Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning - A study from Denmark

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 161-178

  Tress, Bärbel ^a,b   Tress, Gunther ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Land use change; Landscape scenarios; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAND USE; VISUALIZATION;

STAKEHOLDERS;

URBAN PLANNING;

LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; VISUALIZATION;

DENMARK;

EID: 0037599598     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00219-0     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Al-Kodmany, K., 1999. Using visualisation techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation. Landsc. Urban Plann. 45, 37-45.
2. Andersen, K.B., 1999. Hvad mener befolkningen? Uddrag af Gallup-undersøgelse. In: Naturrådet (Ed.), Natur og landbrug, temarapport nr. 1, København, pp. 94-108.
3. Antrop, M., 1998a. Landscape ecology and planning. In: Agger, P., Bjerregaard, R., Brandt, J. (Eds.), Ph.D. Course in Landscape Ecology, Roskilde, 29 May-2 June 1995, Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 9, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, pp. 17-29.
4. Antrop, M., 1998b. Impact of urbanisation upon the countryside. In: Agger, P., Bjerregaard, R., Brandt, J. (Eds.), The Farmer as a Natural Resource-Manager, Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 10, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, pp. 24-41.
5. Antrop, M., 2000a. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 77, 17-28.
6. Antrop, M., 2000b. Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of western Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 15, 257-270.
7. Asbirk, S., 1998. Naturkvalitet i den centrale forvaltning. In: Kristensen, L., Vestergaard, P., Fredshavn, J., Andersen, U.V. (Eds.), Naturkvalitet og landskab, Rapport fra det 7. landskabsøkologiske seminar afholdt af Dansk Landskabsøkologisk Forening i samarbejde med Center for Økologi og Miljø, KVL, 20 November 1997, Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 12, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, pp. 75-78.
8. Bergen, S.D., McGaughey, R.J., Fridley, J.L., 1998. Data-driven simulation, dimensional accuracy and realism in a landscape visualisation tool. Landsc. Urban Plann. 40, 283-293.
9. Bramsnæs, A., 1992. The landscape of agriculture. Planning and regulation of agricultural landscapes in the European community. Landsc. Urban Plann. 22, 17-30.
10. Bramsnæs, A., 1994. Landbrugsland og landskab. In: Marginaljorder og landskabet - marginaliseringsdebatten 10 år efter. Rapport fra et tværfagligt seminar afholdt af Landskabsøkologisk Forening i samarbejde med Institut for Økonomi, Skov og Landskab, 25 February 1992, pp. 63-79.
11. Brandt, J., 1994. Småbiotopernes udvikling i 1980erne og deres fremtidige status i det åbne land. In: Marginaljorder og landskabet - marginaliseringsdebatten 10 år efter. Rapport fra et tværfagligt seminar afholdt af Landskabsøkologisk Forening i samarbejde med Institut for Økonomi, Skov og Landskab, 25 February 1992, pp. 21-49.
12. Brandt, J., 1995. Ecological networks in Danish planning. Landschap 12 (3), 63-76.
13. Brandt, J., 1996. Værdier i landskabet. In: Primdahl, J., Brandt, J. (Eds.), Nye vinkler på kulturlandskabet. Rapport fra det 5. landskabsøkologiske seminar afholdt af Dansk Landskabsøkologisk Forening i samarbejde med Institut for Økonomi, Skov og Landskab, KVL, 24 November 1995. Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 5, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, pp. 63-71.
14. Brandt, J., Primdahl, J., Reenberg, A., 1996. Rural land use and landscape dynamics - analysis of driving factors in space and time. Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 2, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde.
15. Bryner, G., 2001. Cooperative instruments and policy making: assessing public participation in US Environmental regulation. Eur. Environ. 11, 49-60.
16. Centre for Landscape Research, 1997. Value, landscape and biodiversity. Research Project Concerning Values, Consequences and Planning in Regards to Integrated Management and Use of the Countryside, Roskilde.
