Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 512, Issue , 2014, Pages 332-343

  Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour ^a   Pradhan, Biswajeet ^a   Jebur, Mustafa Neamah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Flood susceptibility; GIS; Malaysia; Remote sensing; Support vector machine (SVM); Weights of evidence (WoE)

Indexed keywords

FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES; MALAYSIA; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION KERNELS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE MODELS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; TOPOGRAPHIC WETNESS INDEX; VALIDATION RESULTS; WEIGHTS OF EVIDENCES;

FLOODS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; REMOTE SENSING;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

DATABASE; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODING; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INVENTORY; MAPPING METHOD; REMOTE SENSING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

MALAYSIA; TERENGGANU; WEST MALAYSIA;

EID: 84897880041     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ali, S., Smith, K.A., 2003. Automatic parameter selection for polynomial kernel. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, Australia, pp. 243-249.
2. Arbain S., Wibowo A. Time series methods for water level forecasting of Dungun river in Terengganu Malaysia. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2012, 4:1803-1811.
3. Bajabaa S., Masoud M., Al-Amri N. Flash flood hazard mapping based on quantitative hydrology, geomorphology and GIS techniques (case study of Wadi Al Lith, Saudi Arabia). Arab. J. Geosci. 2013, 1-13. 10.1007/s12517-013-0941-2.
4. Bates P.D. Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling. Hydrol. Process. 2004, 18:2593-2597.
5. Bates P.D. Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got?. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26:2515-2521.
6. Bonham-Carter G.F. Integration of geoscientific data using GIS. Geographic Information Systems: Principles and Applications 1991, 171-184. Longman, London. D.J. Maguire, M.F. Goodchild, D.W. Rhind (Eds.).
7. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS 1994, Pergamon, Ottawa, pp. 398.
8. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientist: Modeling with GIS 2002, Pergamon, New York, pp. 302-334.
9. Chau K., Lee J. Mathematical modelling of Shing Mun river network. Adv Water Resour. 1991, 14:106-112.
10. Chau K., Wu C., Li Y. Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10:485-491.
11. Chowdary V., Chakraborthy D., Jeyaram A., Murthy Y.K., Sharma J., Dadhwal V. Multi-Criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour. Manage. 2013, 27:1-17.
12. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20:273-297.
13. Dahal R.K., Hasegawa S., Nonomura A., Yamanaka M., Masuda T., Nishino K. GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ. Geol. 2008, 54:311-324.
14. Damaševičius R. Optimization of SVM parameters for recognition of regulatory DNA sequences. Top 2010, 18:339-353.
15. Dawson C.W., Abrahart R., Shamseldin A., Wilby R. Flood estimation at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. 2006, 319:391-409.
16. Elshorbagy A., Corzo G., Srinivasulu S., Solomatine D. Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology-Part 1: concepts and methodology. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14:1931-1941.
17. Elshorbagy A., Corzo G., Srinivasulu S., Solomatine D. Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology-Part 2: application. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14:1943-1961.
18. Fenicia F., Kavetski D., Savenije H.H., Clark M.P., Schoups G., Pfister L., Freer J. Catchment properties, function, and conceptual model representation: is there a correspondence?. Hydrol. Process. 2013, 10.1002/hyp.9726.
19. Glenn E., Morino K., Nagler P., Murray R., Pearlstein S., Hultine K. Roles of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated desert river. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 79:56-65.
20. Haq M., Akhtar M., Muhammad S., Paras S., Rahmatullah J. Techniques of remote sensing and GIS for flood monitoring and damage assessment: a case study of Sindh province, Pakistan. Egypt. J. Rem. Sens. Space Sci. 2012, 15:135-141.
21. Jebur M.N., Mohd Shafri H.Z., Pradhan B., Tehrany M.S. Per-pixel and object-oriented classification methods for mapping urban land cover extraction using SPOT 5 imagery. Geocarto Int. 2013, 1-15. 10.1080/10106049.2013.848944.
22. Kanevskij M., Pozdnoukhov A., Timonin V. Machine Learning for Spatial Environmental Data: Theory, Applications and Software 2009, Epfl Press, Lausanne, pp. 47-52.
23. Keerthi S.S., Lin C.J. Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Neural Comput. 2003, 15:1667-1689.
24. Khu S.T., Liong S.Y., Babovic V., Madsen H., Muttil N. Genetic programming and its application in real-time runoff forecasting1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37:439-451.
25. Kia M.B., Pirasteh S., Pradhan B., Mahmud A.R., Sulaiman W.N.A., Moradi A. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67:251-264.
26. Kim G., Barros A.P. Quantitative flood forecasting using multisensor data and neural networks. J. Hydrol. 2001, 246:45-62.
27. Lamovec P., Veljanovski T., Mikoš M., Oštir K. Detecting flooded areas with machine learning techniques: case study of the Selška Sora river flash flood in September 2007. J. Appl. Rem. Sens. 2013, 7. 073564-073564.
28. Lee, M.J., Kang, J.E., Jeon, S., 2012. Application of frequency ratio model and validation for predictive flooded area susceptibility mapping using GIS. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Munich. pp. 895-898.
29. Liao X., Carin L. Migratory logistic regression for learning concept drift between two data sets with application to UXO sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 2009, 47:1454-1466.
30. Lin, H.T., Lin, C.J., 2003. A Study on Sigmoid Kernels for SVM and the Training of non-PSD Kernels by SMO-type Methods. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, pp. 32. <. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/tanh.pdf.
31. Maier H.R., Jain A., Dandy G.C., Sudheer K.P. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:891-909.
32. Manandhar, B., 2010. Flood Plain Analysis and Risk Assessment of Lothar Khola, MSc Thesis, Tribhuvan University, Phokara, Nepal, pp. 64.
33. Marjanović M., Kovačević M., Bajat B., Voženílek V. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Eng. Geol. 2011, 123:225-234.
