My approach to this job is. One person at a time: Perceived discordance between population-Level quality targets and patient-Centred care

Canadian Family Physician

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 258-266

  Ivers, Noah ^a   Barnsley, Jan ^b   Upshur, Ross ^c   Tu, Karen ^d   Shah, Baiju ^e   Grimshaw, Jeremy ^f   Zwarenstein, Merrick ^g  

^a WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^e SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CANADA; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSTANT COMPARATIVE METHOD; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SEX RATIO; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WORK EXPERIENCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; ONTARIO; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84897833598     PISSN: 0008350X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;13:CD000259.
2. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995;153(10):1423-31.
3. Strandberg EL, Ovhed I, Håkansson A, Troein M. The meaning of quality work from the general practitioner's perspective: an interview study. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:60.
4. Ivers NM, Tu K, Francis J, Barnsley J, Shah B, Upshur R, et al. Feedback GAP: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care. Implement Sci 2010;5:98
5. Glazier RH, Kopp A, Schultz SE, Kiran T, Henry DA. All the right intentions but few of the desired results: lessons on access to primary care from Ontario's patient enrolment models. Healthc Q 2012;15(3):17-21.
6. Rosser WW, Colwill JM, Kasperski J, Wilson L. Progress of Ontario's family health team model: a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med 2011;9(2):165-71.
7. Stand Up to Diabetes. Diabetes testing report. Frequently asked questions. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2013. Available from: www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/diabetes/test/report.aspx. Accessed 2014 Feb 11 .
8. Excellent Care for All. Legislation, regulations and policy. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; 2010. Available from: www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ecfa/legislation/. Accessed 2012 Jun 6.
9. Tu K, Manuel D, Lam K, Kavanagh D, Mitiku TF, Guo H. Diabetics can be identified in an electronic medical record using laboratory tests and prescriptions. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(4):431-5. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
10. Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, Person SD, Weaver MT, Weissman NW. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285(22):2871-9.
11. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull 1982;92(1):111-35.
12. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14(1):26-33.
13. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119(2):254-84.
14. Sapyta J, Riemer M, Bickman L. Feedback to clinicians: theory, research, and practice. J Clin Psychol 2005;61(2):145-53.
15. Hysong SJ, Best RG, Pugh JA. Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: making feedback actionable. Implement Sci 2006;1:9.
16. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 2008;78(1):153-89.
17. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol 2002;57(9):705-17.
18. Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health 2000;23(3):246-55.
19. Doroodchi H, Abdolrasulnia M, Foster JA, Foster E, Turakhia MP, Skelding KA, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians in the management of patients at risk for cardiovascular events. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:42.
20. Berthold HK, Gouni-Berthold I, Bestehorn KP, Böhm M, Krone W. Physician gender is associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care. J Intern Med 2008;264(4):340-50. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
21. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. Research methods for primary care, vol 3. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1992. p. 41.
22. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000;320(7227):114-6.
23. Wolf ZR. Exploring the audit trail for qualitative investigations. Nurse Educ 2003;28(4):175-8.
24. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001;322(7294):1115-7.
25. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(1):75-85.
26. Wilkinson EK, McColl A, Exworthy M, Roderick P, Smith H, Moore M, et al. Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study. Qual Health Care 2000;9(3):166-74.
27. Marshall M, Sheaff R, Rogers A, Campbell S, Halliwell S, Pickard S, et al. A qualitative study of the cultural changes in primary care organizations needed to implement clinical governance. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52(481):641-5.
28. Elwyn G, Hocking P, Burtonwood A, Harry K, Turner A. Learning to plan? A critical fiction about the facilitation of professional and practice development plans in primary care. J Interprof Care 2002;16(4):349-58.
29. Tomlin Z, Humphrey C, Rogers S. General practitioners' perceptions of effective health care. BMJ 1999;318(7197):1532-5.
30. Barnsley J, Berta W, Cockerill R, MacPhail J, Vayda E. Identifying performance indicators for family practice. Assessing levels of consensus. Can Fam Physician 2005;51(5):700-1. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/51/5/700 . long. Accessed 2014 Jan 31.
31. Exworthy M, Wilkinson EK, McColl A, Moore M, Roderick P, Smith H, et al. The role of performance indicators in changing the autonomy of the general practice profession in the UK. Soc Sci Med 2003;56(7):1493-504.
32. Levitt C, Hilts L. Quality in family practice. Book of tools. Hamilton, ON: McMaster Innovation Press; 2010.
33. Tracy CS, Dantas GC, Upshur RE. Evidence-based medicine in primary care: qualitative study of family physicians. BMC Fam Pract 2003;4:6. Epub 2003 May 9.
34. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 2001.
35. Presseau J, Francis JJ, Campbell NC, Sniehotta FF. Goal conflict, goal facilitation, and health professionals' provision of physical activity advice in primary care: an exploratory prospective study. Implement Sci 2011;6:73.
36. Presseau J, Sniehotta FF, Francis JJ, Campbell NC. Multiple goals and time constraints: perceived impact on physicians' performance of evidence-based behaviours. Implement Sci 2009;4:77.
37. Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Romero RL, Bowers KW. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Fam Med 2007;5(3):196-201.
38. Søndergaard J, Andersen M, Kragstrup J, Hansen P, Freng Gram L. Why has postal prescriber feedback no substantial impact on general practitioners' prescribing practice? A qualitative study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2002;58(2):133-6. Epub 2002 Apr 17.
39. Mitchell E, Sullivan F, Grimshaw JM, Donnan PT, Watt G. Improving management of hypertension in general practice: a randomised controlled trial of feedback derived from electronic patient data. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55(511):94-101.
40. Folsom Group. Communities of solution: the Folsom Report revisited. Ann Fam Med 2012;10(3):250-60.
41. McLaughlin AS, Schulte DM, Sharp G. Toward a collaborative care delivery model: the role of population health improvement organizations in the patient-centered medical home. Popul Health Manag 2010;13(5):285-8.
42. Gottlieb LM. Learning from Alma Ata: the medical home and comprehensive primary health care. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22(3):242-6.
43. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The " meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363(6):501-4. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
44. Dermer M, Morgan M. Certification of primary care electronic medical records: lessons learned from Canada. J Healthc Inf Manag 2010;24(3):49-55.
45. Johnston S, Green M, Thille P, Savage C, Roberts L, Russell G, et al. Performance feedback: an exploratory study to examine the acceptability and impact for interdisciplinary primary care teams. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:14.