Assessing the quality of large-scale data standards: A case of XBRL GAAP Taxonomy

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 351-360

  Zhu, Hongwei ^a   Wu, Harris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data quality; Data standards; GAAP Taxonomy; Information quality; Quality assessment; XBRL

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY; DATA STANDARDS; INFORMATION QUALITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; XBRL;

INTEROPERABILITY; TAXONOMIES;

STANDARDS;

EID: 84897596505     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. J.W. Bartley, Y.A. Chen, and E.Z. Taylor A Comparison of XBRL Filings to Corporate 10-Ks - Evidence From the Voluntary Filing Program 2010 SSRN (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1397658)
2. M.d.C.A.O.M. Batista, and A.C. Salgado Information quality measurement in data integration schemas VLDB'07 Workshop on Quality in Databases 2007 VLDB Endowment and ACM Vienna, Austria 61 72
3. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila The Semantic Web 2001 Scientific American 34 43
4. P.A. Bernstein, and L.M. Haas Information integration in the enterprise Communications of the ACM 51 9 2008 72 79
5. E.J. Boritz, and W.G. No Auditing an XBRL Instance Document: The Case of United Technologies Corporation 2008 University of Waterloo
6. E.J. Boritz, and W.G. No SEC's XBRL Voluntary Program on Edgar: The Case for Quality Assurance 2008 SSRN (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1163254)
7. M. Bovee, M.L. Ettredge, R.P. Srivastava, and M.A. Vasarhelyi Does the year 2000 XBRL Taxonomy accommodate current business financial-reporting practice? Journal of Information Systems 16 2 2002 165 182
8. M. Bovee, A. Kogan, K. Nelson, R.P. Srivastava, and M.A. Vasarhelyi Financial Reporting and Auditing Agent with Net Knowledge (FRAANK) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) Journal of Information Systems 19 1 2005 19 41
9. T.R. Bruce, and D. Hillmann The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting D. Hillmann, E.L. Westbrooks, Metadata in Practice 2004 American Library Association Chicago 238 256
10. A. Burton-Jones, V.C. Storey, V. Sugumaran, and P. Ahluwalia A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies Data & Knowledge Engineering 55 1 2005 84 102
11. L. Cao, and H. Zhu Normal accidents: data quality problems in ERP-enabled manufacturing ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality 4 3 2013 11:11 11:26
12. K.H. Chou How valid are they? An examination of XBRL voluntary filing documents with the SEC EDGAR system 14th International XBRL Conference, Philadelphia, USA 2006
13. H. Crawford Encyclopedias R. Bopp, L.C. Smith, Reference and Information Services: An Introduction 2001 Libraries Unlimited Englewood 433 459
14. A. David, and P. Graham Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline Decision Support Systems 44 3 2008 657 672
15. H.-H. Do, and E. Rahm Matching large schemas: approaches and evaluation Information Systems 32 6 2006 857 885
16. A. Doan, and A.Y. Halevy Semantic integration research in the database community: a brief survey AI Magazine 26 1 2005 83 94
17. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A.Y. Halery Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web The 11th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) 2002
18. J. Du, and L. Zhou Improving financial data quality using ontologies Decision Support Systems 54 2012 76 86
19. F. Duchateau, and Z. Bellahsene Measuring the quality of an integrated schema Conceptual Modeling - ER 2010 2010 Springer Vancouver, BC, Canada 261 273
20. A. Even, G. Shankaranarayanan, and P.D. Berger Evaluating a model for cost-effective data quality management in a real-world CRM setting Decision Support Systems 50 1 2010 152 163
21. M. Fernández, C. Overbeeke, M. Sabou, and E. Motta What makes a good ontology? A case-study in fine-grained knowledge reuse Proceedings of the 4th Asian Conference on the Semantic Web 2009 Springer-Verlag Shanghai, China 61 75
22. E. Folmer Quality of Semantic Standards Ph.D. Thesis 2012 University of Twente
23. A. Gangemi, C. Catenacci, M. Giaramita, J. Lehmann, R. Gil, F. Bolici, and O. Strignana Ontology Evaluation and Validation 2005 Laboratory for Applied Ontology, ISTC-CNR Trento, Italy
24. W. Harrison An entropy-based measure of software complexity IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18 11 1992 1025 1029
25. J. Krogstie, G. Sindre, and H. Jørgensen Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework European Journal of Information Systems 15 1 2006 91 102
26. Y.W. Lee, D. Strong, B. Kahn, and R.Y. Wang AIMQ: A Methodology for Information Quality Assessment Information and Management 40 2 2002 133 146
27. O.I. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Sølvberg Understanding quality in conceptual modeling IEEE Software 11 2 1994 42 49
28. Y. Ma, B. Jin, and Y. Feng Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems Journal of Systems and Software 83 1 2010 143 152
29. D. MacKenzie Computer-related accidental death: an empirical exploration Science and Public Policy 21 4 1994 233 248
30. S.E. Madnick, R.Y. Wang, Y.W. Lee, and H. Zhu Overview and framework for data and information quality research ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality 1 1 2009 (Article #2)
31. S.E. Madnick, and H. Zhu Improving data quality with effective use of data semantics Data and Knowledge Engineering 59 2 2006 460 475
32. M.L. Markus, C.W. Steinfield, R.T. Wigand, and G. Minton Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: the case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry MIS Quarterly 30 Special Issue 2006 439 465
33. T.J. McCabe A complexity measure Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering 1976 IEEE Computer Society Press San Francisco, California, United States 407
34. G.A. Miller The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information Psychological Review 63 2 1956 81 97
