Interoperability and metadata quality in digital video repositories: A study of dublin core

Journal of Library Metadata

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 37-57

  Weagley, Julie ^a   Gelches, Ellen ^a   Park, Jung Ran ^b  

^a Independent Scholars   (United States)

^b Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Controlled vocabularies; Digital video repository; Dublin core; Interoperability; Metadata quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649752553     PISSN: 19386389     EISSN: 19375034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19386380903546984     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Australian Centre for the Moving Image. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.acmi.net.au/about.htm
2. Ball State University Libraries. (n.d.). Digital media repository: A project of the university libraries. Retrieved June 28, 2009, at http://libx.bsu.edu/
3. Bearman, D., Miller, E., Rust, G., Trant, J., & Weibel, S. (1999, January). A common model to support interoperable metadata: Progress report on reconciling metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI communities. D-Lib Magazine. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/bearman/01bearman.html
4. Bruce, T. R., & Hillmann, D. I. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In D. Hillmann & E. Westbrooks (Eds.), Metadata in practice. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://hdl.handle.net/1813/7895
5. Bui, A. & Park, J.-R. (2006). An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository. In H. Moukdad (Ed.), Information science revisited: Approaches to innovation, Proceedings of the 2006 annual conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science. Retrieved December 7, 2009, from http://www.caisacsi.ca/proceedings/2006/bui2006.pdf
6. Collaborative Digitization Program. (2006, September). Dublin Core metadata best practices, Version 2.1.1. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.bcr.org/cdp/best/dublin‑core‑bp.pdf
7. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (1995-2009). Using Dublin Core. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/
8. Duff, W. M. (2003). The Dublin Core and its limitations. DigiCULT.Info (6), 31-32. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.digicult.info/downloads/dcinfo issue6 december 20031.pdf
9. Folkstreams, Inc. (2006). Folkstreams.net. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.folkstreams.net/
10. Hunter, J., & Iannella, R. (1998). The application of metadata standards to video indexing. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~eresearch/papers/1998/ECDL2.pdf
11. Gasser, L., & Stvilia, B. (2001). A new framework for information quality. Technical Report. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
12. Godby, C. J., Smith, D., & Childress, E. (2003). Two paths to interoperable metadata. DC-2003: Supporting communities of discourse and practice-Metadata research & applications. Retrieved December 7, 2009, from http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/2003/godby-dc2003.pdf
13. McCroskey, M. (2006, October). Cataloging streaming video on the Web: Collaboration between catalogers, an archivist, and a documentary filmmaker. OLAC Poster session presented at the meeting of the Online Audiovisual Catalogers, Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved October 21, 2009, from http://www.tnla.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1
14. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). (2007). The Dublin Core metadata element set. ANSI/NISO Z39.85-2007. American National Standards Institute. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.niso.org/kst/reports/standards?step=2&gid=&projectkey=9b7bffcd2daeca6198b4ee5a848f9beec2f600e5
15. NJVid. (2010). About NJVid. Retrieved June 13, 2009, from http://www.wpunj.edu/njvid/about/default.html
16. Park, J.-R. (2006). Semantic interoperability and metadata quality: An analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections. Knowledge Organization, 33(1), 20-34.
17. Park, J.-R. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. In M. S. Babinec & H. Mercer (Eds.), Special issue on Metadata and Open Access Repositories. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 47(3), 213-228.
18. Shreeves, S. L., Knutson, E. M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C. L., Twidale, M. B., & Cole, T. (2005). Is "quality" metadata "shareable" metadata? The implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. Retrieved December 7, 2009, from http://mailer.fsu.edu/~bstvilia/papers/ACRL.pdf
19. Windows on Maine (n.d.). About Windows on Maine. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://www.windowsonmaine.org/about.aspx
20. Zeng, M. L., Subrahmanyam, B., & Shreve, G. M. (2004). Metadata quality study for the National Science Digital Library (NDSL) metadata repository. In Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization. 7th Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, ICADL 2004 Shanghai, China, December 2004
21. Zeng, M. L. (2006). Metadata quality study for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Metadata Repository. Presented paper at the Research and Teaching Talk Series, Information Science and Technology, Drexel University.