From machinery to mobility: Government and democracy in a participative age

From Machinery to Mobility: Government and Democracy in a Participative Age

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-132

  Roy, Jeffrey ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897748376     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7221-6     Document Type: Book

References (182)

1. Accenture. (2009). Web 2.0 and the next generation of public service: Driving high performance through cloud. Accenture.
2. Allegretti, G. (2011). From scepticism to mutual support: Towards a structural change in the relations between participatory budgeting and the information and communications technologies?. In P. Mindus, A. Greppi, M. Cuono (Eds.), Legitimacy 2.0: E-democracy and public opinion in the digital age Selected papers from the IVR World Congress Special Workshop, Frankfurt. http://www.academiia.edu
3. Alzner, B. (2012). Newfoundland passes Bill 29 to amend access to Information legislation The Canadian Journalism Project. Retrieved from: http://j-source.ca/article/newfoundland-passesbill- 29-amend-access-information-legislation
4. Andoh-Baidoo, F. K., Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2010). How internet security breaches harm market value. IEEE Security & Privacy, 8 (1), 36-42.
5. Ashlie, T. (2011). So how will I pay my housekeeper? Cheque elimination-The top 10 issues. Forum, Canadian Payments Association, 27 (4), 12-13.
6. Aucoin, P., Jarvis, M., & Turnbull, L. (2011). Democratizing the constitution: Reforming responsible government Toronto, ON: Emond Montgomery Publications.
7. Bamford, J. (2012). The NSA is building the country's biggest spy center (Watch What You Say). Retrieved from Wired: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/
8. Batorski, M., & Hadden, D. (2010) Embracing Government 2.0. Virginia: Grant Thorton. Retrieved from: http://www.grantthornton.com/staticfi les/GTCom/Public sector/Gov20Jan2010.pdf
9. Belanger, D., Coe, A., & Roy, J. (2007). Why business models matter. CIO Government Review (July), IT World Canada.
10. Bermonte, A. (2011). Senior leaders' use of web 2.0 and social media in the Ontario Public Service (2011). Theses and dissertations. Paper 680, Ryerson University, Toronto. http://digitalcommons. ryerson.ca/dissertations/680
11. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P., & Grimes, J. (2010a). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264-271.
12. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P., Munson, S., & Glaisyer, T. (2010b). Social media technology and government transparency. IEEE Computer Society, 43, 53-59.
13. Birch, J. (2008). Nanaimo's GOOGLE experience. Municipal World, 118 (6), 5-9.
14. Blakemore, M., & Lloyd, P. (2007). Think Paper 10. Trust and transparency: Pre-requisites for effective eGovernment. cc:eGov Organisational Change for Citizen-centric eGovernment.
15. Borins, S., Kernaghan, K., Brown, D., Bontis, N., 6, P., & Thompson, F. (2007). Digital State at the Leading Edge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. http://www.amazon.ca/Digital-Stateat- Leading-Edge/dp/0802094902#reader_0802094902
16. Buckler, G., & Majer, A. (2008). Mobile government: Governance and government in the age of mobility Toronto, ON: New Paradigm (now nGenera Corporation Canada).
17. Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking New York: Crown.
18. Canadian Bankers Association (2012, November 9). How Canadians bank. Retrieved from CanadianBankersAssociation: http://www.cba.ca/en/media-room/50-backgrounders-on-bankingissues/ 125-technology-and-banking
19. Carmody, T. (2012, February 24). Apple gives shareholders more input: Will Facebook get the message? WIRED Magazine.
20. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google Making Us Stupid? Retrieved from The Atlantic: http://www.theatlantic. com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/
21. Carr, N. G. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains New York: W. W. Norton.
22. Carr-West, J. (2009). From e-democracy to 'here comes everybody' a short history of government and the internet. In A. Sawford (Ed.), Local government 3.0: How councils can respond to the new web agenda (pp. 4-9). London: Local Government Information Unit.
