메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 241-244

Practice of written feedback in nursing degree programmes in Karachi: The students' perspective

Author keywords

Assessment; Assessment experience questionnaire (AEQ); Nursing education; Student perceptions; Written feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSING AS A PROFESSION; NURSING STUDENT; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STUDENT ATTITUDE; STUDENT SATISFACTION; WRITING; WRITTEN FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LEARNING; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897984456     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (8)

References (20)
  • 1
    • 33645214429 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does your assessment support your students' learning?
    • Gibbs G, Simpson C. Does your assessment support your students' learning? Learn Teach Higher Educ 2005; 1:3-31.
    • (2005) Learn Teach Higher Educ , vol.1 , pp. 3-31
    • Gibbs, G.1    Simpson, C.2
  • 2
    • 0013433780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback
    • Hyland F, Hyland K. Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. J Second Lang Wri 2001; 10:185-212.
    • (2001) J Second Lang Wri , vol.10 , pp. 185-212
    • Hyland, F.1    Hyland, K.2
  • 3
    • 84884755064 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teachers' feedback practices in second language academic writing classrooms
    • Magno C, Amarles AM. Teachers' feedback practices in second language academic writing classrooms. TIJEPA 2011; 6:21-30.
    • (2011) TIJEPA , vol.6 , pp. 21-30
    • Magno, C.1    Amarles, A.M.2
  • 4
    • 33645228936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Differing perceptions in the feedback process
    • Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Stud Higher Educ 2006; 31:219-33.
    • (2006) Stud Higher Educ , vol.31 , pp. 219-233
    • Carless, D.1
  • 6
    • 54149105511 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feed-forward: improving students' use of tutors' comments
    • Duncan N. Feed-forward: improving students' use of tutors' comments. Assess Evaluat Higher Educ 2007; 32:271-83.
    • (2007) Assess Evaluat Higher Educ , vol.32 , pp. 271-283
    • Duncan, N.1
  • 7
    • 33947649687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • I might as well give up: self-esteem and mature students' feelings about feedback on assignments
    • Young P. I might as well give up: self-esteem and mature students' feelings about feedback on assignments. J Further Higher Educ 2000; 24:409-18.
    • (2000) J Further Higher Educ , vol.24 , pp. 409-418
    • Young, P.1
  • 8
    • 67651049985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment and feedback: institutional experiences of students' feedback, 1996 to 2007
    • Williams J, Kane D. Assessment and feedback: institutional experiences of students' feedback, 1996 to 2007. Higher Educ Quart 2009; 63:264-86.
    • (2009) Higher Educ Quart , vol.63 , pp. 264-286
    • Williams, J.1    Kane, D.2
  • 12
    • 0010709236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback
    • Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A. Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teach Higher Educ 2001; 6:269-74.
    • (2001) Teach Higher Educ , vol.6 , pp. 269-274
    • Higgins, R.1    Hartley, P.2    Skelton, A.3
  • 13
    • 79551546708 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback
    • Handley K, Williams L. From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assess Evaluat Higher Educ 2011; 36:95-108.
    • (2011) Assess Evaluat Higher Educ , vol.36 , pp. 95-108
    • Handley, K.1    Williams, L.2
  • 14
    • 69249230993 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Thematic analysis of written assignment feedback: implications for nurse education
    • Parboteeah S, Anwar M. Thematic analysis of written assignment feedback: implications for nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 2009; 29:753-7.
    • (2009) Nurse Educ Today , vol.29 , pp. 753-757
    • Parboteeah, S.1    Anwar, M.2
  • 15
    • 28244461832 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment criteria: reflections on current practices
    • Woolf H. Assessment criteria: reflections on current practices. Assess Evaluat Higher Educ 2004; 29:479-93.
    • (2004) Assess Evaluat Higher Educ , vol.29 , pp. 479-493
    • Woolf, H.1
  • 16
    • 44749093112 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms
    • Lee I. Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. J Second Lang Writing 2007; 17:69-85.
    • (2007) J Second Lang Writing , vol.17 , pp. 69-85
    • Lee, I.1
  • 17
    • 34548127909 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teacher-written feedback: student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance
    • Montgomery JL, Baker W. Teacher-written feedback: student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. J Second Lang Writing 2007; 16:82-99.
    • (2007) J Second Lang Writing , vol.16 , pp. 82-99
    • Montgomery, J.L.1    Baker, W.2
  • 19
    • 33645018171 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The differential effects of studentfaculty interaction on college for women and men
    • Sax J, Bryant A, Harper C. The differential effects of studentfaculty interaction on college for women and men. J Coll Student Develop 2005; 46:642-59.
    • (2005) J Coll Student Develop , vol.46 , pp. 642-659
    • Sax, J.1    Bryant, A.2    Harper, C.3
  • 20
    • 79960247878 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effects of undergraduate nursing studentfaculty interaction outside the classroom on college grade point average
    • Al-Hussami M, Saleh MN, Hayajneh F, Abdalkader RH, Mahadeen A. The effects of undergraduate nursing studentfaculty interaction outside the classroom on college grade point average. Nurse Educ Practice 2011; 11:320-6.
    • (2011) Nurse Educ Practice , vol.11 , pp. 320-326
    • Al-Hussami, M.1    Saleh, M.N.2    Hayajneh, F.3    Abdalkader, R.H.4    Mahadeen, A.5


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.