Seeking policy-relevant knowledge: A comparative study of the contextualisation of participatory scenarios for the Narew River and Lake Peipsi

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 72-81

  Kaljonen, Minna ^a   Varjopuro, Riku ^a   Giełczewski, Marek ^b   Iital, Arvo ^c  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^c TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Collaborative knowledge production; Participatory scenario making; Policy relevant knowledge; Post normal science; Water management

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUROPE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; KNOWLEDGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 81255184304     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aguilar J. A survey about fuzzy cognitive maps papers. International Journal of Computational Cognition 2005, 3:27-33.
2. Alcamo J. The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis 2008, 123-150. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J. Alcamo (Ed.).
3. Callon M., Law J. On qualculation, agency, and otherness. Environment and Planning D 2005, 23:717-733.
4. Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. CEC Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Council of the European Communities. Official Journal 2000, L327.
6. Chammas, B., 2009. Water as centre of attention - public participation in planning of water management. Gospodarka Wodna 3: Woda 17, I-IV (in Polish).
7. Carolan M.S. Ontological politics: mapping a complex environmental problem. Environmental Values 2004, 13:497-522.
8. Cashmore M., Richardson T., Hilding-Ryedvik T., Emmelin L. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010, 30:371-379.
9. Council of Ministers of Poland Plan gospodarowania wodami na obszarze dorzecza Wisly. Monitor Polski 2011, 49(549). (in Polish).
10. Dewey J. Public and Its Problems 1927, Swallow Press/Ohio University Press, Athens, OH.
11. Dreborg K.H. Essence of backcasting. Futures 1996, 28:813-828.
12. Funtowitz S.O., Ravetz J. Science for post-normal age. Futures 1993, 25:739-752.
13. Garb Y., Pulver S., VanDeever S. Scenarios in society, society in scenarios: towards a social scientific analysis of storyline-driven environmental modelling. Environmental Research Letters 2008, 3:045015. (8pp).
14. Gielczewski, M., 2003. The Narew River Basin: A model for the sustainable management of agriculture, nature and water supply. Netherlands Geographical Studies, Utrecht, p. 317.
15. Gielczewski M., Stelmaszczyk M., Piniewski M., Okruszko T. How can we involve stakeholders in the development of water scenarios? Narew River Basin case study. Journal of Water and Climate 2011, 2:166-179.
16. Giordano R., Passarella G., Uricchio V., Vurro M. Fuzzy cognitive maps for issue identification in a water resource conflict resolution system. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 2005, 30:463-469.
17. Hering D., Borja A., et al. The European water framework directive at the age of 10: a critical review of its achievements with recommendations for the future. Science for the Total Environment 2010, 408:4007-4019.
18. Hobbs B., Ludsin S., et al. Fuzzy cognitive mapping as a tool to define management objectives for complex ecosystems. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:1548-1565.
19. Howarth W. Aspirations and realities under the water framework directive: proceduralisation, participation and practicalities. Journal of Environmental Law 2009, 21:391-417.
20. Iital A., Voronova V., Klõga M. Development of water scenarios for large lakes in Europe: the case of Lake Peipsi. Journal of Water and Climate 2011, 2:154-165.
21. Ingram H. Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: a political and contextual approach. Paper presented at the Rosenberg Forum for Water Policy, Zaragoza, Spain 2008 June, 25-26.
22. Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 2003, 41:223-244.
23. Kaljonen, M., Varjopuro, R., Opening up water management - a framework for analysing participatory scenario-making experiments on trial. Journal of Water and Climate, in press.
24. Kangur K., Möls T. Changes in spatial distribution of phosphorus and nitrogen in the large north-temperate lowland Lake Peipsi. Hydrobiologia 2008, 599:31-39.
25. Keskkonnaministeerium Ida-Eesti vesikonna veemajanduskava 2010, (in Estonian).
26. Kok K., Biggs R., Zurek M. Methods for developing multiscale participatory scenarios: Insights from Southern Africa and Europe. Ecology and Society 2007, 13(1).
27. Kok K., van Vliet M., Dubel A., Sendzimir J., Bärlund I. Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78:835-851.
28. Kurs O., Manakov A., Martõnov V. Inimgeograafiline Peipsimaa. Peipsi, KKM Info- ja Tehnokeskus 1999, 198-207. (in Estonian).