23. Carson, L., Gastil, J., Hartz-Karp, J., & Lubensky, R. (Eds.). (2011). The Australian citizens' parliament and the future of deliberative democracy University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
24. CBC News. (2012). N.S. civil servants refuse to relocate Retreived online: http://www.cbc.ca/ news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2012/05/11/ns-relocation-refusal-jessome.html
25. Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., & Kleinfeld, R. (2012). Towards a rationalisation of social media exploitation in government policy-making processes. European Journal of ePractice, 16, 77-93.
26. Clark, I., & Swain, H. (2005). Distinguishing the real from the surreal in management reform: Suggestions for beleaguered administrators in the government of Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 48 (4), 453-476.
27. Clemens, J., & Crowley, B. L. (2012). Solutions to critical infrastructure problems: Essays on protecting Canada's infrastructure Ottawa, ON: The MacDonald-Laurier Institute.
28. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (1), 80-93.
29. Cohen, R. (2012). The sorry state of cloud computing in Canada. Retrieved from Forbes: http:// www.forbes.com/sites/reuvencohen/2012/10/24/the-sorry-state-of-cloud-computing-incanada/
30. Collier, D. (2011). Cloud computing 201: Guidelines for successful cloud investments Washington, DC: CAGW.
31. Conabree, D. (2011). Intellectual capital and e-collaboration: The hidden cost of the status quo. Fmi Journal, 23 (1), 11-12.
32. Cornish, P. (2009). Cyber security and politically, socially and religiously motivated cyber attacks Brussels: Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Directorate Policy Department. European Parliament.
33. CSC. (2011). Ahead in the cloud: The CSC cloud usage index CSC. Retrieved from: http://assets1. csc.com/newsroom/downloads/CSC_Cloud_Usage_Index.pdf
34. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147-162.
35. Danske Bank. (2011). Press conference annual report 2010. Danske bank. http://www.danskebank. com
36. de Jong, A. (2011). Benefi ts of cloud computing realized by increasing number of companies. Retrieved from Cloud Times: http://cloudtimes.org/2011/08/27/benefi ts-of-cloud-computingrealized- by-increasing-number-of-companies/
37. Dean, D., & Webb, C. (2011). Recovering from information overload. McKinsey Quarterly.
38. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead- Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (3), 467-494.
39. Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2010). The service state-Rhetoric, reality, and promise (Governance series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
40. Dutton, W. H., & Peltu, M. (2007). Reconfi guring government-public engagements: enhancing the communicative power of citizens (Forum Discussion Paper No. 9). Oxford Internet Institute.
41. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2012). Revisiting Work-Life Issues in Canada: The 2012 National Study on Balancing Work and Caregiving in Canada Ottawa, ON: Carleton University & The University of Western Ontario. Retrieved from: http://www.healthyworkplaces.info/wp-content/ uploads/2012/11/2012-National-Work-Long-Summary.pdf
42. Eaves, D. (2009). MuniForge: Creating municipalities that work like the web Retrieved online: http://eaves.ca/2009/12/08/muniforge-creating-municipalities-that-work-like-the-web/
43. Economist Intelligence Unit (2006) Foresight 2020 - Economic, industry and corporate trends (chapter two: public sector).
44. Eger, J. M. (2012). The creative community: Meeting the challenges of the new economy San Diego, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
45. Eggers, W. (2005). Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock and enhance democracy New York: Rowman and Littlefi eld Publishers.
46. Fatland, E. (2007). Democratic interfaces: Decision-making tools for online communities MA thesis, Media Lab University of Arts and Design, Helsinki.
47. Fenna, A. (2012). Intergovernmental grants and accountability in Australian federalism COAG Reform Council. Retrieved from: http://www.coagreformcouncil.gov.au/excellence/docs/ events/Think_piece:Fenna_2012.pdf
48. Florida, R. (2005). The fl ight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent New York: Reed Business Information.
49. Flumian, M. (2009). Citizens as prosumers: the next frontier of service innovation Ottawa, ON: nGenera Institute on Governance.
50. Flumian, M., Coe, A. A., & Kernaghan, K. (2007). Transforming service to Canadians: The service Canada model. International Review of Adminstrative Sciences, 73 (4), 557-568.
51. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52. Friedman T. (2011, October 23) Info technology revolution is taking off big-time. Retrieved from The Daily Advance: http://www.dailyadvance.com/opinion/other-views/thomas-friedmaninfotechnology- revolution-taking-big-time-734597
53. Fyfe, T., & Crookall, P. (2010). Social media and public sector policy dilemma Toronto, ON: IPAC.
54. Giggey, R. (2011, May 7). The G4: Setting city data free. Canadian Government Executive, 17 (8). Retrieved from: http://www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca/category/item/152.html
55. Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small change-Why this revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker
56. Goldsmith, J., & Hathaway, M. (2010). The cyber security changes we need. The Washington Post.
57. Gooderham, M. (2012). Digital wallet slow to gain acceptance. Retrieved from The Globe and Mail: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-fi nance/fi nancial-road-map/ digital-wallet-slow-to-gain-acceptance/article2414790/?from=sec501
58. Goodyear, M., Goerdel, H. T., Portillo, S., & Williams, L. (2010). Cybersecurity management in the states: The emerging role of chief information security offi cers Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
59. Greenwood, G. (2012). Probing Obama's secrecy games: Will high-level Obama offi cials who leak for political gain be punished on equal terms with actual whistleblowers? Retrieved from Salon: http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/probing_obamas_secrecy_games/
60. Gupta, U. (2010). Wanted 10,000 New Cybersecurity Pros: US Cyber Challenge Kicks Off Nationwide Talent Search Bank Info Security. Retrieved from: http://www.bankinfosecurity. com/wanted-10000-new-cybersecurity-pros-a-2597
61. Habermas, J. (2011). Europe's post-democratic era Retrieved from the guardian: http://www. guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/10/jurgen-habermas-europe-post-democratic
62. Hamel, G., & Breen, B. (2007). The Future of Management Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
63. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162 (3859), 1243-1248.
64. Hardy, B., Graham, R., Stansall, P., White, A., Harrison, A., Bell, A., et al. (2008). Working beyond walls: The government workplace as an agent of change London: DEGW/OGC.
65. HealthForceOntario (2011). Social Media Toronto, ON: HealthForceOntario: Marketing and Recruitment Agency. Retrieved from: https://www.healthforceontario.ca/ru/pdfs/RU_ SMEDIA.pdf
66. Helbig, N., Cresswell, A. M., Burke, G., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2012). The Dynamics of Opening Government Data: A White Paper Center for Technology in Government: Albany http://www. ctg.albany.edu.
67. Hubbard, R., Paquet, G., & Wilson, C. (2012). Stewardship: Collaborative metagovernance and inquiring systems Ottawa, ON: Invenire Books.
68. Hull, R. T. (1979). The varieties of ethical theories Buffalo, NY: Buffalo Psychiatric Centre. Indvik, L. (2011). 5 Big trends in mobile commerce. Retrieved from Mashable: http://mashable. com/2011/06/21/mobile-commerce-trends/
69. Indvik, L. (2011). 5 Big trends in mobile commerce. Retrieved from Mashable: http://mashable.com/2011/06/21/mobile-commerce-trends/
70. INSA. (2009). Addressing cyber security through public-private partnership: An analysis of existing models Washinton, DC: Intelligence and National Security Alliance (INSA).
71. Irvine, C. E., & Palmer, C. C. (2010). Call in the cyber national guard! IEEE Security & Privacy, 8 (1), 56-59.
72. Kamarck, E. C. (2002). Applying 21st century government to homeland security Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
73. Kernaghan, K. (2013). Helping yourself: Changing the channel on public sector services. Canadian Government Executive, 18 (10). Retrieved from: http://www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca/ category/item/1101-helping-yourself-changing-the-channel-on-public-sector-services.html
74. Kernaghan, K., & Langford, J. (1990). The responsible public servant Toronto, ON: Institute for Public Administration of Canada.
75. Kettl, D. (2005). The next government of the United States: Challenges for performance in the 21st century Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
76. Kingwell, M. (2010). The shout doctrine. Walrus magazine Toronto, ON: Walrus Foundation.
77. Kiss, J. (2010). G-cloud would help government save. Retrieved from The Guardian: http://www. guardian.co.uk/cloud-computing/g-cloud-would-help-the-government-to-save
78. Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
79. Kostakis, V. (2011). The advent of open source democracy and wikipolitics: Challenges, threats and opportunities for democratic discourse. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Human in ICT Environment, 7 (1), 9-29.
