Integrative scenario development

Ecology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Priess, Joerg A ^a   Hauck, Jennifer ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinary research; Participatory process; Quality control; Regional scale; Transdisciplinary research

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LAND USE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; QUALITY CONTROL; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84897558580     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06168-190112     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Acreman, M. 2005. Linking science and decision-making: features and experience from environmental river flow setting. Environmental Modelling and Software 20(2):99-109.
2. Alcamo, J. 2001. Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. Environmental Issue Report no. 24. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. [online] URL: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_24
3. Alcamo, J., and T. Henrichs. 2008. Towards guidelines for environmental scenario analysis. Pages 13-35 in J. Alcamo, editor. Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00402-X
4. Alcamo, J., K. Kok, G. Busch, and J. Priess. 2008. Searching for the future of land: scenarios from the local to global scale. Pages 67-103 in J. Alcamo, editor. Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5. Bernarie, M. 1988. Delphi-and Delphi like approaches with special regard to environmental standard setting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 33(2):149-158. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0040-1625(88)90078-9
6. Biggs, R., C. Raudsepp-Hearne, C. Atkinson-Palombo, E. Bohensky, E. Boyd, G. Cundill, H. Fox, S. Ingram, K. Kok, S. Spehar, M. Tengö, D. Timmer, and M. Zurek. 2007. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecology and Society 12(1): 17. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol12/iss1/art17/
7. Bishop, P., A. Hines, and T. Collins. 2007. The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9 (1):5-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516
8. Bohunovsky, L., J. Jäger, and I. Omann. 2011. Participatory scenario development for integrated sustainability assessment. Regional Environmental Change 11(2):271-284. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10113-010-0143-3
9. Chilvers, J. 2009. Deliberative and participatory approaches in environmental geography. Pages 400-417 in N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, and B. Rhoads, editors. A companion to environmental geography. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444305722.ch24
10. Cuppen, E., S. Breukers, M. Hisschemöller, and E. Bergsma. 2010. Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 69(3):579-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.005
11. de Nijs, T. C. M., R. de Niet, and L. Crommentuijn. 2004. Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030. Journal of Environmental Management 72(1-2):35-42. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.03.015
12. European Environment Agency (EEA). 2009. Looking back on looking forward: a review of evaluative scenario literature. EEA Technical Report No 3/2009, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. [online] URL: http://www.eea.europa. eu/publications/looking-back-on-looking-forward-a-review-of-evaluativescenario-literature
13. Giljum, S., A. Behrens, F. Hinterberger, C. Lutz, and B. Meyer. 2008. Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy 11 (3):204-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.005
14. Haasnoot, M., and H. Middelkoop. 2012. A history of futures: a review of scenario use in water policy studies in the Netherlands. Environmental Science and Policy 19-20:108-120. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.002
15. Harries, C. 2003. Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision making? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70(8):797-817. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00023-4
16. Henrichs, T., M. Zurek, B. Eickhout, K. Kok, C. Raudsepp-Hearne, T. Ribeiro, D. van Vuuren, and A. Volkery. 2010. Scenario development and analysis for forward-looking ecosystem assessments. Pages 151-220 in N. Ash, H. Blanco, C. Brown, K. Garcia, T. Henrichs, N. Lucas, C. Raudsepp-Hearne, R. D. Simpson, R. Scholes, T. P. Tomich, B. Vira, and M. Zurek, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being-a manual for assessment practitioners, Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.unep-wcmc.org/medialibrary/2010/10/31/90af3045/ EcosystemsHumanWellbeing.pdf
17. Hughes, B. B. 2009. Forecasting long-term global change: introduction to international futures (IFs). Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures, Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA. [online] URL: http://www.ifs.du.edu/assets/documents/ IntroductiontoIFsv5_04.pdf
18. Hulme, M., and S. Dessai. 2008. Predicting, deciding, learning: can one evaluate the "success" of national climate scenarios? Environmental Research Letters 3:045013. http://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045013
19. Jacobs, K., G. Garfin, and M. Lenart. 2005. More than just talk: connecting science and decisionmaking. Environment 47(9):6-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.47.9.6-21
20. Johnson. K. A., G. Dana, N. R. Jordan, K. J. Draeger, A. Kapuscinski, L. K. Schmitt Olabisi, and P. B. Reich. 2012. Using participatory scenarios to stimulate social learning for collaborative sustainable development. Ecology and Society 17(2): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04780-170209
21. Kahane, A. 2007. Solving tough problems: an open way of talking, listening, and creating new realities. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, California, USA.