34. Mohammady M., Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012, 61:221-236.
35. Mu T., Nandi A.K. Breast cancer detection from FNA using SVM with different parameter tuning systems and SOM-RBF classifier. J. Franklin Inst. 2007, 344:285-311.
36. Oh H.J., Pradhan B. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37:1264-1276.
37. Ohlmacher G.C., Davis J.C. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng. Geol. 2003, 69:331-343.
38. Pourghasemi H., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C., Moezzi K.D. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 2013, 4:93-118.
39. Pourghasemi H.R., Jirandeh A.G., Pradhan B., Xu C., Gokceoglu C. Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 122:349-369.
40. Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C., Mohammadi M., Moradi H.R. Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. 2013, 6:2351-2365.
41. Pradhan B. Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J. Spatial Hydrol. 2010, 9:1-18.
42. Pradhan B. Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 63:329-349.
43. Pradhan B. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 51:350-365.
44. Pradhan B., Buchroithner M.F. Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 2010, 16:107-126.
45. Pradhan B., Lee S. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:747-759.
46. Pradhan B., Shafiee M. Flood hazrad assessment for cloud prone rainy areas in a typical tropical environment. Disaster Adv. 2009, 2:7-15.
47. Pradhan B., Youssef A. A 100-year maximum flood susceptibility mapping using integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models: Kelantan River Corridor, Malaysia. J. Flood Risk Manage. 2011, 4:189-202.
48. Pradhan B., Oh H.J., Buchroithner M. Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk. 2010, 1:199-223.
49. Pradhan B., Youssef A.M., Varathrajoo R. Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural network model. Geospatial. Inf. Sci. 2010, 13:93-102.
50. Pradhan B., Mansor S., Pirasteh S., Buchroithner M.F. Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 2011, 32:4075-4087.
51. Pradhan B., Hagemann U., Shafapour Tehrany M., Prechtel N. An easy to use ArcMap based texture analysis program for extraction of flooded areas from TerraSAR-X satellite image. Comput. Geosci. 2014, 63:34-43.
52. Refsgaard J.C. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J. Hydrol. 1997, 198:69-97.
53. Regmi N.R., Giardino J.R., Vitek J.D. Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 2010, 115:172-187.
54. Regmi A.D., Devkota K.C., Yoshida K., Pradhan B., Pourghasemi H.R., Kumamoto T., Akgun A. Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab. J. Geosci. 2013, 10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z.
55. Samui P. Slope stability analysis: a support vector machine approach. Environ. Geology. 2008, 56:255-267.
56. Smith K., Ward R. Floods: Physical Processes and Human Impacts 1998, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 382.
57. Song S., Zhan Z., Long Z., Zhang J., Yao L. Comparative study of SVM methods combined with voxel selection for object category classification on fMRI data. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17191.
58. Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebu M.N. A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using SPOT 5 imagery. Geocarto Int. 2013, 1-19. 10.1080/10106049.2013.768300.
59. Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebur M.N. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J. Hydrol. 2013, 504:69-79.
60. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naive Bayes Models. Math. Probl. Eng. 2012, 26. 10.1155/2012/974638.
61. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O.B. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 45:199-211.
62. Tiwari M.K., Chatterjee C. Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). J. Hydrol. 2010, 382:20-33.
63. Toth E., Brath A., Montanari A. Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. J. Hydrol. 2000, 239:132-147.
64. Tunusluoglu M., Gokceoglu C., Nefeslioglu H., Sonmez H. Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ. Geology. 2008, 54:9-22.
65. Varoonchotikul P. Flood Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks 2003, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 101.
66. Vorogushyn S., Lindenschmidt K.E., Kreibich H., Apel H., Merz B. Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany. J. Hydrol. 2012, 436:120-131.
67. Wan S., Lei T.C. A knowledge-based decision support system to analyze the debris-flow problems at Chen-Yu-Lan River, Taiwan. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2009, 22:580-588.
68. Wan S., Lei T., Chou T.Y. An enhanced supervised spatial decision support system of image classification: consideration on the ancillary information of paddy rice area. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 24:623-642.
69. Wan S., Lei T., Chou T.Y. A novel data mining technique of analysis and classification for landslide problems. Nat. Hazards 2010, 52:211-230.
70. Wan S., Lei T.C., Chou T.Y. A landslide expert system: image classification through integration of data mining approaches for multi-category analysis. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2012, 26:747-770.
71. Wanders, N., Bierkens, M.F., de Jong, S.M., de Roo, A., Karssenberg, D., 2013. The benefits of using remotely sensed soil moisture in parameter identification of large-scale hydrological models. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 15, pp. 10215.
72. Xu C., Xu X., Dai F., Xiao J., Tan X., Yuan R. Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui river watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck region. J. Earth Sci. 2012, 23:97-120.
73. Yalcin A. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 2008, 72:1-12.
74. Yao X., Tham L., Dai F. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 2008, 101:572-582.
75. Zaleha K., Roswati M.A., Iwasaki N. Distribution of some species of harpacticoid copepods in east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2006, 30:140-145.
76. Zhu X., Zhang S., Jin Z., Zhang Z., Xu Z. Missing value estimation for mixed-attribute data sets. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011, 23:110-121.
77. Zhuang L., Dai H. Parameter optimization of kernel-based one-class classifier on imbalance learning. J. Comput. 2006, 1:32-40.
78. Zou Q., Zhou J., Zhou C., Song L., Guo J. Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2013, 27:525-546.