80. Kotsiopoulos, I. (2009). Bringing together and accelerating eGovernment research in the EU: eDemocracy report. ICT for Government and Public Services Unit, European Commission.
81. Kovar, J. F. (2011). Former U.S. CIO Kundra Outlines Behind-The-Curtain IT Reorganization. Retrieved from CRN: http://www.crn.com/news/data-center/231900783/former-u-s-ciokundra- outlines-behind-the-curtain-it-reorganization.htm;jsessionid=H6Tik+zFpPOmF+4i1kt zFw.*.*.ecappj03
82. Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L. (2005). Information technology and administrative reform: Will E-government be different? International Journal of Electronic Government, 2 (1), 1-20.
83. Kwon, K. (2012). South Korea's 'Best of the Best' tackle cyber crime. Retrieved from CNN: http:// edition.cnn.com/2013/01/14/world/asia/south-korea-hackers/index.html
84. Lacigova, O., Maizite, A., & Cave, B. (2012). eParticipation and Social Media: a Symbiotic Relationship? European Journal of ePractice, 16, 71-76.
85. Lake, A. (2011). The SmartWorking Handbook: How to reduce costs and improve business performance through new ways of working-A practical guide London: fexibility.co.uk. Retrieved from: http://docs.media.bitpipe.com/io_10x/io_100895/item_431149/SmartWorking %20Handbook_fi nal2.pdf
86. Lane, G., & Roy, J. (2011). Mobility and government: How to MEET the challenge. Canadian Government Executive, 17 (8). Retrieved from: http://www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca/ category/item/154-mobility-and-government-how-to-meet-the-challenge.html
87. Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2008). Moving towards cross-boundary citizen-centred service delivery: Challenges and lessons from Canada and around the world Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
88. Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2009). Service transformation, public-private partnerships & shared accountability? Emerging ideas and new practices in B.C., Canada. International Journal of Public Policy, 4 (3), 232-250.
89. LeBlanc, J. (2012). Connecting beyond boundaries. Canadian Government Executive, 17 (8). Retrieved from: http://www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca/category/item/141.html
90. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. (2011). An open government implementation model: Moving to increased public engagement Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
91. Lehrer, J. (2012). Imagine: How creativity works New York: Houghton Miffl in Harcourt Publishing Company.
92. Lips, M. (2012). E-government is dead: Long live public adminstration 2.0. Information Polity, 17 (2012), 239-250.
93. Losse, K. (2012). The boy kings: A journey into the heart of the social network New York: Simon & Schuster.
94. Lowe, G. (2006). High trust workplaces support service excellence. Canadian Government Executive Retrieved from: http://www.grahamlowe.ca/documents/155/CGE%20high%20 trust%20workplaces%20Oct-06.pdf.
95. Lundy, K. (2010). CeBIT 2010: Gov 2.0 building a strong foundation for open democracy. Retrieved from http://www.katelundy.com.au/2010/03/02/cebit-2010-gov-2-0-building-astrong- foundation-for-open-democracy/
96. MacGillis, Al. (2012). No one is 'playing politics' on Solyndra or birth control. This is politics. Washington Post, February 24, 2012.
97. Macintosh, A. (2003). Using Information and Communications Technologies to Enhance Citizen Engagement in the Policy Process. Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Engagement Paris: OECD.
98. Macmillan, P., Medd, A., & Hughes, P. (2008). Change your world or the world will change you: The future of collaborative government and Web 2.0. Deloitte. Retrieved from: http://www. deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Canada/Local%20Assets/Documents/ca_govt_web20_mar08_ EN.pdf.
99. Maier-Rabler, U., & Huber, S. (2011). "Open": The changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. JeDEM: Journal of Democracy, 3 (2), 182-191.
