Fluid responsiveness: An evolution of our understanding

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 617-620

  Marik, P E ^a   Lemson, J ^b  

^a EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE; GLYCOPROTEIN; HYALURONIC ACID; PROTEOGLYCAN; SYNDECAN 1;

AORTA FLOW; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FILLING PRESSURE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HORMONE RELEASE; HUMAN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; HYPOTENSION; HYPOVOLEMIA; LUNG EXTRAVASCULAR FLUID; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; STARLING LAW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VENOUS RETURN;

FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROGNOSIS; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896977716     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet590     Document Type: Editorial

References (27)

1. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure (CVP) predict fluid responsiveness: An update meta-Analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1774-81
2. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Crit Care 2011; 1: 1
3. Marik PE, Desai H. Goal directed fluid therapy. Curr Pharm Design 2012; 18: 6215-24
4. Lee WL, Slutsky AS. Sepsis and endothelial permeability. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 689-91
5. Bruegger D, Jacob M, Rehm M, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide induces shedding of endothelial glycocalyx in coronary vascular bed of guinea pig hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005; 289: H1993-99
6. BrueggerD, Schwartz L, Chappell D, et al.Release ofatrial natriuretic peptide precedes shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx equally in patients undergoing on-And off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106: 1111-21
7. Jacob M, Chappell D. Reappriasing starling: The physiology of the microcircualtion. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: DOI:10.1097/ MCC.0b013e3283632d5e
8. SakkaSG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Prognostic valueof extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 122: 2080-6
9. Chung FT, Lin SM, Lin SY, Lin HC. Impact of extravascular lung water index on outcomes of severe sepsis patients in a medical intensive care unit. Respir Med 2008; 102: 956-61
10. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Xue Y, Xu X, Ni H. Prognostic value of B-Type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its potential role in guiding fluid therapy in critically ill septic patients. Scand J Trauma Resus Emerg Med 2012; 20: 86
11. HughesRE, Magovern GJ.The relationshipbetweenright atrial pressure and blood volume. Arch Surg 1959; 79: 238
12. MichardF, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-8
13. OsmanD, Ridel C, Ray P, et al.Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 64-8
14. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changesin arterial pulse pressureandfluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8
15. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119: 867-73
16. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7
17. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, et al. Intraopeartive fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: Results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010; 14: R118
18. McGee WT. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: Physiologic optimization program. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24: 352-60
19. DeBacker D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23
20. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Dopplerechocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2570-5
21. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, et al. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 395-401
22. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15: R85
23. Marik PE, Levitov A, Young A, Andrews L. The use of NICOM (Bioreactance) and Carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest 2013; 143: 364-70
24. Cannesson M, Le MY, Hofer CK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: A gray zone approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-41
25. Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: A prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 681-5
26. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: Systematic review and meta-Analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1475-83
27. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, et al.Anincrease in aortic bloodflow afteran infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: The mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 541-7.