bowers, J., Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1995). Workflow from within and without: Technology and cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor. Proceedings of ECSCW '95. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
21. Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Büscher, M., Kramp, G., & Krogh, P. (2003). In formation: Support for flexibility, mobility, collaboration, and coherence. Proceedings of The First International Conference on Appliance Design (pp. 136-146). London: Springer-Verlag.
23. Buur, J., & Bødker, S. (2000). From usability lab to "design collaboratorium": Reframing usability practice. Proceedings of the DIS 2000 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. New York: ACM.
24. Danadis, N., & Vicente, K. J. (1999). Designing functional visualizations for aircraft systems status displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(39), 241-269.
25. Emmeche C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Levels, emergence, and three versions of downward causation. In P. B. Andersen, C. Emmeche, N. O. Finnemann, & P. V. Christiansen (Eds.), Downward causation: Minds, bodies and matter (pp. 13-34). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
26. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki. Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
27. Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-90). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
28. Fillmore, C. J. (1977). The case for case reopened. In P. Cole & G. M. Sadock (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: 8. Grammatical relations (pp. 59-81). New York: Academic.
29. Goldkuhl, G. (2001). Communicative vs material actions: Instrumentality, sociality and comprehensability. CMTO Research Paper No. 2001:06, Centre for Studies of Humans, Technology and Organization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
30. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1997). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In D. Middleton & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61-95). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation of learnming and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
32. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Systemic background. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (Vol. 1, pp. 1-15). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
34. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1, 69-94.
35. Hedegaard, M. (1999). The influence of societal knowledge traditions on children's thinking and conceptual development. In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds.), Learning activity and development (pp. 22-50). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
36. Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
38. Krippendorff, K. (1994). A recursive theory of communication. In D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (Eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 78-104). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
39. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation - Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3, 29-64.
40. Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 111-134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Lee, J. D., & T. F. Sanquist (1996). Maritime automation. In R. Paraduramen & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 365-384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Lem, S. E., & Nordseth, A. (1996). Integreret skibskontrol [Integrated ship control]. Copenhagen, Denmark: I. C. Weilbach.
43. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Material sign processes and emergent ecosocial organization. In P. B. Andersen, C. Emmeche, N. O. Finnemann, & P. Voetmann Christiansen (Eds.), Downward causation: Minds, bodies and matter (pp. 181-213). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
44. Leontjev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Leontjev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
46. Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Liu, K. (Ed.). (2004). Virtual, distributed and flexible organizations. Studies in organizational semiotics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale systeme [Social Systems]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
49. Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
50. Minsky, M. L. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design: A semiotic paradigm. Semiotica, 69, 269-302.
52. Nake, F. (1994). Human-computer interaction: Signs and signals interfacing. Languages of Design, 2, 193-205.
53. Nielsen, C., & Søndergaard, A. (2000). Designing for mobility: An integration approach to support mobile technologies. Proceedings of NordiCHI 2000. Available at BuyCDσtimdi.se
54. Nielsen, M. (2000). Sally, the ferry, and the dredger: Collision avoidance and between-vessels awareness. Report CHMI-5-2000, Center for Human-Machine Interaction. Retrieved October 19, 2005, from http:// imv.au.dk/~pba/ElosticSystems.html
55. Norman, D. (1998). The invisible computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Petersen, J. (2000) Knowledge based support for situation assessment in human supervisory control. Department of Automation, DTU, 00-A-897. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
57. Petersen J. (2002). Modeling control situations for the design of context sensitive human-machine systems. In C. W. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Human Decision Making and Control. Gist Technical Report G2002-1, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
58. Popper, K. R. (1982). Science: Conjecture and refutations. In P. Grim (Ed.), Philosophy of science and the occult (pp. 104-111). Albany: State University of New York Press.
59. Posner, R. (1993). Believing, causing, intending: The basis for a hierarchy of sign concepts in the reconstruction of communication. In R. Jorna, B. van Heusden, & R. Posner (Eds.), Signs, search and communication (pp. 215-270). Berlin, Germany: Gruyter.
60. Raeithel, A. (1992). Activity theory as a foundation for design. In C. Floyd, R. Kiel-Slawik, R. Budde, & H. Züllighoven (Eds.), Software development and reality construction (pp. 389-413). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
61. Revilla, E., & Sanchez-Alarcos, J (2003). Organizational learning in complex environments: The case of air safety. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics. Department of Computer Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK: Whiteknights.
62. Rose, J., & Truex, D. (2000). Machine agency as perceived autonomy. In R. Baskerville, J. Stage, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Organizational and social perspectives on information technology (pp. 371-390). Boston: Kluwer.
63. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understandings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
64. Souza, C. S. de (1993). The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 753-773.
65. Stamper, R. (1996). Signs, information, norms and systems. In B. Holmqvist, P. B. Andersen, H. K. Klein, & R. Posner (Eds.), Signs of work (pp. 349-399). Berlin, Germany: Gruyter.
66. Star, S. L., & Greisemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translation," and boundary objects- Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 1907-1939.
67. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. Svanæs, D. (n.d.). Understanding interactivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Retrieved October 19, 2005, from http:// www.idi.ntnu.no/~dags/
69. Valin, R. D. van & LaPolla, R.J. (1997). Syntax. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Originally published in Russian in 1930.
72. Wells, G. (2002). The role of dialogue in activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 9, 43-66.
73. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.