22. Kahneman, D. 2012. Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, London, UK.
23. Kaljonen, M., R. Varjopuro, M. Gieczewski, and A. Iital. 2012. Seeking policy-relevant knowledge: a comparative study of the contextualisation of participatory scenarios for Narew River and Lake Peipsi. Environmental Science and Policy 15(1):72-81. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.006
24. Kok, K. 2009. The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semiquantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Global Environmental Change 19(1):122-133. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.003
25. Kok, K., M. Patel, D. S. Rothman, and G. Quaranta. 2006. Multiscale narratives from an IA perspective: part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures 38(3):285-311. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.006
26. Kok, K., M. van Vliet, I. Bärlund, A. Dubel, and J. Sendzimir. 2011. Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(5):835-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.004
27. Kosow, H., and R. Gaßner. 2008. Methods of future and scenario analysis: overview, assessment, and selection criteria. Studies no 39. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/ bitstream/123456789/26008/1/Methods%20of%20future%20and% 20scenario%20analysis%20-%20overview,%20assessment,%20and% 20selection%20criteria.pdf?1
28. Liu, Y., H. Gupta, E. Springer, and T. Wagener. 2008. Linking science with environmental decision making: experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software 23 (7):846-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.007
29. Lövbrand, E., R. Pielke, Jr., and S. Beck. 2011. A democracy paradox in studies of science and technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 36(4):474-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243910366154
30. Mahmoud, M., Y. Liu, H. Hartmann, S. Stewart, T. Wagener, D. Semmens, R. Stewart, H. Gupta, D. Dominguez, F. Dominguez, D. Hulse, R. Letcher, B. Rashleigh, C. Smith, R. Street, J. Ticehurst, M. Twery, H. van Delden, R. Waldick, D. White, and L. Winter. 2009. A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environmental Modelling and Software 24(7):798-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.envsoft.2008.11.010
31. Masini, E. B., and J. M. Vasquez. 2000. Scenarios as seen from a human and social perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 65(1):49-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625 (99)00127-4
32. Metzger, M. J., M. D. A. Rounsevell, H. Van den Heiligenberg, M. Pérez-Soba, and P. Soto Hardiman. 2010. How personal judgment influences scenario development: an example for future rural development in Europe. Ecology and Society 15(2): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art5/
33. Messner, F. 2007. Integrated assessment of water policy strategies in the context of global change: the integrative methodological approach and its application in the Spree and Schwarze Elster river basins. Pages 265-303 in J. D. Erickson, F. Messner, and I. Ring, editors. Ecological economics of sustainable watershed management. (Advances in the economics of environmental resources, Volume 7). Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3740(07)07012-5
34. Mostert, E. 2003. The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179-197.
35. O'Neill, B., S. Pulver, S. VanDeveer, and Y. Garb. 2008. Where next with global environmental scenarios? Environmental Research Letters 3:045012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ 3/4/045012
36. Palomo, I., B. Martín-López, C. López-Santiago, and C. Montes. 2011. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain. Ecology and Society 16(1): 23. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol16/iss1/art23/
37. Patel, M., K. Kok, and D. S. Rothman. 2007. Participatory planning in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24(3):546-561. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005
38. Rounsevell, M. D. A., and M. J. Metzger. 2010. Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (4):606-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.63
39. Rounsevell, M. D. A., I. Reginster, M. B. Araújo, T. R. Carter, N. Dendoncker, F. Ewert, J. I. House, S. Kankaanpää, R. Leemans, M. J. Metzger, C. Schmit, P. Smith, and G. Tuck. 2006. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114(1):57-68. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.027
40. Seppelt, R., I. Kühn, S. Klotz, K. Frank, M. Schloter, H. Auge, S. Kabisch, C. Görg, and K. Jax. 2009. Land use options-strategies and adaptation to global change. Terrestrial environmental research. Gaia 18(1):77-80.
41. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. 2010. Regionalstatistik. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder, Wiesbaden, Germany. [online] URL: https://www.regionalstatistik. de
42. Statistisches Bundesamt. 2010. Bevölkerungsvorausberechnungen. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, Germany. [online] URL: http://www-genesis.destatis.de
43. Toderi, M., N. Powell, G. Seddaiu, P. P. Roggero, and D. Gibbon. 2007. Combining social learning with agro-ecological research practice for more effective management of nitrate pollution. Environmental Science and Policy 10(6):551-563. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.006
44. Tress, B., and G. Tress. 2003. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 64(3):161-178. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00219-0
45. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). 2007. Global environment outlook 4. Environment for development. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/geo/ geo4.asp
46. van Notten, P. W. F., J. Rotmans, M. B. A. van Asselt, and D. S. Rothman. 2003. An updated scenario typology. Futures 35 (5):423-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00090-3
47. Waldhardt, R., M. Bach, R. Borresch, L. Breuer, T. Diekötter, H. Frede, S. Gäth, O. Ginzler, T. Gottschalk, S. Julich, M. Krumpholz, F. Kuhlmann, A. Otte, B. Reger, W. Reiher, K. Schmitz, P. Schmitz, P. Sheridan, D. Simmering, C. Weist, V. Wolters, and D. Zörner. 2010. Evaluating today's landscape multifunctionality and providing an alternative future: a normative scenario approach. Ecology and Society 15(3): 30. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/ art30
48. Walz, A., C. Lardelli, H. Behrendt, A. Grêt-Regamey, C. Lundstöm, S. Kytzia, and P. Bebi. 2007. Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(1-2):114-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2006.11.001
49. Winowiecki, L., S. Smukler, K. Shirley, R. Remans, G. Peltier, E. Lothes, E. King, L. Comita, S. Baptista, and L. Alkema. 2011. Tools for enhancing interdisciplinary communication. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 7(1).
50. Zurek, M. B., and T. Henrichs. 2007. Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(8):1282-1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.11.005