17. Coeterier, J.F., 1994. Non-agricultural use of the countryside in The Netherlands: what is local opinion? Landsc. Urban Plann. 29, 55-69.
18. Danmarks Statistik, 2000. Landbrug 1999 - statistik om landbrug, gartneri og skovbrug. København.
19. Dolman, P.M., Lovett, A., O'Riordan, T., Cobb, D., 2001. Designing whole landscapes. Landsc. Res. 26 (4), 305-335.
20. Emmelin, L., 1996. Landscape impact analysis: a systematic approach to landscape impacts of policy. Landsc. Res. 21 (1), 13-35.
21. Emmelin, L., 1998. Strategic environmental assessment for tourism - methodological lessons from landscape impact analysis. Environ. Educ. Inf. 27 (3), 227-242.
22. Emmelin, L., 2000. The confusing multiplicity of futures and the beguiling logic of history. In: Møller, P.G., Holm, P., Rasmussen, L. (Eds.), Aktører i landskabet. Odense Universitetsforlag, Odense, pp. 27-55.
23. Emmelin, L., Jones, M., Ree, H., 1990. Landskab på Jæren og Romerike. Utvikling og framtidsbilder. Landbrugspolitikk og miljø del II, Kulturlandskab. Landbruksforlaget/Senter for Forskningsoppdrag, Oslo.
24. European Commission, 2001. Environment 2010: our future, our choice, 6th EU Environment Action Programme 2001-2010. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
25. Fry, G., Gustavsson, R., 1996. Testing landscape design principles - the landscape laboratory. In: Jongman, R.H.G. (Ed.), Proceedings of the First ECNC Seminar on Land Use Change and its Ecological Consequences, European Centre for Nature Conservation, 16-18 February 1995, Tilburg, The Netherlands, pp. 143-154.
26. Groth, N.B., Brix Hedegaard, M., Holmberg, T., Höll, A., Skov-Petersen, H., 1998. Arealanvandelsen i Danmark 1995-2025: Den nuværende og fremtidige arealanvendelse belyst som led i en vurdering af det økologiske råderum, Forskningscenter for Skov og Landskab, By-og Landsplanserien nr. 2/1998, København.
27. Herrmann, S., Osinski, E., 1999. Planning sustainable land use in rural areas at different spatial levels using GIS and modelling tools. Landsc. Urban Plann. 46, 93-101.
28. Hobbs, R., 1997. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landsc. Urban Plann. 37, 1-9.
29. Höll, A., Nilsson, K., 1999. Cultural landscape as subject to national research programmes in Denmark. Landsc. Urban Plann. 46, 15-27.
30. Holmes, E., Brandt, J., Bramsnæs, A., Wind, M., Østergaard, M., 1998. VLBs landskabsdatabase: landskabsdata; scenarioteknik og visualisering. Arbejdspapir nr. 10, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, August 1998.
31. Jansens, J.W., 1990. Landscape development scenarios for planning and implementing agroforestry: a case study in the semi-arid lands of eastern Kenya. In: Budd, W.W. (Ed.), Planning for Agroforestry, Developments in Landscape Management and Urban Planning 6C. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 267-292.
32. Klein, T., 1999. Den aktuelle naturindsats. In: Naturrådet (Ed.), Natur og landbrug, temarapport nr. 1, København, pp. 35-45.
33. Kurz, W.A., Beukema, S.J., Klenner, W., Greenough, J.A., Robinson, D.C.E., Sharpe, A.D., Webb, T.M., 2000. TELSA: the tool for exploratory landscape scenario analyses. Comp. Electron. Agric. 27, 227-242.
34. Lange, E., 1994. Integration of computerized visual simulation and visual assessment in environmental planning. Landsc. Urban Plann. 30, 99-112.
35. Lange, E., 2001. The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plann. 54, 163-182.
36. Larsen, J.B., 1997. Skoven og landskabet, et multifunktionelt kontinuum - en bæredygtig udvikling gennem funktionsintegration. In: Brandt, J., Andersen, E., Hjort Petersen, E. (Eds.), Landskabet og de alternative driftsformer. Rapport fra det 6. landskabsøkologiske seminar afholdt af Dansk Landskabsøkologisk Forening i samarbejde med Center for Økologi og Miljø, KVL, 1. November 1996, Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 6, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, pp. 5-11.
37. Luz, F., 2000. Participatory landscape ecology - a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landsc. Urban Plann. 50, 157-166.