35. D.L. Moody Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions Data & Knowledge Engineering 55 3 2005 243 276
36. D.L. Moody, G. Sindre, T. Brasethvik, and A. Sølvberg Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering 2003 IEEE Computer Society Portland, Oregon 295 305
37. H.J. Nelson, G. Poels, M. Genero, and M. Piattini A conceptual modeling quality framework Software Quality Journal 20 1 2012 201 228
38. P.G.A.P. Neumann Computer Related Risks 1995 ACM Press/Addison Wesley Publishing Co. New York
39. N.F. Noy, A. Doan, and A.Y. Halevy Semantic Integration AI Magazine 26 1 2005 7 9
40. X. Ochoa, and E. Duval Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories International Journal on Digital Libraries 10 2/3 2009 67 91
41. A.M. Orme, H. Yao, and L.H. Etzkorn Coupling metrics for ontology-based systems IEEE Software 23 2 2006 102 108
42. J. Pak, and L. Zhou A framework for ontology evaluation R. Sharman, H.R. Rao, T.S. Raghu, Exploring the Grand Challenges for Next Generation E-business 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 10 18
43. N. Palavitsinis, N. Manouselis, and S.S. Alonso Evaluation of a metadata application profile for learning resources on organic agriculture F. Sartori, M.A. Sicilia, N. Manouselis, MSTR 2009, CCIS 46 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin 270 281
44. J.-R. Park Metadata quality in digital repositories: a survey of the current state of the art Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 47 3/4 2009 213 228
45. C. Perrow Normal Accidents: Living With High-risk Technologies 1999 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
46. Personal Communication, Discussion with participants of MIT Information Quality Industrial Symposium in past five years, 2011.
47. E. Rahm, and P.A. Bernstein A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching VLDB Journal 10 4 2001 334 350
48. E. Rahm, H.-H. Do, and S. Maßmann Matching large XML schemas ACM SIGMOD Record 33 4 2004 26 31
49. T.C. Redman Data Quality for the Information Age 1996 Artech House Boston, MA
50. S. Roohani, X. Zhao, E.A. Capozzoli, and B. Lamberton Analysis of XBRL literature: a decade of progress and puzzle The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 10 2010 131 147
51. A. Rosenthal, L. Seligman, M.D. Allen, and A. Chapman Fit for purpose: toward an engineering basis for data exchange standards International IFIP Working Conference on Enterprise Interoperability Information, Services and Processes for the Interoperable Economy and Society 2013 Springer Enschede, The Netherlands 91 103
52. A. Rosenthal, L. Seligman, and S. Renner From semantic integration to semantics management: case studies and a way forward ACM SIGMOD Record 33 4 2004 44 50
53. N. Shadbolt, T. Berners-Lee, and W. Hall The semantic web revisited IEEE Intelligent Systems 21 3 2006 96 101
54. G. Shankaranarayanan, and Y. Cai Supporting data quality management in decision-making Decision Support Systems 42 1 2005 302 317
55. E.P.B. Simperl, and C. Tempich Ontology engineering: a reality check M. Robert, T. Zahir, OTM Conferences 2006 Springer 836 854
56. V.C. Storey, R.M. Dewan, and M. Freimer Data quality: setting organizational policies Decision Support Systems 54 1 2012 434 442
57. B. Stvilia A model for ontology quality evaluation First Monday 12 12 2007
58. B. Stvilia, and L. Gasser Value based metadata quality assessment Library and Information Science Research 30 1 2008 67 74
59. B. Stvilia, L. Gasser, M.B. Twidale, and L.C. Smith A framework for information quality assessment Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 12 2007 1720 1733
60. S.A. Sutton Metadata quality, utility and the semantic web: the case of learning resources and achievement standards Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 46 1 2010 81 107
61. J. Sweller Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning Cognitive Science 12 2 1988 257 285
62. S. Tartir, I.B. Arpinar, M. Moore, and A.P. Sheth OntoQA: metric-based ontology quality analysis IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing 2005
63. H. Wache, T. Vögele, U. Visser, H. Stuckenschmidt, G. Schuster, H. Neumann, and S. Hübner Ontology-based integration of information - a survey of existing approaches IJCAI-01 Workshop: Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, WA 2001 108 117
64. Y. Wand, and R.Y. Wang Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations Communications of the ACM 39 11 1996 86 95
65. Y. Wand, and R. Weber On the deep structure of information systems Information Systems Journal 5 3 1995 203 223
66. R.Y. Wang, M.P. Reddy, and H.B. Kon Toward quality data: an attribute-based approach Decision Support Systems 13 3-4 1995 349 372
67. R.Y. Wang, and D.M. Strong Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers Journal of Management Information Systems 12 4 1996 5 33
68. J. Weagley, E. Gelches, and J.-R. Park Interoperability and metadata quality in digital video repositories: a study of Dublin Core Journal of Library Metadata 10 1 2010 37 57
69. E.J. Weyuker Evaluating Software complexity measures IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14 9 1988 1357 1365
70. XBRL International Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) 2.1 2006 XBRL International
71. H. Yao, A.M. Orme, and L. Etzkorn Cohesion metrics for ontology design and application Journal of Computer Science 1 1 2005 107 113
72. H. Zhang, Y.-F. Li, and H.B.K. Tan Measuring design complexity of semantic web ontologies Journal of Systems and Software 83 5 2010 803 814
73. Y. Zhang, and Y. Li A user-centered functional metadata evaluation of moving image collections Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 8 2008 1331 1346
74. H. Zhu, and L. Fu Towards quality of data standards: empirical findings from XBRL The 30th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS'09), Phoenix, AZ, USA 2009
75. H. Zhu, and H. Wu Interoperability of XBRL financial statements in the U.S. International Journal of E-Business Research 7 2 2011 18 33