Long-term memory and the control of attentional control

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 72, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-26

  Mayr, Ulrich ^a   Kuhns, David ^a   Hubbard, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Executive control; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; MEMORY, LONG-TERM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897885042     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allport A., Wylie G. Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes 2000, 35-70. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J.S. Driver (Eds.).
2. Altman E.M. Comparing switch costs: Alternating runs and explicit cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:475-483. 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.475.
3. Altman E.M., Trafton J.G. Timecourse of recovery from interruption: Data and a model. Psychological Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:1079-1084.
4. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652. 10.1037//0033-295x.108.3.624.
5. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A Computational Model of Fractionated Conflict-control Mechanisms in Task-switching. Cognit Psychol. 2007, 55(1):37-85.
6. Bryck R., Mayr U. Task selection cost asymmetry without task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:128-134.
7. Crump M.J.C., Logan G.D. Contextual control over task-set retrieval. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2010, 72:2047-2053.
8. Durstewitz D., Kelc M., Güntürkün O. A neurocomputational theory of dopaminergic modulation of working memory functions. The Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:2807-2822.
9. Gilbert S., Shallice T. Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:297-337.
10. Gopher D., Armony L., Greenshpan Y. Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:308-339.
11. Hintzman D. "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 1986, 93:411-428.
12. Hommel B. Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:494-500.
13. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye. Attention and performance IX 1981, 187-203. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Long, A. Baddeley (Eds.).
14. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., et al. Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849.
15. Koch I. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1474-1486.
16. Lien M.C., Ruthruff E. Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:697-713. 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697.
17. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 1988, 95:492-527.
18. Logan G.D. Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms?. Cognitive Psychology 1990, 22:1-35.
19. Mayr U. Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging 2001, 16:96-109.
20. Mayr U. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues?. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 5:794-799.
21. Mayr U., Bryck R.L. Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:337-350.
22. Mayr U., Bryck R.L. Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection. Psychological Research 2006, 71:107-116.
23. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:362-372.
24. Melara R.D., Algom D. Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review 2003, 110:422.
25. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:134-140.
26. Monsell S., Mizon G.A. Can the task-cueing paradigm measure an "endogenous" task-set reconfiguration process?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(3):493-516.
27. Müller H.J., Rabbitt P.M.A. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:315-330.
28. O'Reilly R.C. Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science 2006, 314:91-94.
29. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
30. Rothermund K., Wentura D., De Houwer J. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:482.
31. Spieler D., Mayr U., LaGrone S. Outsourcing cognitive control to the environment: Adult-age differences in the use of task cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 5:787-793.
32. Theeuwes J. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11:65-70.
33. Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F., Hahn S., Irwin D.E. Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science 1998, 9:379-385.
34. Tzelgov J., Henik A., Berger J. Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20:727-735.
35. Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:601-626.
36. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Automaticity of cognitive control: Goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1381-1388.
37. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:252-257.
38. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:361-413.
39. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:595-610.
40. Wylie G.R., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Don't think of a white bear: An fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm. Human Brain Mapping 2004, 21:279-297.
41. Yeung N., Monsell S. Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:455-469.
42. Yeung N., Monsell S. Effects of recent practice on task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:919-936.
43. Yeung N., Nystrom L.E., Aronson J.A., Cohen J.D. Between-task competition and cognitive control in task switching. The Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:1429-1438.