38. Meyer, H. V., 1999. Nature and farming in a European perspective. In: Naturrådet (Ed.), Natur og landbrug, temarapport nr. 1, København, pp. 66-76.
39. Möltgen, J., Schmidt, B., Kuhn, W., 1999. Landscape editing with knowledge-based measure deductions for ecological planning. Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 1737, 139-152.
40. Nakamae, E., Qin, X., Tadamura, K., 2001. Rendering of landscapes for environmental assessment. Landsc. Urban Plann. 54, 19-32.
41. O'Riordan, T., Wood, C., Shadrake, A., 1993. Landscapes for tomorrow. J. Envrion. Plann. Manage. 36 (2), 123-147.
42. O'Rourke, E., 1999. The Caussee Méjan: changing relationships between agriculture, environment and society within a French National Park. Landsc. Res. 24 (2), 141-165.
43. Orland, B., 1992. Evaluating regional changes on the basis of local expectations: a visualisation dilemma. Landsc. Urban Plann. 21 (4), 257-259.
44. Orland, B., 1994. Visualisation techniques for incorporation in forest planning geographic information systems. Landsc. Urban Plann. 30, 83-97.
45. Orland, B., Budthimedhee, K., Uutsitalo, J., 2001. Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plann. 54, 139-148.
46. Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Mander, Ü., 2000. Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landsc. Urban Plann. 50, 85-94.
47. Primdahl, J., 1990. Heterogeneity in agriculture and landscape: from segregation to integration. Landsc. Urban Plann. 18, 221-228.
48. Primdahl, J., Stahlschmidt, P., Jørgensen, I., 1998. Landskabsanalyse og forandring i det åbne land. Byplan 50 (4/5), 149-155.
49. Roe, M., 2000. Landscape planning for sustainability: community participation in estuary management plans. Landsc. Res. 25 (2), 157-181.
50. Sanoff, H., 1990. Participatory Design: Theory and Techniques. Bookmasters, Raleigh, NC.
51. Schoute, J.F.T., Finke, P.A., Veeneklaas, F.R., Wolfert, H.P. (Eds.), 1995. Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
52. Sheppard, S.R.J., 2001. Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualisation. Landsc. Urban Plann. 54, 183-199.
53. Swetnam, R.D., Ragou, P., Firbank, L.G., Hinsley, S.A., Bellamy, P.E., 1998. Applying ecological models to altered landscapes: scenario-testing with GIS. Landsc. Urban Plann. 41, 3-18.
54. Towers, G., 1995. Building Democracy: Community Architecture in the Inner City. University College London Press, London.
55. Tress, B., Tress, G., 2002. Disciplinary and meta-disciplinary approaches in landscape ecology. In: Bastian, O., Steinhardt, U. (Eds.), Development and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht (in press).
56. Tress, B., Tress, G., Brandt, J., Agger, P., 1999. Scenarier for landskabsudvikling og flersidig brug af det åbne land - Forslag til scenariestruktur indenfor projektet "Værdi, landskab og biodiversitet". Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, March 1999.
57. Van Apeldoorn, R.C., Knaapen, J.P., Schippers, P., Verboom, J., Van Engen, H., Meeuwsen, H., 1998. Applying ecological knowledge in landscape planning: a simulation model as a tool to evaluate scenarios for the badger in The Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plann. 41, 57-69.
58. Van den Berg, L.M., Veeneklaas, F.R., 1995. Scenario building: art, craft or just a fashionable whim? In: Schoute, J.F.T, Finke, P.A., Veeneklaas, F.R. Wolfert, H.P. (Eds.), Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 11-13.
59. Van Latesteijn, H.C., 1995. Assessment of future options for land use in the European community. Ecol. Eng. 4, 211-222.
60. Vos, W., Meekes, H., 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc. Urban Plann. 46, 3-14.
61. Warburton, D., 1998. Participation in conservation: grasping the nettle. Ecosystem 19 (2), 2-11.
62. Wates, N., 1985. Co-op consolidation. Architectural Rev. 177 (1058), 57-64.
63. Wollenberg, E., Edmunds, D., Buck, L., 2000. Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning from the adaptive co-management of community forests. Landsc. Urban Plann. 47, 65-77.