Deep learning of orthographic representations in baboons

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Hannagan, Thomas ^a   Ziegler, Johannes C ^a   Dufau, Stéphane ^a   Fagot, Joël ^a   Grainger, Jonathan ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; BABOON; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; NONHUMAN; ORTHOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION; PHONETICS; REINFORCEMENT; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FEMALE; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; PAPIO; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84897106613     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084843     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Grainger J, Dufau S, Montant M, Ziegler JC, Fagot J (2012) Orthographic Processing in Baboons (Papio papio). Science 336, 245-248.
2. Ziegler JC, Hannagan T, Dufau S, Montant M, Fagot J, et al. (2013) Transposed Letter Effects Reveal Orthographic Processing in Baboons Psychological Science 24(8), 1609-1611.
3. Bains W (2012) Comment on "Orthographic Processing in Baboons (Papio papio)". Science 337, 1173. Available: www.sciencemag. org/cgi/content/full/337/6099/1173-b.
4. Frost R, Keuleers E (2013) What can we learn from monkeys about orthographic processing in humans? A reply to Ziegler et al. Psychological Science 24(9), 1868-1869.
5. Ziegler JC, Goswami U (2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 131(1), 3-29. (Pubitemid 40130968)
6. Ziegler JC, Perry C, Zorzi M (in press) Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
7. Grainger J (2008) Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(1), 1-35.
8. Hannagan T, Grainger J (2012) Protein Analysis Meets Visual Word Recognition: A Case for String Kernels in the Brain. Cognitive Science 36, 575-606.
9. Binder JR, Medler DA, Westbury CF, Liebenthal E, Buchanan L (2006) Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage 33, 739-748. (Pubitemid 44485548)
10. Vinckier F, Dehaene S, Jobert A, Dubus JP, Sigman M, et al. (2007) Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron 55(1):143-156. (Pubitemid 46994743)
11. Cohen L, Dehaene S, Naccache L, Lehéricy S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, et al. (2000) The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 123:291-307. (Pubitemid 30055153)
12. Brincat SL, Connor CE (2006) Dynamic Shape Synthesis in Posterior Inferotemporal Cortex. Neuron 49(1), 17-24. (Pubitemid 43017182)
13. Dehaene S, Cohen L, Sigman M, Vinckier F (2005) The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci 9:335-341. (Pubitemid 40910332)
14. Blaizot X, Landeau B, Baron JC, Chavoix C (2000) Mapping the visual recognition memory network with PET in the behaving baboon. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 20, 213-219. (Pubitemid 30108438)
15. Fukushima K (1980) Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics 36(4), 193-202.
16. LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 86(11), 2278-2324.
17. Van Essen DC, Gallant JL (1994) Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system. Neuron 13:1-10. (Pubitemid 24238410)
18. Ciresan DC, Meier U, Schmidhuber J (2012) Multi-column Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
19. Farabet C, Couprie C, Najman L, LeCun Y (2013) Learning hierarchical features for scene labeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
20. Serre T, Oliva A, Poggio T (2007) A Feedforward Architecture Accounts for Rapid Categorization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(15):6424-6429. (Pubitemid 47186110)
21. Bergstra J, Bastien F, Breuleux O, Lamblin P, Pascanu R, Delalleau O, Desjardins G, Warde-Farley D, Goodfellow I, Bergeron A, Bengio Y (2011) Theano: Deep learning on GPUs with python. In NIPS 2011, BigLearning Workshop, Granada, Spain.
22. Perea M, Lupker SJ (2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 231-246. (Pubitemid 38989933)
23. Mechler F, Ringach DL (2002) On the classification of simple and complex cells. Vision research 42, 1017-1033. (Pubitemid 34270526)
24. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology-London 195, 215-243.
25. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, et al. (1991) Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Research 31, 1079-1086.
26. Léveillé J, Hannagan T (2012) Learning spatial invariance with the trace rule in non-uniform distributions. Neural Computation 25(5), 1261-1276.
27. Erhan D, Courville A, Bengio Y (2010) Understanding Representations Learned in Deep Architectures. Technical Report 1355, Université de Montréal.
28. Stoianov I, Zorzi M (2012) Emergence of a "visual number sense" in hierarchical generative models. Nature neuroscience 15(2):194-6.
29. Plaut DC, Shallice T (1993) Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 10, 377-500.
30. Cohen G, Johnston RA, Plunkett K (2000) Exploring cognition: Damaged brains and neural networks, readings in cognitive neuropsychology and connectionist modelling. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
31. Thomas MSC, Purser HRM, Tomlinson S, Mareschal D (2011) Are imaging and lesioning convergent methods for assessing functional specialisation? Investigations using an artificial neural network. Brain and Cognition 78(1):38-49.
32. Mutch, J. &Lowe, D.G. (2008) Object class recognition and localization using sparse features with limited receptive fields. International Journal of Computer Vision 80(1): 45-57.
33. Hannagan T, Dandurand F, Grainger J (2011). Broken symmetries in a location-invariant word recognition network. Neural Comput. 23: 251-283.
34. Di Bono MG, Zorzi M (2013) Deep generative learning of location-invariant visual word recognition. Front. Psychol. 4:635.
35. Rauschecker AM, Bowen RF, Parvizi J, Wandell BA (2012) Position sensitivity in the visual word form area. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(24): 1568-1577.
36. Hannagan T, Grainger J (2013) The Lazy Visual Word Form Area: Computational Insights into Location-Sensitivity. PLoS Comput Biol 9(10):e1003250.
37. Pegado F, Nakamura K, Cohen L, Dehaene S (2011) Breaking the Symmetry: Mirror discrimination for single letters but not for pictures in the Visual Word Form Area. NeuroImage 55:742-9.
38. Mozer M (1987) Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.) Attention and Perfomance XII: The Psychology of Reading. 83-104. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Whitney CS, Berndt RS (1999) A new model of letter string encoding: Simulating right neglect dyslexia. Progress in Brain Research 121: 143-163.
40. Grainger J, van Heuven W (2003) Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Bonin P. (Ed.), Mental lexicon: "Some words to talk about words" 1-23. New York: Nova Science.