Object class recognition and localization using sparse features with limited receptive fields

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 45-57

  Mutch, Jim ^a   Lowe, David G ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Localized features; Object class recognition; Sparsity; Ventral visual pathway

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE PROCESSING; TEMPLATE MATCHING;

LOCALIZED FEATURES; OBJECT CLASS RECOGNITION; RECEPTIVE FIELDS; SPARSITY; VENTRAL VISUAL PATHWAY;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 51149092609     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-007-0118-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agarwal, S., Awan, A., & Roth, D. (2004). Learning to detect objects in images via a sparse, part-based representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(11), 1475-1490.
2. Berg, A. C., Berg, T. L., & Malik, J. (2005). Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondence. In CVPR, June 2005.
3. Bouchard, G., & Triggs, B. (2005). Hierarchical part-based visual object categorization. In CVPR, June 2005.
4. Csurka, G., Dance, C., Willamowski, J., Fan, L., & Bray, C. (2005). Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In ECCV international workshop on statistical learning in computer vision, Prague, 2004.
5. DiCarlo, J., & Cox, D. (2007). Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 333-341.
6. Epshtein, B., & Ullman, S. (2005). Feature hierarchies for object classification. In ICCV, Beijing.
7. Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2004). Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. In CVPR workshop on generative-model based vision.
8. Fergus, R., Perona, P., & Zisserman, A. (2003). Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In CVPR.
9. Figueiredo, M. (2003). Adaptive sparseness for supervised learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25(9), 1150-1159.
10. Franc, V., & Hlavac, V. (2004). Statistical pattern recognition toolbox for Matlab, version 2.04.
11. Fritz, M., Leibe, B., Caputo, B., & Schiele, B. (2005). Integrating representative and discriminative models for object category detection. In ICCV (pp. 1363-1370), Beijing, China, October 2005.
12. Fukushima, K. (1980). Neocognitron: a self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36(4), 193-202.
13. Grauman, K., & Darrell, T. (2006). Pyramid match kernels: discriminative classification with sets of image features (Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-020), March 2006.
14. Holub, A., Welling, M., & Perona, P. (2005). Exploiting unlabeled data for hybrid object classification. In NIPS workshop on inter-class transfer, Whistler, BC, December 2005.
15. Hubel, D., & Wiesel, T. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 148, 574-591.
16. Knoblich, U., Bouvrie, J., & Poggio, T. (2007). Biophysical models of neural computation: max and tuning circuits (Technical Report CBCL paper), April 2007.
17. Krishnapuram, B., Carin, L., Figueiredo, M., & Hartemink, A. (2005). Sparse multinomial logistic regression: fast algorithms and generalization bounds. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(6), 957-968.
18. Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid. matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In CVPR, June 2006.
19. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 2278-2324.
20. Leibe, B., Leonardis, A., & Schiele, B. (2004). Combined object categorization and segmentation with an implicit shape model. In ECCV workshop on statistical learning in computer vision (pp. 17-32), Prague, Czech Republic, May 2004.
21. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
22. Mladenic, D., Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., & Milic-Frayling, N. (2004). Feature selection using linear classifier weights: interaction with classification models. In The 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference (SIGIR 2004) (pp. 234-241), Sheffield, UK, July 2004.
23. Moosmann, F., Triggs, B., & Jurie, F. (2006). Randomized clustering forests for building fast and discriminative visual vocabularies. In Neural information processing systems (NIPS), November 2006.
24. Mutch, J., & Lowe, D. G. (2006). Multiclass object recognition with sparse, localized features. In CVPR (pp. 11-18), New York, June 2006.
25. Olshausen, B., & Field, D. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381, 607-609.
26. Opelt, A., Pinz, A., Fussenegger, M., & Auer, P. (2006). Generic object recognition with boosting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(3).
27. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
28. Potter, M. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966.
29. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1019-1025.
30. Rolls, E. T., & Deco, G. (2001). The computational neuroscience of vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Serre, T., Kouh, M., Cadieu, C., Knoblich, U., Kreiman, G., & Poggio, T. (2005). A theory of object recognition: computations and circuits in the feedforward path of the ventral stream in primate visual cortex (Technical Report CBCL Paper #259/AI Memo #2005-036). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, October 2005.
32. Serre, T., Wolf, L., & Poggio, T. Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex. In CVPR, San Diego, June 2005.
33. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
34. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002). Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience, 5(7), 682-687.
35. Zhang, H., Berg, A., Maire, M., & Malik, J. (2006). Svm-knn: discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition. In CVPR, June 2006.