100. Maio, A. D. (2009). Cloud computing may become the worst enemy of centralization. Retrieved from Gartner Blog: http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/08/05/cloud-computingmay- become-the-worst-enemy-of-centralization/
101. Martin, L. (2010). Harperland: The politics of control Toronto, ON: Penguin Group Canada.
102. Mayeda, A., & Miller, H. (2012). Secret memo warns of Canadian cyber threat after Nortel attack. Retrieved from Financial Post: http://business.financialpost.com/2012/06/06/secret-memowarns- of-canadian-cyber-threat-after-nortel-attack/
103. McNutt, K. (2009). Citizen engagement through online consultation a comment on public involvement and e-consultation: A new era of democratic governance in Canada Montreal, QC: IRPP.
104. McNutt, K. A., & Carey, M. (2008). Canadian digital government Regina: Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy.
105. McNutt, K., & Pal, L. (2011). "Modernizing Government": Mapping Global Public Policy Networks. Governance, 24 (3), 439-467.
106. Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked Coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 7, 598-607.
107. Mergel, I. (2012a). Working the network: A manager's guide for using twitter in government Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
108. Mergel, I. (2012b). A manager's guide to designing a social media strategy Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
109. Mindus, P., Greppi, A., & Cuono, M. (2011). Legitimacy 2.0-E-democracy and public opinion in the digital age (p. 182). Frankfurt am Main: Goethe University Press.
110. Mossberger, K., & Wu, Y. (2012). Civic engagement and local e-government: Social networking comes of age Chicago, IL: UIC Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement.
111. Mota, J. C., & Santinha, G. (2012). Social media and civic engagement: Discussing the case of Aveiro Portugal. European Journal of ePractice, 16.
112. Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic defi cits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40 (4), 376-399.
113. OECD. (2001). The hidden threat to E-government: Avoiding large government IT failures Paris: OECD.
114. Oliveira, M. (2012). Canada's 'most socially networked' title slipping away. Retrieved from the Globe and Mail: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/digital-culture/social-web/ canadas- most-socially-networked-title-slipping-away/article550205/
115. Orr, A. (2010). Blogging, deliberation and the public sphere University of New South Wales, School of Social Science and International Studies. Retrieved from: http://www.polsis.uq.edu. au/docs/Challenging-Politics-Papers/Allison-Orr-Blogging-Deliberation-and-the-Public- Sphere.pdf
116. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in government: Why and how? Luxembourg: European Commission Joint Research Centre.
117. Owens, J. (2012). Welcome to the Political Sphere Facebook Generation! iPolitics Retrieved from: http://www.ipolitics.ca/2012/02/23/jordan-owens-welcome-to-the-politicalsphere-facebookgeneration/
118. Owens, R. C. (2010). Noises heard: Canada's recent online copyright consultation process- Teachings and cautions. IPOSGOODE. Retrieved from: http://www.iposgoode.ca/wp-content/ uploads/2010/04/RichardOwens_Online_Copyright_Consultation_19April2010.pdf
119. Paquet, G. (1997). States, communities and markets: The distributed governance scenario. In T. J. Courchene (Ed.), The nation-state in a global information era: Policy challenges the bell Canada papers in economics and public policy (pp. 25-46). Kingston, ON: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy.
120. Paquet, G. (2004). There is more to governance than public candelabras: E-governance and Canada's public service. In L. Oliver & L. Sanders (Eds.), E-government reconsidered: Renewal of governance for the knowledge age Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.
121. Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (1995). Prosperity through networks: The bottom-up strategy that might have been. In S. Philips (Ed.), How Ottawa spends 1995-96 midlife crises (pp. 137-158). Ottawa, ON: Carleton University Press.
122. Pogue, D. (2012). Where is David Pogue's iPhone? Retrieved from The New York Times: http:// pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/02/where-is-david-pogues-phone/
123. Pole, A. (2011). Blogging the political: Politics and participation in a networked. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 290-293.
124. Ponemon (2011). Global survey on social media risks: Survey of IT & IT security practitioners in Canada The Ponemon Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.websense.com/content/ponemoninstitute- research-report-2011.aspx
125. Press, J. (2013). Legal threats over lost student loan SIN numbers may fi nally push government to better secure data. Retrieved from National Post: http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01/18/ legal-threats-over-lost-student-loan-sin-numbers-may-finally-push-government-to-bettersecure- data/
126. Public Accounts Committee. (2012). Public accounts committee-Tenth report implementing the transparency agenda UK: British House of Commons.