29. Kämäri J., Alcamo J., et al. Envisioning the Future of Water in Europe - the SCENES Project. E-water 2008/3 2008.
30. Kämäri J., Bärlund I., Kok K. Development of water scenarios for Europe-Preface. Journal of Water and Climate 2011, 2:85-86.
31. Latour B. Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy 2004, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Leino, H., Laine, M., forthcoming. Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation. Planning Theory, doi:10.1177/1473095211417595.
33. Marres N. Issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science 2007, 37:759-780.
34. Mol A. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice 2002, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
35. Moss B. The water framework directive: total environment or political compromise?. Science of the Total Environment 2008, 400:32-41.
36. Nachlik E., Zaleski J. Managing the water management - waiting for Alexander the Great, who will cut the existing Gordian knot. Gospodarka Wodna 2010, 1:9-17. (in Polish).
37. Parson E.A., et al. Global Change Scenarios: Their Development and Use 2007, US Climate Change Science Program, Washington, DC.
38. Patel M., Kok K., Rothman D. Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis. An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:546-561.
39. Pellizzoni L. The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason. British Journal of sociology 2001, 52:59-86.
40. Ramsey K. GIS, modelling, and politics: on the tensions of collaborative decision support. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1972-1980.
41. Ravetz J. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems 1971, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
42. Ravetz J. What is post-normal science?. Futures 1999, 31:647-653.
43. Reid W. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Survey of Initial Impacts 2006.
44. Rotmans J. Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 1998, 3:155-179.
45. Schwartz P. The Art of Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World 2006, Doubleday, New York.
46. Steyaert P., Jiggins J. Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy 2007, 10:575-586.
47. Steyaert P., Ollivier G. The European water framework directive: how ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1):25.
48. Stirling A. " Opening up" and " closing down": power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 2008, 33:262-294.
49. Taboryska B., Dmitruk U., Piascik M., Jancewicz A. The Quality of the Bug and Narew rivers in the Zegrzyński Lake basin in 2001-2005. Wiadomosci Meteorologii, Hydrologii, Gospodarki Wodnej 2007, 1:31-64. (in Polish).
50. Turnpenny J., Jones M., Lorenzoni I. Where Now for Post-Normal Science?. A critical review of its development, definitions and uses. Science, Technology and Human Values 2011, 36:287-306.
51. Uitenboogaart, Y., van Kempen, J., Wiering, M., van Rijswick, H., 2009. Dealing with complexity and policy discretion. A comparison of the implementation process of the European water framework directive in five member states. Sdu Uitgevers, Netherlands.
52. UNEP Global Environmental Outlook GEO4. Environment for Development 2007, UNEP, Nairobi.
53. Valve H. River basins as planning institutions. How to avoid a place-centrist trap?. Symposium on Climate Change Challenges in River Basin Management 2011.
54. van Vliet, M., 2011. Bridging gaps in the scenario world. Linking stakeholders, modellers and decision makers. Ph.D. thesis for Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
55. van Vliet M., Kok K., Veldkamp T. Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: the use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures 2010, 42:1-14.
56. Veidemane K., Iital A., Gielczewski M. Participatory scenarios for regional water management planning: Eastern Baltic case study. Journal of Water and Climate Change 2011, 2:143-153.
57. Wesselink A., R.Hoppe R. If post-normal science is the solution, what is the problem?. The politics of activist environmental science. Science, Technology and Human Values 2011, 36:389-412.
58. Winter M., Oliver D.M., Fish R., Heathwaite A.L., Chadwick D., Hodgson C. Catchments, sub-catchments and private spaces: scale and process in managing microbial pollution from source to sea. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:315-326.
59. Wynne B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes, but missing the music?. Community Genetics 2006, 9:211-220.
60. Wysocka E., Adamczyk-Habib A., et al. The Development Strategy of the Functional Area of Green Lungs of Poland National Foundation for Environmental Protection 1998, (in Polish).