A framework for information quality assessment

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1720-1733

  Stvilia, Besiki ^a   Gasser, Les ^b   Twidale, Michael B ^b   Smith, Linda C ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITY CONTROL; TAXONOMIES;

CAUSAL CONNECTION; IQ ASSESSMENT; KNOWLEDGE RESOURCE;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 35348926870     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20652     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and information. London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
2. Barton, J., Currier, S., & Hey, J. (2003). Building quality assurance into metadata creation: An analysis based on the learning objects and e-Prints communities of practice. In S. Sutton, J. Greenberg, and J. Tennis (Eds.), Proceedings 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Applications, Seattle, WA. Retrieved May 23, 2007, from http://eprints.erpanet.org/83/
3. Basch, R. (1995). Introduction: An overview of quality and value in information services. In R. Basch (Ed.), Electronic information delivery (pp. 1-13). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
4. Belkin, N., & Robertson, S. (1976). Information science and the phenomena of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(4), 197-204.
5. Brookes, B. (1974). Robert Fairthorne and the scope of information science. Journal of Documentation, 30(2), 139-152.
6. Bruce, T., & Hillman, D. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In D. Hillman & E. Westbrooks (Eds.), Metadata in practice. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
7. Buckland, M. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351-360.
8. Carroll, J. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9. Cover, T., & Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
10. Crawford, H. (2001). Encyclopedias. In R. Bopp & L. C. Smith (Eds.), Reference and information services: An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 433-459). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
11. Dushay, N., & Hillman, D. (2003). Analyzing metadata for effective use and re-use. In Proceedings of the 2003 Dublin Core Conference. Seattle, WA.
12. Eppler, M. (2003). Managing information quality: Increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
13. Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Data Mining KDD-96 (pp. 226-231). Portland, OR.
14. Evans, J., & Lindsay, W. (2005). The management and control of quality (6th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson.
15. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Gasser, L., & Stvilia, B. (2001). A new framework for information quality (ISRN UIUCLIS-2001/1+AMAS). Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
17. Gracy, D. (2002). What you get is not what you see: Forgery and the corruption of recordkeeping systems. In R. Cox & D. Wallace (Eds.), Archives and the public good: Accountability and records in modern society (pp. 247-264). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
18. Higgins, M. (1999). Meta-information, and time: Factors in human decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 132-139.
19. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report.
20. Johnson, R., & Wichern, D. (1998). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Juran, J. (1992), Juran on quality by design. New York: The Free Press.
22. Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Machlup, F. (1983). Semantic quirks in studies of information. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 641-671). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
24. Marschak, J. (1971). Economics of information systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(333), 192-219.
25. McClave, J., & Benson, P. (1992). A first course in business statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
26. McCook, A. (2006). Is peer review broken? The Scientist, 20(2), 26.
27. Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Quinlan, J. (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
29. Redman, T. (1992), Data quality; Management and technology. New York: Bantam Books.
30. Redman, T. (1996). Data quality for the information age. Boston, MA: Artech House.
31. Salton, G., & McGill, M. (1982). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33. Strong, D., Lee, Y., & Wang, R. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110.
34. Stvilia, B., Twidale, M. B., Gasser, L., & Smith, L. C. (2005a). Information quality in a community-based encyclopedia. In: S. Hawamdeh (Ed.), Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation, and TechnologyProceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 101-113).
35. Stvilia, B., Twidale, M. B., Smith, L. C., & Gasser, L. (2005b). Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In: F. Naumann, M. Gertz, S. Mednick (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality-ICIQ 2005 (pp. 442-454). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
36. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1995). Measuring information: An information services perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Taylor, A. (2004). The organization of information (library and information science text series) (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
38. Taylor, R. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
39. Taylor, R. (1991). Information use environments. In: Progress in Communication Sciences, (pp. 217-255)
40. Wand, Y., & Wang, R. (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39(11), 86-95.
41. Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5-35.
42. Williams, M. (1990). Highlights of the online database industry-the quality of information and data. In: M. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1990 National Online Meeting (pp. 120-135). New York: Learned Information.