127. Public Administration Committee. (2011). Twelfth report-Government and IT: "A Recipe For Rip-Offs": Time for a new approach London: Parliament of Great Britain.
128. Public Policy Forum. (2012). Building youth engagement through civic collaboration Ottawa, ON: Public Policy Forum.
129. Quigley, K., & Roy, J. (2011). Cyber-security and risk management in an interoperable world: An examination of governmental action in North America. Social Sciences Computer Review, 30 (1), 83-94.
130. Raduege. (2011). Top Three 2012 Cybersecurity "Game-Changers." Retrieved online from: http:// www.washingtonexec.com/2011/12/lt-general-harry-raduege-top-three-2012-cybersecuritygame- changers/
131. Reddick, C. G. (2011). Customer Relationship Management (CRM) technology and organizational change: Evidence for the bureaucratic and e-government paradigms. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 346-353.
132. Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (Eds.). (2012). Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications New York: Springer.
133. Reddick, C. G., & Roy, J. (2013). Business perceptions and satisfaction with E-government: Findings from a Canadian Survey. Government Information Quarterly, 30 (1), 1-9.
134. Reid, J. (2004). Holding Governments Accountable by Strengthening Access to Information Laws and Information Management Practices. In Oliver, L. and Sanders, L., Eds. (2004) E-Government Reconsidered: Renewal of Governance for the Knowledge Age Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.
135. Reinwald, A., & Kraemmergaard, P. (2011, March 17-18). Managing stakeholders in transformational government-A case study in a Danish local government. tGov Workshop '11 (tGOV11) West London: Brunel University.
136. Ritchel, M. (2010) Growing Up Digital, Wired for Distraction. New York Times. Accessed online: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/technology/21brain.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&ref=yourbrai noncomputers&adxnnlx=1367238698-ZxbokT5qr2J1eSPbBiaAtA
137. Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out-Government secrecy in the information age New York: Cambridge University Press.
138. Roberts, N. C. (2011). Beyond smokestacks and silos: Open-source, Web-Enabled Coordination in Organizations and Networks. Public Administration Review, 71, 677-693.
139. Rogers, B. (2005). From membership to management? The future of political parties as democratic organizations. Parliamentary Affairs, 58 (3), 600-610.
140. Roman, F., Koster, A., Le Merle, M., & Petersen, M. (2010). The rise of generation C: Implications for the World of 2020. New York: booz@co.
141. Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age (Governance Series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
142. Roy, J. (2008). Beyond Westminster governance: Bringing politics and public service into the network era. Canadian Public Administration, 5 (4), 541-568.
143. Roy, J. (2010). The rise of networked governance everywhere but in Westminster democracy. Policy options, September, 2010 Montreal, QC: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
144. Roy, J. (2011). Bridging the great divide: Piliticians and the public Montreal, QC: IRPP.
145. Roy, J. (2012a). Social media's democratic paradox: Lessons from Canada. European Journal of ePractice, 16, 5-15.
146. Roy, J. (2012b). E-government & the evolution of service Canada-Transformation or stagnation? In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Public sector transformation through E-government: Experiences from Europe and North America London: Routledge.
147. Roy, J. (2012c). Secrecy versus openness: Democratic adaptation in a Web 2.0 era. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications New York: Springer.
148. Roy, J. (2013). E-government & the evolution of service Canada-Transformation or stagnation? In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Public sector transformation through E-government: Experiences from Europe and North America London: Routledge.
149. Rubin, J. (2010) Why Your World is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller. Toronto: Random House.
150. Salusinszky, I. (2012). Faith in political leaders collapses according to Newspoll survey Retrieved from The Australian: National Affairs: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/faithin- political-leaders-collapses-according-to-newspoll-survey/story-fn59niix-1226518493021
151. Samara. (2010). It's my party: Parliamentary dysfunction reconsidered. The third in a series of reports exploring political leadership in Canada Toronto, ON: Samara Research Institute.
