Interoperability of XBRL financial statements in the U.S.

International Journal of e-Business Research

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 19-33

  Zhu, Hongwei ^a   Wu, Harris ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data Quality; GAAP Taxonomy; Interoperability; Long Tail; XBRL

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052876556     PISSN: 15481131     EISSN: 1548114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jebr.2011040103     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 207-216).
2. Bartley, J. W., Chen, Y. A., & Taylor, E. Z. (2010). A comparison of XBRL filings to corporate 10-Ks -evidence from the voluntary filing program. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397658
3. Bernstein, P. A., & Haas, L. M. (2008). Information integration in the enterprise. Communications of the ACM, 51(9), 72-79. doi:10.1145/1378727. 1378745
4. Bernstein, P. A., Melnik, S., Quix, C., & Petro-poulos, M. (2004). Industrial-strength schema matching. SIGMOD Record, 33(4), 38-43. doi:10.1145/1041410.1041417 (Pubitemid 40056331)
5. Boritz, E. J., & No, W. G. (2008a, May 11-12). Auditing an XBRL instance document: The case of United Technologies Corporation. Paper presented at the International Conference on XBRL: Taxonomies and Assurance, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
6. Boritz, E. J., & No, W. G. (2008b). SEC's XBRL voluntary program on Edgar: The case for qual-ity assurance. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1163254
7. Bovee, M., Ettredge, M. L., Srivastava, R. P., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2002). Does the year 2000 XBRL taxonomy accommodate current business financial-reporting practice? Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 165-182. doi:10.2308/jis.2002.16.2.165
8. Bovee, M., Kogan, A., Nelson, K., Srivastava, R. P., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2005). Financial reporting and auditing agent with net knowledge (FRAANK) and e Xtensible business reporting language (XBRL). Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 19-41. doi:10.2308/jis.2005.19.1.19
9. Bradshaw, M. T., Miller, G. S., & Serafeim, G. (2009). Accounting method heterogeneity and analysts forecasts. Working paper of the University of Chicago, University of Michigan, and Harvard Business School.
10. Chou, K. H. (2006). How valid are they? An exami-nation of XBRL voluntary filing documents with the SEC EDGAR system. Paper presented at the 14th International XBRL Conference.
11. Debreceny, R. S., Chandra, A., Cheh, J. J., Guithues-Amrhein, D., Hannon, N. J., & Hutchison, P. D. (2005). Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC's EDGAR system: A critique and evaluation. Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 191-210. doi:10.2308/ jis.2005.19.2.191
12. Du, H., & Roohani, S. (2007). Meeting challenges and expectations of continuous auditing in the con-text of independent audits of financial statements. International Journal of Auditing, 11(2), 133-146. doi:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00359.x
13. Gus, D. F., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2009). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1266659
14. Hahsler, M., Grun, B., Hornik, K., & Buchta, C. (2010). Introduction to arules - a computational en-vironment for mining association rules and frequent item sets. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/arules/vignettes/arules.pdf
15. Hoffman, C. (2010) Discussion of XBRL taxonomy and company extensions.
16. Hoffman, C., & Watson, L. (2009). XBRL for dum-mies. Indianapolis, IN: For Dummies.
17. Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001). A survey of ap-proaches to automatic schema matching. Very Large Data Bases Journal, 10(4), 334-350. doi:10.1007/ s007780100057 (Pubitemid 33570972)
18. Rahm, E., Do, H.-H., & Maßmann, S. (2004). Match-ing large XML schemas. SIGMOD Record, 33(4), 26-31. doi:10.1145/1041410.1041415
19. Roohani, S., & Zhao, X. (2009). XBRL citation analysis: A decade of progress and puzzle. Paper presented at the International Conference on XBRL.
20. XBRL International. (2006). Extensible business reporting language (XBRL) 2.1. Laytonsville, MD: XBRL International.
21. Zheng, X., & Roohani, S. (2010) Determinants of the deficiency of mandatory filings. Paper presented at the 10th Bryant University XBRL Conference, Smithfield, RI.
22. Zhu, H., & Fu, L. (2009). Towards quality of data standards: Empirical findings from XBRL. Paper presented at the 30th International Conference on Information Systems.
23. Zhu, H., & Madnick, S. E. (2007, December 9). Semantic integration approach to efficient business data supply chain. Paper presented at the 6th Workshop on e Business, Montreal, QC, Canada.
24. Zhu, H., & Wu, H. (2010, August 12-15). Quality of XBRL US GAAP taxonomy: Empirical evaluation us-ing SEC filings. Paper presented at the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru.