Dimensions of anthropomorphism: From humanness to humanlikeness

ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 66-73

  Złotowski, Jakub ^a   Strasser, Ewald ^b   Bartneck, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN LIKENESS; REVERSE PROCESS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MEASURE;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 84896904808     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21672148     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2559636.2559679     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. H. Aviezer, Y. Trope, and A. Todorov. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338(6111):1225-1229, Nov. 2012.
2. C. Bartneck, D. Kulic, E. Croft, and S. Zoghbi. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1):71 - 81, 2009.
3. C. Bartneck, M. Verbunt, O. Mubin, and A. Al Mahmud. To kill a mockingbird robot. In HRI 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - Robot as Team Member, pages 81 - 87, Arlington, VA, United states, 2007.
4. N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4):864-886, Oct. 2007.
5. F. Eyssel, F. Hegel, G. Horstmann, and C. Wagner. Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 646 - 651, Viareggio, Italy, 2010.
6. F. Eyssel, D. Kuchenbrandt, and S. Bobinger. Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. In HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 61 - 67, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2011.
7. K. Fischer, K. S. Lohan, and K. Foth. Levels of embodiment: Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. In HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 463-470, 2012.
8. B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn, Jr., and J. Hagman. Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '03, pages 273-280, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
9. H. M. Gray, K. Gray, and D. M. Wegner. Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812):619, 2007.
10. K. Gray and D. Wegner. Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3):505-520, 2009.
11. K. Gray and D. Wegner. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1):125-130, 2012.
12. S. Guthrie. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press, USA, 1995.
13. N. Haslam. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3):252-264, 2006.
14. N. Haslam, B. Bastian, S. Laham, and S. Loughnan. Humanness, dehumanization, and moral psychology. 2012.
15. N. Haslam, S. Loughnan, Y. Kashima, and P. Bain. Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1):55-85, 2009.
16. C. Ho and K. MacDorman. Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6):1508-1518, 2010.
17. D. Kuchenbrandt, F. Eyssel, S. Bobinger, and M. Neufeld. When a robot's group membership matters. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(3):409-417, 2013.
18. J. H. Lesher et al. Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments: A Text and Translation With a Commentary, volume 4. University of Toronto Press, 2001.
19. J. Leyens, P. Paladino, R. Rodriguez-Torres, J. Vaes, S. Demoulin, A. Rodriguez-Perez, and R. Gaunt. The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2):186-197, 2000.
20. M. Mori. The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4):33-35, 1970.
21. J. W. Peirce. PsychoPy-psychophysics software in python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1):8-13, 2007.
22. M. Salem, F. Eyssel, K. Rohlfing, S. Kopp, and F. Joublin. Effects of gesture on the perception of psychological anthropomorphism: A case study with a humanoid robot, volume 7072 LNAI of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2011.
23. V. K. Sims, M. G. Chin, H. C. Lum, L. Upham-Ellis, T. Ballion, and N. C. Lagattuta. Robots' auditory cues are subject to anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, volume 3, pages 1418-1421, 2009.
24. M. L. Walters, D. S. Syrdal, K. L. Koay, K. Dautenhahn, and R. Te Boekhorst. Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN, pages 707-712, 2008.
25. E. Wang, C. Lignos, A. Vatsal, and B. Scassellati. Effects of head movement on perceptions of humanold robot behavior. In HRI 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, volume 2006, pages 180-185, 2006.
26. A. Waytz, J. Cacioppo, and N. Epley. Who sees human? the stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3):219-232, 2010.
27. A. Waytz, N. Epley, and J. T. Cacioppo. Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1):58-62, 2010.