152. Savoie, D. J. (1999) Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
153. Schick, S. (2011). Lac carling: Belgian IT ministry shows off electronic IDs. Retrieved from IT World Canada: http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/lac-carling-belgian-it-ministry-showsoff- electronic-ids/143145
154. Schon, D. (1971). Beyond the stable state New York: Random House.
155. Serrat, P. (2010). Social media and the public sector Manila: Asian Development Bank.
156. Shane, P. M. (Ed.). (2004). Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the internet London: Routledge.
157. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations New York: Penguin Group.
158. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs Council of Foreign Relations.
159. Sloam, J. (2007). Rebooting democracy: Youth participation in politics in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 60, 548-567.
160. Smith, A. (2011). The internet and campaign 2010 Washington, DC: Pew Research Institute.
161. Sommer, L., & Cullen, R. (2009). Participation 2.0: A case study of e-participation within the New Zealand Government. 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii: Systems Sciences 2009, pp. 1-10.
162. Stoker, G. (2005). Public value management-A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), 41-57.
163. Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of twitter networks. Social Networks, Special issue on Space and Networks, 34 (1), 73-81.
164. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2006). WIKINOMICS-How mass collaboration changes everything New York: Penguin Group.
165. Thomas, P. (2008). Political Administrative Interface in Canada's Public Sector. Optimum Online, 38 (2), 21-26.
166. Timberg, C. (2012) Refugee from Facebook questions the social media life Washington Post. Retrieved from: http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-08-03/business/35491933_1_facebookboard- member-katherine-losse-facebook-homepage.
167. Timoshenko, L. & Demers, J. (2012) Social Media Use Among Ontario Municipalities is Growing Fast. Redbrick Communications (Toronto). Accessed online at: http://www.redbrick.ca/assets/ fi le/resource/Social-Media-Growth.pdf
168. Treadwell, J. (2007). Shared Governance and Collaboration. Prepared for EDUCAUSE Australasia 2007-Advancing knowledge pushing boundaries. Melbourne, Australia. 21-26
169. Ubaldi, B. C. (2011). The impact of the economic and fi nancial crisis on E-Government in OECD member countries. European Journal of ePractise, 11, 1-14.
170. Ubaldi, B. C., & Roy, J. (2010). E-government and federalism in Italy and Canada-A comparative assessment. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative E-government (pp. 183-200). New York: Springer.
171. United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2007). Participatory governance and citizens' engagement in policy development New York: Service Delivery and Budgeting.
172. United States Offi ce of Personnel Management. (2012). Status of telework in the federal government Washington, DC: United States Offi ce of Personnel Management. Retrieved from: http:// www.telework.gov/Reports_and_Studies/Annual_Reports/2012teleworkreport.pdf
173. Viitanen, J. (2010). Does transparency erode trust? The Guardian.
174. Wanna, J., & O'Flynn, J. (2008). Collaborative governance: Collaborative governance Australia: The Australian National University Press.
175. Ware, J., & Grantham, C. (2010). Managing a remote workforce: Proven practices from successful leaders The Work Design Collaboration, LLC. Retrieved from: http://www.thefutureofwork. net/assets/Managing_Remote_Workforce:Proven_Practices.pdf
176. Weerakkody, V. & Reddick, C.G. (2011). Public sector transformation through E-Government: Experiences from Europe and North America. Routledge: New York.
177. Williams, A. D. (2012). Government 2.0: Wikinomics and the Challenge to Government. Canadian Government Executive, 14 (1). Retrieved from: http://www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca/ innovation/item/730-government-20-wikinomics-and-the-challenge-to-government.html
178. World Economic Forum. (2011). The future of government: Lessons learned from around the World. World Economic Forum: Global Agenda Council on the Future of Government.
179. Wyld, D. (2007). The blogging revolution: Government in the age of Web 2.0 Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for The Business of Government.
180. Wyld, D. C. (2010a). Moving to the cloud: An introduction to cloud computing in government Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
181. Wyld, D. C. (2010b). THE cloudy future of government IT: Cloud computing and the public sector around the world. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 1 (1).
182. Young, N. (2012). The virtual self Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.